|
|
It would be nice if this guy were perfect and lost weight in a way that didn't cause any strain on his family, but if we're going to ask him to be different than he is, why don't we just ask him to not have gained weight in the first place. Being fat's not a moral failing, and neither is not having the willpower and discipline to sustain a gym regimen.
Yeah, but what is a failing - maybe not a moral one, but one of intellect and imagination - is saying publicly "The only way I can lose weight is to by making a huge fucking deal of it, putting my family's financial well-being at risk, getting myself on TV and radio, and this makes my achievement comparable with the builders of the pyramids and the first astronauts to walk on the moon." Um, no. It makes your achievement comparable with the "Weight Loser of the Week" in my women's weekly magazines, but with a lot more pointless waste of time, effort and money, all while trumpeting what a splendid anti-consumerist rebel you are (I feel as though I am being taken advantage of by companies and people that want fat people to buy their latest "miracle pill" or prepackaged food that will help me lose the weight... We, as a society, are growing larger and have become a big market for high dollar fast fixes.)
Incidentally, within the first two weeks he went from not being able to walk "from one side of the store to another" to being able to walk ten miles. Maybe it was only the prospect of walking all the way across America that motivated him to be able to do it, but that's a fair bit of discipline and motivation right there.
(If I sound snippy, btw, it's because I kind of resent the implication that I came within a million miles of saying that being fat was a moral failing.) |
|
|