BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


A story for you to read

 
 
matthew.
04:18 / 22.10.05
Hyperparenting

  “We named him Stephen,” she says to the other mothers standing around the carriage on this beautiful summer day. “After the physicist Stephen Hawking,” she adds, making sure everyone in the park is aware of it.

  The baby coos a little, and Eva smiles, her heart flying around in her chest. She looks back up at the other mothers and says, “He’s a gifted baby. I know it.” Nobody says anything, so she says, “And to make him as healthy as possible, he’s a vegan. That means he won’t have any animal products whatsoever. He’ll be eating veggies and loving it. No meat for this baby.”

  “He’s so cute,” says one mom holding an unfortunately average baby.

  “Yeah,” says the chorus of moms.

  “Thank you,” Eva responds. She is proud of her Stephen. “Well, I have to get going. He has Spanish lessons in-” she examines her watch “-26 minutes. I have to pre-quiz him.” She begins pushing the ultra light super cool carriage away and the mothers resume chatting among themselves.

  Eva says to the baby, “One plus one is two. It’s very simple. One and two is three. One and three is four. You see?” The baby giggles. “Show mommy what one and one is? With your fingers!” The baby lifts up both hands and slaps them down on the plastic barrier holding him. “That’s okay,” says Eva. “I know you’re a little crampy. But just so you know, one and one is two. See?” She shows the peace sign to Stephen.

  Eva and Stephen reach the little house and Adam opens the door on cue. He ushers them into the safety of the house and he shuts the door behind them. He locks the two deadbolts and fixes the chain. He bends down slightly and says in voice devoid of baby-talk, “How’s my genius, today? What’s five and five, Stephen?”

  The baby slaps the plastic barrier.

  “Ten!” Adam squeals. “That’s right.” He stands up and examines the clock in the hallway. “23 minutes until Spanish. Do you want to pre-quiz him, or should I?”

  “I don’t think he’s interested in Spanish today. Do you want to pop in a ‘Genius Baby’ DVD?” Eva unlocks her child from the safety of the carriage and hoists him to her chest, where he starts pawing at nourishment.

  “Which one?” Adam asks from the DVD library in the Learning Room.

  While walking to the living room, Eva says, “The spelling one called ‘Baby Loves to S-P-E-L-L’. He hasn’t worked on his spelling in two days.”

  “Great choice,” Adam remarks, freeing the disc from its protective rounded shell and he penetrates the player with the disc. He straightens up and the doorbell rings. He stares at the red clock the shape of a planet in the Learning Room and announces that the Spanish tutor is early.

  “Can you get it?” Eva asks. She’s busy preparing a protein shake for Stephen, who sits on the floor playing an abacus.

  Adam unlocks the two deadbolts and unlatches the chain. He opens the door to find his mother, Ruth, carrying a fire engine and a plastic bag. She squeals a greeting at him and steps inside.

  “Yes?” Adam asks, still holding the door.

  “I thought I’d give you two the night off,” Ruth explains, taking off her shoes. “Go see a movie, grab a bite to eat. You guys haven’t left the baby alone since he was born. You kids deserve a night off.”

  “No thank you, Ruth,” Eva answers.

  Hearing the mother’s voice, Ruth walks past Adam and enters the living room, shrieking baby-talk at the poor infant.

  “We’re fine, Mom,” Adam answers, locking the two deadbolts and latching the chain. He peeks into the peephole to see if any weirdo is thinking of breaking in. Home invasions are very common nowadays, and Adam does not want somebody kidnapping Stephen.

  Leaving the hallway, Adam says, “Stephen is getting Spanish lessons in… 21 minutes. After that, he’s playing the piano with Eva for 20 minutes. We may squeeze in a little math later if we have time. Busy night, Mom.”

  In the kitchen, Ruth kneels, babbling to the baby. She drops her plastic bag on the floor and hands the toy she brought to the baby on the floor.

  Adam, standing over her sighs and says, “Mom, remember we talked about the baby-talk? It’s doesn’t nurture a healthy linguistic ability.”

  “Oh! It’s doesn’t hurt anybody.”

  “What?” Eva snaps. “What is that?”

  “A fire truck. For Stephen.”

  “He doesn’t need it.”

  “Oh. Ah…”

  “Thank you, though, Ruth. It just doesn’t have an educational value, does it?” Eva bends down and removes the unsafe toy from her son’s innocent clutches and places it on the counter, high above his reach. She also notices the plastic bag.

  “Ruth,” she groans. “We also have a no-plastic bag policy in this house. They’re not safe. What if he-”

  “It’s just a bag,” interjects Adam’s mother.

