BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


High calcium intake accelerates aging of your bones

 
 
ReformedRobotMan
18:00 / 02.07.05
Yes, my multi-personality disorder is reasonably under control, thank you for asking.
A few years ago i posted the rudimental version of this theory on Barbelith (does anyone remember?) and The Guardian. Here's the version that will soon be published in Medical hypotheses (i left out the acknowledgments and the references, which you can find here). What do you think?

Lifetime high calcium intake increases osteoporotic fracture risk in old age



ABSTRACT

Caloric restriction prolongs life span. Calcium restriction may preserve bone health.
In osteoporosis, bone mineral density (BMD) has significantly decreased, due to a lack of osteoblast bone formation. Traditional osteoporosis prevention is aimed at maximizing BMD, but the lifetime effects of continuously maintaining a high BMD on eventual bone health in old age, have not been studied. Strikingly, in countries with a high mean BMD, fracture rates in the elderly are significantly higher than in countries with a low mean BMD. Studies show that this is not based on genetic differences. Also, in primary hyperparathyroidism, on the brink of osteoporosis, BMD levels may be significantly higher than normal.
Maybe, BMD does not represent long term bone health, but merely momentary bone strength. And maybe, maintaining a high BMD might actually wear out bone health.
Since osteoporosis particularly occurs in the elderly, and because in osteoporotic bone less osteoblasts are available, the underlying process may have to do with ageing of osteoblastic cells.
In healthy subjects, osteoblastic bone cells respond to the influx of calcium by composing a matrix upon which calcium precipitates. In the process of creating this matrix, 50 to 70% of the involved osteoblasts die. The greater the influx of calcium, the greater osteoblast activity, and the greater osteoblast apoptosis rate. An increased osteoblast apoptosis rate leads to a decrease in the age-related osteoblast replicative capacity (ARORC). In comparison to healthy bone, in osteoporotic bone the decrease in the replicative capacity of osteoblastic cells is greater. Due to the eventual resulting lack of osteoblast activity, micro-fractures cannot be repaired. Continuously maintaining a high BMD comes with continuously high bone remodeling rates, which regionally exhaust the ARORC, eventually leading to irreparable microfractures.
Regarding long time influences on bone health, adequate estrogen levels are known to be protective against osteoporosis. This is generally attributed to its inhibiting influence on osteoclast activity. Instead, its net effects on osteoblast metabolism may be the key to osteoporosis prevention. Adequate estrogen levels inhibit osteoblast activity, calcium apposition and osteoblast apoptosis rate, preserving the ARORC.
Conclusion: Regarding osteoporosis prevention, ARORC better than BMD represents bone health. Regarding ARORC, adequate estrogen levels are protective, opposing the similar effects of hyperparathyroidism and a high calcium diet.
Tests need to be performed in mice to assess the lifetime effects of a high versus a low calcium diet, on eventual bone fracture toughness.



INTRODUCTION

Osteoporosis represents a major public health problem. Efforts to prevent osteoporosis have not been successful, which is demonstrated by increased incidence of age-adjusted osteoporotic fractures. For decades, prevention of osteoporosis has been aimed at increasing peak bone mass, but in countries with a high mean bone mineral density (BMD), osteoporosis incidence is high as well.
In Europe, BMD of healthy female adults in Poland are lower than those in French, Italian and Spanish populations (1); and the age-adjusted incidence of hip fractures is lower as well (2). In Sweden the mean BMD is higher (3), and so is hip fracture incidence (2).
Japanese subjects have lower peak bone mass than their European counterparts and also hip fracture incidence is lower in Japan than in the West (4). This lower BMD is not due to genetic differences; U.S.-born Japanese-American women have BMD values equivalent to those of white normals (5).
Women in China have lower BMD and much lower risk of hip fracture than women in Europe or North America (6). This lower BMD is not due to genetic differences; Chinese premenopausal women who immigrated to Denmark more than 12 years ago have a similar BMD to that of Danish premenopausal women (7).
In Gambia, calcium intake, mean BMD and osteoporosis incidence are all very low (8). Again, this has no genetic cause. There are no significant differences in BMD in Gambian and Caucasian adults living in the UK (9).

Might maintaining a low BMD preserve long-term bone health?
Maybe, BMD does not represent long term bone health, but merely momentary bone strength. And maybe, maintaining a high BMD might actually wear out bone health, eventually causing poor bone strength; in as much as constantly speeding will cause your car to break down sooner.



