BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Jobs to which you can bring your kid along with you

 
 
Saturn's nod
18:23 / 12.04.06
My friend needs a job and has a kid who is 22months. This person (who is a single parent) would like to be able to bring the kid along to work, so as to avoid the trauma to both of them of daycare separation.

It's something that interests me a lot, because when I start growing my own I want to be able to bring my kids to work with me too. I want to be able to have both the sanity-saving interactions with other adults AND a healthy attachment with the offspring. I guess after (my kind of) revolution everyone will be able to bring their kids to work with them, but which kinds of organisations are ahead of the curve now?

I know you are all clever people, please will you suggest some ideas to explore?
 
 
Axolotl
18:32 / 12.04.06
One where you work from home?
I know it's not very tolerant or understanding of me, but I personally can't think of anything that would make my working day even less enjoyable than it already is than having to put up with my colleagues' children. I don't think it's really a practical suggestion in any office based job.
 
 
girakittie
18:39 / 12.04.06
The only answer I know of is to work in the daycare/child care field. I know that several successful businesswomen have started daycares because they didn't want to leave their children during the day and didn't mind watching others.

I could imagine that you could run something like your own flowershop or other sort of small boutique with a baby, but certainly not a toddler - and not with a baby, come to think of it, if it was a very fussy one.

If you're looking for another perspective on the "trauma" of daycare separation, my daughter has been in daycare since she was two and we never had any problems with it. She was happy to go play with her friends, I was secure in the knowledge that she was in a safe environment. I think that if you approach it expecting there to be problems there probably will be, but if you approach it matter-of-factly and keep your chin up, it's certainly not the end of the world.
 
 
alas
18:40 / 12.04.06
This is probably obvious, but places with on-site daycare try to create a balance between your friend's interest in having her child with her, and the desire that Phox shares with many others never to have to deal with the offspring of officemates.

I find myself torn between both views: sometimes my colleagues bring their children to work for brief times (when day care falls through, etc.). I think it might be bothersome if it were an all the time sort of thing, given the lack of facilities for kids, but I kind of like at least briefly seeing children in/around the workplace.
 
 
Axolotl
19:03 / 12.04.06
I feel a bit bad about my immediate negative reaction, and am going to try and be a bit more helpful.
As Alas says your friend's best bet might be trying to work for a place with an on-site creche. This would enable your friend to at least visit hir sprog during the day.
If possible your friend could work from home, either as a freelance, or with a company that is willing to let their staff do so.
Depending on hir financial situation could they try a job share? We have a couple of parents at my company who do this. A job-share would maximise the amount of time they can spend with the child, but may not be financially viable.
In more general terms, your friend will probably have the most luck in very big companies, or very small ones. The large ones have more facilities and so on to offer, where as the very small ones you tend to be dealing with an individual, who may or may not be able to work with your friend to find a solution.
 
 
Dead Megatron
19:57 / 12.04.06
I'm with Phlox: a working environment with its own daycare sounds nice.

But, as an aside, is daycare all that bad? I mean, it provides the child the chance to socialise with other kids, and not just "mommy'n'daddy". Maybe it's the parent who's being traumatized by the separation? One should question oneself about the possibility of being spoiling one's offspring a bit much (22 months is not that young, I guess)

I don't mean to be insensitive, I just sugest.
 
 
William Sack
10:58 / 13.04.06
I'm with Girakittie, the only thing I can think of is in the childcare field. Even homeworking is not as easy as it seems as looking after a 22 month old toddler is a full time job in itself. My wife's employer is a wonderfully parent-friendly organisation in terms of maternity packages, flexible working etc., but even they have told her that if she wants to work from home we would have to make childcare arrangements.
 
 
Saturn's nod
16:49 / 13.04.06
22 months is still within the recommended time to be breastfeeding, according to the World Health Organisation, so I don't think it's beyond the pale for child and primary carer to want to be together almost all the time at that age. I guess it must depend on the people a lot - whether the breastfeeding relationship is working for both, and how much mother&child are nursing and so on. I want there to be a lot more choices available to cut down on the amount of people who feel they are forced into making decisions that don't suit their real needs or the real needs of their kids.

