BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


why is tzaddi not the star?

 
 
odd jest on horn
08:45 / 06.03.02
according to Aleister Crowley "tzaddi is not the star". and he decided it meant that tzaddi was the emperor. (and Heh the star).

has anyone got a clue as to what he was on about?

in the book of thoth he says:

quote: It is finally to be observed that the white light which descends upon him indicates the position of this card in the Tree of Life. His authority is derived from Chokmah, the creative Wisdom, the Word, and is exerted upon Tiphareth, the organized man.


i.e. the emperor occupies the path between chockmah and tiphareth in the tree of life. but never have i seen this path attributed to tzaddi. it's always heh.

for a while i thought that "tzaddi is not the star" meant that the emperor should occupy the path between netzach and yesod and indeed there is a picture of the tree of life in the book of thoth where the emperor *is* placed there. incongruency!

but it makes absolutely no sense from any point of view to put the emperor there. the path that raises dreams to the higher level of emotion? does that sound like the emperor?

was aleister crowley masturbating over some numerology or something when he decided that the emperor should correspond to tzaddi?
 
 
pacha perplexa
14:10 / 06.03.02
Dear, here's some advice: if you wish to learn Cabala, forget about Crowley. This "I know the path to arcane knowledge and you don't" that he spills in most pages of his writings will get you nowhere (Aw, ok. It could take you somewhere in slow motion, and it doesn't have to be like that).

There are many other good, clarifying books and sites (I'm sure you can find hundreds of them) on the "cabala and magick" subject. Or you could read Allan Moore's "Promethea", which is what I did.

I'm sorry for not having answered your question (no idea of how, anyway), just though I should warn you, from my own experience.
 
 
odd jest on horn
14:23 / 06.03.02
thanks, i'm kinda coming to that conclusion myself. it's just that i like his and Harris' deck. i mean really like it. so i thought he might have something worthwhile to offer on the tarot/qabalah connection. and i'd also like what he was on about, because some people think he makes sense i'd like to know why. (assuming they're not just deluded crowley fans)
 
 
Mystery Gypt
15:30 / 06.03.02
oh great, take your advice on cabala from someone who claims to have learned it all from promethea? that's some in depth advice.

most people in our current time and place wouldn't know about cabala if not for the efforts of crowley and the golden dawn. where do you think moore gets his initial impetus? christ. "real" cabala doesn't even use the fuckig tarot cards, so if you're looking for those symbolic associations, you're already in a christianated / corrupted version.

you study crowley to understand crowley, and to see what a master synthesis looks like, not to understand the ultimate teachings of the zohar. how much hebrew do you speak?

don't mean to be so snarky, but it seems a silly thing to be purist about. unless you're actually going to study cabala with the hasids, you're cobbling together your own working technology of myth and symbol, and you should be clear on doing exactly that. crowley was.
 
 
cusm
16:43 / 06.03.02
Crowley made a change in the tree of life as as escoteric thesis, as well as as a personal act of magick. He had his reasons, and they're pretty sound in a self contained sort of way. He offers a different interpretation than the Golden Dawn is all. Read 777 for more detail on it.

Remember, the Zohar didn't include the correspondances to the Major Arcana. That's all later work, and it can be redone if you don't like it. That's basicly what he did, show that you could do it your own way. Only, he's Crowley, so it all came out as the obfuscated prophetic gospil that he usually spouts.

His work is indicitive of his times, you can definitly say that. A pity that. He had a lot of really deep insights, but its a tremendous lot of work to extract them from his text.
 
 
Naked Flame
20:56 / 06.03.02
Actually I'd kinda go with what pacha said. There are a gazillion different takes on the cabbalah, even more than there are alternative spellings... I don't think there's any great case for using one over the other. If you want to argue the finer points of esoteric systems, go right ahead... but the whole tree of life thing is so well worn into the fabric of collective human consciousness that you can pretty much take a walk in it and ask the locals about it. Alan Moore would be one of the locals, as indeed would pacha reading his work.
 
 
odd jest on horn
09:41 / 07.03.02
quote: "real" cabala doesn't even use the fuckig tarot cards, so if you're looking for those symbolic associations, you're already in a christianated / corrupted version.


hey snarky

well i'm not worried about having my jewish mysticism kosher.

it's just the incongruence that worries me. i.e. the picture of the tree of life vs. the text accompanying the emperor. also i'll second what Flame On said about the tree of life being very archetypal. and from my point of view you can't go around saying that the emperor connects yesod and netzach. it just does. not. make. sense.

fine, let heh connect them, and fuck with a few centuries dogma of which letter corresponds with which path. but the emperor does not belong there. (you can tell i'm coming from the tarot direction to qabalah, rather than the other way around, right? )

anyhoo,
cusm would you care to elaborate on the explanation in 777? it'd prolly take me a few weeks to get my hands on it. and prolly a few weeks more to actually get a grip on what he's saying. well maybe it's worth it, but it'd be great to get the short version up front.
 