  “What if he puts it on his head and suffocates?” Eva continues.

  “I’m sure he won’t-“

  “Nonetheless, Ruth, please?”

  She sighs and picks up the bag. She tosses it onto the counter and it makes a large bang, which startles the previously calm baby and he screams in surprise. Eva groans in disgust at the intruding Ruth and picks up Stephen. While walking to the Learning Room, Eva says, “As well, we have a no loud noises policy, Ruth. It’s upsetting.”

  Once Eva is out of earshot, Ruth hisses at Adam, “What is going on here? No loud noises?”

  “Mom, she’s right. I want my child to be as happy as possible.”

  “I understand that, sweetie, but-“

  “And big bangs do nothing to nurture a healthy environment.”

  “A little scare never hurt anybody.”

  “Really? I think that was a big scare, Mom.”

  “Ugh. Fine.” Ruth follows the baby into the Learning Room, where Eva is breastfeeding. Stephen has headphones on, and Ruth can faintly hear classical music. Ruth crouches beside the young mother, apologizes quietly, and asks if Eva would like Ruth to baby-sit tonight.

  “No way. We have… 14 minutes until the Spanish tutor arrives, and I have done no pre-quizzing whatsoever.”

  Ruth stands up and turns to Adam. “Spanish?”

  “Young minds are like sponges, Mom. It’s best to teach them as much as possible while their minds are still absorbing.”

  “Shouldn’t you be teaching him English first?”

  “Yeah, he’s picking up on what we’re saying right now. He’s absorbing our language this second.”

  “No he’s not. He’s listening to Mozart.”

  “Schubert, actually,” Eva snaps.

  “Ugh,” Ruth replies. She shakes her head and says, “Okay, but after the Spanish lessons and the piano playing, don’t you guys want a night to yourself?”

  “Not really,” Eva quickly answers. “I have Stephen.”

  Without a word, Ruth turns back to her son, who offers no response.

  Eva says, “Anyway, Adam has to get to sleep early. He doesn’t get very much sleep on the couch, so the more hours….”

  “What?” Ruth exclaims. “You’re sleeping on the couch? What’s wrong with your bed?”

  “Well, where’s the baby going to sleep?” Adam asks.

  “Stephen sleeps in your bed?” Ruth asks. “What’s wrong with that new crib Harold and I got you?”

  “It’s unsafe. It could collapse at any second, burying my son under plastic,” Eva explains.

  “Ugh,” Ruth responds. She grabs Adam’s elbow and leads him out of the Learning Room. In the kitchen, she whispers, “You’re not sleeping in the same bed with your wife?”

  “No,” Adam says very slowly, because his mother is just not getting it. “No, where is Stephen going to sleep?”

  “In the crib that cost hundreds of dollars. Ugh.”

  Adam offers no explanation. He shrugs instead.

  Ruth whispers, “But when do you and Eva have… intimate time?”

  “Sex? We don’t need it. Stephen is more important than our sex life, Mom. Thanks for asking.” He chuckles to himself.

  “Ugh,” Ruth replies.

  “We don’t ask you to understand, Ruth,” says Eva. She is suddenly standing in the kitchen without Stephen. Ruth spins around and glares at her daughter-in-law. Eva continues, “We want our talented and special boy to be raised in the perfect environment. It’s that simple. We want to be the best parents possible.”

  “But, Eva, honey,” the elder woman says very patiently. “How do you know your child is gifted?”

  Eva gasps.

  Adam says very quickly, “We just know, Mom. He’s going to be a Nobel prize winner. We just know in our hearts.”

  “Listen,” Ruth says coldly, “every parent wants to think their kid is the smartest one on the block. But you have to face facts. Stephen is probably not as smart as his namesake. It’s-“

  “No,” Eva snaps. “He is a genius, Ruth. It’s plain to see. He will go on to great things. He won’t if you’re constantly giving him negative exposure-“

  “But that’s-“

  “No! The most positive environment is the most conducive for intellectual development!”

  “Stop quoting from parenting books, Eva!”

  “Mom!” Adam interjects helplessly.

  “Stop telling me how to raise my child!” The young mother is very distraught. She cannot believe that Ruth would have the audacity to say such things. She’ll never be as good as mother as Eva. It’s very simple.

  Ruth says, “Ugh” and walks away from this conversation.

  Adam merely stands there watching this train wreck.

  But Eva is not finished. She says to the grandmother, “And another thing, Ruth. The reason why we don’t have you baby-sit is because I don’t trust you. I’m-“

  “What?” Ruth shrieks.

