BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


On Faith

 
  

Page: (1)23

 
 
iconoplast
16:20 / 03.02.06
This discussion in the Conversation forum made me think a bit about why i don't post in the Temple. And the whole "I pray, I don't use magic" thing had never really felt like that solid of a reason. It's just that as much as I like reading what all of you do, most of it feels totally alien to me, and disconnected from my practise.

So I thought I'd start this thread to kind of suss out how we feel about Faith, about prayer, and about how they relate to what it is that it seems like all the other kids are doing.

So. First, a couple of clarifications:
I think I'm talking about faith here, as opposed to belief. The difference being that faith isn't or maybe even can't be reasoned to.
I also use faith to mean both credence and trust in something beyond my senses. (e.g., not only believing THAT god exists, but believing IN god, the way you might say to someone, 'I believe in you.')
I'm going to use god as a noun. I'm not capitalizing it because I don't necessarily mean an old guy in the sky with a white beard who's mad at me. I just mean, you know... generic wonderbread higher-power/deity-of-your-choosing type stuff.

From what I've read here, I feel separated from most of the discussion of magic and what-not, because of what I think is a difference in first principles. I was told, in no uncertain terms, that I'm supposed to ask for two things: knowledge of god's will, and the power to carry it out. And a lot of what I've read of magic is exemplified by the first step in sigil-writing - a phrase that begins, "It is my will that..."

I'm finding this very hard to write. My faith is very personal, acquired through experience and experiment, and not something I feel I've ever really found a way to talk about. So. I'm gonna put some trust in Barbelith, and talk about how I got faith. Please bear with the digression. The story's meant to be about an arrival at faith, there's just a bit of groundwork to be laid, and since I don't have any theory to hang this on, I have to use my experience to structure it.

Four years ago next week I had to stop drinking.

I'd been drinking again for about a month, following a couple-three years' descent towards what ultimately became a many-times-a-day intravenous drug habit. This managed to convince me that something was wrong. I started to see a social worker, curious about what in me was so bent that shooting speedballs had seemed like a good idea.

He told me I was an alcoholic. I told him he was mistaken, and never saw him again. I remember thinking that a mere MSW (Masters in Social Work) wasn't qualification enough to understand someone as obviously complex as me, and that I should probably be seeing someone with a PhD.

I started drinking again. It wasn't really working - I wasn't the fun drunk I'd been, and it was just a really frustrating month. Details aren't important - just picture a lot of despair, and discovering that my life had shrunk to a room with the blinds shut, my local dive, and I'd just eliminated the car trips into the city to buy drugs. So.

Fast forward the last month of unhappy efforts. Picture a sustained and failed effort to drink successfully. Now, here's the big thing - I can neither understand what is going wrong, nor really do anything about it.

So a very good friend is getting sober in AA. And he's taken me to meetings, but they're not for me. So, like I said, I'm drinking again and I'm sloppy and unhappy and confused. And while having a screwdriver with brunch, I get a phone call - different friend. She needs to stop drinking and I need to help.

I take her to an AA meeting that night, against my wishes. She drinks again a month later. I don't. Because in that month, something very profound changed - some kind of shift in internal architecture.

It was twelve days after that screwdriver. I was sitting on a couch in my girlfriend's apartment, just vibrating at the thought of a glass of cold vodka. You know that sensation as you take the first drink, that the shackles are off and you don't know what's going to happen? That release of pressure and tensionn from your shoulders? That. That thought - that feeling. I knew I was going to drink, and it was just a question of when.

But at this point all my friends were in AA. And I knew, or thought I knew, they'd be mad at me for drinking. So I ran through the checklist of things AA tells you to do before you drink: Make a meeting, call a sponsor, call a friend... couldn't, for one rationalized reason or another, do any of these. So, I figure, I'm in the clear. I just have to pray, and when that doesn't work, I can say "Hey - I tried, it didn't work, it doesn't work, and it's not for me" and return to my drinking.

Except it worked.

I got on my knees and asked "God, please take this feeling away," and ze did. I don't know how else to talk about what happened. It wasn't seas parting or mountains walking, but to me it was a complete impossibility - a wholly supernatural experience that was nothing short of a miracle. I prayed, and the obsession was lifted, never to return.

So I gave the faith thing a chance. And I have found out, I think, a lot of why people go to church, though I don't. And I also feel like I'm missing out on a lot of why people go to church, which is why I'm posting this.

Giving my problems to god meant, first, that they were never my problems to begin with. I wasn't able to drink successfully because I'd never been meant to. The game had been rigged from the jump street. Hanging a difficulty on the externalized god-hook means that I don't need to feel guilt about my inability to overcome it. Which, oddly, makes me much more capable of then going and solving it.

This weird constellation of ideas has manifested in my life. That I, unaided, am not capable of guiding and directing my own life. That I can and will get in my own way. That willpower is a liability rather than an asset. That surrendering my will and suborning it to the will of god is an act of strength. That my happiness is proportional to my ability to do what I am supposed to be doing at any given moment.

The addition of some invisible benificent force to my personal cosmology has allowed for meaning to surface in my life. My actions have meaning, my life has purpose, though the meanign and purpose aren't always immediately apparent, I have Faith that they're there, and that while I may or may not someday understand, god certainly does.

See, it's Faith. I don't try to rationally deduce my way to it. Instead, my decision to believe (because it was, and is, a decision) came from the fact that I believe people of faith are happier. And I'd finally decided I needed to be happy.

But this idea of an invisible purpose guiding existence feels very close to the kind of narrative physics - where one thing can be said to cause another for reasons other than contingent proximity in space and time - which seems another axiom of this Forum. So I'm not really sure if what I'm doing is all that different.

So far, what I've been describing is Spirituality (I think) - a personal relationship between self and god. What I'd like to find is Religion. God's got nothing to do with religion, really - the latin root means to tie together, and when I look at churches, I envy the churchgoers their shared experiences together - the closeness that must come of shared faith. But... yeah. Not religious, and since my faith is rooted in personal experiences, I have a hard time adopting the weird dogmas and myths that any particular religion involves. Sadly, I think those are the very things - the dogmas and myths - that make the tying-together possible.
 
 
LVX23
17:16 / 03.02.06
Hmm... I guess I'll start with thanking you for posting this here and having the guts to wave the traditional western God flag in these parts.

To my mind, there's not a whole lot of difference between what we as pagan/occultist/magicians do and what the ardent worshipper does. It's just a different set of dieties and symbols and grimoires.