The family I'm thinking of are second generation Continuum Concept people, so they are into attachment parenting, and the mindset that looking after children isn't work in itself. It's not for everyone, sure, and parent/child relationships are all different. But these people, they want to hang out together, and I am sure there are some ways they can make it happen.

My impression is, within the Continuum Concept culture it's generally seen as a good thing for kids to be involved in parents' working lives, since then they know from the earliest age what the realities of adult life are, instead of being segregated from 'real adult lives' in wholly child-centred environments. I've asked a few people in the CC culture for ideas but it seems to be an issue a lot of people stuggle with, unless there is a parent who can afford not to work for money and just bring the kids along to volunteer work etc where there's more choice. I know of at least two CC families where the main earner is a writer, but that's quite a specific kind of talent.

A couple of ideas I had yesterday were: bike couriering, if it could be made profitable without a very tight scheduling. Or, bike maintenance, since there is a bike workshop in the buildings of the co-op where this friend lives. My friend is a creative type with a degree in dance and performing arts, so it might not necessarily meet the need for creative expression, but it might do for a while.

Another idea I have wondered about is an art cafe - like the paint-your-own-pottery businesses, but with different types of creative arts. But I guess the overheads for setting up something like that might be pretty big, and would probably need several people working together to get it going.

Setting up school garden projects in schools around the city is another idea, as workplaces where there are small children will be more accustomed to taking into account the needs of smaller people, as lots of people have already pointed out. E.g. Edible schoolyard project in CA, U.S.A, aforementioned in the 'fantasy curriculum' thread.

I know my friend has wondered about doing something like the Fairyland Trust, 'cos it's workshops for kids with creative arts and imagination and environmental education. But like most of my ideas here it demands the confidence probably to lead and launch a new business (for example if the plan was to set up a franchise or similar project to Fairyland Trust locally,) which is not within everyone's confidence and abilities.
 
 
Olulabelle
20:44 / 13.04.06
Not to miss the point or anything am464 but 'breeding'? I think there is more to having children than breeding. Isn't breeding just the act of reproducing?

I don't know why the word makes my teeth hurt, I looked it up before I posted this because I was thinking about why. Maybe it's because a gay friends of mine uses it as term for women; 'Breeders' or 'fish' and it feels just a bit nasty, like it's a derogatory thing.

Maybe there's no reason for it. It just gets my goat.
 
 
Hallo, Paper Spaceboy
21:11 / 13.04.06
Sssh, they're not supposed to know about the Secret Homosexual Eugenics Program ('s on the Agenda after brunch). I always thought it was just a general hetero-slur, not woman specific, though?
 
 
Olulabelle
21:17 / 13.04.06
Oh right. I have only ever heard it used by men about women, but I guess it could apply to anyone...

It's the 'slur' aspect of the use that bugs me, that's all. Like reproduction is somehow a bit nasty.

I don't mean to digress.
 
 
Spaniel
21:22 / 13.04.06
Frankly, am, I think your fantasy workplace is just that: a fantasy. There is no way in the world I could find the energy let alone the time to look after Bobossino (a reasonably cheerful baby) _and_ hold down a job simultaneously. Even the day care scenario sounds unrealistic to me.

Maybe Ginafordian's could work it in, but I'm of the opinion that they're a big bunch of twunts hellbent on ruining their childrens' nascent minds so I'll never know.
 
 
Ganesh
22:16 / 13.04.06
Maybe it's because a gay friends of mine uses it as term for women; 'Breeders' or 'fish' and it feels just a bit nasty, like it's a derogatory thing.

I've heard 'fish' too; it's particularly nasty. 'Breeders', though, is applied across the board to heterosexuals, not specifically toward women.
 
 
redtara
22:16 / 13.04.06
Co-operative working lets me do this. It's a not for profit woman's co-op which isn't as full on as it sounds. We just ascribe value to having a satisfying home life and like and respect kids. Our co-op is a book shop. It's been going thirty years and the culture of support for those of us with kids is ingrained.

Mums bring in thier babies to feed who don't work there. And our staff includes mums, aunties and god mothers children are among our friends and customers. We have a few kids through our door. My predesesor spent a year with her children on her hip and then left to be a doula. Within the shop there are jobs that can be done with a child on your hip and those that can't. My co-workers will take up things i can't do. I'm on maternity leave and I'm phasing my back to work in over two months starting with a half day a week.

