|
|
It's not just about prayer, Grant. The West Bank provides a defensive riverbank position with Jordan which would be lost as a border if the occupied territories were abandoned. Jerusalem is another issue again - the PLO claims East Jerusalem as the favourewd site for a Palestinian capital, and the Palestinian Authority treats Jerusalem (in its entirety) as the capital of Palestine, whereas the Jerusalem law of 1980 declared Jerusalem (also in its entirety) as the capital of Israel - a claim identified by the UN as illegal, creating a slightly awkward situation.
If it was just a question of access to holy sites, it wouldn't be much of an issue - all religions have access to their holy sites, pretty much, under Israeli control. the problem is the Palestinian inhabitants of East (or eastern) Jerusalem, while permitted too move freely inside Israel, lose this right if they move out of Jerusalem into the West Bank. In effect, they're stuck. Jordan has abandoned its claim to the West Bank and East Jerusalem, so that's not a huge issue, so the only other option apart from Israeli control of the holy sites is Palestinian control. Sharon is simply not going to go for that, IMHO, but a hypothetical partition would require strong controls on access too the holy sites anyway, which it would not be in the interests of the Palestinians to mess with.
Academic question, however. |
|
|