A lot of occultists tend to view magick as a mechanical function or a simple set of techniques that when executed correctly will produce the expected results. I tend to feel that magick is much more about really throwing one's self into the act; about believing that what you're doing is real and true; about having faith in your ability to interface with the divine. The actual mechanics are more or less arbitrary as long as they're meaningful to the seeker.

So I'd say that a degree of faith is necessary in magickal work. It may be faith in self or faith in practice but it's nevertheless a concerted effort to believe. Just like religion and spirituality, occultists are continually assailed by the "facts" of Science. But magick and the occult have traditionally been better at staying hidden and resisting the war cries of dogma.

Chaos magick is predicated on a flexible belief system, one that doesn't hold to any singular path. Like wearing different hats for different occassions, each has it's place, each is equally real, but nore are more true than the other. Nevertheless, you always have to believe just for that moment that your sigils/mantras/prayers will be heards. Ritual can be considered as a way to bring one into the space of the divine so that we're more likely to believe.

While practical magick often works with matters of the material world - need a job, need a lover, etc..., those who really feel the calling seem to inevitably enter into a devotional relationship with some higher form or forms. Whether they're deities, loa, elementals, planetary bodies, or the characterization of the higher self, getting deep into magick evokes an often overwhelming sense of the absolute grandeur and magnitude of reality that is, when truly apprehended, absolutely stunning and awe-inspiring, as if looking into the very eyes of G_d.

Prayer and spirituality are an awed and humbled relationship with the divine, cool and sublime. Magick is the torrid affair, the guiding urge to make love with the heaving folds of the starry goddess. Magick is about experiencing G_d directly, about communicating with that essence. It cares little for hard pews and stoic patriarchs mediating the sacred relationship while taking a cut from the plate.
 
 
Quantum
18:02 / 03.02.06
Thank you for starting this thread, excellent post!

I was told, in no uncertain terms, that I'm supposed to ask for two things: knowledge of god's will, and the power to carry it out.

See, I was told that too but it didn't suit my temperament to believe it- I get fidgety if my psychological locus of control is too far from my hands. Which is why I'm in a religion of One, and practice Hubris whenever possible. I can certainly see the attractions of Religion and submitting to a benevolent higher power though, and it seems to have done a lot of folk a lot of good. Weirdly I often find myself in a pro-religion position ('weirdly' because I was raised an atheist and turned into a magician) compared to the many people I encounter who are virulently critical of all organised religion, usually because of the Inquisition or the historical oppression of women or personal trauma, depending on the religion and the person.

Anyway, I was struck by this bit of your post-
The addition of some invisible benificent force to my personal cosmology has allowed for meaning to surface in my life. My actions have meaning, my life has purpose,

..which chimes with me as the 'reward' of spiritual beliefs or Faith. I pursue magic because it's my preferred technique to perceive beauty and purpose and meaning and awe and glory and stuff in the world, so in that way it's like religion, but I do it alone according to a system I pretty much devise myself. One drawback is that I don't have a worldwide network of amazing temples to use in my practice, or a huge congregation of like minded worshippers, so my rituals are puny compared to, say, High Mass. Yes, there's incense and chanting, but it's not as easy to feel religious awe in your living room as it is in a cathedral or mosque.
 
 
grant
18:52 / 03.02.06
First, I jump for joy at that first post. (For one thing, I read it as a great illustration of that "faith is a process that you work at, not a passive state of belief" thing.)

Second, I think when you describe god as an invisible purpose guiding existence, you've come awfully close to what a lot of ritual occulty Thelemite types describe as Will with a capital-W. The idea of a Holy Guardian Angel somewhere outside the self but linked to it invisibly and completely is an old idea with a lot of faces. It gets spun in different ways by the limitations of language, I think.

Third, I'm curious if you find this present in your life as a sort of intangible awareness, or if there are certain things you do that make it feel more immanent -- if there's any kind of rituals or little things you do that, I don't know, make the process work for you.
 
 
illmatic
09:11 / 04.02.06
Iconoplast, thanks for starting the topic, and thanks for a brillant first post. I think this is exactly the sort of discussion we should be having.

I'm going to come back later on, when I've re-read your post, and chewed on it for awhile. Just a random thought or two for now: willpower is a liability rather than an asset reminded me very much of taoist attitudes (wu wei - not doing) and (following Grant) Thelemic ones too ("for pure will, unassuaged or purpose is in every way perfect").

On a personal note, I can relate to - I think - what your talking about, with faith. I've mentioned my advocacy of the I Ching numerous times in this forum. I draw a lot of strength from the fact that I've got such a reliable source of wisdom to turn to when I need it. It's like resting on something, being supported, but not in way that infantilises you - it's something empowering instead. More later, when I've thought and digested. Cheers again.
 
 
iconoplast
17:22 / 05.02.06
Third, I'm curious if you find this present in your life as a sort of intangible awareness, or if there are certain things you do that make it feel more immanent -- if there's any kind of rituals or little things you do that, I don't know, make the process work for you.

Well, I've been on Barbelith for a while, so I've picked up a couple-three habits. My meditation is taken from page one, chapter one of some handbook of practical occultism. Every time I see one, I remind myself that palindrome times are the signposts of synchronicity. My co-driver on my road trip last month immediately started putting electrical tape over all the clocks and watches in the car. So I told him about Fotamecus. Stuff like that.

What I think is coolest, though (and most useful) is this: when I was first trying to get a handle on all this, I asked someone how to pray. And he told me, and I've used the formula ever since.

The idea is you pray in four parts, Adoration, Contrition, Thanksgiving and Supplication. (See? It's a mnemonic. Acts.)

Adoration I've just sort of invented a little liturgy (?) - "I love my god as a blind man loves the sun. I trust my god as the forest trusts the rain. I love my god as the sparrow loves the flock. I trust my god as the filing trusts the magnet. Allahu Akbar, god is great, there is no truth but god. I love my god and I trust my god. My god loves me and my god knows me." That kind of thing.

Contrition is where I review my day and own up to the parts of it where I "took my will back" and acted out of base impulses and against what I believed god's will for me to be. A lot of the stuff that comes up here involves a turning-away from the world, a retreating into video-games, into fear and procrastination, into whatever weird lower vibrational state I've chosen, that day, to hide from the world in.

Thanksgiving is just (for me) a laundry list of gratitude. I generally start with "Thank you for my existence, for my life, for my consciousness..." Trying to remind myself that it is better to be than to not be, to be alive and active than inert and inactive, aware and capable of witnessing creation than unaware.