You can want to avoid seperation without needing to avoid seperation. It's a choice. My first kids were given sticks at 2 and got on with it. Now I can't imagine putting my six month olds down.

I suspect that lots of co-workers would think it a special kind of hell to have someones kids under thier desk. And I have been in jobs where I felt the same. Capitalism is petty hostile to children. Their only value is as consumers since they closed the mills.

I suspect that as a general rule of thumb kids and ties or hard hats don't go. Your looking for anything veggie, organic for a good bet. Co-ops - there's a book called 'Diggers and Dreamers' about eco co-ps. 'Eurotopia@ is another one. It's printed in Germany, but covers UK. i wouldn't presume that every veggie-eco-permaculture... is up for kids, but that's where I'd look. There is saftey in numbers. Seek out the other cudley mums.
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
22:25 / 13.04.06
Yeah, "breeders" applies equally to men and women. I've been referred to on many occasions (affectionately, I hasten to add) by gay friends as "a fucking breeder", despite the fact that the likelihood of me ever actually breeding is somewhat zero, as it's contrary to my personal principles.
 
 
Spaniel
22:33 / 13.04.06
Redtara, as cool as your job sounds I have to ask, do you support yourself? Because I get the impression that am is talking about someone who will need a proper wage and it sounds like you probably don't make much money.
 
 
redtara
23:27 / 13.04.06
Boboss your funny. My income runs my house hold. I was working as a supervisor for pizza hut when my Daughter was born and you couldn't pay me enough to shoulder that level of guilt, pressure, hostility and genreal contept again now.

My kids will never have ponies and I don't have international holidays or credit cards, but I pay my rent, run a car (hopefully minibus soon), will spend the summer week ends at festivals and generally enjoy my life. I get wages and I don't work for anyone except myself and my colleages. AND I'M NOT ALONE we are everywhere. It's the 'between the cracks' business model. It just depends what you want.

No kids then?
 
 
Triplets
00:36 / 14.04.06
You don't know the Bobe then.
 
 
Spaniel
10:06 / 14.04.06
Redtara, I draw your attention to this quote from my post above.

There is no way in the world I could find the energy let alone the time to look after Bobossino (a reasonably cheerful baby) _and_ hold down a job simultaneously. Even the day care scenario sounds unrealistic to me.

So, kid then.

You seem rather unnecessarily defensive. I'm not trying to do down cooperatives or suggest that working in a cooperative is in some way inauthentic. In fact I think it's absolutely 100% great that you've managed to find a work life balance that leans towards parenting. It's just that in my experience people who work in cooperatives don't earn much money *at all*.
Now admittedly I'm hardly an authority on the subject, but living in Brighton I happen to know a lot of people that have worked in cooperatives at one time or another and I struggle to see how they could have supported a child let alone children on their average wage. So it was with that in mind that I asked whether you support yourself.

In future I'd really appreciate it if you actually read my posts before responding with a snark.
 
 
Saturn's nod
10:56 / 14.04.06
Lula, I've put in a request for a strikethrough on 'breeding' in my post above, following your comment. I think there's a real ontopic point there which seems to me to relate to the discussion in Headshop about whether experiencing one mode of exclusion necessarily sensitizes a person to witnessing other kinds of exclusion.

redtara, thanks very much for posting with your experience. I am glad to know I am not the only one here who thinks accomodating the needs of small children and parents of young children in the working world is more than just a fantasy. Much respect to you for making it work, and I really appreciate you posting with your actual successful experience, (which is well beyond ideas and opinions about whether it's possible), suggestions and thoughts.


I know people who have got stuck in a house with no spare money and fulltime kid-care and no adult company feeling crazy, and think the only option is that or sending the kids into daycare while they do a 'job' which might wipe out any financial benefit from the 'job', leaving them again poor but with adult company but separated from the kids as well, and so on. It's exactly the kind of double bind that evokes my sympathy and creative determination to find ways through that better meet human needs. It's not as if it's a new situation although clearly it's not a timeless one either, being so related to post-industrial-revolution concepts about productivity, segregation, etc.

I guess the issue of poorly paid work and poverty was bound to come up, given how disproportionately poverty affects children and the primary carers of children. (Which is probably obvious but much further reading exists in case it isn't 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.)
 
