|
|
This is an odd question for me, or perhaps just an odd moment for me to come across this question.
For me, right now, it would be more to the point to ask what advice my just-beginning self could give to the me that's now. (This is slightly off... It's not really the very-just-beginning self that could tell me things, so much as the practicing-for-maybe-two-years self).
That's not to say that I haven't learned a lot in the time since then. I think I probably have a broader idea now of what magic is to me and how to use it/how it affects me. On the other hand, I think I might have had a better idea then of where the underlying magic around me is. I have relearned/am relearning that, but I knew it then.
I'm just astounded lately when I read things from that time in my life, from my first couple of years with a real awareness of magic, rediscovering that I knew things then I'm only just relearning now, things I've forgotten to know for a while. And that me knew how to have patience with the learning, which is something else I'm having to find again. A lot of that likely has much to do with the fact that for a good three years (part of the time since then) I pushed magic out of my life good and hard, at least on the surface. Tried, anyway. Then again, that might've caused me to forget some things, but I think it's part of where the knowledge I have now (as said, the broader idea of what magic is) comes from.
Other people have said brilliant things about what they would tell their younger self, though, particularly those things (and there are many) that have to do with letting go.
As far as the books are concerned, silly as they may have been, I think it was good for me to read some of them first, try to learn from them, believe in them perhaps for a bit, so that later I could disregard most of that and follow myself in a different direction. Similar to what people say about learning to follow the rules before breaking them (please no one respond thinking I'm actually saying that those books present 'the rules,' I'm not I'm not, it's just a rather poor analogy). |
|
|