BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


2006: What are you currently reading?

 
  

Page: 1 ... 678910(11)

 
 
Joggy Yoghurt
22:00 / 16.11.06
Yeah I heard Choke is the best from someone else aswell
 
 
Our Lady Has Left the Building
19:17 / 19.11.06
OK, I've finished A Spot of Bother by Mark Haddon. It's by no means bad, but it does seem to be your average family in crisis story, Dad is going mad, Mum is having an affair, Daughter is getting married and not sure whether she really loves husband-to-be and gay Son splits from his boyfriend and decides what he wants from life.

The various characters are all sympathetically treated but really no-one is as interesting as Christopher, the boy with Aspergers from Haddon's first novel The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time, and the page count is a little too long for a story which is basically a family falling apart and then coming back together in pretty much the same order. Some amusing jokes and scenes though.

On to Lost Girls now. Hurrah!
 
 
matthew.
21:30 / 19.11.06
Working on The Night Gardener by George Pelecanos, one of the writers of The Wire and an established "mystery and/or crime" novelist in his own right. This novel is deserving of the superlatives heaped upon its back, a burden it carries with skill and subtlety. It seems to be about a murder mystery, but really, that mystery happens in the background. We're watching DC descend into a hell of poverty and social decay. It's a short novel (approx. 350) and still seems very Dickensian in its scope of social commentary (a trait also ascribed to The Wire, a show I've never watched). If you like your mysteries with a spoonful of social commentary, then this is the book for you.
 
 
Whisky Priestess
21:37 / 22.11.06
I picked up Dan Brown's Angels and Demons at work and zipped throuhg it on the Tube. I enjoyed it more than the last one I read (Digital Fortress), mostly because Dan loves his history and mythology and symbology and conspiracy and races against time, and this has it in spades.

I called whodunnit instantly, but didn't know how, which was what made the journey interesting. That and all the brilliantly expositional stuff about particle physics and antimatter (bit of a McGuffin to be honest but quite fun) at the beginning. I was also entertained by all Dan's research/made up nonsense on the Illuminati, especially the ambigrams (words that can be read both ways up) that dot the text.

I couldn't find a credit for these so had assumed Brown designed them himself but apparently not - the designer is acknowledged here and cited as the inspiration for the hero's surname. Which is quite sweet. The writing's ... efficient, shall we say, but the fun of the book is that it's a bit like a crossword puzzle and I like crossword puzzles, especially when they're not too easy and not too hard.
 
 
matthew.
22:24 / 22.11.06
(By the way, I finished The Night Gardener and I'm thoroughly convinced it's one of the best mystery/crime novels I've ever read. Very highly recommended.)
 
 
Corey Waits
07:00 / 23.11.06
Finished reading Random Acts of Senseless Violence by Jack Womack. It's an interesting read - it's told from the perspective of a 12 year old girl writing in her journal, so it's a very easy read, and one that gets you hooked from the start.
I can't remember who recommended it to me or why though, so I'm not sure what the significance was supposed to be, but it was still a good book.

Next is The English Assassin but Michael Moorcock, 'cause I've never read a Jerry Cornelius book, and it seems as though every comic writer I enjoy references the character in one way or another.
 
 
lonely as a cloud...
10:51 / 24.11.06
I ploughed through Redemption Song, the new biography of Joe Strummer, and Schrödinger's Kittens recently; Redemption Song was well written and interesting (for a Clash fanatic like myself; others may not find it as interesting...), though I got the feeling that the book's main purpose was an excuse for the author to go chat to his famous rock mates and then boast about it in writing.
 
Schrödinger's Kittens, by John Gribbin, is a sequel of sorts to In Search Of Schrödinger's Cat. In Search... was a very well-written overview of Quantum Theory/Physics, as it stood in the mid 80's, and ...Kittens basically quickly covers what was in In Search... and then expands based on more recent research and discovery. Gribbin's a good writer, and manages to explicate most of the complex physics he writes about well; but sometimes you do feel led around by the nose, as his own opinions and biases about various theories colour his prose somewhat. Not that that's altogether a bad thing.
 