 
Spaniel
11:23 / 14.04.06
Am, I'm interested, are you planning on having kids outside of a co-parenting relationship? I only ask because if you're in a couple (or indeed a triple) there are alternatives to taking your child to work. For example, I have friends who work different hours from one another and can, therefore, look after their child six days a week. That's six days of one-on-one child and parent time with no distractions.

I hoping that Bobosso and I can create a similar arrangement a year from now, but for the time being I work and she stays at home (the really difficult job) - not ideal, but practical and it means that Bobossino gets a lot of quality time with his mum.

Also, just because Red has managed to find a great balance doesn't mean that a similar arrangement - if found - will work for you or your friend.
 
 
ibis the being
11:58 / 14.04.06
Boboss, that's the arrangement my dad and stepmom had with their youngest kids for the first three years or so. They're both self-employed and work together, so they'd just switch off... either day by day or sometimes in shifts, depending on how they felt and how much had to get done on the job site(s). They loved being able to be equally bonded with the kids, to spend a lot of time with them in those early years. Now that the girls are 4 and 2, they've started sending them to day care for half days... the girls enjoy day care and it gives my parents a bit more time to do work/clean/etc. In my opinion, not that they're my own children, it's also good 'practice' for school for the older of the two, who will be attending kindegarten in the fall.
 
 
redtara
12:10 / 14.04.06
Yeh the isolation of raising toddlers alone is crushing. Any solution I have discovered involves women throwing their hand in together and pooling thier time and energy. Building a community around you if there isn't one in place is the thing to save your sanity. Oh and pubs with beer gardens.

There are always alternatives if you are open minded enough to see the possibilities and you don't expect to make a ton of money while your children are small. That said working and child tax credits have made a real impact on our family. I am considerably better off working than i would be at home and they also pay 2/3 of child care costs if you choose that route.

Oh and Boboss, reading your own posts before posting might avoid having some one takeing the piss out of your assumptions. Your assumption that I don't support myself, whatever that means, smacks of the capitalist delusion that the rejection of profit must make for a 'pretend' business, somehow not really about paying wages and making a product or providing a service. i do a proper job and get a proper wage and i don't have to pull myself in different directions to do it.
 
 
Spaniel
13:33 / 14.04.06
And I never suggested you did (quite the opposite, in fact) and I'd really like you to stop being so aggressive, it's totally uncalled for and entirely unnecessary. I think I've made it pretty clear that I *admire* what you've been able to do. Spending time with your children is invaluable and I would hope that as a society we can see our way towards a far more family friendly and less work orientated culture.

As for asking whether you support yourself, I was asking an honest question about the financial viability of bringing up a family on a cooperative wage. I think it's reaching to suggest that by asking said question I must have a capitalist mindset and/or a patronising attitude towards you, your choices, or your choice of work*. My question was (again, as I've already pointed out) based upon limited knowledge of cooperative work and the rewards thereof.

The reason why I've been cautious about your approach is because while I'm aware that it's worked for you, I'm also aware that it isn't for everyone, and that there are alternative approaches that could work just as well such as my aformentioned shared parenting suggestion.


*You did read my comment about how I *don't* think of your work as inauthentic, didn't you?
 
 
redtara
17:37 / 14.04.06
O.k. this is not an aproach, or a theory or even an oppinion, it's the experience of my life. I understand that you don't think that your reservations are offensive, given that your experience of parenthood and work is your partner looking after your child, but if you can feel being called 'funny' is aggressive then 'a proper wage' is surley patronising, your word.

Also, just because Red has managed to find a great balance doesn't mean that a similar arrangement - if found - will work for you or your friend.

Now does that really need saying... So far I am the only person who has posted with a solution to the threads question from first hand experience. The tone of the thread had been a little negative on the notion that there is a way. When offered one (of many no doubt) the negativity went up a gear.

Wish your friend good luck am464, we all need it.
 
 
Spaniel
18:21 / 14.04.06
But, red, I don't have reservations about your approach. I think your approach is a *great* approach - how many times do I have to say that before you actually take notice?
The most I have done is express a cautious attitude towards a one size fits all position and the only reason I did that was because Am seemed to suggest earlier (and correct me if I'm wrong, Am) that your approach was the only game in town - or at least the only opinion (based, as it is, on on solid experience) worth listening to.

