BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Rosa Parks gets a state burial - but what about disenfranchised voters?

 
 
grim reader
02:18 / 01.11.05
The recent death of Rosa Parks, a figurehead of the American Civil Rights Movement, came as something of a surprise, not least because some of us didn't realise she was still about! Whilst learning history at school, many of us in the UK were inspired her act of defiance on that Alabama bus, where she faced arrest for refusing to give up her seat to a white man. Her death at 92 is a loss to the world, though one cannot help but feel joy at her longevity and the legacy she has left behind.

When President George W. Bush says of Parks that she is "one of the most inspiring women of the 20th century," who "transformed America for the better," I am in complete agreement with him. However, one cannot help but detect a note of hypocrisy in the US establishment falling over itself to make tributes to her. Let us recall, for a moment, the circumstances surrounding Bush's rise to office.

Many readers will be familiar with footage of the joint session of Congress and the Senate which was disseminated as part of Michael Moore's documentary, Fahrenheit 911. This is truly jaw-dropping footage, as we see member after member of the Congressional Black Caucus rise to voice objections to the blatent disenfranchisement of black voters during the 2001 US election. Ironically, it is election loser Al Gore who chairs the meeting, and who must repeatedly reject the petitions on the basis that not one senator has given his signature in support of the objections.

When Congresswoman Waters takes to the stand, she remarks "I do not care that it is not signed by a Member of the Senate," to which Gore replies, "The Chair will advise that the rules do care." The ripple of self-satisfied applause and laughter which travels through the ranks of the assembled white male senators speaks volumes about the state of American democracy. It is a humiliating put down of a black female politician who has the best interests of her constituents at heart. And, perhaps more importantly, it displays a callous lack of regard for the democratic rights of the black voters disenfranchised in that election.

Given these events, it is ironic, and one may say somewhat cynical, that the senate has authorised the burial of Rosa Parks' body at the US Capitol Rotunda, a tribute usually reserved for presidents, soldiers and politicians. Senator Harry Reid is quoted as saying "The movement that Rosa Parks helped launch changed not only our country, but the entire world, as her actions gave hope to every individual fighting for civil and human rights. We now can honor her in a way deserving of her contributions and legacy." Given such forthright support for Parks' movement, one wonders why Mr Reid did not give the congressmen and women the signature they needed at the joint session described above. We know he was there, because records show that he called the Senate to order at 11am on that same day.
 
 
Our Lady Has Left the Building
20:16 / 01.11.05
Well, I did know she was still alive, until very recently, albeit only because of that argument between her representatives and OutKast. But hypocrisy involving the recently dead is nothing new. Authority wants us to believe that we have achieved equality, the wars are over, when faced with still existing inequality they reassure us that those left behind deserve to be so, anyone without a job must be a malingering dole-scum who doesn't want to work, and all the psychological profiles in the world will not persuade David Blunkett otherwise.

However, I wish I'd held on to the library copy of that anti-Michael Moore book I read last month for a bit longer as it gave what sounded like a perfectly reasonable non-conspiracy theory explanation for the dropping of all those names from the voting lists.
 
 
grim reader
20:24 / 01.11.05
Miss Ashes (or is it Mrs?)

Thanks for the reply. One of the reasons i posted this here was i hoped someone could knock down parts of this piece, and help educate me on these matters a bit more. I would, therefore, be most interested in reading the Anti-MM book you mention. Please do post details of the book if you can find them.
 
 
w1rebaby
21:46 / 01.11.05
As far as I am concerned, the significant aspect to the celebrations of Rosa Parks that have been occurring recently and, for that matter, ever since her position was accepted, is the way she and the civil rights movement have been turned from radical protestors into people promoting stuff we already knew. I mean, hey, come on, who would ever have opposed those things? Well, the entire fucking government for a start, including people who are still in power.

Rosa Parks herself has been turned from a serious member of an organised protest and agitating movement into a tired black woman who just couldn't take it any more - causing the system to fall. It's a propagandistic re-interpretation of history that makes me very cross indeed. First of all it is immensely patronising - "it's their simple naive truth that made those protests by blacks (let alone black women) work" - when in fact the entire government was ranged against them and people had to (literally, in some cases) fight for the simplest position of equality. Rosa Parks going into court did not free anyone, it was that plus a huge organised activist struggle. The "rightness" of her position was not perceived without an enormous amount of effort on her part and the part of her fellow activists.

Secondly it seems designed specifically to deny the utility or relevance of any modern day activism. If you can remove activism from history, you can make it seem like anyone engaging in it today is an unjustified terrorist.
 
 
grim reader
06:57 / 02.11.05
thanks for the input, fridge magnet ... i think you and Ashes have both pin pointed what it is i dislike about the way in which they're playing politics with this lady's corpse.

Just to come back on Ashes' earlier comment regarding the book that gives a reasonable explanation for all those names being knocked off the voters register: i understand you're not necessarily arguing for that point yourself, Ashes, but if there was a reasonable explanation, wouldn't going ahead with an investigation have laid all the 'conspiracy theories', as you call them, to rest?

Also, i missed Ashes' 'conspiracy theory' comment on first reading, but now it sort of jumps out on me. Are you saying the issues raised in the original post are conspiracy theories, with all that that implies about paranoia and a lack of grip on reality? If so, please get back to me. I not, please clarify...that phrase is often used as something of a slur.
 
 
grant
17:32 / 02.11.05
We're flying flags at half-mast, and I like that.

I like that because it keeps the story alive, and maybe makes people think about how to do what Rosa Parks did today, and where it might need to be done.

I like it because she can't be ignored. They'll do their best to co-opt her (whoever they are), but they can't.
 
 
grim reader
19:06 / 02.11.05
sorry, what did she do today? she hasnt, like, returned from the dead and i've missed it, has she?
 
 
Slim
15:53 / 04.11.05
I was amused by a picture in the USAToday recently. It showed her casket in the rotunda with a number of individuals, mostly elected officials, encircling it. The first two rows of people were almost 100% white with a larger number of blacks standing behind them. Some things don't change.
 
 
Our Lady Has Left the Building
10:42 / 05.11.05
Calvin, The book I was thinking of was Michael Moore Is a Big Fat Stupid White Man by Hardy and Clark (Amazon UK, Amazon US) Hugely, HUGELY partisan, but interesting none the less. I'm not saying you are inventing conspiracy theories and are therefore a loony. Conspiracy theories can be valid, there is clearly a conspiracy theory here, because people have claimed that thousands of black people were denied the vote. The conspiracy theory states that this was done deliberately because they were bound to vote for Al Gore, presumably as a token of thanks for him inventing the Internet. Hardy and Clark, as part of their debunking of Moore's work up to Stupid White Men give a Republican explanation for how they lost their vote legitimately. Conspiracy theory solved? Tonight, You Decide!

I did enjoy The Daily Show showing people trying to desperately crowbar Rosa Parks into their speeches, no matter how grossly inappropriate it was.
 
 
w1rebaby
11:33 / 05.11.05
You really want to read Greg Palast on the Florida thing, given the enormous amount of investigation he did; The Best Democracy Money Can Buy has huge sections on it, as well as other topics. Michael Moore just isn't an investigative journalist.
 
  
Add Your Reply