Anyway, at the moment, I've gone back to fiction; reading Kate Mosse's The Labyrinth. Which is kinda fun, although nothing much has happened in it yet, though I'm about a third of the way through...
 
 
ibis the being
21:04 / 25.11.06
Reading a ton lately, some of the highlights and lowlights:

The Greatest Story Ever Sold by Frank Rich, a non-fic piece that traces the Bush admin's manipulation of the media and it's governance-by-PR style of rule from 9/11 through Katrina. Factually it's nothing you don't already know, but it's well put together and does present an interesting thesis.

My Antonia by Willa Cather... I read this in preparation for my move to Nebraska. It's a romantic novel about a boy who is transplanted to Nebraska and grows up party on a farm and partly in a small prairie town, and his observations on the Bohemian farmgirl Antonia. The descriptions of the prairie and farm homes were lush, vivid, wonderful - kind of nostalgic for me as a former Little House on the Prairie fan.

Switching it up big time I read some popular fiction that was lent to me on my travels by friends/family -

Sam's Letters to Jennifer by James Patterson, and The Rescue by Nicholas Sparks (author of The Notebook as well). I have to review them together because plot points aside, they're practically indistinguishable. From two immensely popular novelists in the US... these were two unbelievably sappy, corny, and perhaps worst of all boring novels with utterly predictable plots, cardboard characters, and atrocious writing. I now understand why Dan Brown is thought of as clever, if this is the standard for pop fiction. These were just so appalling I hardly know what to say. All the characters are these perfect people with hearts of gold and no flaws whatsoever except for having had their hearts broken or their parents die... they're pretty, sexy, kind, loveable, and all they need is to find their soulmates, which of course they do in the most wonderful ways. They have candlelit dinners with champagne and strawberries. Blech, blech, blech, blech. On the plus side, I'm going to start writing a novel, it couldn't be any worse than a Nicholas Sparks ouevre and he's already got a hit movie.
 
 
stabbystabby
23:28 / 25.11.06
Have just started reading Adult Themes by Kate Crawford, about the changing nature of adulthood. Very good....
 
 
Mourne Kransky
20:59 / 26.11.06
Just finished Sarah Waters' Nightwatch and amazed by it. Such invention and so much lightly worn knowledge of the period. It puts you into recognisable but extreme situations, during and after the Blitz, and really gets inside the heads and hearts of Kay and Helen and Viv and Duncan. I loved the way it gives you tiny, tiny (wonderful) detail of some times and situations and then years pass by in a blink, leaving gaps in the direct narrative that the reader must and does fill in for hirself.

It's very involving emotionally. You want to know how relationships will work out and how they came to be You want to comfort them and cheer them on. Walters moves backwards on time. At one point, one of the characters says she likes to arrive in the cinema half way through a film and watch the end first, then watch the start of the film because, she says, people's pasts are always more interesting. And Walters does just that, which shouldn't work but does, splendidly.

First thing of hers I've read and keen to read her earlier stuff now.
 
 
Kiltartan Cross
21:25 / 26.11.06
Finally finished The Shape of Things To Come as above, romped through City of Saints and Madmen (thread elsewhere; highly recommended) and got onto Celestis, by Paul Park. Very easy to read (although the subject matter is painful; the whole thing with the implants was profoundly nasty, for starters; I guess it can be read as an allegory for "civilisation", although the "civilising" effect of the humans is dealt with independently). Mind, I really couldn't get a grip on the "science" of it. Perhaps that's deliberate, seeing as humanity's blinkered scientific approach to the world is a theme, but... well... without going into spoiler-laden details, there are plot holes in the density-of-inhabited-planets / location-of-same / speed-of-ftl side of things you could drive a very large bus through. Forgive me if I miss the point!

Currently onto Dusto's Icelander, which is, ah, cool so far, but again has a thread of its very own.

