BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


The Bates Method of Vision Improvement.

 
 
Sam T.
00:51 / 29.03.06
The Bates Method of vision improvement.

You might have heard of the Bates Method. It has been devised by Dr William Bates around 1910. It has since been denounced as quackery quite a number of time. Bates findings run totally contrary to many common beliefs of ophthalmology. I'll let you peruse the Wikipedia article, which is quite balanced. Short partial summary: He may have been wrong on a number of counts, but everything he said about the psychology and mental inner working of vision is true.

Here is my personal experience:

I've started practicing five years ago. It's been working quite well, on and off. I've got a bad condition to start with, a very pronounced imbalance between the two eyes, the right being nearly blind. I suffer from amblyopia, meaning I switch off my ''bad' eye vision because it is too different from the other eye.

I first managed to get my better eye rather quickly to normal vision, but this worsened the amblyopia in a way.

I'm since slowly getting back good acuity on the worse eye, coordination of both eyes, and 3d vision.

My wife had a small myopia when I met her, 7/10 in both eyes, measured reliably at her workplace. She wasn't wearing her glasses much. It took half an hour of explanation and demonstration for her to grok the few basic principles. Last time her vision was checked, she was tested good until 12/10.

There have also been a few persons I know that have been helped. Most people I've talked to are uninterested to try it and prefer to keep their glasses, or worse, go for surgery (which is, in my opinion, an abomination).

I don't feel qualified to help people directly since I don't have normal vision myself. Direct teaching is what makes the method works best because of the instant feedback the instructor can give.

For those who want to give it a try.

Best thing you can start with is probably palming. You should try to demonstrate to you that the method works, so take some visual cues without your glasses first. Print and pin to a well lighted wall an eyechart if you want.

Picture of palming

Remember to breathe, calm down. Looses the muscles of the faces, the jaws. Try to stop end-gaining when taking finally your hands off. Open your eyes as if it didn't matter.

Reason why you are not seeing well is because you have habitual ways of doing your seeing that are wrong. Let the eyes free, don't try to control them, forget them. Each time you are conscious of your eyes, you lessen your vision.

Seeing is done with the mind, and with the memory . You are in fact 'watching' a representation elaborated by your brain. The focusing and the automatic movements can only be done unconsciously. If you let your eyes do their thing, without intervention, you'll see better. Be one step removed from what you are seeing. Smoking pot helps, for those who are into it.

Then, because palming alone can quickly become tedious, you'll want to open the whole barrel of fun of all the different Bates exercises.

You might want to start reading Bates. Skip all the theory (unless you're interested, and like pictures of dead animals eyes), and start at chapter 7. This is quite difficult to read, and what he is trying to convey isn't obvious if you have bad vision. The iBlindness site is full of interesting reads, and has a good forum.
 
 
Quantum
10:41 / 29.03.06
Aldous Huxley was a keen fan of the Bates Method, it really helped him and he wrote about it much more accessibly than Bates himself.
 
 
Sax
10:56 / 29.03.06
So Master Bates is good for your eyesight, after all. Who knew?
 
 
Sam T.
11:17 / 29.03.06
Famous controversy surrounding Huxley and the method. I paste:

Did his treatment by the bates Method really enabled Aldous Huxley to read without glasses? In his column in the Saturday Review for April 12, 1952, Mr. Bennett Cerf related how he saw Huxley read a prepared address without benefit of glasses.

Impressed by this apparent demonstration of the efficacy of eye exercises, Cerf suddenly saw Huxley falter -- and it dawned upon him that the novelist was not really reading his address. Apparently he had memorized it but had forgotten a passage.

Bringing his eyes closer and closer to his manuscript, he still could not decipher the words. Finally he had to take a magnifying glass from his pocket in order to make the words visible. Cerf describes the moment as one of agony.


From the Bates Method advocacy point of view:

"Huxley wrote about the Bates Method a book which included a description of his own improvement, from the condition that his doctors claimed could only get worse. He then scheduled to present a speech without glasses in order to show that he could read it.

How likely is it that he would dare present himself as evidence of the Bates Method's efficacy, by reading without glasses, without being sure beforehand that he was able to do so?

Temporary relapses are extremely common with people improving their vision, until they are fully cured, especially under conditions of pressure. Huxley improved his condition, but he was never fully cured.

That a relapse under stress should prove that he never had improvement is ridiculous. He claimed to be able to often read in good lighting without glasses, and why would he say that, without being able to do so at least part of the time?"
 
 
Alex's Grandma
11:19 / 29.03.06
Sax, I think you should get your coat.
 
