BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Weeding the Garden

 
  

Page: (1)2

 
 
miss wonderstarr
07:36 / 30.03.06
It's been suggested I start another thread for this topic. I originally posted to "Moderation Request" about the thread on Conversation, called "My Best Mate's Uncle Fucked My Mother - I Need A Comeback" and subtitled Got a good comeback. Tell me so I can get something over a friend. Caustic the better, I want his eyes to bleed.

In my post I referred to another Conversation thread, "Stump Fuckin'", which was previously discussed at length on "Moderation Request".

My specific comment is below. But more generally, my question is this. If Barbelith is a kind of "garden" that we all create and tend, what if someone plants a seed that seems unlikely to grow into anything most people in the garden will find attractive -- that seems perhaps to blight the other plants around it -- that would perhaps be one of the first things visitors to the garden saw -- that may grow to dominate that patch, scratching and casting shadows -- that would look entirely right within another garden, but not Barbelith.

I think the garden metaphor may have died on me. But you might take my point. The two threads in question aren't offensive in a way I could unequivocally pin down. With "Stump Fuckin'" it was suggested that the title and topic could possibly offend women, or amputees, but that apart from being clearly crass, it was opaque to the point that it was hard to find specific reasons to either lock or delete it. I've given my misgivings about the "Uncle-Fucker" thread below.

These threads don't break any rules I know of, or explicitly hurt or hate and specific group of people. But they do seem to go against the general idea that Barbelith should be different from other internet communities -- that it should try to be better.

See and say what you think.

----------------------------

++MY ORIGINAL POST++


I wonder if the thread about someone's best mate's uncle having once slept with his mother is another case for discussion, like "Stump Fuckin'".

I can't see that it's intended to, or destined to (without concerted derailment of the original intention) go anywhere that doesn't involve retro ideas of male pride, smackdowns verbal and physical, silly boasts and unpleasant ideas about female sexuality (that having once 'fucked' a woman can be used years later as a taunt; that a woman's sexuality is a matter for duelling between men; that for a mother to have a sex life in the past is hard to contemplate).

I'm not asking anyone to lock or delete it. I think it might be another case for discussion about whether some threads go against the stated ethos of Barbelith, and threaten to make it a different type of place from the place most people in the community seem to want -- that is, make it a place like many others online, rather than somewhere unusual in a good way.
 
 
Jawsus-son Starship
07:43 / 30.03.06
Maybe because this isn't just your garden? It's my garden as well? And everybody gets to plant whatever they want?

If you feel my thread has no worth (which it doesn't) then ignore it, it'll so fall down the board and you can talk about something else. That's the best suggestion. But don't get all high and mighty about it, because it is soooooo not needed.
 
 
miss wonderstarr
07:48 / 30.03.06
I'm not high and mighty at all. You're right that a thread that doesn't seem to "fit" should fall down the board. I'm not a moderator and have no power to lock or delete any thread; I was just opening this for discussion, because I felt that your contribution, and "Stump Fuckin'", seemed like they'd be more suited to another board, and I felt uncomfortable with their presence on the first page of Conversation, and yet there seemed no rule or code that they'd broken, and no specific group of people they could be said to have explicitly offended.
 
 
Jawsus-son Starship
07:51 / 30.03.06
And yet you still are.
 
 
miss wonderstarr
07:52 / 30.03.06
What? "You still are?" What?

This discussion isn't as good as I'd hoped. Perhaps someone else will contribute at some point.
 
 
Jawsus-son Starship
07:57 / 30.03.06
You said that it offended no group, and yet you still are offended. Why do you find this thread offensive? Is it just the word "fucking", because if that is the issue, I'll call for the name change myself.
 
 
miss wonderstarr
08:02 / 30.03.06
No, I think I said I had misgivings and was uncomfortable. I've scanned my own posts and can't see that I've said I was offended. I think I said, on the contrary, that I couldn't pin down any specific way in which those threads were offensive.

Oh dear... this isn't really up to the standard of previous policy-arena duels on Barbelith. I'm just the weak warm-up to Haus vs today's contender, you see.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
08:03 / 30.03.06
Math, you're sort of providing a masterclass right now on how not to post to the Policy. Let's start with:

You said that it offended no group, and yet you still are offended.