Supplication is supposed to be where you ask god for stuff. But after goinng through the first three steps, by the time I get to supplication I'm feeling pretty centered and 'in tune', and so I'll usually close with one of the AA prayers. "God, I offer myself to thee -to build with me and to do with me as thou wilt. Relieve me of the bondage of self, that I may better do thy will. Take away my difficulties, that victory over them may bear witness to those I would help of thy power, thy love, and thy way of life. May I do thy will always."

That's about as ritualistic as I get, and I try and go through that every night before sleep. The Thelemite concept of capital-W Will is something I've always meant to investigate. I was talking to Boy in a Suitcase years ago, and he was trying to explain that the whole "It is my will that..." thing wasn't a fancy way of saying "I want," but was in fact talking about that externalized Will. But I didn't get a footnote out of him, so I never got around to reading up on the concept.

Back during the confused times (which was also when I found barbelith), I read a lot about Chaos Magic, and the other stuff people around here posted about. But... I don't know. There seemed to be a difference in ontology between the way people talk about the existence of a deity and the way we talk about the existence of servitors and god-forms and things.

And I haven't really been able to think of a framework that can support both an omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent entity and the legions of stratified and sparkling servitors and egregores and pop-stars and comic book characters that I'd like to incorporate into my personal mythologies.
 
 
eddie thirteen
01:57 / 06.02.06
That really is an excellent post, Iconoplast. I can't ask whether you're in AA now (although I guess that the nature of Barbelith does provide anonymity for anyone who wants it), but if not, I might (humbly) suggest it as a means not just of keeping your resolve and staying sober, but as a path to the non-denominational faith-based community that you seem to be searching around for. As you know, twelve-step programs endorse a belief in a non-specific higher power of the kind that seems to be in your life -- in fact, they see that faith as a crucial component of recovery. (Interestingly, this is the aspect of AA and similar programs that a number of people I've known have had the most trouble with.) And faith and sobriety are difficult things to hold on to alone. Another thing to consider is how inspirational your story could be to addicts and alcoholics who have yet to find that faith in a higher power.
 
 
grant
17:37 / 06.02.06
ACTS. Hopefully I can remember that.
 
 
Seth
21:19 / 06.02.06
If you don’t mind, iconoplast, I’d like to be the first to volunteer to be in your church. Your accounts here are remarkably similar to my own experience, in that discerning the will of god has been a primary concern for a great deal of my life. So if you want some sense of religious community then I’d like to be it.

This thread has caused me to pull some old files of mine off the shelf, and although I can’t find a lot of what I’m seeking (for example, I think my notes on Aryeh Kaplan’s The Infinite Light: A Book About God - probably the best and simplest distillation of monotheism I’ve encountered), I have found my old theology notes on the will of god, some of which I now discover retroactively have informed a great deal of my current thinking. I’ve also found pages of old transcripts of prophecies I was given, along with the tapes they were sourced from. Much interesting stuff to mull over: it’s all a legacy from my days when I self-defined as Christian, and it seems a devoted monotheistic faith has stayed with me long after I stopped calling myself that.

So if it helps at all here’s some bits and bobs that I’ve culled out of the notes from my theology course on the will of god, plus my own exposition. I hope you find this useful, I’ve pretty much lived through a lot of this so if it helps you to avoid some of the mistakes I’ve made then it will have served a good purpose. If I use the terms of Christian scripture I trust you’ll understand that it’s because that’s where I come from, not necessarily where I am now, and I always played pretty fast and loose with scripture anyway, even when I did call myself Christian. These days the most I call myself is *Seth* and if you know anything about the name you’ll know that’s loaded enough as it is.

There are a number of potential points to consider in living a life dedicated to serving the will of an unseen omnipotent and omniscient god.

Are we equipped to know god’s will? In exactly the same way as we can never always accurately perceive the universe (because we are a small part of that universe), is it always possible to know god’s will at all times? How much do we forgive ourselves when we mess up, and do we always allow for room that we may be wrong?

Where do you draw the line? In other words, at what point do you allow yourself to just make up your own mind? I’m assuming there’s a level to which you seek god’s perspective on some things and not others, according to the type of issue and the level of its importance to you. For example, I rarely seek the will of god when it comes to drinking alcohol these days, although I certainly used to and for many years operated on a strict three pint limit. Now it’s become something that I no longer have a hard and fast rule over, and I decide how much I want to drink based on each situation. I wonder: is that because I’ve changed, because what once was problematic for me is no longer?

Does god have a single plan for you, or are there infinite acceptable paths you might take? I used to become extraordinarily upset about this one, because I used to subscribe the former. It created a huge amount of anxiety in me: by believing that there was one *correct* path I was in turmoil about whether I was on that path. Sometimes I had the benefit of strong internal feelings that signposted to me that I was on the right track, an inner compass or witness that gave me feelings of peace, wellbeing and congruence with my lord. However, I believed (and, to be honest, still believe) that to live purely by *feelings* is to open yourself up for a huge range of potential problems, and I became determined to live by faith regardless of what my feelings happened to be. The feeling of fear is a very interesting one in how it relates to our ability to accurate understand any situation, for example. Or the numb absence of feeling, something I also know only too well. Or to find a path when all you feel is confusion. So if there’s only one correct route then how do you deal with the possibility that you might think you’re on it but actually aren’t?

By the way, I now subscribe to the latter. God’s will is worked out in my life through the authority he has delegated to me to make my own decisions, based on what I know of him, myself and the world I live in. By examining the consequences of my actions in the light of what I perceive of his wisdom, and my own limited and developing wisdom (if they are not aspects of the same thing) I am living in the realisation of god’s will. I’m convinced that the references to becoming like Jesus in scripture are to finding the unique and personal Jesus within us – exactly as those who have referenced Thelema and True Will above have already related – and that process only makes sense if it is about the choices we make of our own free will, to do what seems good and wise to me. My Christhood is within me, my hope is that it will begin to colour everything in my life, because my Christhood is synonymous with my Sethhood, they are the same thing, and to become more like him is the same process as becoming more like me. I AM the True Vine and My Father is the Husbandman.

Do you allow yourself to foster costly delays because of uncertainty about god’s will for you? If you’re anxious about whether something is right for you in accordance with god’s will or not, then how long can we allow ourselves for the decision making process? I’ve procrastinated for years because I’ve been terrified of doing the wrong thing, always with the knowledge that by procrastinating I almost certainly was doing the wrong thing because I was immobile, unmoveable, and therefore doing nothing except inserting the rod further up my own ass. Under what kind of timeframe do you operate?

