| |
|
Aren't some stories better paced when spread over a few books? Or like Storm Constantine's first Wreaththu Trilogy, it was written from 3 different perspectives, one for each book, and worked really well, I reckon it wouldn't have been right in one book, unless it was deliberately divided into 3 parts.
Would I? Urm, I've never gotten that far, but if I did and the story called for it, and sometimes I think it does, I definately would, capitalist issues be damned.
I guess theres something to that argument, for example with comics, sometimes it does look like the writer wrote a story and cut it into pieces because the market expects it. Although some do seem to serve the story best in that format. Hmmm. |
|
|
ieces spread across many books. Would you? That is, would you set out to write a trilogy? Is it something that happens naturally?