 
Sam T.
11:42 / 29.03.06
As for the readability of Huxley vs Bates, I sure agree. What Huxley wrote about the links between Alexander Technique and the Bates Method is particularly enlightening.

Bates, when you get into it, does offer a vast array of techniques and is exposing them precisely. They are all aimed at obtaining relaxation of the eyes in an indirect way.

But the man needs an introduction and a general (re)framing, or his writings looks totally cryptic. Huxley caters quite neatly to that, but there are better introductions available now.
 
 
illmatic
11:49 / 29.03.06
I've worked with the Bates Method, with mixed results. I found things like plaming tremendously helpful and this really showed me the link between good eyesight and relaxation. I particulary liked the mental side of it - being attentive to vision and surroundings - the feeling quality of your eyesight was really interesting.

I've never progressed beyond a certain point though, but probably haven't given it enough time due to always having to work with a computer. I sometimes pop onto the Bates Method Yahoo group, and there are some people on there who have been "cured" 100% - they seem to be the minority though.
 
 
Sam T.
12:08 / 29.03.06
Sure, this is hard, especially when you're doing it alone. It takes time and dedication. Most people don't get cured, relapse into glasses. Most do note a temporary improvement, or get clear flashes though.

The social pressure is somewhat difficult to handle too: "You should get glasses, you don't seem to see very well!" - "I'm going without them." - "You are hurting your eyes!" - "YOU are hurting my eyes, now go away!"

 
 
Sam T.
12:25 / 29.03.06
Those programs can be of help when working on the computer

(Haven't tested them myself. Windows only)

Everybody can try the Swing browser. You can set the font size at the Central fixation homepage. 'Options', on the left side. I find the movement a bit coarse.
 
 
Sam T.
18:18 / 29.03.06
I'm realizing that my answer to Illmatic above could well be considered derogatory, especially in the light of my previous interventions. Ok, it wasn't funny. Sorry for that.

I don't feel like I'm equipped for conversation, after all. It's hard for me to expose my ideas, and follow up. I'm feeling quite inadequate socially, in a way.

Thanks to all for your kindness.
 
 
distractile
08:13 / 30.03.06
I tried this quite extensively when I was a teenager and became self-conscious about my glasses, which I've worn since I was about seven.

It seemed to work well; I got to the point where I was comfortable going out on my driving lessons without them. One day I was out in the car with my Dad, waiting to pull out. "What are you waiting for?" he asked. "For those pedestrians to cross," I said.

There were no pedestrians.
There was a house about a hundred metres away.

Dad drove home.
 
 
illmatic
08:21 / 30.03.06
I didn't read your comments as negative.

Will add a longer post later about my experiences.
 
 
Sam T.
16:39 / 01.04.06
(Had a bad attack of paranoia and felt suddenly useless. Half back in shape now.)

To answer Robozero, yes, you should always be cautious, you can always have a sudden relapse. So, safety first, keep your glasses on when driving.

This method isn't an on/off thing. The improvement will be quite noticeable on the long run, and the general trend is towards better vision, with some sudden short periods of excellent vision. But sometimes, your eyes will fail, some days, it will feels as if all had been in vain, at other times, you will hit a plateau for a long time and get no improvement whatever you do.

In short, this follow a classic learning/healing curve. Don't give up, assess your progress regularly, and when things look grim, look at all the road you've already made.

When isolated, under peer pressure, on those days where you can't see a darn thing it's easy to want to give up and go back for good on glasses. Keep it up, try new things, and suddenly you're back on tracks.

Btw, robozero, did you continue using the method, or did you plain drop it after that?
 
 
Bruno
13:42 / 02.04.06
I have myopia in one eye.
It didnt get better but my eyes are a lot more relaxed.

I read Huxley's book and I recomend it to anyone, a really insightful book especially the early chapters which are more theoretical.
I practiced some of the techniques but nothing close to the rigorous stuff Huxley suggests (blinking exercises every hour; palming many times a day). That shit is hardcore.

I found palming quite useless on its own; I mean I couldnt relax my eyes if I was tense somewhere else, especially the whole head and neck. I think palming is good as part of a general practice of relaxing. I also like lying on my back with a folded t-shirt over them. I found focusing on softening my eyes before going to sleep very beneficial.
The computer fucks them up.

A lot of my shifts of consciousness are triggered by eye movements and eyework helps somewhat.

-carl-
 
 
Sam T.
18:37 / 02.04.06
I practiced some of the techniques but nothing close to the rigorous stuff Huxley suggests (blinking exercises every hour; palming many times a day). That shit is hardcore.