Would you allow me to justify any decision I made, based purely on whether I said it was god’s will? What if I were wrong? What if you claimed you were enacting god’s will and weren’t? Look back at everything you know of history, fact and fiction, for examples of people who believed they were doing god’s will and the effects they may have had. This is one of the extraordinary benefits of faith in community, something that you mention in your first post. It’s an advantage of being part of a religion of people with similar religious ideas: you allow yourself constrastive analysis with the people around you, and you allow yourself to painfully and pleasurably rub your rough surfaces along other people’s rough surfaces and allow relationships with them to change you, as much as you might change them. I believe wholeheartedly that it’s impossible to know yourself without other people and the situations that arise between you. This is why the believed concept of an omniscient and loving god works for me regardless of whether it is true or not: by believing I am known utterly, to the furthest depths of myself, and by knowing that I am acceptable to god regardless of how I see myself, I allow myself to know myself. And that one of the best realisations of that relationship with god is in our relationships with other people: for me the two go inseparably hand in hand. The two greatest commandments are inextricably interwoven: To love the Lord Your God with all Your heart, and to love Your Neighbour as You love Yourself.

How much of god’s will or plan should we need to know at any given time? Does he give us a five year business model that is perfect despite the needs of the changing market? Or does he give us enough, just the amount we might need for any given moment? Does he allow us to live without any clear sense of his will for a season? Does he sometimes entrust us with a knowledge of his will that he doesn’t want us to act upon, for example knowledge relating to people and situations with which we are not directly involved? God's thoughts may not always seem similar to Our thoughts, neither are His ways always immediately identifiable as Our ways, and Who can drink of the cup of which He drinks?

When faced with options do we reject personal preference? In my experience almost everyone’s perceptions of god are coloured by their own history, and more often that not the more problematic element of the individual’s history is their relationship with their parents and how rewards were meted out and punishments given whether that was done justly or not. So often people think that if they are to follow god’s will it will by necessity be a joyless and soul destroying path in which their individuality is crushed, and they believe this quite rationally because of their previous experience of authority. But god is not like the authority figures of their experience. He is perfect authority, and his goal is for us to be happy regardless of whether we choose to know him or not, because in order to have the solid lasting happiness of the examined self we have to submit to the process of becoming ourselves fully, as hard and painful as that process can be at times, and that process is god. Don’t be surprised if you ask him what he wants and he replies, “You choose.” It’ll happen with increased frequency.

Do we count ourselves out of acting in accordance with the will of god because we see ourselves as unworthy? In my experience a lot of people never think they’ll be good enough, strong enough or important enough to take part in his plan, or that the need to do so will come at some future point of their life. How will you ever know if you’ve heard the starting gun? Exactly what constitutes *worthy?* This is why understanding that god is full of grace and acceptance is so important to Christian theology: to offer a bridge across people’s poor self image, because the self-image and the image of god your hold within yourself are inextricably linked. My Dad always says, “Your decisions concerning what you understand of god are the most important you’ll ever make.” What happens when you substitute the word *god* in that sentence for *yourself?*

Do we ask for signs? Do we test god? In my notes this practise is referred to as “putting out a fleece.” I think that’s taken from a Bible story in which a fleece was laid on the ground overnight because gave god the ultimatum, “If this decision is your will, then make this fleece dry when I check it in the morning, untouched by dew.” What if we don’t get the signs we want? How much of our freedom is removed by an omniscient god confirming courses of action by giving acknowledgement by the small-minded parameters in which we choose to give him to work? Should god choose to conform himself to what we want, should he become domesticated like that? Or should we pay attention to the infinite variety of ways in which he might be speaking, even if the way he chooses to speak is by allowing us in his wisdom to make a mistake that we believe he could have prevented by his power? In my experience god rarely visits by means of a lightning flash of an epiphany or eureka divine inspiration, let alone by means of a burning bush.

Is all of this carried out in retrospect? Do you live out a day and then examine what fits and what doesn’t fit with your understanding of god’s will? Do you only live out the will of god by looking backwards and learning from your successes and mistakes? Examining ourselves is of crucial importance, but being exclusively focused on the past is like driving away from a car crash in reverse: you get nowhere fast, it’s hard to manoeuvre, you can’t see obstacles because you’re always looking back, and chances are you’ll crash again before you’ve gone fifty feet. I think more psychiatrists and therapists should bear this in mind.

Those are just a few considerations, it’s not intended to be exhaustive, just a brief summary of some of the stuff I’ve had to consider throughout my life because of the way I grew up and who my Dad happened to be. And before I mention anything else I think it’s really important that one more question is asked: How many of the above considerations are important regardless of whether you’re trying to discern god’s will or your own will?

The way I operate is really simple these days: I am devoted to a God who is Everything in the Universe and also transcends the Universe, and that Every Part of Every Thing gives an indication of His Wholeness because That which is Above is reflected in That Which is Below, and that in My Self I hold the keys to understanding God, because I AM the God whose will I discern.

To me the splitting of god and myself in two is more about function than it is about a necessarily accurate description of reality, in that it is sometimes useful to see us as distinct in the same way it is useful to see myself as distinct from the air I breathe or what happens to the food I eat or my piss as it seeps into a brick wall and evaporates as steam as I stop to urinate after a winter night getting wankered in a warm pub full of friends. Sometimes it’s useful to see my friends and I as separate entities, sometimes it’s useful to see us as one single entity and notice how a change in one of us effects all of us, so if two people in a group suddenly get together in a relationship you observe the effect that has on the social structure and perceived hierarchies and how that might change the way those people are seen and acted towards. And because holiness is evenly distributed throughout everything because god is everything then it doesn’t matter whether he actually exists or not, because even a god shaped mirror of my own making will usefully reflect back the qualities of a god, and that mirror will reflect back in accordance with the properties I believe god should have (whether I am conscious of those beliefs or not). Consciously or not I would choose to believe in a god, whether he real or imagined, that acts in ways that may be unprecedented in my previous conceptions of who and what he is. And because everything is part of him I can usefully integrate all the pantheons of other divinities into this conception, as they are reflections of him as much as I am a reflection of him.

If the story of Jesus means anything at all then it means We are all God as he re-experiences Himself within His own Creation, and We all save Our own lives as He saves Us.
 
 
Seth
21:19 / 06.02.06
IMO.
 
