|
|
[Reposting something I wrote on the Switchboard thread for this topic.]
This is to me is probably the most fascinating aspect of the Gospel of Judas - in one interpretation, it completely changes the meaning of the gospels and of Christianity so that the redemption of sins is not meaning of the death and resurrection of Jesus - instead, his teachings become the central focus and his death/resurrection are the prototype for what happens to those who follow his teachings. In other words, it's not about sin and redemption but rather about how to get closer to God.
Another way to look at the Gospel of Judas that would affect one's view of Christ relates to the issue of his divinity and humanity. In the canonical gospels, when Jesus says at the last supper that "one of you will betray me," and when he prays in the garden before his arrest, it would seem that because he's God he has divine knowledge of what is about to happen. But if, as in the Gospel of Judas, he asked his disciple to arrange the arrest, than he knew what was about to happen as a man, with no divine or psychic vision.
I agree that this will have little or no effect on mainstream Christianity. But I think it may have great significance on people (like me) who are drawn to the teachings of Christ yet are unable to accept a lot of the tenets of mainstream/organized/orthodox Christianity. I listened to an NPR show on this new gospel today and a few people called in to say that as children raised Christian, they always felt a lot of confusion and saw contradiction in the figure of Judas - he was the catalyst for God's divine plan, so why was he portrayed as a betrayer? Also, (here my memory falters a bit) didn't Judas hang himself just after "betraying" Jesus? I never understood why, if he was so treacherous, he felt guilty enough to kill himself after Jesus was captured - it makes more sense that he did as his beloved leader asked, but felt grief and devastation enough to kill himself afterward. |
|
|