 
Nietzsch E. Coyote
09:41 / 07.03.02
more than a few weeks to understand 777. Thoth is easy reading by comparison. imho.

tzaddi not the star has something to do with crowley's whole aeon thing... if you believe that then it becomes more coherrent. As for the incongruence with the image, the editors prolly lifted it from a completely different book.
 
 
—| x |—
09:41 / 07.03.02
!!!

quote:Originally posted by Mystery Gypt:
you study crowley to understand crowley, and to see what a master synthesis looks like, not to understand the ultimate teachings of the zohar. how much hebrew do you speak?
<snip>
unless you're actually going to study cabala with the hasids, you're cobbling together your own working technology of myth and symbol, and you should be clear on doing exactly that.


!!!
 
 
Mystery Gypt
09:41 / 07.03.02
quote:!!!

???

[ 07-03-2002: Message edited by: Mystery Gypt ]
 
 
pacha perplexa
10:00 / 07.03.02
quote:Originally posted by Mystery Gypt:
oh great, take your advice on cabala from someone who claims to have learned it all from promethea? that's some in depth advice.

most people in our current time and place wouldn't know about cabala if not for the efforts of crowley and the golden dawn. where do you think moore gets his initial impetus? christ. "real" cabala doesn't even use the fuckig tarot cards, so if you're looking for those symbolic associations, you're already in a christianated / corrupted version.

you study crowley to understand crowley, and to see what a master synthesis looks like, not to understand the ultimate teachings of the zohar. how much hebrew do you speak?

don't mean to be so snarky, but it seems a silly thing to be purist about. unless you're actually going to study cabala with the hasids, you're cobbling together your own working technology of myth and symbol, and you should be clear on doing exactly that. crowley was.



In you urge to get angry over my criticism of Crowley, you were very, very annoying, mister. And you misinterpreted what I said, twisting my words, which is something I hate.

I shouldn't care about you, but I'll explain myself better so Jest can draw his own unbiased conclusions:

When I started to study magick, 7 years ago, it was by reading lots of Crowley's books. I didn't have a any OTO "masters" to teach me, because I knew of no such organization in Brasil, so the only one I could talk to about it was my boyfriend, who knew as much as I did.

I spent lots of time trying to figure out the meanings of all the numbers and symbolic references in the Book of the Law, and, lemme tell ya, the only thing I lerned from it was that "do what you will" is one of the nicest pieces of advice ever (oh, and I like the "every man and every woman is a star" bit, too).

The Book of Lies was very interesting and so was "Magick in Theory and Practice", but they had the same problem: sometimes I had to read the same paragraph over and over to get its meaning, which is ridiculous! I started to think that there should be other way to say things without being so arcane about them. I mean, Dion Fortune herself and Israel Regardie could do it, why not Frater fucking Perdurabo, or whatever?

My irritation with Crowley increased as I began to read Chaos Magick stuff and Chinese and Hindu philosophy - a relief.

Ok, so:

- did I say Crowley had no merit for bringing Cabala to "our current time and place"? I didn't.
But the fact that he was the responsible (and I have my doubts) doesn't mean I should rotten my eyes into his cryptic writings and pretend I'm lerning soemthing when I could get much more from more didactic books. That'd be purism.

- did I say I learned "it all" from Promethea? Well, I did learn some things from Promethea, but mostly from three other works I left in Brasil, one of them written by a rabi (sp?), the other relating the Three of Life with Jung's collective unconscious and Waite's tarot deck and the third I took from the internet (can't remember the names). And I must say: all these works gave me wonderful insights on the theory and the practice, even if they're not the "real" cabala.

And Promethea has illustrations, which are very useful.

Actually, your despising of Promethea smells like some kind of prejudice against comicbooks as lerning material.