HYPOTHESIS:
OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURES RESULT OF EXHAUSTED AGE-RELATED OSTEOBLAST REPLICATIVE CAPACITY (ARORC)


Caloric restriction elongates life span (10)(11)(12)(13) by retarding age-related physiological and biochemical changes (14)(15)(16). Calcium restriction may preserve bone-health by retarding the decrease in the age-related osteoblast capacity to form new bone.

The short-term effects of a high calcium intake have been well established. In our bones, osteoblasts create the matrix upon which calcium precipitates. A high calcium intake leads to an increased activity of osteoblasts and increased bone formation rates, which, depending on bone resorption rates, may increase BMD, and thus create stronger bones.
In maintaining a higher BMD, both bone formation and bone resorption are increased. Unfortunately, 50 to 70% of the composing osteoblasts die in the composition of new matrix (17), and osteoblasts have a limited proliferative capacity (18)(19)(20). Increased osteoblast activity and cell differentiation coincide with increased osteoblast apoptosis rate (21)(22), which is specific for the proliferating zone (21)(23)(24). Increased osteoblast apoptosis rates accelerate the decrease in the age-related osteoblast replicative capacity (ARORC).
Osteoblasts from osteoporotic bone have a severely reduced replicative capacity (25)(26). Therefore, in osteoporotic bone, less osteoblasts are available (27)(28)(29) and/or osteoblast activity is impaired (28)(29)(30)(31)(32), as in ‘exaggeratedly aged’ bones (25)(33). Due to this lack of osteoblast activity, less pre-calcified matrix is available (34) and micro-fractures cannot be repaired (35).
In osteoporotic patients, there is no occurrence of a generalized premature cellular aging (36). Instead, the decrease in osteoblast activity is regional (27)(28), indicating external factors, such as the regional over-use of osteoblasts.



SIMILAR TO A HIGH-CALCIUM DIET, INADEQUATE ESTROGEN LEVELS STIMULATE OSTEOBLAST ACTIVITY AND INCREASE OSTEOBLAST APOPTOSIS

It has been well-established that optimum estrogen levels are protective against osteoporosis. This is generally attributed to predominant inhibitory effects on bone resorption, but the influence of adequate estrogen levels on osteoblast metabolism may be key to understanding the etiology of osteoporosis.
It has often been claimed that estrogen stimulates osteoblast activity, but these findings may have been the result of the previous use of inadequate methods. After verification and characterization of the reported anabolic effects of estrogen on bone formation in growing rats, the compiled data consistently demonstrated that estrogen inhibits bone formation (37).
Other studies reported anabolic effects in the first six days of estrogen administration (38) or when added intermittently (39).
On the longer haul, estrogen does not stimulate, but suppresses osteoblastogenesis (40), attenuating osteoblast birth rate (41)(42), inhibits human osteoblast cell proliferation, differentiation and activity (43)(44)(45)(46), bone formation, (47)(48)(49) and prevents osteoblast cell death (42)(50)(51), thereby increasing osteoblast lifespan (40)(42)(52). Partly, estrogen may inhibit osteoblast activity by modifying the effects of parathyroid hormone (PTH) (53).
More importantly, as osteoporosis is particularly prevalent in postmenopausal women, estrogen deficiency is responsible for increased osteoblastogenesis (54), increases the number of osteoblasts (55) and osteoblast activity (56), accelerating bone formation (49)(54)(57)(58)(59)(60)(61) (and predominantly bone resorption), increasing osteoblast apoptosis rate (62), shortening the lifespan of osteoblasts (63)(64).
Regarding understanding the etiology of osteoporosis, the net effects of estrogen on BMD are not the issue, because BMD only represents momentary bone strength. Instead, the net effects of adequate and inadequate estrogen levels on osteoblast activity, apoptosis rate and the ARORC are essential, explaining the possible detrimental effects of a high calcium diet on eventual bone health.



