I suspect that to a certain point what we think of as the "third eye" is not perceiving additional bands of energy with our physical eyes, but rather perceiving these energies some other way, and then mapping it to the visual as a means to filter/accept/understand what we are receiving. In practice, it doesn't matter as its your belief that counts, but since I'm an incorragible theory bitch...
I think the difference is in how much we "preprocess" the data so far as deliniating between internal interpretation vs external reception. When the image is interpreted as valid visual data, such as we believe we are really seeing it with our eyes, it may be more "valid" of a reception of external energies. When we interpret it as a daydream overlay, it may be more from within than without. Or put another way, pure visual is less processed through our internal filters before being brought to our conscious awaress, whereas imagined images are more liekly filtered through our personal paradigms before we become aware of it.
So um, as a short answer, I think I agree with you, Will. |