- What's "real Cabala", anyway? Whatever it is, I wasn't even thinking of it.

- Who dictated that "you study crowley to understand crowley"? When did you make this law?

And why would I want to understand Crowley? What will it teach me?

- Who the hell is being purist?
I'm just trying to make him look for more didactic stuff, so he can actually get easily into the theory. Then he can go back to Crowley with a better background.

- I don't speak hebrew. Do you, master? And what on earth has this to do with undestanding things?

Oh, 777 I still think is very useful.

Odd Jest, I have Thoth's Tarot deck too, and I love it. You could as well look for books by people who studied the Book of Thoth, they usually have good explanations/interpretations if you really want to get into the meanings. I had one in my mind right now, but I forgot the name. As soon I remember, I'll post about it for you.

Flame: cheers
 
 
deja_vroom
10:48 / 07.03.02
go pacha!
 
 
The Natural Way
11:05 / 07.03.02
Hold on....

You got annoyed because you had to reread some paragraphs...?

What the fuck?
 
 
pacha perplexa
12:16 / 07.03.02
Lemme rephrase it: many times I had to read the same paragraph and still would find no meaning. That's the fuck.
 
 
The Natural Way
12:26 / 07.03.02
Yeah, but occassionally I kinda like putting in a bit of work... makes the whole thing more...rewarding.
 
 
pacha perplexa
13:04 / 07.03.02
Indeed.
I'd rather put effort in Nietzsche's works, or on the mathematical theory of Chaos, though.
 
 
The Natural Way
13:11 / 07.03.02
Mmmmm. Fair enough, really. I suppose it all depends on how much you like and respect dear old Al.
 
 
pacha perplexa
14:07 / 07.03.02
Oh, I respect him. Because of the "attitude" thing, y'know? People who shock societies by breaking rules of moral behaviour are usually fascinating and important to change the systems constantly.

Besides, y'gotta have guts for this kind of challenge (unless ye're psychotic).

"dear old Al"...
 
 
The Natural Way
14:16 / 07.03.02
Just to clarify: I don't particularly like or respect him.
 
 
—| x |—
15:08 / 07.03.02
!!!

quote:Originally posted by You and Runce:
...a bit of work... makes the whole thing more...rewarding.


!!!
 
 
Mystery Gypt
15:09 / 07.03.02
heh. you're a bit off about my relation to comics.

i think promethea is the greatest, it's a great learning tool, but the original post was about a very specific crowleyean issue. if i posted a question about Kant's transcendental idealism and it's relationship to his ethics, and you responded with, "forget kant, if you want to know about ethics read Naked Lunch" i would find that fascinating but not directly helpful.

and yeah, as far as getting a good grip on modernistic cabala, Fortune's book fucking rocks andthe Thoth deck and book is the best and clearest work crowley ever did to bring together mythologies and alchemy.
 
 
pacha perplexa
15:34 / 07.03.02
quote:Originally posted by Mystery Gypt:
heh. you're a bit off about my relation to comics.


See? That's exactly the way you twarted my words.

quote:if i posted a question about Kant's transcendental idealism and it's relationship to his ethics, and you responded with, "forget kant, if you want to know about ethics read Naked Lunch" i would find that fascinating but not directly helpful.

I assumed, wrongly, that Jest was trying to understand the principles of Cabala. But he explained what was his intention ("so i thought he might have something worthwhile to offer on the tarot/qabalah connection").
If you think I misinterpreted him, why don't you say so, without this ridiculous sarcasm?

quote:and yeah, as far as getting a good grip on modernistic cabala, Fortune's book fucking rocks andthe Thoth deck and book is the best and clearest work crowley ever did to bring together mythologies and alchemy.

I see. You didn't try to understand my point so you could reply with real arguments. I'll not waste more time with you.
 
 
Nietzsch E. Coyote
23:37 / 07.03.02
If you want traditional QBL find a copy of the zohar, sepher yetzirah and the bible in english and hebrew. Then learn hebrew while comparing the numeric equivilents of words in the first five books of the hebrew bible. Sepher Sephiroth in the back of Crowley's 777 is useful for this.

For General and Hermetic QBL Colin Low's writings are useful. Colin Low's Web page.

To work specifically with Crowley's Tarot attribution you'll need...
The Book of Thoth
The Book of the Law
777
a good Hebrew/english dictionary
and nearly as much time as it would take to learn hebrew.