EFFECTS HYPERPARATHYROIDISM ON ARORC SIMILAR TO EFFECTS OF HIGH CALCIUM INTAKE

Opposed to and inhibited by adequate estrogen levels, prolonged hyperparathyroidism (HPTH) is a well-known cause of osteoporosis, which is often attributed to its stimulating effects on bone resorption. Osteoblasts, however, are the main target cells for parathyroid hormone (PTH) (65). Intermittent and continuous PTH have similar effects on the number of osteoblasts and bone-forming activity. (66) PTH stimulates osteoblast proliferation (67)(68)(69)(70)(71), enhances osteoblast differentiation (70)(72)(73), increases osteoblast number and mineral apposition rate (74)(75), stimulating bone formation (76)(77)(78). PTH supplementation may induce a net gain of bone mass (79)(23)(80)(81)(82), similar to the effects of a high calcium diet.
In HPTH, bone formation (and resorption) rate is markedly elevated (83) and increases in formative and resorptive markers seem to be of equivalent size (84). Therefore, In HPTH, BMD values widely differ (85), depending on the regional balances between increased osteoblast and osteoclast activity. Some BMD values may be significantly higher than in controls (86). The resulting BMD values, however, are not the issue, because they only reflect momentary bone strength. The issue is long term bone health, which is compromised by increased osteoblast apoptosis rates.
PTH-induced osteoblast apoptosis is specific for the proliferating zone (23)(24), indicating that the effects of PTH on apoptosis can only be explained on the basis of its anabolic effect on osteoblast proliferation, similar to the effects of a high calcium diet.
HPTH eventually leads to exhaustion of the ARORC, causing osteoporosis. HPTH enhances fracture risk (87)(88)(89).
Regardless of the net effects on BMD, estrogen inhibits, and a high calcium diet and HPTH increase bone turnover. Regarding ARORC, estrogen is therefore protective, opposing the effects of HPTH and a high calcium diet.



CALCITRIOL MAY BE PREVENTIVE REGARDING OSTEOPOROSIS DUE TO ITS PTH-INHIBITING EFFECTS

The protective or opposite effects of 1,25 dihydroxycholecalciferol (Calcitriol) on the ARORC depend on coexisting PTH levels. Similar to PTH, but to a lesser extent, Calcitriol directly stimulates osteoblast differentiation and activity, increasing osteoblast apoptosis (22), accelerating the decrease in the ARORC. Indirectly, however, Calcitriol may be protective due to its inhibitory effects on PTH levels, net downregulating both osteoclast and osteoblast activity (90), which attenuates the decrease in the ARORC.



GLUCOCORTICOIDS CAUSE OSTEOPOROSIS DUE TO DIRECT PRO-APOTOTIC EFFECTS

Long-term glucocorticoid therapy promptly induces osteoporosis, whose severity depends on the dose and duration of the treatment (91).
Glucocorticoids directly stimulate an increase in the apoptosis of mature osteoblasts (92)(93)(94), unlike the indirect effects of HPTH and a high calcium diet, which increase osteoblast apoptosis by stimulating osteoblast proliferation and activity.
Glucocorticoids decrease BMD by inhibiting osteoblast activity, and simultaneously accelerate the decrease of the ARORC by inducing osteoblast apoptosis.



THE LIMITED INFLUENCE OF EXERCISE INDICATES EXHAUSTION OF OSTEOBLAST REPLICATIVE CAPACITY

Exercise is positively associated with BMD of the hip, but often osteoporosis patients cannot increase their BMD through exercise (95). The possible exercise-induced bone mass gain is far less than the disuse-induced bone loss (96), which may indicate exhaustion of the ARORC.
Exercise is essential to maintain the shock-absorbing effects of strong muscles (97). In the short term, in older adults, exercise can partially (20 – 40%) decrease hip-fracture risk (98), but this will accelerate the decrease in the ARORC. In elderly women who had previously been diagnosed with hip fracture, a protective effect was found for women who were moderately active recently. In women, however, who were very active recently, hip fracture risk was slightly elevated (99), which might indicate a lack of osteoblast capacity to repair loading-induced microfractures. The later in life, the smaller the effects of exercise (100), due to the decrease in the ARORC. In elderly with a mean age of 73, exercise was not protective for osteoporotic fracture (101). In women of about the same age, with a history of postmenopausal fractures, exercise did not affect BMD or fracture rates either (102).
Regarding osteoporotic fracture risk, exercise may have long-term beneficial effects by focusing on increasing muscle strength rather than bone strength.



