BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


The Eighties, Athena and the appearance of the homoerotic poster...

 
 
Tom Coates
23:27 / 16.04.06
I was having a conversation the other day with some straight male friends of mine about the incredible amount of pictures of semi-naked women in the world. More specifically I was commenting on my astonishment that straight men manage to get anything done. When I was a teenager the sight of a semi-naked man was pretty much extraordinary and hence deeply impactful - completely distracting.

So I started thinking back, and remember very clearly Athena - the chain of t-shirt and poster shops around London that had all these pictures of athletic muscle men holding babies and the like - being this weird kind of revelation. And it started to make me think about the appearance of the semi-clad male in public photography, advertising and the like. Did it really all start appearing in the mid-eighties as I recall, or was that just when I started noticing it? Is the specific imagery particularly representative of the times (see 'a hard man is good to find, below') And what impact do we think it had on the world generally, on male self-image, on gender roles and art?

A couple of examples I found on the net:



This latter one was, apparently, called "Make a Wish"

 
 
Saturn's nod
17:47 / 20.04.06
This essay with photos about the male gaze and poses made me look differently at the two photos you posted. It discusses a proposition that women are trained to be 'subjects' or male gaze whereas men are trained to be the one who looks. Clearly this is a kind of heterosexual construction, right? And homoerotic photography goes back a long way, so it's not a new thing - in the Guardian a while ago showing some very early photos of beautiful young men in Russia.

So what I'm seeing in the posters shown above, is two different ways of being male under the same internalised male gaze. In the top photo, the model's gaze is away from the camera in the 'being looked at' pose mentioned in the photo essay I link to. But, he has dark glasses on - to me that looks like a signifier for his gaze being obscured - something like the guy in the 'Charlie Chaplin' photo in the photo essay, putting his hand up to obscure his face from the camera: it's a kind of refusal to be the subject, reserving the right to be the looker.

In the second photo, what I see in the guy's expression is the same kind of goofy face as in most of the female models in the photo essay - it's adopting the sterotyped 'female' response to being the subject of the gaze. Which might be a bit offtopic. It's related at least to gender roles. And it has a bit about history. I'm sure it'll be removed if it's thought to be too far off the mark.
 
 
alas
01:34 / 21.04.06
I loved the photoessay about semeiotics, am464! Everyone everyone everyone should look at that!

Back to Tom's question...There's a good essay precisely on this topic, actually, from a book by Susan Bordo, whom I've mentioned elsewhere on barbelith (the conversation thread about digital manipulation of images). It's from her book, The Male Body; the chapter of particular note in this context is "Beauty (Re)Discovers The Male Body. (Here are excerpts.)

[Another commercial for Bordo: she's a delightful writer. And can be wickedly funny. This, oh, about 7" tall book about male bodies has a ruler printed on the spine...heh heh. (She may not have personally come up with that image, granted, but it's still a pretty good index to her style).]

Bordo traces the appearance of semi-naked men in the mainstream specifically to Calvin Klein and gives very precise dates:

Calvin Klein had his epiphany, according to one biography, one night in 1974 in New York's gay Flamingo bar:

As Calvin wandered through the crowd at the Flamingo, the body heat rushed through him like a revelation; this was the cutting edge....[The] men! The men at the Flamingo had less to do about sex for him than the notion of portraying men as gods. He realized that what he was watching was the freedom of a new generation, unashamed, in-the-flesh embodiments of Calvin's ideals: straight-looking, masculine men, with chiseled bodies, young Greek gods come to life. The vision of shirtless young men with hardened torsos, all in blue jeans, top button opened, a whisper of hair from the belly button disappearing into the denim pants, would inspire and inform the next ten years of Calvin Klein's print and television advertisements.

Klein's genius was that of a cultural Geiger counter; his own bisexuality enabled him to see that the phallic body, as much as any female figure, is an enduring sex object within Western culture. In America in 1974, however, that ideal was still largely closeted. Only gay culture unashamedly sexualized the lean, fit body that virtually everyone, gay and straight, now aspires to. Sex, as Calvin Klein knew, sells. He also knew that gay sex wouldn't sell to straight men. But the rock-hard, athletic gay male bodies that Klein admired at the Flamingo did not advertise their sexual preference through the feminine codes --limp wrists, raised pinkie finger, swishy walk-- which the straight world then identified with homosexuality. Rather, they embodies a highly /p. 181: masculine aesthetic that --although definitely exciting for gay men-- would scream "heterosexual" to (clueless) straights. Klein knew just the kind of clothing to show that body off in too....

Klein transformed jeans from utilitarian garments to erotic second skins. Next, Klein went for underwear. He wasn't the first, but he was the most daring. In 1981, Jockey International had broken ground by photographing Baltimore Oriole pitcher Jim Palmer in a pair of briefs (airbrushed) in one of its ads --selling $100 million worth of underwear by year's end. Inspired by Jockey's success, in 1983 put a 40-by-50 foot Bruce Weber photograph of Olympic pole vaulter Tom Hintinauss in Times Square


So, in essence, yeah, your time line seems right. I'll try to write more later about the latter, even more interesting question about the effects on straight and otherwise men and women...although at the moment I'd probably be pretty much repeating Bordo. So I hope people will look at the excerpts on the linked page--which has more pictures of semi-naked men in ads, if that's any incentive...
 
 
Lilly Nowhere Late
21:07 / 21.04.06
Wasn't this about the time everyone went off their heads about Richard Gear doing full frontal nudity for about 1/zillionth of a second in American Gigolo or somesuch? Then the stories about the hamsters, etc...
Surely all naked men are gay, right?
Serious question, I noticed last week in America the Abercrombie stores were very in the windows with close ups on male nipples and ripples. However, it does seem to me that mostly the couture designers are alone in their still choosing to use male semi's. Is this a valid observation and are mainstreamers still more cozy with female bodies or am I just not noticing, walking to and fro in the fog which I do?
 
 
Ticker
19:12 / 24.05.06
The essay with photos link kicked serious ass. Thank you.
The male gaze is something I'm quite familiar with in this context but that is a great way of explaining it to others.
I'm personally very aware of how it has affected me as a female to have been 'programmed' (ads/porn etc) to look with this perception especially at other women.

There is an article I'm trying to dig up about why some islamic women return to the veil after living in the West because of the impact of this framing. I'm paraphrasing here but it was about the relief of escaping the 'catwalk' and being objectified.

I've also sent the link on to some photographers I'm friends with to see if it impacts their art.

Also to touch on the main aspect of this thread, I remember quite clearly when Brad Pitt in T&L made the six pack no longer just a subject of airbrushing but a requirement for male uber-hottie status. Shatner as Kirk had already wired 'shirt off = virile male' but then Pitt and those Klein ads converged.

Then something weird happened in the 90's and all the models started looking like waify children. Muscular waifs......but I digress.
 
  
Add Your Reply