He was pretty bad, this don't have to be so constraining. Blinking is a very important part, and should be done softly and naturally as often as possible. Normal blinking is so fast that people with normal vision aren't even aware that the eyes were closed for a fraction of second.

Problem is that when people start this thing, they often think it is a regimen to be followed. You sure need some time to do some exercises, but they should be more properly called 'games'. They are used to teach you, make you aware of a way of using your eyes.

If you do the exercises, and then go back to your normal habits and don't think of it anymore it won't work. You should apply in action what you have learned as often as possible.

"When a patient says he has no time to practise, he is mistaken. He has all the time there is to use his eyes in the right way, or he can use them in the wrong way. He has just as much time to use his eyes properly as he has to use them improperly." - Bates.

Palming is usually a great relief. If when you stop palming you go instantly to using your eyes in the previously wrong way, it won't improve your vision.

The transition from eyes relaxed when palming to eyes relaxed in use is a difficult one oftentimes. it is very important to don't care about the vision, and to let the eyes free. This way you can have a clear flash.

You can also open your eyes and imagine you are STILL palming. In fact, when you can't palm, the memory/imagining of palming is close to being as beneficial as the real thing, after some getting used to.
 
 
Sam T.
19:05 / 02.04.06
Also, if palming is of no use to you, try something else. You say you don't get any mileage out of it if the head and neck aren't relaxed.

I have found that proper posture and correct position of the head on the neck is very important. This is an 'holistic' thing, the eyes can't do it alone if you don't have a correct posture. I'm mostly referring here to Alexander technique and what it says about driving yourself correctly. This is hard to convey.

To know if your head is level or not (you might be leaning one way), try pinning a string to the wall. Some 50 cm will do. Do two knot on it, one in the middle, and one close to the free end.

Take the free end, tighten the string, and put the free end somewhat close to your nose bridge. Look at the middle knot. You should see an 'X' done by the string when you do that, the string shall appear double, each branch of the X being seen by an eye.

If you focus on the pinned end on the wall, you'll see a 'V'. Focusing on the knot near your nose will give a 'V' too, but inverse from your previous attempt, the junction point is where you are focussing.

Anyway, back to the 'X'. Do you notice that the two 'branch' of the 'X' are at the same height? Do they really cross in the middle and fuse in one single point? Move your head around a bit, move the string also.

If when you think you are level the central knot isn't fusing well, you are either holding your head badly, or your eyes aren't teaming together properly. You have to ask someone else to know.

A bit of screwing around with this exercise is loads of fun, and should help considerably if you have bad vision in one eye only.
 
 
Bruno
17:11 / 09.04.06
Thanks a lot Sam, both posts were really helpful.
 
 
Sam T.
09:58 / 11.04.06
Glad to be of help.

Here is some random stuff:

Strain:

- Each time you make an effort to see, you lessen your vision.

- Vision, like any other sense, is a passive process. You don't have to do any kind of effort to listen, or to touch. Same thing with the eyes.

- You are not looking at an object 'out there'. You are having some of the light reflected from this object enter your eyes.

- If you don't see well, it is partly because you probably have some pattern of straining you use when looking at things, because straining this way temporarily makes your vision better.

Those patterns are so ingrained that they are now in the background, and you don't feel you are doing them anymore. Find them. Become aware of them. Do them voluntarily to regain control. Then stop doing them. Yes, it will make you see worse at first.

- Ok. It is blurred. So what? Does it really matter? There are many, many hours during the day were you don't NEED to see well. Take off those glasses.

- Sometimes, it will all clear up suddenly. Usually after you forgot about the whole thing. Don't panic. It doesn't matter. Don't try to 'keep' it. You can't. Dodge the improved vision.

- Always go for the easiest way to see. If you feel you are doing an effort, then you're on the wrong track. You must stop doing anything.

- Yes, sometimes you are doing an effort because stopping it means pain. Frankly, doing an effort to suppress pain... Do you think this is healthy? :-) Be cautious to not let everything go at once. The pain will disappear. Go palming if needed.

- The eyes can take an enormous amount of pressure and put it in the background. Layers upon layers. You wouldn't believe.

Next: Central fixation.
 
 
illmatic
14:41 / 11.04.06
Even though I've been to lazy to contribute yet, I'm enjoying this thread. I will write something soon!
 
 
Sam T.
23:42 / 17.05.06
This was long overdue!

Writing here about the Bates Method has re-ignited my interest in it, and has compelled me to try out stuff in a different way. I'm looking to be able to find a simple way to do it that will work for most people, and be simple to explain. I think I might be onto something.

But first of all, a bit of theory.

*Central fixation.