  “-I’m fairly sure you’re going to feed my child things that are not on the diet. I’m constantly reminding you not to feed Stephen fries or ice cream or hamburgers and you’re always waving that stuff in front of his face. It’s not healthy food!”

  “Jesus Christ,” Ruth says.

  “Hey!” Eva shrieks. “Do not take the Lord’s name in vain!”

  “Ugh. Shut up, Eva. Nobody cares.”

  “I run a household built on faith and education, Ruth, and I would greatly appreciate it if you followed my rules, and that means following the Ten Commandments.”

  Ruth grins horribly. “Then that means you must honor thy mother and thy father.”

  “Mom!” Adam interjects helplessly.

  “I’m just trying to do the right thing and you’re harassing me about it!” cries Eva. “I want you out of here! The Spanish tutor is going to be here in… 9 minutes. Please leave.” She turns around and hugs Adam.

  Ruth says nothing for a moment. She’s thinking of mean and spiteful things to say to the young mother, but zero comes to mind. So she turns around and walks to the hallway where the locked door prevents her escape from this parenting nightmare. She can hear Eva cry in the kitchen and she feels guilty. She caused this debacle.

  She unlocks the door and steps outside. A lovely young woman steps to the door and says, “Hello,” with a slight accent. Ruth nods and marches past her. She looks to the sky and ponders the future of Stephen.

  Back in the house, the Spanish tutor is commencing the lessons. Eva drinks some soy milk in the kitchen. She can hear the lesson, but she’s not really paying all that much attention. She’s thinking about how hurtful and selfish Ruth is. She's thinking about how Stephen will show his grandmother that she was wrong. He’d better do so. Failure is not an option.
 
 
All Acting Regiment
11:19 / 24.10.05
Before we comment, could you give us a bit of background on it?
 
 
matthew.
14:02 / 24.10.05
Sure. I read this article in a magazine called Maclean's (in Canada) about hyperparenting, how this disease of accounting for every second of a child's time is becoming very widespread. I also saw a Dr. Phil segment on it, and that's when I realized it was ripe for satire. See this article for another look at this problem.

It seems very, uh, useless. My parents worked two jobs each when I was growing up, and I didn't see them that much. Now, as I'm older, I'm a relative success. Their parenting style was always laissez-faire. I never really had a curfew, and I wasn't grounded that much (although I did do bad things). I think this hyperparenting thing is just annoying. Parents are reading too much literature on parenting skills and they aren't developing their own independent style. They are also missing out on a huge, huge, huge hole in their idea of parenting: parents have been raising children for thousands of years, and with the expection of some bad apples, most people turn out all right, and that's without the "advantage" of having each second of their extra-curricular activities mapped out.
 
 
Sax
08:14 / 25.10.05
Uh, how old is this "baby" exactly? I couldn't gauge it from the story.
 
 
Ganesh
10:20 / 25.10.05
I'd suggest changing one of the parents' names. Seeing 'Adam' and 'Eva', I was already cringing slightly from an anticipated cheesy science-fiction/post-apocalypse style 'shock' ending...
 
 
All Acting Regiment
13:46 / 25.10.05
I hate to be boring but could you break it up into paragraphs? With breaks in between?
 
 
matthew.
14:12 / 25.10.05
Ganesh: which parent? I thought I was being funny when I named her "Eva" and not "Eve". I was kind of leaning towards an "Eva Braun" type of reference. So it's not subtle? You figured out the Adam and Eve thing? Because when I submitted this to writer's circle, they were completely oblivious. I mean, I don't think I'm being subtle here. I think I'm using a frigging anvil, and everybody else hasn't figured it out.

Legba: it is in paragraphs. Do you mean larger indentations? Or a whole line break between each paragraph?
 
 
All Acting Regiment
16:05 / 25.10.05
Well, yeah, a whole line break would make it easier to read. I know it doesn't look as proper but on here it seems to work better.
 
 
Ganesh
18:35 / 25.10.05
Either parent. It's just that having parents called Adam and Eve (and okay, it's 'Eva' but it's close enough) is a bit of a science-fiction cliche. I remember using it myself, in a horribly derivative end-of-the-world short story I wrote for my English O-Grade.
 
 
Sax
10:15 / 27.10.05
Did they walk into the atomic sunset, holding hands?
 
 
Sax
10:16 / 27.10.05
And Matt - I'm a bit confused that the baby is both breast-feeding and eating vegetables and protein shakes.
 
 
Ganesh
11:27 / 27.10.05
Did they walk into the atomic sunset, holding hands?