 
Scrambled Password Bogus Email
21:58 / 06.02.06
I *heart* Seth.
 
 
illmatic
06:43 / 07.02.06
And so do I.
 
 
Quantum
11:03 / 07.02.06
I <3 this thread. And Seth of course.
 
 
Scrambled Password Bogus Email
11:56 / 07.02.06
I ekspecially *heart* the fact that the above words were written by



this creature.
 
 
Claris Dancers
16:31 / 08.02.06
On free will, i was thinking about this...

That willpower is a liability rather than an asset. That surrendering my will and suborning it to the will of god is an act of strength. That my happiness is proportional to my ability to do what I am supposed to be doing at any given moment.

and

And I haven't really been able to think of a framework that can support both an omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent entity and the legions of stratified and sparkling servitors and egregores and pop-stars and comic book characters that I'd like to incorporate into my personal mythologies.

and

Don’t be surprised if you ask him what he wants and he replies, “You choose.”

I have been thinking about this for the longest time and have discussed it on other message boards. Noone has been able to give me an adequate answer. My question is this...

If God is omniscient, meaning that He knows everything past present and future, how can one possibly have free will? If He knows what you are going to do, no matter what it is, then you really have no choice in the matter. Not that He is necessarily directing you to one "decision" over another, but your path, whatever it is, is already laid out before you, because it is already known to Him. Omniscience and free will seem incompatible.

With all the immensely smart people on this board (admittedly probably smarter and definately more knowledgable than me), I hope to finally get a decent answer to this.
 
 
Scrambled Password Bogus Email
17:01 / 08.02.06
I doubt this is going to satisfy as a decent answer, but if there is no 'you' in the first place, no self, no cohesive underlying orchestrator of the arising and vanishing stream of thoughts within consciousness, merely thoughts arising and falling away (with a recursive notion of selfhood existing as nothing more than a thought about the thoughts, creating an invisible, intangible and nearly impenetrable iterating illusion of apparent self-ness) does the issue of 'free will' retain any meaning whatsoever?

If there is no Self, then who or what has either deterministic-fate or free-will? It means nothing with no Self to apply it to. Or does it?

Like:

There was a young man who said 'Though...
it appears that I know that I know,
What I'd most like to see
is the 'I' that knows Me
when I know that I know that I know'


You can split your'self' into an infinite number of seperate identities searching for the One doing the searching, all observing each other in a top heavy hierarchy without end...the I regarding the I regarding the I...I and I, seen?...try it, if you like, you can kill days if you're so inclined.

So : free will requires a Self to be meaningful.

As I was going up the stair
I met a man who wasn't there
he wasn't there again today
I wish, I wish he'd go away.


Told you it wouldn't be a satistfactory, decent answer.
 
 
Claris Dancers
18:14 / 08.02.06
does the issue of 'free will' retain any meaning whatsoever

No I would say it doesn't retain any meaning. Nor would much anything else at that point, including whether or not there is a god who is omniscient or even exists at all. And i do agree with you about there being no "self" as such. But that's not where we live life. I think what i'm hinting at is what Castaneda's Don Juan called the "sorcerer's folly," meaning that we know that what we do in our everyday lives doesn't really mean anything, but we still do it because we are people and that's what people do. So from a reductionist viewpoint, you're right, it doesn't really matter if we have free will or not. But people will still act and believe and preach to others as though they do have free will or do not.
 
 
iconoplast
21:21 / 08.02.06
Omniscience and free will seem incompatible.

Yeah, I know. Personally, I just put the emphasis on seem, and remember that thing about mysterious ways his wonders to perform.

Because I believe very strongly in both. That I have free will, and am both capable of, and responsibl for the consequences of choices. In fact, very often when I'm jammed up and just psychically blocked in reference to a particular situation, remembering that I have a choice, and being reminded (generally by someone else) of my options is what allows me to process the situation better.

My all time desert island number one least favorite choice ever is the one I get hit with the most often: Do you want to be happy, or do you want to be right? (The context is generally when you're either arguing or refusing to apologize)

My whole paradigm of faith is linked with the access it grants me to Meaning. And that involves free will. In order for my life to have meaning, which I believe it does, my choices have to matter. Free will is a totally necessary presupposition for the kind of moral accountability I want in my personal belief structure.

Again, it comes down to faith - just as the question of whether to believe god is everything or nothing was a choice, so is the question of whether to believe my choices have any kind of weight.

Seth's point about there being a number of different paths towards God was... I don't know how to communicate how deeply that hit me. I'd never considered that possibility, and it's making the way my spiritual life intersects my every day life feel more comfortable. I'm still mulling over that post.

I wish I had more of an answer, but all I can offer is that I know both of the following statements to be simultaneously true - first that I have free will, a ability to choose my path, and an accountability for the choices I make, and second that the god of my understanding is omniscient and omnibenevolent.

Some part of this feeling stems from reading Paradise Lost, and thinking about the opportunity squandered by Lucifer. He was in the position of being the first Angel ever to choose to turn towards god. That story illustrates the way I understand my will and its relation to god's will. The choice to align ones will with gods will to the best of one's ability is... I want to say I think it's the most important part of being human, but I think calling it a part of being human is selling it short.

I think this is the classic christian answer to the question, so I may have cribbed it from some reading somewhere, but I think the way free will and an omniscient deity can be simultaneously true is that free will is necessary in order to lend weight to the decision to do god's will.
 
 
Scrambled Password Bogus Email
22:01 / 08.02.06
Slight OT:

Nor would much anything else at that point, including whether or not there is a god who is omniscient or even exists at all.

We probably understand very different things by the term 'god' here. And 'omniscient'. Particularly wrt your suggestion that the absence of self may call into question the 'existence' of 'god'. I consider that a tautology.

And i do agree with you about there being no "self" as such. But that's not where we live life.

This is a bit confusing. If this is not where we (you) live life, then where? Where else is there?

I think what i'm hinting at is what Castaneda's Don Juan called the "sorcerer's folly," meaning that we know that what we do in our everyday lives doesn't really mean anything, but we still do it because we are people and that's what people do.

On the contrary, I don't understand that to be 'sorceror's folly' at all. This realisation does not, for me, lead to the nihilism you seem to glean from it. Far from not 'really meaning anything', it suggests that most of what we previously considered to be meaningless or take for granted actually contains every and all meanings that we could ever have hoped or dreaded to consider in our lives.

So from a reductionist viewpoint, you're right, it doesn't really matter if we have free will or not.