First thing of hers I've read and keen to read her earlier stuff now.

Do! Affinity is great.
 
 
Kiltartan Cross
18:22 / 09.12.06
Read George R.R.R.R. Martin's short story collection Sandkings, and then just had to go the whole hog and bull through the gargantuan Dreamsongs collection. There's a series of accompanying introductions by the author through the book; he treads the thin line between authorial narcissism and self-parody with an assured step. There are one or two misses from the stories - his screen scripts for the Twiglet Zone I can live without, f'r'instance - but many more hits and some real standout stories. Unfortunately it's left me with an urge to reread A Song Of Ice And Fire again.

You've got to live your life like you're falling over the borderline...

There's also been Alan Moore's League of Extraordinary Gentleman (#1) comic, which while not, perhaps, the subject of this subforum led me to this, ah, gem. The mind fair boggles.
 
 
COG
18:47 / 09.12.06
just finished Americana by Don DeLillo. This is his first novel from 1971, and the first thing that I have read by him. I guess I enjoyed it. Lots of very nice segments and well described internal thought processes. I enjoyed the first half more, about the protagonist's unsatisfying corporate life in TV. I didn't know the date that this was written until just now, which made the experience strange for me, wondering if it was a recreation or more of a report from the world of the 1960s. I ploughed through the last 100 pages today to get it back to the library on time. I wasn't really carried along in the second half, and none of the secondary characters come to life. The end seems rather stuck on.
 
 
Dusto
13:20 / 10.12.06
My general feeling with DeLillo is that the first parts of his novels are always best, before he realizes that he needs a plot, which always ends up feeling forced.
 
 
Mistoffelees
14:19 / 10.12.06
I´m reading David Mitchell´s Cloud Atlas. That book got so much hype on the internet, that I bought it, when I saw, that it got published here, too. I´m reading the English version, though, since it´s about 15 € cheaper.

The book is made up of six stories, that are loosely connected to each other. Except for one, every story stops suddenly with a cliffhanger, and the next chapter starts. The protagonists of the next chapter read (or view) the previous one, then get into trouble and there is a theme of oppression, slavery or imprisonment.

I just finished the first part of the old guy´s story. It started so funny, and then got so sad. So far, it has been very entertaining, and I´m curious how it will work out after the book´s first half, when I can get to every story´s second part.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
12:34 / 11.12.06
That and all the brilliantly expositional

And totally wrong. And stupid.


Really, Angels and Demons is like penile warts, but with a more tenuous grasp of the geography of Rome. I am upset at the very thought of a human being reading it.
 
 
Whisky Priestess
14:44 / 12.12.06
That and all the brilliantly expositional

And totally wrong. And stupid.


Do I really have to crack out the %sarcasm indicators% in a review of a novel by Dan Brown? Such insensitivity to nuance is atypical, Haus. Are they putting something in the prison tea?
 
 
Feverfew
19:55 / 12.12.06
I'm currently reading Neal Stephenson's Snowcrash for the first time, and I'm finding it really good to read and easy to stay with.

That is, up until the point it goes from Sci-fi to a discussion of Religion as a psychosomatic form of viral infection and an in-depth researching of Ancient Sumerian.

At which point, frankly, it just becomes brilliant, although not in a Fast Show sense.

This may mean I may have to go back and restart Cryptonomicon from 200-odd pages in where I trailed off about two weeks ago. All for the better.
 
 
captain piss
09:27 / 13.12.06
Trying to read Our Lady of the Flowers by Jean Genet at the moment - and I have to confess that it’s tough going… There’s lots of characters who keep morphing into someone else and doing inexplicable things, making me think I’ve lost the thread, and lots of sentences I read over and over again and think “nup – I’ve still no idea what you mean – or how that relates to what came before”. But there does seem to be a dementedly brilliant poetry lurking in there, if I could just decode it – anyway, I’ll persevere… Maybe the book’s ‘lith namesake could proffer a few helpful hints.