I suspect they did. Wearing ragged grey overcoats and lots of L'Oreal Studioline gel spiking up their hair, for this was the '80s and we children of the nuclear age had learned to love the bomb. Man.
 
 
matthew.
13:39 / 27.10.05
Uh... why do people think this is some apocalypse story? Is it entirely because of the Adam and Eve thing? Or is it because of something else?

It's just a quick little satire on crazy parenting skills. It's not ambiguous in the slightest. The parents are, in a word, stupid.

(I never thought about the protein shake/veggie/breast-feeding thing. Will edit in next draft. This being the second draft)
 
 
Char Aina
15:08 / 27.10.05
dude.
read ganesh'sposts.
start with the first one, the one when he mentioned his schooldays.
like, uh, budding writers might wanna cultivate their, uh, observational skills...um.
yeah.
 
 
Ganesh
16:09 / 27.10.05
Uh... why do people think this is some apocalypse story?

They don't. I was about my crappy apocalypse story of yesteryear. I mentioned this as an example of the way the names 'Adam' and 'Eve', used in a short story, are evocative of a particular kind of literary cliche.
 
 
All Acting Regiment
16:31 / 27.10.05
dude.
read ganesh'sposts.
start with the first one, the one when he mentioned his schooldays.
like, uh, budding writers might wanna cultivate their, uh, observational skills...um.
yeah.


Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm picking up a bit of unhelpful agression here. Not so much in what you say, because Ganesh makes a good point, but if you want to say that Matt could do with sharpening up his observational skills, it would be better to just say it instead of all this "dude" and "...um" business.

Personally, Matt, I can see where you're coming from with this piece but I think you're aiming your satire at the wrong people. We seem to be being encouraged to laugh at the parents here, but I actually feel sorry for them: they seem to have been taken in by a sort of product philosophy, and I feel they, as well as their child, are the victims here.

I think the satire would be more effective if you aimed it at the purveyors of "hyper-parenting" as opposed to the consumers/victims. Think about how the concept would be sold to people, the kind of adverts they'd use/already do use etc.

I assume that you don't have kids- as far as I know you're one of the younger 'lithers- as a younger person I feel you may be able to draw on more information about the media than about the family, yeah? I'm not saying you're incapable of writing domestic scenes, just that it might not be the best area to choose.

A small but important point: we could do with knowing exactly where the characters are at the start of the piece. I assume they're in a park but you don't say. I feel it would be better to describe the whole scene first.

I like how you have the Ruth character as an outsider looking in from the outside. I think perhaps if you set the story from her point of view, it might be easier to introduce the ideas in it: remember how in the Invisibles (chiz chiz moan drone) Jack's character fulfills the role of the reader, entering Bizarro world with "our" attitudes?

I think you could also do with looking at the use of present tense here. The thing with present tense is, I find it demands to be detailed, like the steady stream of information you generally get in a film: I think that perhaps you could try putting this peice in the past tense ("she did" as opposed to "she does"), and having a character narrate it- possibly Ruth. That might better serve your writing style which seems to focus on separate chunks of information.

Possibly you might want to try adding an older male sibling, modelled on yourself, to the family and using him as a narrator, talking about the way his parents are bringing up his brother. He could be in a bar, say, having a conversation: thus each little vignette would seem more natural.

So, to recap: I think you need to target the concept of "Hyper-parenting" as opposed to the victims. As well, think about how you could introduce the creepy overprotective family in a more subtle way- perhaps using Ruth as a reader substitute, or by highlighting first the normality of the other mothers before going on to point out the strangeness of Eva's behaviour.
 
 
Char Aina
16:56 / 27.10.05
i apologise if i have made you feel my comments were representative of aggression.
i was surprised at this interpretation when i read your post, and assure you it was not my intention to convey any aggression.
in fact, i was um-ing and the rest in an attempt to convey the exact opposite.
i was trying to express nervousness, a characteristic often displayed by those who wish to point out a flaw but feel bad for doing so.

i realise now that the style i chose to convey this atmosphere of 'nervous correction' is a bit ambiguous and open to misinterpretation, and apologise for any upset my part in your misunderstaning might have caused.
 
 
matthew.
16:58 / 27.10.05
toksik: you're right. my mistake. read everything too fast, didn't pay attention.

Legba:
The wheels in my head are turning. Great criticism, by the way. Thanks. This is the kind of stuff I need, to improve, as opposed to this awful writer's circle I attended a couple times, in which everybody wrote domestic squabble stories.

I'm seeing in my head this story, but with more influence from the media, like say that the parents quoted more Dr. Phil. Or even with the television blaring some sort of parenting nonsense. As I say, the wheels in my head are turning.

Also, I'm just a tad confused. You say my style seems to focus on separate chunks of information. Could you give me an example, so that I might try to either alleviate or improve?