As for your posts being aggressive, well for a start you've self-described your comments to me as piss-taking, you've made all kinds of assumptions about my attitudes and proceeded to get all huffy about said supposed attitudes. You've accused me of being offensive for no reason other than the fact that I used the words "proper wage", a phrase that as far as I'm concerned just means something along the lines of a decent amount of money. In fact, I've even gone so far as to explain why I asked (and to ask a question usually means that the person asking realises that they lack knowledge in a given area) the question about your wage in the first place - citing, I feel, a perfectly reasonable motivation. Not only that, but you've also suggested that I haven't thought carefully about what I've posted to this thread - *and*, to add insult to injury, this is after you've apparently selectively read what I've written.

At no point have I demeaned you as a mother, or your job, or your attitudes towards parenting. Again (and again, and again...) quite the opposite, imho.

This isn't a battle, I'm not trying to win, I'm not your enemy, and I'm definitely not trying to be offensive. I value your contributions to this thread - when you're not arguing with me, at least - and I think you've offered us all a *very* valuable, dare I say important, perspective.
 
 
Saturn's nod
20:10 / 16.04.06
No, I had no intention to suggest that it was the 'only game in town'. I chose these words specifically to acknowledge that the kind of option I am looking for suggestions about is not the only way:

This person ... would like to be able to ...

... it must depend on the people a lot ...

I want there to be a lot more choices available ...

It's not for everyone, sure, and parent/child relationships are all different ...

In passing I'll note that like redtara I found some of the comments further up this thread to be pretty negative and dismissive at the time I first read them. My (self-protective?) reading was that my point was not understood, and that I needed to consider whether I could more clearly express what I meant. I think the impression of a dismissive and negative response partly originates in the reflexive impulse of Barbeloids to 'question the question' of a topic, or at least to question what they assume the assumptions of the topic post were.

Thinking about my own future, my present career plan involves mainly working from home, because I find myself to be most productive that way. Maybe I could pay a helper (for example a local teenage homeschooler friend) to come along for the few hours a week when I need to be in business meetings, so there would be two pairs of arms and an extra person's attention to help look after the infant who could then be brought along too. Of course, as I am not yet a parent, I might be totally surprised by the temperament or needs of the children I might end up with.

It's not just about care for the small child, to me it's also finding good ways to be aware of and to meet human needs. I think child and parent needs don't have to be in opposition, as they're framed to seem when a parent is desperate for adult company and a child is seen as the reason for the isolation, and when in the wider world the child's presence might be seen as a nightmare being inflicted on the non-parent adults who perhaps are considered to be the 'real' or 'important' people?

Of course as redtara points out it's not a new problem and women have been co-operating to work on this since the problem arose (perhaps during the industrial revolution?) I suggested above that it could be seen as ... a good thing for kids to be involved in parents' working lives, since then they know from the earliest age what the realities [and rhythms] of [working] adult life are, instead of being segregated from 'real adult lives' in wholly child-centred environments. (Words in [] added now to clarify.) Maybe that's one of the less popular ways to understand what childcare is for. I think children's knowledge of the world is shaped in their early years in exactly such modalities as; work patterns, sensations of work environments, rhythm of behaviour in professional interactions. Children's involvement in the 'real' working world might help them grow up better adjusted in adult life. Might it also help shape working environments be better adjusted to and accomodating of adult's real needs as well?

I wasn't certain of the direction it might take, earlier in the thread, hence started this in Conversation but it could be moved to Headshop if mods think it fits there.
 
 
Spaniel
10:04 / 18.04.06
You raise some good points, but to keep things away from theory and firmly in the realms of your personal situation, Am, the reason why I responded negatively to your initial thoughts is because I thought you were lacking a good understanding of what looking after a very young child entails, and looking at your last post it would seem that you're still not taking my, and others, comments on board*.
I asked earlier whether you are in interested in having children outside of a co-parenting relationship, the answer to this question is important in that it has implications for what is possible in terms of child care. If you are a lone parent I strongly suspect you won't have the time to look after your child and work from home - at least for the first few weeks (if you're very, very lucky and have an incredibly cooperative baby), or months. My partner currently spends most of her time sitting on the sofa feeding and amusing our little one because she doesn't have the time or the resources to do anything else.
Please try to understand, I'm not going on about this stuff to be deliberately contrary or negative, I'm just trying to highlight how difficult parenting a young child can be and usually is. I should also stress that I don't see highlighting these issues as inherently patronising - before I had my son I had no idea just how much work is involved, how they're on your brain 24/7, and how every second you're with them demands mindfulness, and most of the time not a little effort.