That was not my point at all. Nowhere have I said that.

But people will still act and believe and preach to others as though they do have free will or do not.

So what? Nothing I have said contradicts or invalidates the posts from iconoplast or Seth. The terms of the question posed by you are all I was addressing. Namely - how can there be free will if god is omniscient??

Your question is akin to the following: Where do we end up if we fall off the edge of the world?
 
 
Seth
22:43 / 08.02.06
Omniscience and free will seem incompatible.

Imagine a Choose Your Own Adventure game book. Every option is pre-written, but you have a choice about how to proceed. Some adventure game books even allow the rolling of dice to add the element of chance. Now imagine the scope of that model increasing to account for every choice you've ever made, whether you perceive you had a choice or not, and then the complexity increases to every possible universe from every possible event that could have happened.

They all exist in the mind of god, and are all a part of his plan. We perceive one and can only imagine *what if* scenarios, never experience them directly. In his kindness to us god prepares for all eventualities.

This may account for the fascination with time travel narratives in fiction. We’d love to be able to unpick the tapestry of our lives and see what may have happened if they’d been woven in another way. So often characters who change their history see the consequences play out in a manner that causes the alternate history to be something totally alien to themselves, because it causes a self to be bought into being that is different from what the *them* making the change would have wanted. It produces a *them* that would not have chosen to make the change, and so the *them* that makes the change feels cut adrift and lost from the reality that gave birth to *them.* And when it comes to the ethics of time travel so often depicted in science fiction it’s rather telling that there’s such an emphasis on preserving the time stream, with the justification for that so often being, “Who are we to play god?”

The trap here is that because we can only perceive our lives as they are to us at any given time we think that that is the only route that god has planned for, and therefore are concerned that free will is negated. I believe he’s kind and wise enough to have planned for everything that our lives aren’t, including the possibility that different choices could have been made before our birth and that there is the possibility that we never existed should other choices have been made. I reckon he’s planned for it all. God is not only the entire universe; he transcends that small, fixed universe and is every possible universe.

And I reckon he transcends that, too.
 
 
Seth
22:47 / 08.02.06
In a nutshell:

When a beyond infinite god gives us infinite choices in infinite possible universes, do we really have much to complain about?

Is it then possible for god to have his plan and us to have our free will?

No answers, just my current best thinking.
 
 
Seth
22:55 / 08.02.06
But of course, we can never have the choice to choose something outside of the infinite choices that god has made available to us within the parameters he has set. But given that we cannot conceive beyond the infinite, would we really miss the choices that we are incapable of imagining?

I'm incapable of conceiving of infinite possible universes, but I imagine that to some minds they already constitute an intolerable prison.
 
 
Scrambled Password Bogus Email
23:20 / 08.02.06
Just to pitch in back on topic (or more so), I have found my own behaviours in this whole strange yard of thoughts and actions to have drifted far more towards devotional 'religion' than anything else over the last year, particularly the last six months. Springing from a foundation of total gratitude for the gift of being, and a shrugging acceptance of the fact that I am not, have never been, and will never be in control, and that any sense of such is an illusion, has liberated much of the anxiety and emotional restrictiveness I used to roll with as par for the innings. I am barely in control of the thoughts which cross the screen of consciousness, never mind anything else. Respiration? nope. Immune system? nope. Bodily intelligence generally? Nothing to do with 'me'. The happenstance of my life? Sure, I have an intention. But that is all. Who am I to judge the way that intention manifests? To gauge the time it is going to take to resolve, if it is? What breathtaking presupposition, assumption, and arrogance. There is learning, slowly but surely, to just let it be, without attaching the labels 'Good' or 'Bad' to any of it. The intention is the only (apparent) choice.

It has struck me, as I posted over in the aphorisms thread, that the majority of nodes I encounter requiring an apparent choice, can be usefully sorted in terms of intention, before other considerations, into just two (isn't it always?) base options: Satisfaction of appetite or avoidance of entaglement in suffering.

Suffering is a slippery one, because it is essential to remember that the division between self and other is false. Causing your body (which I take to include the 'emotional body' and 'mind', no seperation, all one thing) to suffer is causing suffering no different to inflicting it 'out there' (hah). It, among other factors, has informed my decision to be vegan, and given me pause for thought over many things within this definition - to honey, or not to honey? It's an ongoing process, and will remain so, but I find the consciousness of it immensely important, suddenly...am I involving myself in a movement of the chain reaction of suffering in order to satisfy the appetites of my ego? Can I avoid this, or at least consciously reduce that movement, towards a goal of complete conscious abnegation? Is it possible?

The reason I wish to is because I believe the entire process of 'God' (existence, isness, that which underlies, gives rise to and bounds Everything, while being 'itself' without boundary, which defines all forms yet has none, which is unseperate and inseperable and yet within which all seperation is occurring and arising, etc...the abstract state of Being which underlies all existence, even Nothing and Nowhere, if such a no-thing and no-place actually 'exist'...the Supreme Being, yes? Not a noun, a verb (and actually neither of those, but, you know, words...) to be Unififed and Closed...like a Tom and Jerry cartoon bump-on-the-head, which can be pushed back flat only to pop up elsewhere exactly the same size and dimensions and emotional weight and resonance. I figure its my point, if I have one, and the point, if there is one. I don't especially mind if there isn't - I'll most likely never know. But it feels right, to me.

I'd say discovering the book 'Prayers of the Cosmos' pretty much radicalised my entire take on the figure of Jesus and the teachings he shared...I know the Aramaic inside out, now, and use it daily, it is so powerful and each line worthy of deep meditation depending on mood and circumstance, location, many things. As a working prayer, I adore it, and I also know a nice slice of Portuguese, both traditional and personal, which I work through, and possibly translate quite deliberately afterwards for myself as well, given time...

I've done this round these parts in a couple of other threads, but will go again, it never bores me.

The first phrase, particularly, contains the vibratory pitch which should resonate most deeply within the whole body - this is your own heritage from Abwoon, and requires a little time and attention to find, and fix...as it leads into the silence, I follow it, and sort of Vipassana meditate on all the processes within my body that continue wihtout attention - heartbeat, breathing, peristalsis, muscular tension etc. - and consider each as internal prayers that point to the gift and responsibility of co-creation with and as part of God.

