|
|
No, I see where you're coming from. It can indeed be viewed on more than one level, and while it's been a couple of years since I saw it and I've probably forgotten a lot, I am aware of the underlying metaphores one can find in Cube — or project onto it, for that matter. Some would argue there's no difference, so anyway... (been reading too much Lao Tzu again lately, I guess. Can't be arsed to analyze everything to death, just let it grow on me.)
So yes, I was being facetious — up to a point. I didn't take it quite as literally as my initial response might have led you to believe, but regardless of what level one chooses to interpret it on, it's definitely not one of those stories that ends with a simple "and he lived happily ever after". I was left with a distinctly ambiguous feeling about him "walking into the light".
I think we can agree transcendence is not a happy end, or an end at all, so I suspect we're just approaching the same subject from a different angle anyway. I simply try to avoid the trap of thinking I know exactly what the author meant; "trust the story, not the storyteller" and all that. |
|
|