On the whole, thanks for the advice. Greatly appreciated.
 
 
All Acting Regiment
01:41 / 28.10.05
Well, the first three paragraphs all deal with a different element of the tuition the child goes through. Sort of like:

Para 1: Steven name stuff

Para 2: Vegan stuff

Para 3: Spanish lessons stuff

See, there is a lot of material to be got out of each of those, but it's squeezed into a leetle paragraph each: it's kind of like large lumps of meat with little in between as opposed to a soup.

This sort of thing is really hard to explain. It's just the fact that she mentions each of those in swift succession seems unrealistic- I know you're interested in hyper-real dialogue, and this is a satirical comedy etc- but whereas I can imagine someone saying after the event, "Yeah, it was bizarre, she called the kid steven after the proffessor, she gave him spanish lessons, she made him eat vegan", I can't imagine a person relating all that information at once, it seems unnatural somehow.
 
 
All Acting Regiment
01:43 / 28.10.05
I can't imagine a person relating all that information at once at the time, I should add.
 
 
matthew.
03:04 / 28.10.05
toksik: For some reason, my computer did not display your apology... so when I posted my apology, I didn't know you already had.... so whatever. No harm done.

Legba: So if I decompressed the information, this would be better? So, for example, if one of the other mothers asks a question, say like this:

“We named him Stephen,” she says to the other mothers standing around the carriage on this beautiful summer day. “After the physicist Stephen Hawking,” she adds, making sure everyone in the park is aware of it.

"Ooh," says one mother.

The baby coos a little, and Eva smiles, her heart flying around in her chest. She looks back up at the other mothers and says, “He’s a gifted baby. I know it.”

Another mother quietly says, "Is he going to get shots?"

Eva glares at the woman and says, “No. Inoculation’s very dangerous. I want him as healthy as possible, and that means vegan. He won’t have any animal products whatsoever. He’ll be eating veggies and loving it. No meat for this baby.”


Or is this even worse? *shrugs*
 
 
All Acting Regiment
00:09 / 29.10.05
I'd say that's a lot better. There's a reason now for her to be outputting all the information (because she's been asked).

As a young/less experienced writer, and as a writer generally when starting a new project, it can be tempting to rush and splash down all the most major ideas at once, and *sex education video voiceover* it's totally natural and nothing to be ashamed of. The problem is that each piece has it's own pace or paces, and the inofrmation download can disrupt this. You (generally, I'm not pointing Matt out in particular) need to go back and fill in just the right amount of in between stuff to make the piece work.
 
 
matthew.
04:38 / 29.10.05
Slow down my meme output, essentially, according to the pace of the piece. Awesome. Thank you.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
22:30 / 30.10.05
Might be worth dropping the Christianity - it doesn't seem to make a huge amount of sense in the context of middle-class overparenting, and it's another overlay. Also, the presence of Ruth could probably do with being firmed up a bit - she spends a lot of time listening to something the reader is intended to find ridiculous or grotesque, and then saying "Ugh." Also, the last three paragraphs I think need a rewelding - have a think about what your payoff is to be, maybe?
 
 
matthew.
02:32 / 01.11.05
Might be worth dropping the Christianity

Do you mean the Adam and Eve aspect?

What if I changed the names, but made the Christianity more obvious? Would that be better? Or worse?
 
 
Sax
11:45 / 01.11.05
Not sure, really. I think it would be better to either have the parents heavily Christian OR into uber-modern parenting techniques... I don't necessary conflate the two. In fact, I think they're somewhat at odds.

Also, can Ruth say "Ugh" a bit less often?
 
 
All Acting Regiment
12:17 / 01.11.05
I'm not stereotyping all christians by any means, but I certainly think christianity, like all religions, could potentially lead to some strange and unpleasant parenting. However, the particular flavour would be very different to this "Hyperparenting"- quite possibly involving isolated communities in the mountains etc. As has been said, it's basically two different worlds.
 
 
quixote
17:30 / 07.11.05
I'd second some of the comments above. Ruth says "ugh" too often, and sometimes it makes no sense. That's an expression of disgust, but she seems to say it for everything. Also, the Christian business didn't work. Another overlay, as somebody said, and it's just laying it on too thick.

Overall, I'd say the beginning is stronger than the end, pssibly because that's before the points have been belabored. Somewhere about the middle, I found myself saying, "So, what *happens*?" I'd like to see the baby, in his essential baby-ness, effortlessly making a fool of his parents in front of grandma. Grownups being the way they are, nobody would learn anything, but the baby would figure out how to make engine noises and scoot the truck along the floor....
 
  
Add Your Reply