Abwoon d'bwashmaya

- Pai Nosso que estais no Ceu

- Our father which art in heaven

- O Birther! Father-Mother of the Cosmos, divine process of creation, Radiant Oneness, source of all Power and Stability, whose light, sound, name and vibration within perfection touching and interpenetrating all form, shining in every place we see, every centre of activity, in the potential of all things, that we are able to recognise by our own conscious manifestation in and of this very Universe - name of names, our small identity unravels in you, you hand it back as a lesson. Wordless and actionless action, Silent Potency, where ears and eyes awaken, there Heaven comes, and is, and remains. O Birther! Father-Mother of the Cosmos.

nethqadash shmakh

- Santificado seja o Vosso Nome

- Hallowed be thy Name

- Focus your light within us - make it useful, as the rays of a beacon show the way. Help us breathe one holy breath, feeling only this radiance - creating a shrine inside, and thus around, in wholeness. Help us let go, clearing a space inside of busy forgetfulness: So the Name has a place to live. This Name, this Sound, this Vibration can move us, and play us as instruments, if we tune our intentions as instruments to its tone. Hear the One sound that gave birth to all others, in this way the Name is hallowed in Silence. So often I look elsewhere for this Light, this Sound, drawn out of myself - but the Name always lives within. Focus your Light within us - make it useful.

Teytey malkuthakh

- Vamos nos ao Vosso Reino

- Thy Kingdom come

- Create your reign of Unity now - through this fiery heart and willing hands. Let your quiet counsel rule this life, clearing this intention for co-creation. Unite our sense of "I can" within the Great Mother to your own, that we may walk as Kings and Queens with every creature upon the Earth. Desire with and through us the rule of Universal fruitfulness onto the earth. Your guidance springs into existence as and at the moment that we reach out to embrace all of Creation. Come into the bedroom of our hearts, prepare us for the Divine marriage and union of Power and Beauty. From this Holy Union let us birth new images for a world of Peace. Create your reign of Unity now.

Nehwey tzevyannach aykanna d'bwashmaya aph b'arha

- Seja feita vossa vontade, assim na Terra como no Ceu

- Thy will be done, on Earth as it is in Heaven

- Your One desire then acts with and of our own, as in all Light, so in all forms. Let all harmonious cooperation of movement, all actionless action move together in your vortex, as stars and planets swirl through the cosmos. Help us love beyond our ideals and sprout acts of compassion for all creatures. As we find your unbounded Love reflected in our own, let the Universe and all the Powers of Nature form a new creation. Unite the crowd within in a vision of passionate purpose : light mates with form. Create in me a divine co-operation, harmonious - from many selves, one voice, in chorus, one action, in unity. Let your inscrutable fervent desire unite heaven and earth through out harmony. Your One desire then acts with and of our own, as in all Light, so in all forms.

And so on, sorry, I don't have the time for the rest...

And still, within all of this, afterwards, I have time for my Lady Oxum, whom I have a very personal song for, which I recite for her every day, that her particular mysteries may manifest and be present in my attention...like the malakh or angelos of Hebrew/Christian eschatology, the Orixa serve as messengers (the meaning of those two words, in Hebrew/Greek) to the somewhat unapproachable and difficult to do much but give thanks by humans Immensity. The form of this song is very beautiful, and ends with a Yoruba hail to Her...my Brazilian friend, who is part of a Iemanja congregation back in Brazil, told me it is perfectly reminiscent of the Oxum hinos he knows from his homeland - very melodic, swooping, slightly sad...I treasure it. It was a beautiful gift, to me, and my friends, from Her. All under the auspicies of the immense Abwoon here in d'bwashmaya.

It integrates seamlessly with my more general devotions, I find.

Sheesh, rambling much? What Seth said.
 
 
Scrambled Password Bogus Email
23:37 / 08.02.06
I should definitely point out that had the Aramaic subtleties of the Gospels survived the KJV butchering and been taught as part of my religious education while at school, I may have taken more interest and not ended up loathing the entire thing quite so much for quite so long, and being so obnoxious to the faithful for most of my life...

It staggers me that it is not taught in Christian churches, actually. The words of their icon, as he spoke them, and what they mean...the KJV is such a limp and skinny detail-vacuum. No wonder most people are bored senseless and cynical by their early teens.
 
 
iconoplast
02:03 / 09.02.06
Money, did you say you've posted more of that elsewhere? I love that kind of... exegesis? of the Our Father. Could you point me towards more of it, please?
 
 
Scrambled Password Bogus Email
08:42 / 09.02.06
Sort of exegesis : the KJV is the English translation of the Greek translation of the Hebrew translation of the earliest known Aramaic text. A great deal was, obviously, lost in this epic journey.

Aramaic is like Hebrew - few words, with many layers of meaning and complexities and resonances, single words having huge depth according to context, intonation, and stress, and complex gematria relating all of the letters, words and phrases mathematically (a simple example of this would be 'Adam' the first human : ADM, Aleph, Daath and Mem - Aleph 'is' Air, the Life Breath, Daath 'is' Venus, the Mother, Love, and Mem 'is' Water, the water of the Womb and the water of the Earth and the Water of the Human body...hence Life Breath + Great Mother Love + Water = first human. When I say 'is', I mean numerically...sorry if you already know all this). Ishoa (Jesus) was a total Master at utilising this subtlety within the phraseing of his teachings, apparently simple sentences actually shoulder-deep in complexity and resonance.

The exegesis above is pretty much the deeper content and meaning of the Aramaic words of the prayer...so many layers, so much resonance, as you can see. A gender non-specific supreme source of all that 'rises and shines' in space all around and lives right here in and of this Universe, very Middle Eastern, and not quite so otherworldly-afterlife-abstract-Greek conceptualisations of 'Heaven' as a seperate realm of the soul, or whatever...it's stunning. All in the first line of the prayer...

Prayers of the Cosmos

Buy this book. It also contains body-prayers and meditations to conduct in different circumstances to live and breathe the meaning of those words...I stumbled across it for 50p at a book market in London...incredible, incredible book.

It represented a big turning point in my appraisal of the man and his teachings. I also recommend the Gospel of the Twelve and the Essene Gospel of John. Many people discard these as hoaxes, but I find it compelling that the (supposed) Aramaic translation of the Prayer above in the Essene Gospel of John is very close indeed to all of the academic Aramaic translations of the same I have studied...Its a fascinating subject, and they are fascinating retellings of familiar stories in very unfamiliar ways...
 
 
Claris Dancers
12:46 / 09.02.06
your suggestion that the absence of self may call into question the 'existence' of 'god'.

