BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


The "Walking with..." natural history series

 
 
All Acting Regiment
02:10 / 04.01.06
What did you think of these when they were on? Would you buy the DVD? What did they do right/wrong?
 
 
X-Himy
03:13 / 04.01.06
One of my professors actually wrote Beasts and Cavemen. Though I have not seen them yet, some of my friends have and speak well of them.
 
 
Smoothly
08:43 / 04.01.06
I only saw a few bits and pieces of these and thought they looked reasonably impressive, but was surprised recently to see one of them qualify in some ‘Top 50 Documentaries’ clip show. That’s what bothered about what I have seen: the producers spend so much time and (American) money making everything look authentic, they can’t bring themselves to shatter that illusion with trifling details like what is based on evidenced fact and what they have just made up.

As anyone with a moustache on the Antiques Roadshow will tell you, there can be a fine line between restoration and forgery, and the Walking With… programmes feel more like the latter to me. And the world seems topsy-turvy when consumers swallow Jurassic Park as documentary, but call foul when the cover stars on glossy magazines are given photoshop facelifts.
 
 
sleazenation
09:24 / 04.01.06
And yes this remains my central problem with the 'walking with' the whole conceit of doing a documentary with long dead creatures is flawed precisely because it often presents that speculation as known fact...
 
 
All Acting Regiment
21:53 / 04.01.06
Quite possibly. They maybe could've run a sort of disclaimer in the opening: "Now, prepare to see the world as it may have looked x milliom years ago" or something.

In terms of getting public interest going, they could maybe have left some open questions at the end: you know, "We still don't know what this thato r theo ther fossil was, we need more scientisits" etc to get people interested in paleantology.
 
 
Smoothly
22:45 / 04.01.06
Thinking about this, I remember seeing one in which someone so much like Nigel Marvin I think it was Nigel Marvin was walking around the paleozoic reacting to CGI basilosaurs as if it were a a genuine field documentary - speaking in hushed tones, like Attenborough among the silverbacks, lest he disturb the green screen. I remember wondering at the time whether this might confuse younger viewers; whether it was accidentally fostering an impression that prehistoric animals interacting with human beings was something other than a bizarre contrivance. Having since become aware of just how many people (particularly Americans, the target audience for these series) are actually teaching their children that all these creatures were gamboling around together just a few thousand years ago, it's cast this doubt into a whole new light.
 
 
All Acting Regiment
23:26 / 04.01.06
I think there was an element of time-travel in that program though. I think he had a MARVIS or something.
 
 
Captain Zoom
22:51 / 07.01.06
I own Dinosaurs on disc and thoroughly enjoy it. As did my son. Yeah, it's pop science and probably mostly wrong, but I thought the meshing of CGI and real was pretty good, and it was entertaining enough to keep a 4 year old's attention.
 
 
sleazenation
23:53 / 07.01.06
Which is fine if you are aiming to make a straight entertainment show, but less so if the aim is to educate and inform...
 
  
Add Your Reply