What you just did is make a statement. For a statement to be valuable, it has to fulfil various conditions. One of those has to be that it is based on fact. Please show me anywhere Miss W has said "I am offended by this thread". If theer is such a place, I apologise for not seeing it. If there is no such place, you have just made a false statement, which will make it harder to continue with the discussion.

If what you mean is that Miss W is clearly offended, even though she has not said so, then you might want to read Ganesh's comments on the use of words like "offense/offend/offended" when ascribing motivation in Mister Six's recent thread here in the Policy.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
08:16 / 30.03.06
I guess the problem I have with threads like the uncle one is that they seem to be working from a whole boatload of assumptions that just aren't a given on Barbelith. You've got the assumption that one's mother's sexual history is a legitimate weak spot, and that the only way to protect yourself against having that weak spot exploited is to attack the exploiter on his own terms. These themselves rest on a shaky foundation of dodgy attitudes to women as sexually active beings, male sexuality as an expression of dominace or otherwise, interpersonal relations, and so forth--all assumptions that get heavily questioned and tackled in a very deep way elsewhere on the board.

It's kind of like... One of the reasons I dig Barbelth is just because those assumptions aren't a given, you know? I don't feel like I'm going to have to be tripping over them all the time like I do in other places. Sometimes you feel like you have to start from scratch every time you enter a discussion on certain topics, and it gets very wearing. That happens less around here. So a thread that seems to start with all those assumptions and attitudes in place as a given can feel really scratchy and tiresome, like having to go back into work and finish something up after you thought you were done for the weekend.
 
 
*
08:20 / 30.03.06
Am I the only one who took the position that if one is going to start a post seeking ways to insult someone who is insulting one, one ought not to be too surprised when some of the responses to the thread are insulting to oneself? I think questioning the premise behind the thread is not even in the realm of mild rebuke.
 
 
Jawsus-son Starship
08:32 / 30.03.06
If people feel that the thread was insulting to women due to sexual attitudes, then I'll ask for a deletion, as this was not the intent.
 
 
miss wonderstarr
08:46 / 30.03.06
That's not what I meant, Math. This thread was meant to raise a broader issue, about threads that don't cause specific offence but that feel kind of like they don't belong, because (in the case of these two examples) they have what I would call a crass, laddish tone and bring with them assumptions of a... (stereotypical) male locker-room atmosphere, perhaps, with the associated values and terminology. Those threads both seem to invite a boys-together-alone banter that, perhaps, includes women only as someone's conquest. This kind of social atmosphere or virtual space is not, I think, the kind of atmosphere and space Barbelith is "meant" to be about (this is itself open to debate.)

BUT. Those two threads are just an example. I was asking for people's opinions and discussion about any thread that seems to prompt vague discomfort because of the tone and assumptions it seems to carry (without being offensive in any specific way) and a quite different thread (not a "laddish" one at all) could fall into the same category.
 
 
Jawsus-son Starship
08:55 / 30.03.06
So you just wanted to bring up that you find these threads laddish. Well I think that this whole thread is pure bullshit then, becuase this is making me much more uncomfortable then any "Stump-Fucking" or "Uncle-Fucking" ever could. This is much of the same thing as you feel these threads have done, as you're stating that these threads are not "Barbelith" threads and have no place here.
 
 
Jawsus-son Starship
09:00 / 30.03.06
That last post doesn't really make much sense. Instead I'll say that if people find a thread/post specifically offensive, then we should talk about and delete said thread/post. However, if you just don't like the tone of the thread, then do we really need to talk about it? Do you really believe, for example, that becuase I want to stop my friend from taking the mickey out of me because his uncle fucked my mother I'm a mysogynist? Because I don't.

If I've misread what this thread is about, then please explain it to me.
 
 
miss wonderstarr
09:06 / 30.03.06
No, I didn't start the thread to complain that your thread is laddish. I thought I made it clear that your thread was one of two current examples of a certain type of thread that (sigh... I have said this many times before) provokes vague discomfort without specifically crossing any lines.

No, I do not think you're a misogynist. I think your thread is perhaps best suited to another community -- that's really the strongest and most potentially insulting thing I'm saying about it. I did say it suggests a locker-room atmosphere where women are perhaps relegated to conquests, but that's also quite a mild comment on my part.

However, if my thread upsets you at all or makes you angry or uncomfortable, then you have a point; I'm doing to you what I suggested your thread might be doing to others. That's a fair argument and my only obvious defence would be that the majority here might agree with me -- which I don't think is a great response, and which I wouldn't really want to fall back upon. So, food for thought there.
 