The eye only sees clearly at a place at the center of the retina, called the fovea. Anatomically, the fovea is equipped with photoreceptors cells that are able to both interpret details, and see colors (cones). Away from the fovea, those retina cells are quickly replaced by others that see movement well, but in black and white, and with poor details (rods).

Most people with poor vision are consciously or not trying to see everything equally well at the same time. They think that they should be able to take a much larger part of their visual field than they are really able to.

To do so, they freeze their eyes and stare. This approach is doomed from the start, because, as we've seen above, the retina isn't equally sensitive in all its parts, like a camera film.

In fact, to be able to see an object, the eye is going over the details, follows the edges, use saccadic movements, etc... The elaboration of the object all takes place more or less unconsciously in the memory. This is the memory that gives you the impression that you are seeing the whole of this object equally clearly.

*Oppositional movement. This is very simple, but it probably won't be obvious to those who have 'bad' vision.

Perception depends upon change . It has been proved scientifically that a static image on the retina soon fades, and that the eye becomes blind to the static object (they used contact lenses with an opaque motif on it). Staring is also self defeating for this reason. The eye can only see well when it is constantly moving, even if it is only a little and can't be perceived consciously.

The illusion of oppositional movement is only the fact that when you are turning your head to the left, the scenery appears to move to the right, and vice versa. Same thing for moving your head up, things will appear to go down. In a movie, when the camera does a traveling, things appear to move in the direction opposite to the movement. Also, when walking down the street, you have the illusion that things are coming towards you, etc...

Now, if you have bad vision, this might not be obvious at all. You might have the impression that everything is unmoving. In the worst case, you might only be able to see things moving if you are looking at something close and are turning your whole body fast, pivoting from one side to the other.

*Double oppositional movement.

Download and watch this homemade video. (And sorry if that made you seasick)

There's a pen standing on a table, and a piece of paper on the ground. The camera is moving left and right. The pen is clearly moving opposite the direction of the camera. But if you look at the piece of paper, you have the impression it is moving in the same direction that the camera is moving.

Of course, it is not, it's simply that the paper being farther than the pen, its movement is slower, so relative to the pen movement, it appears to move in the camera's direction.

Great, I hear you say, and, so what?

Well, here comes the practical part. This is NOT a work out, please keep it fun.

Set up something thin and vertical on a table. Put a small object on the ground, or farther on the table. Set up the whole thing in a way that what you see is quite like in the video, and look at the small object. Position yourself so that you shall see two pens instead of one, because you have two eyes, and are focusing at the object.

If you have trouble seeing two pens, use the string and knot exercise above first.

Take off glasses, and rotate your head left and right so that the object on the ground appears to move in the same direction that of your head movement, like in the video.

The slower and the narrower the object movement, the better. If you have to move your head wide and fast to notice movement, so be it. Just try to slow down and narrows progressively, while still making that object move.

Best thing is if you can keep the object bouncing inside the 'gate' formed by the two pens. The pens are somewhat on your peripheral vision, don't concern yourself much about them, but at the same time, don't loose too much track of them either. If you inadvertently focus on them, and they become one again, notice that now you have two moving piece of paper in the background, and focus back on it. Keep it up for a little while, remember to BREATH and BLINK. I ask for you to keep it up for 30 seconds after the moment you will feel like stopping for no good reason.

You might start to see a halo around the pens, this is very encouraging. Also the object might start to blur, don't worry.

Now, look around you. It is better if you have taken some visual clues before, so you can assert there was an improvement in your vision.

Do this again, the farther the object is and the farther you are from the pen, while still seeing two, and still seeing the object move, the better. I'm myopic, for people having some kind of hyperopia, you might like to shorten the distances instead, maybe.

What I just described has been, for me, invaluable in the last few days. I've gotten incredible moments of clear vision and of relaxation from it. Worked heaven for a co-worker in a few minutes too. I am very much interested in your feedback and would be happy to answer any questions.

You might like next to hear what Bates says about the swing, now that you know what it is.
 
 
tokenfemale
08:07 / 16.04.08
As an addition to what has been stated here, I came across (through talking to an AT teacher) the work of Peter Grunwald. He has developed the EyeBody program, which is the cumulation and overlap of his extensive Alexander Technique training and Bates training. He found that by asking different parts of his eye to move, he found a paired movement in another part of his body. This could identify why Alexander himself eventually no longer needed his glasses. His lifelong practice had removed all evidence of strain in his eyes.

Peter has supposedly identified which parts of the eyes match the parts of the body. I'm still sceptical since his explanation includes matching the eyelashes to the teeth?
 
  
Add Your Reply