|
|
No worries!
Upon re-rereading my earlier post I can see where it would get confusing (<--not sarcasm) as I am jumping aroung a bit. That's the way my mind works--thoughts come out like explosive diarrhea! I guess what I was trying to say was that if a person has talent then they should have a corresponding confidence in themselves...and upon putting it like that I certainly can see some exceptions. Still, if a person has little talent and knows it, and then gets dressed up for a performance--then the lack of confidence might seem "fake" to some of the audience. I'm thinking Ashlee Simpson at the moment.
Just to show some fairness, I'll point out an exception or two.
Beth, singer for Portishead, has very little visible confidence in the New York live performace DVD--she even apologizes (needlessly, in my mind) for not being as good as she should be. YET she sings wonderfully. Granted, she's not dressed in a stylish manner--she doesn't look like a pop-star and clearly looks uncomfortable even being there. Then there's that infamous Fiona Apple performance when she broke down on stage.
So I guess the overall point I was trying to make was this: style means little without some talent to back it up. (and now we see why language and writing have always been my weakest areas, especially when compared with music, art, math, and science.)
Enough of the thread-rotting, though! I think most of these issues have already been discussed in relation to the use of stereotypes within "The Invisibles." Stereotypes exist because similiar people do similiar things. No one person can ever really be a stereotype, because each individual is an exception...still stereotypes can be useful and fun if we're only willing to accept who we are. |
|
|