BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Antigravity devices (formerly, "Stupid Gravity Tricks")

 
 
Enamon
03:11 / 08.08.01
http://www.rommel.stw.uni-erlangen.de/~markus/antigrav/
 
 
Enamon
03:11 / 08.08.01
quote:John is a scientific wizard who's interested in the whole spectrum of physics. However his lab is nothing at all to brag about. He's not much for promoting his inventions and speaks of himself as a complete failure. His heart simply belongs to pure science. That includes the neutralization of gravity which he simplified radically and is trying to patent. A charlatan or a genius? I can't wait to find out.

John, too, uses superconductors to shield gravity - a black disk on top of three magnetic coils.

Its design has been extremely simplified. His disk doesn't need to turn.

He wants to make everything above the disk lighter.

Liquid nitrogen to cool the superconductor down to its working temperature.

And a simple beam scale to measure the strength of the shielding effect.

The test sample is four coins, the weight of which he'll try to reduce. They're placed above the disk.

Then he submerges everything in the cooling vessel.

If the disk is able to shield off part of the earth's gravitational forces, the left side of the beam scale will become lighter and rise.

The other side of the beam scale, weighted with a counter weight would go down.

If the effect works, the electronic postal scale would then display more weight.

He lets the apparatus cool for half an hour, until everything's settled down.

Then the experiment gets underway.

Schnurer:
"Please come to the scale and then we'll see where we started, roughly 23.15."

The scale still shows nothing. The effect begins as soon as the current to the coils under the superconductor is switched on.

"Now we're going to do the fields. Maybe a peak reading of 23.7."

It's already over...

John Schnurer calculates in percent how much lighter the coins were made by the shielding.

"... equals a little over two percent. I would be comfortable with a conservative two percent.

QUESTION
"How can you be sure about the effect, that it is gravitational?"

ANSWER
"I don't know that it's gravitational, but I do know that it's an unusual effect. All I can do is depend on my observations and do the best of my ability try to cast out unknowns."

To my surprise he invites us to come again tomorrow. The next experiment will strengthen the case that the results are due to a gravitational effect.

This time he uses eight quarters instead of four, doubling the weight of the sample.

The question is not whether it also works with eight, but how strong the effect will be this time. Stronger? Weaker? Or in percentage terms the same? That would in fact be a strong argument for a gravitational effect, as it's unlikely that an undesirable side effect would double in direct accordance with the sample.

Otherwise, everything's exactly as it was yesterday. John Schnurer switches on the coils to produce the fields.

Schnurer
"2.6 percent. It's scaled with weight. It's scaled with weight almost exactly and that was a very good run."

How will I ever be able to throw a stone again without thinking about superconductors and the shielding effect. Of course we know how a stone falls to the ground.

But why?

No one really knows the cause of gravity, how this force that holds the universe together is produced.

Cosmic catastrophes, gravitational shock waves that race through space.

How is it created, this field, this energy? That's as much a mystery as the cause of the force that makes a stone fall to the ground.

 
 
grant
13:22 / 20.08.02
More on antigravity from spinning discs:

From World of the Strange (reprinting the London Sunday Times).

Evgeny Podkletnov watched in annoyance as clouds of smoke drifted across the laboratory from his colleague’s newly lit pipe and clung to his delicate research apparatus.
The fumes would mean hours of recalibration, but the smoker was his superior and Podkletnov, a quiet, shy man, felt unable to stop him. Then, in the midst of his annoyance, he spotted something peculiar. As the smoke drifted over his machine it suddenly changed direction, shooting upwards to form a bizarre column shape above it.
At the time it seemed no more than a curiosity. But that observation, in an obscure university in Finland 10 years ago, would soon change his life and prompt some of the biggest aerospace companies to come knocking at his door. For Podkletnov had unwittingly discovered a device that, if his claims are to be believed, can change gravity itself.

And

The kit was basic by current scientific standards: a ceramic disc coated in specially formulated alloys was cooled to -220C and then spun at high speed in a magnetic field.
It was important but dull work, and had no apparent link with challenging the forces of gravity.
But when Podkletnov observed his columns of smoke he was puzzled enough to investigate further. First he suspended a metal ball above the machine, then some silicone and wood. Each time he found that the objects lost about 2% of their weight above the spinning disc.
That wasn’t all. Investigating further, Podkletnov found that the anti-gravity effect extended far above the machine, right to the ceiling. Then he went up to the roof and, sure enough, there was a narrow circular beam penetrating right the way through the building which reduced the weight of anything placed in its path. It was just as strong there as it was above the machine.


And
COULD it be, then, that Podkletnov had stumbled on a secret other scientists had been trying to keep quiet for half a century? What is certain is that since his work was released to the public in 1996 some very big names have admitted their enthusiasm.
Last week George Muellner, the executive who oversees Phantom Works, Boeing’s secretive research organisation, told The Sunday Times that “anti-gravity works”. He added: “We know it can work but what we don’t know is whether it can be useful. The systems we have seen consume too much energy. I believe that one day there will be a breakthrough but it is a long way away.”
What Muellner would not talk about was an internal seminar held at Boeing earlier this year in which the researcher Jamie Childress and other senior Phantom Works executives described the potential of anti-gravity research.
Childress, who has been in contact with Podkletnov, concluded: “It is plausible that gravity modification is real.” He warned that, if it were proven, the aerospace industry would experience a “gold rush” that would alter Boeing’s entire business.


and

But having dropped his bombshell, Podkletnov disappeared again and has never published details of that work. Officially he still works for the Moscow Chemical Science Research Centre, a secretive institute that does not even publish its address.
This weekend The Sunday Times traced Podkletnov to Finland, to a home near the University of Tampere, where he did his first gravitational research. “He will not talk to anyone about anything,” said a woman who then slammed the phone down. What is he hiding from? What does he know?
 
 
We're The Great Old Ones Now
21:55 / 01.09.02
Boeing are taking a flyer.
 
 
grant
15:09 / 03.09.02
The project is being run by the top-secret Phantom Works in Seattle, the part of the company which handles Boeing's most sensitive programmes.

The head of the Phantom Works, George Muellner, told the security analysis journal Jane's Defence Weekly that the science appeared to be valid and plausible.


That's cool as hell.

Think we'll see antigrav passenger planes in our lifetimes?
 
 
Caleigh
08:49 / 22.02.03
I wonder if this somehow relates to an alternative theory of gravity suggesting that it is not an attractive force between objects, but a pressure/radiation that is being exerted outwardly against everything, from every direction equally and simultaneously. The mass of an object shields this radiation from objects on the side it blocks and thus the unimpeded pressure/radiation from the unblocked side induces the smaller/blocked object to move toward the sheilding object.

this is hard to explain without a picture, and i've made one but i have no website to put it up on.

i've thought about it alot though and this alternate explantion has very sound logic. larger/denser objects block more of the pressure/radiation from the one side, creating a greater imbalance thus a greater gravitational effect.
 
  
Add Your Reply