BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Is it okay for babies to watch television?

 
 
matthew.
14:19 / 05.04.06
This article says that Sesame Street has partnered with a well-known and respected advocacy group to make a series of videos designed for babies (not toddlers) that will be watched with the parents. The controversy is that some experts feel babies shouldn't be watching any television. At all. That children will be watching enough television in the future and they don't need to start so soon.

This thread is designed to look at the big picture, as well as this article. Is this a symptom of a television-obsessed culture, or a cause of a television-obsessed populace? Will this create more obsese children who spend more of their time watching tv than breathing fresh air?

(Children who are obsese in the States in 2000:

  • Ages 2 to 5 - Boys 9.9%, Girls 11%
  • Ages 6 to 11 - Boys 16%, Girls 14.5%
  • Ages 12 to 19 - Boys 15.5%, Girls 15.5%

Abstract for study, found on Wikipedia. To be fair, I'm not saying television is the cause of obesity. What I'm saying is that a sedentary lifestyle (one where TV and video games play a large part) is one factor for obesity.)

US children watch an average of 25 hours of TV per week, found here. Scientic American says that television addiction is like any other addiction. Doing a Google Search on TV and violence leads to a number of sites saying that watching violence on TV can potentially lead to aggressive and possibly violent behaviour IRL (this is up for debate, though)

The good news is that educational programming in the early years lead to better pre-reading skills test results in the future, according to this, while children who watch non-educational do poorer. It also shows that reading is a skill that must be developed and watching tv generally takes away from that time.

The good news is that Sesame Street often works with education systems and experts in order to achieve a higher educational content and efficiency. We can expect that Sesame Street's videos for babies will be educational and probably have a positive effect on the babies.

But wait. Have you seen the Elmo's World segment on Sesame Street? It's a little skit in which Elmo lives in a CGI crayon-styled world with a goldfish. It's aimed at the younger portion of Sesame's audience. There was some controversy over that because Elmo was teaching some erroneous facts that were considered charming because of Elmo's innocence. I need a citation or a link for this. Will return.

So what do you think? Should babies be watching television? Does it matter?
 
 
Olulabelle
17:17 / 05.04.06
It seems to me that the TV companies want to start the telly addiction earlier and earlier.

I think babies have quite enough to look at what with all the trees and flowers and sky and faces and world around them. The last thing a baby needs is television, there are far more interesting things to learn from all around them in their actual lives.
 
 
Spatula Clarke
17:29 / 05.04.06
What I'm saying is that a sedentary lifestyle (one where TV and video games play a large part)

And book-learnin'. That tends to be a sitting-down thing.
 
 
matthew.
19:34 / 05.04.06
I would bet money that very few children read for 25 hours a week outside of the school's time, but I get what you're saying.
 
 
Benny the Ball
07:16 / 04.12.06
I direct peoples attention to the essay 'amusing ourselves to death' by Neil Postman, which I remember mentioning Seasame Street as a bad thing from when I read it waaaaay back in 1991 or so. I think television watching is okay, but would say that it isn't a substitute for human contact, and if parents are going to use videos (the whole baby einstien thing for example) it should be a shared experience with the child, not as a replacement.
 
  
Add Your Reply