BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Webcomics and all that goes with them

 
 
Jack Vincennes
10:27 / 07.09.05
There have been a couple of threads about webcomics here, and a few thread on the general greatness of Achewood in the conversation, but since I'm interested in a specific aspect of this I thought it'd probably fit better here...

Basically, I'm interested what people think of all the subsidiary 'products' of Achewood and, to a lesser extent, Wigu -in the former, one of the characters has an advice column, he and nine others have blogs -as does the comic's author (in which he talks about his life with the characters...) Wigu is a comic in its own right, but the author also has a blog comic, Overcompensating, which occasionally crosses over into Wigu, so to get the full plot you need to read them both.

Anyway, I never really minded this when I was a student and had time to check all of the above, but now that I'm not and don't I feel like I'm missing out slightly on some things in the comics -the achewood blogs are mostly, but not totally, self-contained. So what do you think? Should a comic be able to stand alone, or do all of these different aspects actually make reading 'around' the main strip better? (and, incidentally, has anyone read the achewood strips on Serialiser? as they're another aspect of the comic, but one you have to pay for.)
 
 
sleazenation
15:07 / 07.09.05
It's an ongoing balencing act I think, comparable to the the problem of having 'families' of titles in more the world of print publishing (and particularly comics).

Tie-in content is meant to bring added value to the main content (and, more often than not, an added imperative to buy more product) - but makes those ties too strong and you run the risk of alienating selective/casual readers...

I guess in terms of webcomics, it is also about the expectations placed on the readership, an area I'm not all that familiar with because I don't read any webcomics on a regular basis.
 
 
iamus
19:47 / 08.07.08
Kate Beaton is magnificent. I honestly think she may be one of the most natrually gifted cartoonists I've seen in a long while.

As far as I can tell, all her output looks knocked out in three minutes with a biro on a napkin, but by god if she doesn't continually nail composition, body language and expression with just a couple of scratchy lines. She could spend longer, cleaning it up and thickening it out, but there's really no need. All you need is right there and, from what I've seen, it kind of suffers a bit when coloured (by other fans) taking away the clarity and humour.

She's got a great way with dialogue and pacing, arriving often on punchlines that are total non-sequiturs, but punctuate things perfectly and, when combined with the art, leave me in fits of giggles.

She's got a couple of different schticks. Her history comics are definitely up there, as are her conversations with her younger self.

Cannae say enough good things about her work. Go to the site and have a good poke round.
 
 
iamus
20:41 / 08.07.08
Oop, wrong thread perhaps.


Curse you, search function!

Curse you, apathetic literacy!
 
 
Axolotl
07:13 / 09.07.08
Well maybe, but I thought I'd drop in and agree about the amazingness of Kate Beaton's work. I'm a big fan of her conversations with a younger self, and the one's she did about her family over Christmas were great as well.
 
 
Automatic
08:16 / 09.07.08
Well, personally Achewood stands head and shoulder over every other serial webcomic for me. It constantly amazes me how recognisable and distinct each character's voice is. The stories range from surreal trips to the afterlife, to intensely personal character drama. Chris Onstad is a fantastically gifted writer who's getting more and more mainstream accolades these days. Achewood was Number 1 in Time Magazine's list of the best graphic novels of 2007 and long may it continue to be published.
 
  
Add Your Reply