BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Recommended Read: The Traveller

 
 
solid~liquid onwards
20:01 / 17.12.05
"What lies ahead is already here"

Thoroughly enjoyable book. The book is filled with information about how we are watched and controled while giving some alternatives to the distraction of the vast machine/the grid. Lots of philosphical, Spiritual and political references. I cant really say much more wihout spoiling a romping read.
 
 
Alex's Grandma
23:21 / 17.12.05
Well it certainly sounds like the sort of thing I'd enjoy, sttab ( or should I say, "John Twelve Hawkes"!)

I'm currently working on a novel which is a bit like this, except it's more sort Valis meets The Beach meets The Filth meets The Stud meets the complete works of Ian Fleming and Franz Kafka, via Noam Chomsky, Chekov, and Danielle Steele.

I haven't finished it yet, though.

Well done though, for getting your book published, mate - I'm sure it's pretty good!
 
 
Digital Hermes
21:56 / 19.12.05
Has anyone actually read this? It could either be a counterculture wank trying to hit all of the buttons of rebellion, or an interesting allegory for the world we're in. Present-day cyberpunk romance-noir, or Portrait of a Mad, Mad World?

Someone who's actually picked this book up, please let us know.
 
 
Shrug
22:09 / 19.12.05
I haven't read it. But if you're interested there's a favourable review on the NyTimes Website It does contain spoilers however. (Probably nothing you wouldn't find on the back of the bookjacket or intuit yourself IMHO)

And remember Bugmenot is your friend
 
 
solid~liquid onwards
20:20 / 22.12.05
sounds more like you wrote the traveller mr john (Alex's UFO abduction incident) Twelve Hawks. Be curious to read your book when its finished.

My personal opinion is that it certainly not wank. I wish i had origionally described it as "an interesting allegory for the world we're in" But i have a feeble mastery of english. Just read the bloody book, its good, really.

It seems its being promoted by the same publishing house as the daVinci code and some reviews have called it the new DaVinci code. So read it before everyone else does so you can feel smug about it later. Mabye i did write this book *sttab ponders his faulty memory*
 
 
Digital Hermes
20:36 / 22.12.05
Could you compare writing styles at all, sttab? I mean, if we're referencing 1984, does he have that thick English description of Orwell? Or the noir sensibility of William Gibson? Maybe Neal Stephenson's vignette style? (From the Diamond Age, I haven't read his others yet.) Wordy or Sparse?

One of my big issues is reading a book where I enjoy the setting but can't stand the writing. Robert Jordan is an example of that. His characters are wooden, his plots are exercises in monotony, but the other aspect, the actual detailed world and history he's created, THAT's interesting. So I'm worried that though the author may be Off the Grid, he may also be Off his Aesthetic.

Not that that's the case. You sound like you enjoyed it, Sttab. Give me more! Pacing? Style? Dialogue? What stands out?
 
 
solid~liquid onwards
21:24 / 22.12.05
You want more? i'll give you more (*haven't written a book report since i was backin school*) Actually i dont think im capable/can be bothered to give you a fleshyer report.

It pushed quite a few of my buttons. It manages to convey a lot of information and big ideas in a fast paced manner without being too ponderous and losing itself up its own backside. It makes the philosphy f the book part of the action. I liked the way fact and fiction are mixed together such as the factual (probably debatable) methods of control. the organisation that weilds such powers is like a personified fictisous extension and source of oppression. Stability at the cost of civil liberty... But its a dark road to travell down (resists spoiler).The spiritual aspects of the book resonated with me in parts although partly fictisous for plot purposes there is enough truth there to make me think that mr John TH comprehends a bit more of everything than your average joe. some elements of the descriptions of Out of Body experiences coincide with some of my own experiences.

I dont think i can do much more of this without wadeing past my neck line in bullshit. Look what you made me do! are you happy!
 
 
Digital Hermes
14:12 / 23.12.05
Moo hoo ha ha ha

{pets cat in an evil-like fashion}
 
 
HCE
15:20 / 26.12.05
You lost me at da Vinci Code.
 
 
Shrug
16:59 / 26.12.05
You know that everything that's vaguely conspiracy theory-ish and pulpy will be compared to DaVinci Code for at least another few years though. The media spin is suitably Blair Witch/Lost-esque with a few fake websites spread across the internet and there is a certain level of intrigue to the identity of the off-the-grid author but yeah much trepidation for anything that seems so focused to profit off a niche already established by the likes of Dan Brown or even Anne Rice.
 
 
khephret
01:03 / 28.12.05
You know that everything that's vaguely conspiracy theory-ish and pulpy will be compared to DaVinci Code for at least another few years though.

It's too bad that The DaVinci Code has supplanted me old favorite, The Illuminatus Trilogy, as the 'conspiracy' referent of choice these days....

The media spin is suitably Blair Witch/Lost-esque with a few fake websites spread across the internet and there is a certain level of intrigue to the identity of the off-the-grid author but yeah much trepidation for anything that seems so focused to profit off a niche already established by the likes of Dan Brown or even Anne Rice.

media spin? fake websites? sounds like someone's been cribbing from Joseph Matheny and Ben Mack, if you ask me....
 
 
Logos
00:40 / 29.12.05
No, this actually feels like the DaVinci Code at the text level to the poit where I'm suspicious that maybe Dan Brown wrote this thing under a pen name.

It is narrated by the Prince of Exposition. All characters on a particular side share all of the narrator's beliefs about that side. Everyone knows everything, yet remains frustratingly stupid.

If you want a cleverly written novel of paranoia and conspiracy, or just a good read, choose something else.
 
 
Logos
00:46 / 29.12.05
Sorry kephret--that post wasn't meant to contradict you--rather it was a response to the posters above.

Also it was a rather nasty review of the book. urp.
 
 
Digital Hermes
19:39 / 12.07.06
I started reading this yesterday, as a passenger of a very long drive, and oy. I had such hopes.

The dialoge is wooden; and when emotional events occur, these cardboard-cool characters react with pop-up expressions that leave me uncaring.

The conspiracy-theory setting, mashed with occultism, only serves to distance me instead of engross. Twelve Hawk's attempt to trump all the other mythologies and big-brother conspiracies, rather than work with them, means that this book suffers from what many amateur fantasists suffer; the notion that if it's bigger and more complex, it must be better.

The notion of cool, or the attempted stab in that direction, permeates through the book. The 'shopping lists' of what each cool character is wearing/owning/packing in hidden comparments, often has nothing to do with the plot directly, and so these half-page derivations seem like glaring attempts to make these people 'cooler,' using the Matrix as it's starting place.

Someone else mentioned that Twelve Hawks was the prince of exposition. A well deserved title! Rather than telling me WHY Maya, our Hero Harlequin, carries a sword in whichever position and why it's hidden in whatever location, why not just have her USE it, and TAKE it, thereby showing us without hitting us over the head with how cool these people are.

As a last ranty bit, these characters are practically super-human at times, super-secret-ninja-spys, yet they're capable of being tricked, captured, killed, or converted whenever the plot demands.

These are a few of the points that had me smacking my forehead while reading this. Most of all was the fact that this was published.

(But maybe I'm being too harsh. Earlier that day I was reading Pynchon.)
 
 
DaveBCooper
09:45 / 24.11.06
Just finished this last night, and whilst it's pretty disposable fare, I didn't find it to be half as bad as the Da Vinci Code.
Not bad, not great, but I have my doubts about it being spun over three books. Though maybe that's the reason for the Matrix comparisons: a harmless enough idea stretched too far.
 
  
Add Your Reply