I still think the chart is not Crowley's fault but that of his posthumous editors.
 
 
odd jest on horn
23:37 / 07.03.02
i have been reading quite a lot on Colin's page. it's very useful, i agree.

i am not really interested in traditional qabalah. the whole gemantria thing does nothing for me. i am very interested in the tree of life as a model of reality, though. it makes a lot of sense to me and is therefore useful to me. i'm also interested in the attribution of tarot cards to the tree of life. even though it may be heretical and/or ad hoc, it seems to me to add to both systems.

upon reflection i think my main question should have been this: "which is correct, the text or the picture." i have decided to go with the text as it makes a lot more sense to me and the picture is more likely to be an editorial mistake. i don't know about it being posthumous, i believe the book was published in his lifetime, even though the deck wasn't.

my other question is this. why did he change it? some of you people seem to know why. would you care to elaborate? i have seen quotes online (can't find them now) that said that it "balanced the tree". does anyone know anything about that?

i know i'm being a lazy bastard by not reading 777 and the others, but i'd really like to get an inkling of what the matter is about. i mean i have never read the The Annotated C++ Reference Manual but i'm still quite a proficient programmer in C++. and it really seems to me from what i've read about 777 that it's very much a reference manual. maybe this is incorrect, i don't know.

most qabalahists online which mention the switch seem to always put the emperor between yesod and netzach, ie they preserve the position of heh. also at least one is very adamant that heh is always associated with aries, even though the star might as well be heh. Crowley does not agree.

quote: originally by cusm:

Remember, the Zohar didn't include the correspondances to the Major Arcana. That's all later work, and it can be redone if you don't like it. That's basicly what he did, show that you could do it your own way.



cusm, this seems to suggest that you think that position of the emperor was changed by Crowley, rather than the position of heh. what do you base that on? or am i misunderstanding?

quote: originally by fenris23:
tzaddi not the star has something to do with crowley's whole aeon thing


would you care to elaborate if you can?

does anyone know approximately what correspondances got mixed up with his switch? was it only the letter and it's numerical value? but then the change seems somehow pointless, doesn't it?

i know am being eclectic here, scrapping gemantria, not reading the Zohar etc. but i'm still interested in what Crowley was meaning. maybe MG is right about studying Crowley just to study him. and i might go in that direction too. but i'd really like a primer on Crowley's thoughts on qabalah/tarot. is there such a thing? can anyone here sum it up for me?

i mean i can sum up the *essence* of quantum physics in a short letter. so someone should be able to sum up Crowley too, right? and i probably will study 777, and hope that fenris is exaggerating about the difficulty

do i really need to go deeply into the hebrew thing to understand 777? i thought it was mainly just a list of correspondances? i mean i'll take Crowleys word for what the hebrew stuff means
 
 
Mystery Gypt
17:36 / 08.03.02
777 is combination Crowley qabala primer and reference manual. the first hundred pages or so are the descriptions of the various aspects of qabala, it makes a great primer especially in conjunction with the Dion Fortune book. the rest of the book, as you surmised, is a reference manual. but i've found that pouring through it or looking up bits and pieces here and there is just so much fun, i constantly learn things. the sephiroth is like an index to the whole of occult history and mythology -- there are correspondances to the tarot, to the alphabets, to herbs, to drugs, to colors... when you start to see these connections for yourself using his tables, the world becomes more and more interesting. and the sort of exciting thought space demonstrated by promethea opens up to your imagination. the gematria stuff is similarly exciting. i've found that as i've seen correspondances between words and concepts that at first seem disconnected, i have learned endlessly interesting myths. one of my favorite examples is this: the number 358 is a gematria for both Messiah and the word that means the serpent that handed out the eden apple. such a beautiful corresondance, no? and the book is packed with bits like that.

you're original question i don't remember the answer to. sadly, all my crowley books are far away right now, and i can't remember if he changed the value with the letter, etc etc. sorry about that.

i'm not sure from your question how much crowley you've checked out, though. the poster above who referenced "crowley's thing about the aeon" is refering to the line of thought that started with The Book of The Law, the text from which the tzaddi line comes from. Remember, that book was channeled, so crowley himself doesn't claim to understand everything it says.

