|
|
With regards to the numbers theory, it does make sense in some twisted way. Take for example the year 1 physical development and correspond it to your teenage years, where it is all about physical development as well, being the changes that puberty bring about. Very often, it is the extent of these physical changes, your fellow teens' reaction to these changes in themselves and you, and your experience at the hands of said peers.
How often will a pattern of introversion be perpetuated throughout your life based on the teasing that you experienced as a teenager for developing too fast, not fast enough, to a greater or lesser degree or just differently?
I admit, this is a fairly narrow interpretation of the theory and that in all probability it cannot be seen as the blanket solution to all your problems, but it gives an interesting insight and potential avenue for exploration.
If the numbers theory pans out, isn't it possible to be able to anticipate the potential sphere of the pattern that needs to be dealt with, and in being forewarned, be prepared to deal with it? Her theory basically gives you an estimate of what opportunities exist to identify your destructive patterns, what to look out for and a potential avenue of self discovery in sorting them out.
Another thing about her theory is that patterns that are no longer needed, but are not dealt with, place additional strain on your body and emotions, which in turn can lead to aging. Her argument is that strictly speaking, we should be able to happily reach very old age, without suffering the disabilities that go with it, by handling the destructive patterns that we've picked up through our lives. If we don't handle them, by the time we reach 60, we're carrying around so much baggage, that we just can't deal with it anymore, hence the age related illnesses, like arthritis etc.
Being in my twenties, I'm wrestling with the usual questions of what do I want to do with my life, where do I see myself in a couple of years' time etc. All in the mental sphere, lending some validity to her theory.
So it makes for an interesting journey to say the least. Has it possibibly given you some insight? |
|
|