*The caveat here being that it is possible that you're entirely aware of the demands of parenting, but through a combination of a lack of information about your personal situation (whether you have a partner, say) and your proposed plans I have been given the impression that you may have underestimated the problems involved.
 
 
redtara
22:03 / 18.04.06
Boboss, putting any tetchiness behind us, I think I am beginning to see where you are coming from. The awe your partner inspires in you is papable and no doubt earned even in the trivial parts of her day. It sounds like it has been a bit of a surprise to see how all consuming a child coming into your life is. Having children is massivley restricting if your life does not already include them.

That said women tend fields, cook, spin, weave, and do work of all kinds all over the world and did here too untill quite recently with small children and babies in tow.

I've not long had triplets. I am constantly being told what is not possible in my life, by people who havn't a clue. I think some times that's all they see when they look at the boys, restrictions and boundaries.

My antinatel care was very stressful because i wanted a low tech birth and the unit was geared up to one, high tech senario. I had to insist and then persist, very stressful.

My babies were in hospital for some time after their birth and for the duration every shift without fail some one asked me 'How you gonna cope?' like it was impossible, pointless trying. I didn't know how, I just knew that I would, 'cos you just do. One day a nurse told me that a study had found there wern't enough hours in the day to look after triplets. Ace! I'd laugh and come up with one of my witty little quips, 'Oh, I'm selling them.' It was a weight that i had to consciously shrug off though, the burden of their disbelief or lack of imagination.

Another one was breast feeding. Nurse after nurse would tell me that it couldn't be done or that if it could why would you want to 'your going to spend all your time feeding blah blah'. I luckily found some one who had fed her triplets and that was enough for me to keep the faith and six months on we are still at it.

Life is pretty peachy. Jesus! I even have time to waste dossing around on this board! I'm very laid back and the lads seem to follow me there. I know I am enough. Thank god I didn't need anyone to tell me. I'd have been fucked!

I think a possitive attitude and no clue what so ever are often better preparation for parenthood than experience and a bunch of negativity. Please allow those of us stupid enough to dream the luxury, even if you would settle for a good nights sleep.
 
 
redtara
22:25 / 18.04.06
And another thing, sorry,

You keep useing this word co-parenting. I feel like you see it as some isolated social phenominuminum. I went off on one about my many childrened nan who was married to a sailor and then deleated it along with my point... getting there... Women have always co-parented, is that a word? Yuck. Sisters, parents, inlaws and friends. That's how we get these fragile little things to adulthood without loosing/damaging/eating them. Modern britian is a strange, hostile society to raise children in.
 
 
Spaniel
08:51 / 19.04.06
Wow, you had triplets, that's absolutely bloody amazing. Being a twin myself I have some inkling of the kind of work a parent of mutliples has to put in. My brother and I almost drove our poor mother insane in the first weeks and months - that our father wasn't too helpful (and that he ultimately left) probably didn't make things any easier.

The fact that women have always had to work and rear children doesn't make it any less of an awe inspiring feat - even with the additional help of their co-workers.

Co-parenting? I'm using the word as shorthand for working in a parenting partnership of two or more parents. It's also an attempt not to privilege heterosexual, monogamous, married, and/or couples that don't work within the context of an extended family unit. After looking at dictionary.com I realise I am misusing the word.

Bugger, I hate it when I do that.
 
 
Saturn's nod
15:28 / 20.04.06
Sorry for the delay in reply, Boboss. In my understanding there is as wide a range in the attention needs of children as in adults. Some people need live-in care their entire life, others only need 10 min direct attention in 2 hours even when they are tiny and dependent. I appreciate how lifechanging an event it is for people who have never had much contact with kids to suddenly be in sole charge of someone who is small and needy and doesn’t share a spoken language, but in my own limited experience it is not catastrophically incompatible with adult working life in all cases.

