BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


California legislature votes in favor of gay marriage bill

 
 
diz
09:30 / 07.09.05
Story here, and probably elsewhere.

This is probably the most unwelcome news of the past few months for Governor Schwarzenegger. He's previously made noises in the direction of being OK with gay marriage, but his approval ratings are crap right now, and I don't know which way he's going to see this as far as changing those numbers. Prop 22's smashing success five years ago would seem to indicate that public sentiment favors a veto, but a lot's changed in the last five years on that front, especially in California with the whole Gavin Newsom thing, and he could sign the bill in a mid to win over moderates who have supported him in the past largely because of his more liberal positions on social issues.

If it does pass, then we get to add California to Massachusetts for a probable court battle over the full faith and credit clause of the Constitution. Also, the Christian right will turn on him like a pack of dogs, and considering his stature within the party, and the weakened position of the President right now, that could be the spark that ignites a full-scale battle over the future of the Republican party as a whole.
 
 
FinderWolf
16:36 / 07.09.05
Good. And I bet Ah-nold won't try hard to negate this; he's basically said he's ok with gay marriage but thinks that legally it's an issue for the voters and the courts.
 
 
*
19:22 / 07.09.05
Rumor has it he's going to veto, but I think he's getting rather a lot of calls discouraging such action.
 
 
alejandrodelloco
19:30 / 07.09.05
If this goes, I really wanna see Republicans suddenly have to take sides. Schism in time for the 2006 election = a Good Thing.
 
 
FinderWolf
13:00 / 08.09.05
Wrong I am, he just vetoed it, along with saying 'well, I don't really think gay people should be discriminated against,' and some other such backpedaling. He says his veto is 'out of respect for the will of the people' or some such nonsense.
 
 
Mr Tricks
21:21 / 12.09.05
yeah, a year or so back there was a "movement" to have marrage "defined" as "between a Man & a Woman" here in California. California allows prettymuch anyone to place anything on the next election ballot if said person can get enough registered voters to sign a petition stating they'd like the opportunity to vote on it. Come the election that ballot measure won by a very narrow margin. So when Arnald the Barbarian says he's vetoing that bill out of respect for the voters, he's refering to those who voted for that Ballot measure... probably the only people left to fill the 30% approval rating.
 
 
*
21:31 / 12.09.05
Five, I heard. He based that decision on a referendum which was actually about honoring other states' gay marriages, which took place five years ago.
 
 
Mr Tricks
21:43 / 12.09.05
Ment to type "a few years ago" but there you go...
 
 
*
00:56 / 13.09.05
Yeah. Sorry. The emphasis was just so as to point out that the referendum was not just irrelevant, but out of date.
 
 
Mr Tricks
16:03 / 13.09.05
Not sure what you mean by "out of date." As far as I know there's no Sell by dates for these things. "Out of step with the times" or "behind the times" I'd certainly agree with.
 
 
*
17:56 / 13.09.05
To the extent that he was using the referendum to reflect the will of the people of CA now, and it does not reflect the will of the people of CA now, if indeed it ever did, it seems outdated to me.
 
 
Mourne Kransky
18:05 / 13.09.05
I think the gayers should all just move somewhere else. It has worked for Kevin Spacey.
 
 
Ganesh
19:38 / 13.09.05
In that same vein, what about the real issue: video games censorship?
 
  
Add Your Reply