|
|
There's some symmetry to Sharon not outliving Arafat by too long. Historical aesthetics aside, Netanyahu vs. Perez is a crappy choice. On the other hand, the present situation may force whoever wins to sober up.
From the outside:
Post-9/11, Bush gave Sharon a free pass to tear the Palestinians a new one in the name of fighting terrorism globally by suppressing them locally. Sharon returned the favor by egging Bush on to attack Iraq. (Before that, Reagan and the US fundies encouraged the Israeli adventure in Lebanon, in which Sharon played a large part, including allowing the infamous massacres of Sabra and Shatila.)
4-1/2 years on, Bush is on the ropes or at least distracted (more than usual). The US fundies's support for Israel is revealed to be just a hardon for Armageddon (resulting, by the way, in the deaths of far more than 6 million Jews - Thank God, G*d or the FSM the Cold War is over). So Israel are sort of on their own for now.
Iraq is another mess on Israel's doorstep, a national recruiting depot for anti-Israeli terrorists, irregular soldiers and possibly regular soldiers. Iran is fairly close to having the atom bomb, and certainly have medium-range ballistic missiles, and they'll certainly retalitate if Israel tries a surgical strike on the nuclear plant(s). The Iranians are probably not stupid enough to keep their missiles near their atom bomb factory, so Israel would need at least two successful strikes.
So basically, the winners in Israeli politics might as well leave the hot rhetoric to Iran's President Ahmedinejad and concentrate on sorting out their economy and, what the hell, let Hamas stand for elections. Let the Palestinians see how well the Hamas jihadis can lay down water and sewage lines and run buses instead of blowing them up. |
|
|