The book of the law predicts the coming of the age of aquarius, heralded later by new agists and visionary comic book writer's alike. In this age, humankind with spiritual evolve and experience the self-awareness that "every man and woman is a star". there is clearly a connection between these two uses of "star" and somehow the tarot switch is related. other tarot changes following the book of the law was crowley's creation of the AEON card, depicting the chid god horus, and his switch of STRENGTH to LUST, all of these are following along with his developing concept of THELEMA, the religious beliefs he developed after book of the law.

I think i remember that in The Book of Thoth, he recounts his own turmoil about tazaddi. he "received" this information but didn't know why it was the case. he spent the rest of his life working out the details of The Book of the Law and Thelema. i wish i could be more specific, but again, its a great and accessible book and you may as well poke into it.

as far as crowley in a nutshell, i'll give it a quick, incoherant shot. it comes down to:


1) a pragmatic belief in the value of an overall mytho-occult synthesis, which includes qabala, alchemy, hindu myths, buddhism, gnosticism, and modern science and technology;

2) the comprehension of THELEMA, the core magical law that if you do magick correctly, both YOUR will and the will of the UNIVERSE become the same. "Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law" is Crowley in a nutshell, but it doesn't mean do whatever the hell you want. it means do everything you can to strip away false will, illusions of the self and ego, and the you will find the universa will. this is best represented by his methods of contacting the Holy Guardian Angel, a version of yourself on the spiritual plane that can guide your universal will; and

3) alchemy was a coded language for sex magick, which is the most powerful form of ceremonial magick, especially when combined with drug use.
 
 
cusm
18:44 / 08.03.02
Ok, its been a long time since I've hashed it out, and Crowley is not my primary area of study. So, I won't go into the math behind it. But here's the quote that got it all started, from Chapter 1 of Liber Al:

quote:57.Invoke me under my stars! Love is the law, love under will. Nor let the fools mistake love; for there is love and love. There is the dove, and there is the serpent. Choose ye well! He, my prophet, hath chosen, knowing the law of the fortress, and the great mystery of the House of God. All these old letters of my Book are aright; but Tzaddi is not the Star. This also is secret: my prophet shall reveal it to the wise.

I think the reasoning had to do with the changing of the Aeon that so obsesses his work, and that the Emperor should not stand next to the Heirophant. Recall one of Crowley's big goals (and debatably the entire point of Thelema as an organization) was to reduce the influence of the Church in the world. Its about that. I take it all with a grain of salt, personally.
 
 
Nietzsch E. Coyote
19:07 / 08.03.02
quote:i probably will study 777, and hope that fenris is exaggerating about the difficulty

You get out of 777 twice what you put in. Say your invoking Ganesha you flip to the attribution of hindu gods and find out his number is 9. Now you get the perfumes for nine and the colors for nine and you have a temple for invoking Genesha.

Much easier to use 777 then to figure out why he switched the star to heh. Crowley thought in gematria(if you don't believe me go read liber aba or book of lies, ouch) So in order to figure it out you would have to understand gematria really well and read the book of the Law. The hebrew english dictionary is not to learn hebrew, its just because Uncle Al doesn't always define the hebrew words.

Interestingly 777 still uses Golden Dawn attributes, Tz is still the star.

quote:does anyone know approximately what correspondances got mixed up with his switch? was it only the letter and it's numerical value? but then the change seems somehow pointless, doesn't it?


According to what I can suss out. The letters retain their value but the card and astrological sign have switched.

Tzaddi used to be: Star Aquarius
Heh used to be: Emperor Aries

I think he did this so that heh, the which is attributed to water as part of YHVH, would not have a fire sign.
 
 
Mystery Gypt
00:52 / 09.03.02
quote:Originally posted by fenris23:
Interestingly 777 still uses Golden Dawn attributes, Tz is still the star.


i think this is cuz 777 -- or at least the pamphlets that comprise it -- is written before the "transmission" of the book of the law.

it's true about him thinking in, or at least endlessy obsessing about, gematria. A friend of mine dealt extensively with crowley's personal library, and all the margins of all his books are filled with him trying to manipulate the numbers -- more often than not, he's trying to get everything to add up to 666!

'sokay, we've all been there.
 
 
Nietzsch E. Coyote
04:25 / 09.03.02
or 93 he LOVED 93
 
 
—| x |—
04:49 / 09.03.02
Yarr! The 93rd current, ya? And thus, the name for the band Current 93.
 
  
Add Your Reply