Not the existence, just whether god matters if you have no "self." who and what are "you" accountable to and for if there is no "you?"

Where else is there?

What I meant was the difference between running off into headspace contemplating the true essense of self and flipping off the motherfucker that just cut infront of you on the way to work.

So from a reductionist viewpoint, you're right, it doesn't really matter if we have free will or not.

That was not my point at all. Nowhere have I said that.


Then that is my failing. I assumed from what you were explaining that you were taking a reductionist viewpoint.

The only possible resolution I see to my question is a fair bit of cognitive dissonance. Probably because i am not religious, I find religion and faith to be a fascinating area and i want to understand it better. If it is only cognitive dissonance then i will let the question drop, but all of you have more experience and knowledge than i do. i was hoping there was something i missed.
 
 
Claris Dancers
12:50 / 09.02.06
The trap here is that because we can only perceive our lives as they are to us at any given time we think that that is the only route that god has planned for, and therefore are concerned that free will is negated.

When a beyond infinite god gives us infinite choices in infinite possible universes, do we really have much to complain about?


So you are saying that he knows every choice that he has made possible, but not which ones we will actually choose? So is that an omniscient god or not?

Or is it more that among the infinite choices and alternate realities created by those choices our path has already been laid out by his foreknowledge. So therefore our choices have already been made and our freewill has already played out and now we live with that? I think im confusing myself.
 
 
Claris Dancers
13:01 / 09.02.06
and a shrugging acceptance of the fact that I am not, have never been, and will never be in control, and that any sense of such is an illusion...Sure, I have an intention. But that is all. Who am I to judge the way that intention manifests?...The intention is the only (apparent) choice.

Firstly, I apologize for taking such a small part of your post and taking it entirely out of context. Secondly,what do you mean by this? An intention is a goal, a desire. If all the control you have is to define what you want, then as you said, any sense of control (will) is an illusion.
 
 
Unconditional Love
13:59 / 09.02.06
Its the sound of the thoughts not the meaning, what is the song of thoughts your awareness is hearing, are you praying, lamenting, cursing. The thoughts are a chorus, the meaning social, its how a mind sounds, the meanings are important in a human context. the resonence and vibration of the process of mental sound is how you sing. faith should make your entire personailty a mantra, a prayer, a hymn, a mandala, the smell of faith. The sound, feeling and being of every thought an utterence of faith.

with no self, god, it, thatness, clearlight fills the empty vessel. Self, pride, attachments and clinging to things thoughts identity feelings emotions, leaves no emptiness for the sounds of thatness to echoe in.
 
 
Elijah, Freelance Rabbi
14:02 / 09.02.06
When I was in my first year of college I took a comparative religion class and my final paper was on the topic of free will. The teacher in this class was a Presbeterian Minister, and he and I had quite a few discussions about the topic at the time.

Basically, as he explained it, God knows what the outcome of every decision you will ever make is. God knows what will happen if you go left, and also if you go right. It is your decision to choose which way to go. Thus, free will still exists, and God knows all.

I always liked that because it makes God outside our reality space, which I think is part of abstract monotheism, that you beleive there is a God, knowing there is no way you will ever be able to prove it, and that He/She/It is not likely to ever intervene with your life.

On a side not, my paper was called "The Trap Of Free Will, How God Conned Humanity Out Of Paradise" Got an A too...
 
 
Seth
04:41 / 10.02.06
So you are saying that he knows every choice that he has made possible, but not which ones we will actually choose? So is that an omniscient god or not?

I suspect he sees the entirety of it, all possible worlds and choices playing out simultaneously, with space-time looking very different to us from the inside.
 
 
Gypsy Lantern
10:33 / 10.02.06
I suspect he sees the entirety of it, all possible worlds and choices playing out simultaneously, with space-time looking very different to us from the inside.

There's also the school of thought that might speculate that God does not just see the entirity of all possible worlds and choices but is the manifestation of all of space time, and the minutia of our day-to-day lives and the choices we make are the mechanism by which God contemplates and seeks to understand itself. As are the daily activities of a fly, walrus, bank manager, lion or daffodil.
 
 
Scrambled Password Bogus Email
12:59 / 10.02.06
Qwik, when I previously said:

We probably understand very different things by the term 'god' here. And 'omniscient'. Particularly wrt your suggestion that the absence of self may call into question the 'existence' of 'god'. I consider that a tautology.

I was thinking very much along the lines made explicit by GL here. The terms in which you are framing your question are limiting the possibilities of that which is limitless, and the possible answers. Hence: What happens, where do I end up, if I fall off the edge of the Earth?

What I meant was the difference between running off into headspace contemplating the true essense of self and flipping off the motherfucker that just cut infront of you on the way to work.

Still a false division, I think. Just because you just stubbed your toe, quantum theory must be irrelevant? Your example of lack of emotional containment and compunction is a perfect illustration of the choice based nodes we all face everyday : Avoid suffering entaglement or satisfy appetite?

An intention is a goal, a desire.

No, it's not. An intention is an intention. A goal is a goal. A desire is a desire. (Desire, particularly, in the context of this discussion, has a very specific and particular meaning you may want to examine a bit more thoroughly). Unlike Aramaic and Hebrew, English has many, many words, with quite specific meanings.

If you like, I'll briefly elucidate the difference, as I see it:

An intention is unattached to outcome, being centred, focused and attentive to the ever-present now. It originates a code of behaviour which is its own 'reward', if you like, right here and now. It thus differs from a goal, which is centred, focused and attentive on an (imagined) future. The future is the most important thing. A desire is a movement towards the satisfaction of an appetite non-essential to the perfect funtioning of the organism, and also attached.

As a flawed illustration here, an intention is what is expressed by a mule in the wild foraging for food when hungry. A goal is the carrot hung in front of a donkey on a pleasure beach, utilising its desire to take advantage of it.

Intention flows from within, is present, and expressed as and in the behaviours of the individual. They require no movement for expression. They simply are. Goals are without, and are moved towards by the individual, dictating behaviours. They are timebound and require volitional action for satisfaction or resolution of their self created tensions. An intention does not need to resolve. It is self-perpetuating.

Not sure I've done such a good job describing that. Ah, well.

It's a fine difference, and easily conflated, but it definitely strikes me as a difference.
 
 
Scrambled Password Bogus Email
13:05 / 10.02.06
btw, if this is the sort of discussion engendered by non-Temple regulars bothering to visit, then bring it on. This is a fantastic thread.
 
  

Page: (1)23

 
  
Add Your Reply