BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Feature suggestion/request/volunteer - 'my posts'

 
 
JohnnyDark
10:08 / 12.11.05
Don't know if this is the right place to ask and I'm *very* unsure as to whether this sort of new-request thing is at all entertained on barbelith but here goes.

I think a massive addition to the interactivity of the board would be the addition of one simple feature - the ability to look at your own posting history and then hop over to that post and see what the reponses have been. Nothing more. Dead simple. The board otherwise has a very well judged set of interactive features - I don't *want* a profile, an avatar, mates and an RSS feed, but I do think this would be a hugely helpful addition.

Background: I've been piddling about on barbelith for a year or two (and even donated a little!). I think it's great but I don't post a lot. I'm an experienced web developer and I'd be happy to volunteer time to help with this though I realise B isn't open-source or whatever. I.e. I know this is a potentially expensive db hit each time someone logs in, altho for all I know, B is flat-file based.

Thoughts?
 
 
All Acting Regiment
08:41 / 13.11.05
I think the reason we don't have this is so that people are forced to look at more than just their own threads. On other message boards it becomes tempting to just read the threads you start, and obviously if you do that you're missing out on a lot and aren't really interacting with Barbelith as a community. That's not to say that everyone would do that- it's just a feature bearing that in mind.
 
 
w1rebaby
10:22 / 13.11.05
It's a long-running argument on Barbelith, though it usually concentrates around the idea of a "show new posts" button.

Personally I'm all for posting histories easily available for all members - click on a profile, see posts made by that person, which means not only can you see where you've posted yourself, but also if you like the cut of someone's gib you can check some of their other posts. Or if you don't and want to see whether they have a history of talking bollocks. Or just to get a sense of someone's posting activity, the sort of thing they tend to write about; this is information about somebody that you cannot practically get by going through every thread in every forum.

I have to say, though, Johnny, it's unlikely to happen even if everyone suddenly agrees about the need. It's been stated that there aren't going to be any board modifications in the near future and, well, I would imagine that anyone who doesn't actually know Tom and Cal personally isn't going to get access. I'm reasonably experienced with PHP and web tech myself and a few other people here are too, and people have proposed things, even gone into how they'd implement them, but there's not been any positive response. I've even thought about generating my own offline database of lith posts so that I could interrogate it myself but really, that just seems silly.

Google is often your friend here incidentally; "site:www.barbelith.com (username)" will get you a reasonably good list, particularly if you can vaguely remember what you were talking about and add a few new search terms, but it's not going to be up to date. Barbelith gets indexed quite well but not every five minutes.
 
 
JohnnyDark
21:04 / 13.11.05
Legba - good points.

fridgemagnet - I had picked up the idea that the board isn't really up for upgrades. On the subject of the searches, (and at the risk of sounding like a moaning b*stard) I think the indexing isn't great - am I right in thinking that the thread bodies themselves aren't indexed, only the abstracts and titles? And in the search results no date is shown for the thread or its last post...

Anyway, you're right about the google site: search - kicking myself for not thinking of it before. Good one.

Overall, I suppose I agree with the keep-it-simple philosophy on Barbelith. Great board.
 
 
w1rebaby
21:15 / 13.11.05
Yeah, it's only titles and abstracts. I wouldn't bother using the built-in search, to be honest. Google does a much better job.
 
  
Add Your Reply