|
|
Okay, a couple of disclaimers first.
1. Was going to put this in Policy, but thought that it was more conversational than directly relating to policy.
2. I like Boboss.
The second disclaimer is there as a means to get across that this thread, although born in reaction to one of hir posts, in no should be read as a complaint or dig at them personally.
Boboss's posts on the Stop The Madness! thread (along with some others) got me thinking. Is a post complaining of something not being funny in a joke thread a wasted post or as valid as those posts that go along with the joke - by this I mean do most posters have a 'I don't like/get it, so I'll ignore it" mentality, or does the board, by its very nature encourage debate, and so, even though posting may veer off topic, such posts are equally valid (perhaps valid here is not the best word, but hopefully you'll get what I mean).
For example, in the same thread miss wonderstarr mentions that ' There are "joke" threads on Conversation that read to me like commentaries on fun's funeral. But I don't try to police them." (although it should be noted here that boboss is a moderator on the comics forum). So where do you stand?
Personally I try to veer away from 'we are not amused' posts myself, only really posting on threads that interest me or that I feel comfortable commenting on. As for others posting habbits, it doesn't bother me what most people post, it's only when personal attacks start happening that I lose interest - even the smallest 'shut up, you don't know what you're talking about' style posts. |
|
|