 
Tryphena Absent
09:08 / 30.03.06
Yes, yes Oedipus, that's very interesting.

Now tell me about your mother.
 
 
Jawsus-son Starship
09:12 / 30.03.06
Well is it wrong that nearly every girl I've ever dated is as much of a nightmare as her? And some even look a bit like her?
 
 
Smoothly
09:13 / 30.03.06
Trying to pull this back to look at the question in the broader sense intended, I do think that Math raises an important point here:

Maybe because this isn't just your garden? It's my garden as well?

So, how do we decide what is a plant and what is a weed, and what is beautiful and what is ugly?
 
 
miss wonderstarr
09:14 / 30.03.06
You know, with respect, I started this thread to discuss a general issue.

It became overly-focused on one specific thread, which perhaps was my fault for including that as the main instance and case study, but it then became all about Math and his attitudes, and I get the impression it's breaking down into banter right now.

I didn't really want that to happen.

eta thanks Smoothly, x-posted.
 
 
Jawsus-son Starship
09:16 / 30.03.06
So, how do we decide what is a plant and what is a weed, and what is beautiful and what is ugly?

Perhaps we don't? We just let what happens happen?
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
09:23 / 30.03.06
People. Policy and Help. If you don't want to contribute in a relevant and useful fashion, don't contribute. The world will go on. That includes you, math. It being your thread doesn't give you special privileges.

So. Math, what you just did was a modified form of the "I suppose that makes me x" gambit - that is, to say that if somebody does not agree with you then they are calling you a racist, misogynist, homophobe or whatever. The idea of this is brinksmanship - that somebody will shy away from apparently making such a serious allegation,and therefore let the matter drop. It's not good practice.

I will happily say that the thread rests on unsupported assumptions about women as receptacles of sexual activity, about the apparent shamefulness of a woman being sexually active and that if a man has sex with a woman he has somehow scored against them. It depends on views of women as passive, unwilling sexual prizes which are misogynistic.

How to deal with that? Well, probably how it's being dealt with - by a mixture of open mockery and trying to explain the bad programming behind the whole question. This at least demonstrates that Barbelith as a whole is not buying in to these assumptions. Whether there are now too many people around who _do_, and therefore that Barbelith is going to start reflecting that... well, that is possible, and is a concern. If it is the case, to what extent is it our right and our duty to force Barbelith towards a standard of discussion we feel is acceptable and mandated by the mission statement?
 
 
Smoothly
09:28 / 30.03.06
If it is the case, to what extent is it our right and our duty to force Barbelith towards a standard of discussion we feel is acceptable and mandated by the mission statement?

But who is ‘us’?

Perhaps we don't? We just let what happens happen?

Yes, Barbelith as meadow is a possibility. But I’m not sure that’s what people want. So I think we need to get an idea of what the membership as a whole wants Barbelith to be like.
Personally, if we’re sticking with the metaphor, I think ‘Kitchen garden’. Not to fussy but lots of nourishing goodness. It doesn’t have to be comfortable, I don’t really mind a bit of crab-grass or a few daffodils pop through here and there, but as long as the mint doesn’t take over, and we keep some variety and some sturdy perennials, I’m broadly happy. But I sense that others feel differently.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
09:30 / 30.03.06
Ah. Multiple x-post.
 
 
Jawsus-son Starship
09:32 / 30.03.06
OK Haus, here's how i view the idea behind the thread;

So my best mate's uncle was my mother's boyfriend when she was sixteen, and now he won't stop using it in conversations as the ultimate comeback. Now it doesn't bother me who fucked my mother, but I can't give him any abuse because he brings this out a comeback and it is really fucking me off.

I'm not talking about sexual politics, I don't have oppinions on a woman's role as a sexual being, I just wanted a comeback that would silence my friend. If you wanna go and analyse this, fine, thats you're perogative. But as this wasn't the intention, surely it is somewhat a waste of time?
 
 
Our Lady Has Left the Building
09:33 / 30.03.06
You know, I might have some sympathy for Math if it didn't seem as though he started this purely because of the fuss over the 'Stump Fucking' thread.

Seeing as at the moment I would be disinclined to believe him when he says he has a mother, can I ask Math whether he can offer any better justification for posting this then 'because I can'?
 
 
Kit-Cat Club
09:39 / 30.03.06
I think persuade rather than force... or possibly chivvy.

