|
|
I always found it very amusing that despite the fact that I was forbidden toy guns while living on an RAF base guarded by men with, er, guns, and devoted to, you know, raining death from above and all that. Not that that stopped me: I remember many happy hours spent with a hairdryer that I'd modified after it had been thrown away. And I agree with cube that any of the games in which guns were involved were all fairly innocuous in that they tended to be sci-fi- or Ian Fleming-inspired, albeit with a little more technical detail due to the fact that we were all Forces children.
However it is interesting to note that I discovered a friend of mine* had suffered some fairly horrific bullying while in a school cadet force, which would feed into the idea of specifically militaristic "role playing" being harmful. This being in a school where the cadets were allowed to wear their military uniforms in lessons on days when they practised, and also to carry (I don't know the term, but held at the hip and pointing forwards rather than shouldered) guns from the armoury to the rifle range in formation, a route which took them through several busy areas. My point being that children's play is fairly violent in tone regardless of the actual /content/, but it seems that more realistic additions might be genuinely harmful, in promoting a sense of power and superiority over others, perhaps? Oddly, I can't conceive of giving any hypothetical child of mine a toy gun (waterpistols aside), but that's more because I think that directly representational toys stunt the imagination. As wanky as that might sound.
*Actually not me, despite the convention. |
|
|