I’m always leaving books unfinished, which I blame on a cannabis habit and magpie interests – I usually read about 5 books at a time (or bits of them). Or maybe it’s just my weak and dissolute character.

But Genet is unusually high-brow reading for me, and I got onto it having read the biography Genet by Edmund White, which is extremely accessible and fascinating – speaking as someone who’s quite new to the man. It’s one of the best biographies I’ve read in ages.
 
 
ORA ORA ORA ORAAAA!!
11:14 / 13.12.06
I know this is off-topic, and that everyone knows Dan Brown doesn't write well, but in Angels and Demons, the entire plot hinges on not locating an object which could be located in TWO SECONDS.

SPOILERS!!@!

It's a wireless camera.

They can triangulate.

There is no need to patrol the vatican with EMP detectors, or solve centuries-old art mysteries*!

just get two antennas and point them around in circles for a bit.


*actual mystery may vary.
 
 
ORA ORA ORA ORAAAA!!
11:20 / 13.12.06
That said, I am currently reading: The CEO of the sofa, by PJ O'Rourke, which has the honour of being, not only one of the five (so far) books I have stopped reading part-way through, but also the first book I've ever thrown in the bin on a train station in disgust.

The man is a smug prick and I have only three chapters of time for him.

I wish I'd read his intro to Fear and Loathing, which is in the last chapter, though, now. But I pretty much had to throw it out, it's rubbish, insulting and patronising, and uses elementary techniques to bring the reader around to PJ's viewpoint, which are also insulting and patronising.

I'm also re-reading Earthly Powers, by Burgess, which is still really good, but not as tremendous as it was the first time I read it. As I recall I'm not up to the really great parts yet, though. Also this copy is falling apart, which is somewhat hampering my reading enjoyment. It's still a really, really good book.

I'm also partway through The Stand, by King, and am a bit concerned as everyone I love has come down with a minor cold. I've put it aside for the sake of Earthly Powers, though.
 
 
Tabitha Tickletooth
11:23 / 13.12.06
I've just read something really interesting that I randomly picked up in my library (big hugs atya, library). The Great Stink by Clare Clark is essentially a crime/mystery novel, but the two central characters are really interesting. The main protagonist is an engineer working on the rebuilding of the London sewers under Bazalgette. He has returned from the Crimean war with a serious mental health condition and begins self-harming. I found the descriptions of how and why he did this really compelling and it struck me as a brave attempt to look at a very secretive issue. Some of the details are really grim and the writing quite spare in places.

The other main character is a very poor old man who falls in love with a dog. The writer describes so beautifully the detail of their relationship and the way they fit their lives around each other.

The story is interesting enough, it all wraps up a little neatly at the end, but I would still highly recommend it because I really thought these two very unusual characters were beautifully drawn.
 
 
Janean Patience
11:45 / 13.12.06
JD: Finished reading Random Acts of Senseless Violence by Jack Womack... I can't remember who recommended it to me or why though, so I'm not sure what the significance was supposed to be, but it was still a good book.

There was a recommendations thread somewhere in this very forum where its virtues were extolled. I bought it on that basis. No offence to whoever recommended it, but I truly hated this book. I detested reading it. The moment halfway through when my partner suggested I simply stop reading it was like sunshine breaking through the dark clouds of a nuclear winter. So let me offer an anti-recommendation here.

Cog: just finished Americana by Don DeLillo. This is his first novel from 1971, and the first thing that I have read by him. I guess I enjoyed it. Lots of very nice segments and well described internal thought processes. I enjoyed the first half more, about the protagonist's unsatisfying corporate life in TV.

That first half, which is only about 100 pages so possibly more like a quarter, is wonderful. Blank, and surreal, not unlike Glamorama in its description of the emptiness of privilege. As soon as that ends, at the beginning of the protagonist's roadtrip when he hears the list of who's been fired, then you may as well put the book down because the rest's of little use. I always thought there was a great indie movie in that first section, ending with the camera circling the phone booth in a nondescript American town.