I agree with the objections to the premise underlying Desperate Math's thread (not saying btw that I think Math necessarily holds with this premise), and I think the way it is currently being dealt with is the most appropriate. I wouldn't like to see a situation in which a group of people x could decide that thread y was inappropriate on grounds of its being puerile (or grounds of other not-directly-offensive content, with reference to all the many discussions we have had on this etc.), and that that thread could then be deleted on account of being inappropriate for Barbelith. Not that I think that there is a serious danger of the board being dominated by a small clique, nor that I think that it should be all things to all people, but I do think debate and response is a better way to deal with things than trying to close down a line of discussion (again where it is not offensive etc. etc.) that seems crass or out of place.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
09:39 / 30.03.06
Math: If it doesn't bother you, why does it mean you can't respond for fear that he will bring it up? If you present an analysis that makes no sense, then other people will try to create some meaning. It's a natural human tendency towards pattern recognition.
 
 
Kit-Cat Club
09:42 / 30.03.06
sorry, x-post. Response was to Haus.
 
 
miss wonderstarr
09:43 / 30.03.06
Haus has just said this, but with more specific reference to your own words:

he won't stop using it in conversations as the ultimate comeback. Now it doesn't bother me who fucked my mother,

How can something you don't care about be the ultimate comeback, which you have to seek a mightier, ultra-ultimate comeback to counter?
 
 
Evil Scientist
09:52 / 30.03.06
If you feel my thread has no worth (which it doesn't) then ignore it, it'll so fall down the board and you can talk about something else.

I feel they're utterly without worth and a complete waste of threadspace which could be devoted to something a lot more engaging. I am, it should be mentioned, ignoring them and praying to Darwin that they'll drop into the crushing depths of Convo never to be seen again.

I do however, think that people should be free to post criticism of threads that they deem to be out of place on Barbelith. Simply ignoring and not actually saying anything almost feels like giving tacit approval, to me anyway.

Math, I think that, as the creator of the threads in question, you have a responsibility to justify the worth of the threads and explain what you feel they contribute to Barbelith. Are they meant to be humourous? What, if anything, was the Stump-F**king thread meant to achieve?

I don't feel they should be deleted, locked, or whatever. But I do think that asking people to ignore what they don't like is not an appropriate method of dealing with criticism of your threads. If you feel the threads are strong enough to stand then you should be able to explain why this is so.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
10:06 / 30.03.06
Small correction, ES: Math didn't start the stump thread, that was Sauron.
 
 
Evil Scientist
10:14 / 30.03.06
Whoops, apologies Math. I hang my head in miserable shame.

Same question. Directed at Mutha-f**king thread then.
 
 
William Sack
10:22 / 30.03.06
I'll address your original question, if I may, despite your correction Evil Scientist.

What, if anything, was the Stump-F**king thread meant to achieve?

Don't know what it was *meant* to achieve, but I what I see happening there is a number of people trying to have some fun, including well-respected, thoughtful old-timers like Xoc, Ganesh, and Stoatie who I don't think have the reputation of being towel-snapping locker-room boys.
 
 
Smoothly
11:15 / 30.03.06
Math, I think that, as the creator of the threads in question, you have a responsibility to justify the worth of the threads and explain what you feel they contribute to Barbelith.

Considering this comment, among others, is it worth having a dedicated thread to discuss what The Conversation is for, and what is and what isn't acceptable? I get a feeling that expectations have begun to change of late.
 
 
Evil Scientist
12:55 / 30.03.06
Don't know what it was *meant* to achieve, but I what I see happening there is a number of people trying to have some fun, including well-respected, thoughtful old-timers like Xoc, Ganesh, and Stoatie who I don't think have the reputation of being towel-snapping locker-room boys.

Most of the replies to the initial post seem to be taking a light-hearted swipe at the thread rather than anything else. Personally I'm pro-flumps.

My question wasn't about the direction the thread took, but the initial intention and expectations of the thread from the perspective of the person who started it (and then, as far as I can see, abandoned it).

I get a feeling that expectations have begun to change of late.

There's certainly been a growing body of people who don't like Convo to be percieved as the place that crap threads go to die. I personally like that threads there aren't necessarily analysed with a fine-tooth comb, but I do feel there has to be some sort of quality-control going on.
 
  

Page: (1)2

 
  
Add Your Reply