|
|
So, in the 'Agent Smiths OH NO' thread, ibis said:
Barbelith dislikes... Jamie Oliver
And I'm wondering if this is still true.
As summed up in this Observer article (which itself may influence your opinion one way or another I suppose):
His career has been unlike many people's - first, he was loved, like a new puppy, and then he was hated, absolutely loathed by the press in particular, and now he's loved again, and also respected. Everybody says it was the School Dinners campaign that turned him around. And he certainly needed it; it's easy to forget how low he sank in 2000 and 2001.
I'm sure it's not at all difficult for most British 'Lithers to remember quite how much Jamie Oliver was hated and derided in 2001. After all, many of us were doing the hating and deriding at the time. However, I genuinely wonder - as in, this one I don't think I could predict in advance - whether that has changed, reflecting (or independent of) a more widespread change in the public perception of Oliver. Certainly, there can be little doubt that campaigning to improve the diet of young children in the context of school dinners is a good thing, and in doing so Oliver showed a willingness to get his hands dirty (with something other than olive oil) that is noticeable absent from pretty much all of his contemporaries.
It's also hard not to concur with his assessment of the early Naked Chef days - that that was him at 21, daft haircut and all, but that by implication anyone at 21 might make an immense prat of themselves given pride of place in a TV show that was as much about selling a lifestyle as it was about cooking (one wonders how recently Oliver started to think about how the rich are eating better while the poor are eating worse, and whether he feels any need to atone for some of the more 'aspirational' elements of his earlier career).
Many of those Sainsbury's adverts are, it has to be said, somewhat harder to forgive.
But what's your verdict? |
|
|