BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Medium

 
 
■
05:45 / 16.08.05
The BBC will soon be showing a new series in which PAatrica Arquette plays a mother of three who solves murders by talking to the dead. I'be just seen the first episode and found it both interesting (quite well made, fairly involving) and slightly worrying (is it pushing a wider Christian agenda?).
I was wondering how it had gone down in the States, and whether it develops into something that pits a heroic believer against a secular world or if it just takes the premise as a given and runs with it to create an entertaining show. Anyone ever watched it?
 
 
Dxncxn
07:29 / 16.08.05
I haven't seen it, but I certainly intend to watch at least the first few - despite the fact that the premise doesn't sound all that promising - because it's created & run by Glenn Gordon Caron, the man behind Moonlighting.
 
 
doglikesparky
08:23 / 16.08.05
Yeah, I've seen it and it's exceedingly, er, average.
The show quickly becomes a very forumulaic murder mystery of the week. I don't think it's (deliberately, at least) pushing a Christian agenda, rather just trying to be entertaining. Sadly though, for the most part it's rather dull and doesn't really do much we haven't seen before.
That said, it's never terrible and I did find myself coming back to it each week if only for the relationship between Patricia Arquette and her husband (played by David Weber whom I remembered from American Gothic) which I found to be a really nice mundane contrast to the pschic 'excitement' of every episode.
 
 
■
12:20 / 16.08.05
Good to know I won't have to dislike it for that. I think you're right about the family interaction stuff. It all looks so normal compared to the histrionics we normally get. There's a bit in the first episode where she says something like "You think I should go away and read other people's minds" in an argument to hubby, and he replies "Actually, that's a good idea". In any other show that would be a cue for a big bust-up where one of them heads for the hills, but no, he's understanding and thinks she has just had a great idea. I liked that.
 
 
■
15:18 / 16.08.05
I have just realised what a hopelessly lame post that was. I shall kill myself now.
 
 
D Terminator XXXIII
22:45 / 20.02.07
Been meaning to post summink about this show that I find compulsively watchable. I follow it through two-three different networks so I flit through episodes from seasons 1 and 2 in a non-linear way, and... It doesn't hurt it the slightest which, to me, is a good compliment. The emphasis on Medium is the believability of character in a very 70s movies way, you know, those kind of movies some critics pine for when the artificiality and committee-style filmmaking of today gets to them, so it's not like missing an episode of Lost or Prison Break, whose propulsive qualities (or, frustratingly, occasionally, non- in the case of the former) are due to plot machinations and as a result are kind of hollow entertainments if one scratches beneath the surface of their casts characters. Medium's not *deeper*, per se, but it operates on a different wavelength much like Allison herself, played fiercely by Arquette, a deeply flawed and determined character trying to do good to the signals fluctuating around her, while also dealing with her responsibilites to her family. I was initially on the fence re: the concept but that quickly dissipated because it's so lowkey - as compared to, say, that dreadful Love-Hewitt headliner - and that each episode is a selfcontainer, which builds subtly upon the previous, and most of them satisfyingly excellent.

Anybody else follow this?
 
  
Add Your Reply