IMHO most, if not all DeLillo books have this problem: sections which don't work right next to sections of sheer brilliance. Underworld is full of them. Pretty much anything set in New York in that novel is incredible. When you're not in New York, the quality varies.

It was the section in Underworld where J. Edgar Hoover attends Truman Capote's Black & White ball that prompted me to read Party of the Century by Deborah Davis. I wanted to learn more about the ball. I still do. It's a book assembled from diligent research, from Capote's original guest list and every publication at and around the time, but like so many prominent New Yorkers at the time it doesn't get into the party. It's all clippings and unilluminating. A wasted opportunity when there are so many attendees still around who could have provided some interesting first-hand testimony. And the ball itself, it seems, wasn't the meeting of high and low society it appeared. Actually it was just one more party for posh people.
 
 
Our Lady Has Left the Building
06:27 / 14.12.06
I finished The Shape of Things to Come by Greil Marcus a short time back. As an investigation of the American psyche it left me cold, probably as it did it through film and media I've not seen, like most of David Lynch's work, or stuff I don't like, like what little of Lynch's work I have seen.

I'm now on Counterfeit Worlds by Brian J. Robb, on the various films and TV shows based on Philip K. Dick's fiction. It's more the story how each of these films got made but I get the feeling Robb had no access to most people beyond what they said in old interviews so it's variable as to what insight he has on the changes that turned say We Can Remember it for You Wholesale into Total Recall. Depending on how much you care about PKD it's an interesting and undemanding read.

After that it'll be QI: The Book of General Ignorance by John Lloyd and John Mitchinson. It looks like a collection of rejected questions and answers from the TV show, issued to catch the Christmas market.
 
 
Paralis
22:42 / 21.12.06
I'm currently reading Daniel Handler's Adverbs, which, a quarter of the way through it, is a collection of briefly episodic love stories conceptualized by specific adverbs--Immediately, Obviously, Soundly and so on. David Eggers on the back writes that Handler's an American Nabokov, which makes me wince. Handler writes maybe the best teenager I've ever read, with sparkling wit and earnestness and inanity; it's a lot of fun even though it feels somewhat samey after his other two books, and even if his teenagers turn out to be adults and parents, too. But as much as I'm enjoying it, I feel cheated by the quotes on the back--Michael Chabon, who is (almost certainly) a far more insightful reader than I am, seems to enjoy this far more than I know how.

Before that was P.D. James' The Children of Men, on which the recent film was very loosely based. The novel's so different from the film that I'm curious about the production process, to see if they started with a completely independent script and either had long-since-acquired film rights or copyright issues that forced the patchy adaptation. I'm not sure how much I liked the book, although I like the film much less for it: James' novel is a depiction of dystopia writ very small, illustrating the pettiness of autocracy and rebellion in a world stripped of posterity.

Prior to that (this will get a bit listy, I'm afraid), Graham Greene's The End of the Affair. The intricacies of the plotting and the sparse beauty of the language are enough to overcome the fact that Greene seems to enjoy seeing even his lesser characters hurt and isolated (the most vivid example of this is, I think, in The Quiet American when the American journalist learns of his son's polio, and only has Fowler, who hates him, to confide in and to console him). But I'd have liked this a lot better if it were forty pages shorter; the ending as an answer to Bendrix's and Smythe's rationalism felt hollow and a bit silly.

Also in the mix were Milan Kundera's Immortality and Slowness. Written consecutively, they feel the most similar of Kundera's books, and both feature Kundera the narrator interacting with his characters. Slowness is a light work, the story of two seductions taking place in parallel at a chateau in Prague two centuries apart, comparing the slowness and indulgence of the eighteenth century with what Kundera depicts as the haste and desire for forgetfulness in the modern age.
 
 
Dutch
11:21 / 28.12.06
I'm re-reading "The name of the Rose" by Umberto Eco, and trying my best to get through Dostoewsky's Brothers Karamazov, not sure if I'll make it though.
 
  

Page: 1 ... 678910(11)

 
  
Add Your Reply