I hear a few months of ‘babymoon’ preferably for with both/all parents fulltime to adjust to having a new child is a really good idea, and it’s part of my plan to have enough savings so spouse can take that time off to adjust as well. On the high needs end of the spectrum, I wouldn’t expect to be able to do many hours of payable work every week, and that’s the luck of the draw I imagine. However, I don’t think it’s ‘normal’ (as in, what we expect in a median member of the human species) that operating as a ‘child plus adult’ team makes it impossible to do any productive decently remunerative activity for 4 years.

I’m sorry it seemed like I was avoiding the question. It doesn’t seem clear to me how it’s relevant how much experience I have of looking after kids. I am clear that I am talking about a certain subsection of parent/children relationships, only those which do have the ability for a wider involvement in adult life but are perhaps being prevented by their own or others uncertainty or the unfashionable nature of the decision.

I pointed out the Continuum Concept website because that’s a whole subculture who have this attitude about work, which I rated as less subject to dismissal (wrongly?) than my personal opinions, and I was wondering why the pattern is not more widespread. Although dysfunctional subcultures clearly exist, I’m impressed by the CC people I know and I don’t get the impression they are self-deceiving about the possibilities of integrating child and adult needs together into workplaces.

I will list some of the kids I know and have looked after, to illustrate the wide variance in temperament that I’ve observed, and hence where my thinking is coming from. Not a complete list, but some examples where I can recall the age of the child at the time and some flavour of the pattern of their direct attention needs and socability. My hesitation to list my observations as if they are objective data points I guess comes from the model in my head, which is that us humans are pattern seeking organisms and that it is easy to observe patterns which might be due to chance alone: I am much more interested in whether other people with wider experience also see the possibilities that I have raised, and I am glad that others like redtara do because it confirms my suspicion that it is being made to work more widely than is generally acknowledged. E.g., compare redtara’s experience with the first few responses which mostly seemed to question that it was possible at all to make it work.

Child N was happy tucked under my elbow and then on my hip whilst we played football or did housework with or for his mum, from when he was two weeks old until he was crawling (oof, heavy! Babysitting doesn’t strengthen the muscles like everyday parenting), unless he was actually ill.

Child A at three years old was fine hitch-hiking, camping and working alongside her mum at a hippy camp when I spent a few weeks with them and I didn’t witness even a single episode in which she caused any disturbance unsuitable to the situation.

Child V has a high level of special needs, multiple disabilities and autism and his mum didn’t return to her academic career until he went into residential school aged 12, choosing to care for him full time, living mostly on a care allowance and tax credits.

Child J was happy aged 2 months and up as long as he didn’t have to wear clothing when he didn’t want to, and was being held or in a sling attached to one of his extended family or one of 2 part-time nannies, until he was independently mobile.

Child H, 4 months, will protest loudly at being held by anyone except her parents, but will happily lie on a blanket on the floor for half an hour while a parent showers as long as there is something interesting to look at or listen to.

Child C aged 20 months is happy during two hour choir rehearsals to wander around mostly watching and listening, as long as she gets reassurance when her mum is actually uninterruptably busy e.g. conducting one of the songs.

Child P aged 3 can play for hours digging outside with his older brother, but loves to make high-pitched loud squealing noises for fun from time to time that would disturb anyone’s concentration within earshot!

Child E would occupy herself happily playing with a handful of stones for 40minutes at a time even when she was 18months. She has also had such extreme tantrums aged 2-4yrs that people once called the police when her Dad was trying to take her home, presumably fearing she was being adbucted.(!)

Child M, nearly 2yrs, lives in a residential community and is highly sociable. She is happy to occupy herself, with short interactions with adults she knows every 10 or 20 minutes, during the entirety of the monthly music night, as long as she gets a bit of direct attention, and that's been the case ever since she was mobile 10months plus, before that she was mostly in mum's sling or a moses basket by her mum's feet. When I’ve accompanied her and her mum recently on errands (like fetching langar from the local Gurdwara for the refugee night shelter we help at) she’s come along with no problems, except y’know maybe a bit a sob if she is really tired.
 
  
Add Your Reply