CONCLUSION

Regarding osteoporosis, BMD represents momentary bone strength and ARORC represents long-term bone health. Regarding ARORC, adequate estrogen levels are protective, preserving osteoblast viability, opposing the pro-apoptotic effects on osteoblasts of glucocorticoid therapy, hyperparathyroidism and a high calcium diet. Maintaining a high BMD has adverse effects on long-term bone health, explaining the positive correlation between mean BMD and age adjusted osteoporotic fracture incidence, per country.
Osteoporosis prevention may be successful by aiming to reduce mean calcium intake to the level of countries where osteoporotic fracture incidence is lowest, approximately 300 to 500 mg / day.
Tests need to be performed in mice (half the population at 90% and the remaining at 100% of average life-expectancy) to assess the lifetime effects of a very high (3%), high (1.5%), moderate (0.5%), low (0.2%) and very low calcium diet (0.1%) respectively (Ca/P=1.5, Ca/Mg=10, Mg>0.02%), on eventual bone fracture toughness.
More beneficial effects of exercise may be obtained by focusing on increasing muscle strength rather than bone strength.
If this theory is correct, worldwide millions of people may have been treated wrongly, and traditional prevention may have had, and will continue to have, strong adverse effects on the health of hundreds of millions of people. Even the most conservative estimates of costs are astronomical.
 
 
grant
04:14 / 03.07.05
Thx.

V. long.
 
 
Ganesh
14:39 / 03.07.05
Well done on getting published, RRM. Hopefully it'll interest someone with a decent level of research funding...
 
 
ReformedRobotMan
15:53 / 03.07.05
Hi Grant and Ganesh,
thx for responding
yes, im hoping for funding by getting some publicity first. buzy with that. 2 professors from the International Osteoporosis Foundation independently wished me luck; they said i will need that because i will have to face the influence of the dairy industry, the pharmaceutic companies and the companies that sell the machines that can measurese bone mineral density. Its a fuckedup world. But to me it feels we are in a time of changes. Maybe we can make a difference somehow. At least we got to give it a try, right?

oh, and the abstract of the article is already available in major medical databases, such as here in PubMed
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
16:09 / 03.07.05
So... calcium from dark green leaf vegetables instead?
 
 
ReformedRobotMan
17:48 / 03.07.05
well, actually, too much calcium from whatever source has the same effect on osteoblasts; it accelerates the aging of your bones.

All cells in your body can replicate a limited number of times. This is what makes us mortal.
The same goes for your bone cells.
If you take good care of your body, it wount have to use up that capacity to replicate so fast.

You may compare it with skin cells. If you spend lots of time in the sun, your skin cells will die in a much faster rate.
As long as you are young, this doesnt seem to have any effect, but what you dont know, is that in the meantime you have used up that replicative capacity very rapidly, which means that this capacity will be exhausted sooner than expected. Your skin will be way too wrinkly for your age.

The same goes for your bones.
The faster these special bone-forming cells have to replicate, the sooner this replicative capacity will be exhausted.

The reason why extra calcium has exhausting effects, is because this extra calcium needs to be taken out of the blood to prevent excess, and therefore these special bone cells have to work harder to create a matrix upon which this extra calcium may precipitate.

So, all excess calcium (regardless its source) makes your bones work harder, and eventually get exhausted sooner.
 
 
astrojax69
22:30 / 03.07.05
so your research needs to find the optimum calcium intake, huh? my boss bangs on about the limited caloric intake idea all the time and will be fascinated by this.

very creative solution: good work! ...& good luck!!
 
 
ReformedRobotMan
15:03 / 04.07.05
thanx astrojax69,

so your research needs to find the optimum calcium intake, huh?

well, actually, that is already known.
The only one who perfectly knows how much calcium you exactly need on a specific day, is your body.
It appears that your body simply adjusts the absorption rate, so that regardless whether you consume 300 or 1000 mg calcium, you take up the same amount. This, however, no longer is the case when you consume way too much (over 1200 mg), or way too little (below 200 mg daily) calcium. Then the absorption rate simply cannot be sufficiently adjusted anymore.
It is extremely hard to consume less than 200 mg calcium daily.
On the other hand, its quite easy to consume over 1200 mg, by taking supplements, by consuming milk, cheese etc.

Logically, it doesnt matter in whatever country on whatever diet, you will always be able to absorp sufficient calcium to grow and maintain strong bones. And therefore, in whatever country, children are perfectly able to grow perfectly strong bones, becoming full grown adults.
So, what is normal in countries where little calcium is consumed (300 to 500 mg daily) is absolutely enough, and not too much.
Its our own body who tells us this.

You know whats funny?

That they started advising us to consume more calcium, based on the reasoning that only part of the consumed calcium is actually absorbed into the blood. That this is a mistake of mother nature, which we should correct, since we know better than nature.


my boss bangs on about the limited caloric intake idea all the time and will be fascinated by this.

the limited caloric intake idea does make a lot of sense, doesnt it?
Save your body and it will last longer...
I mean; speeding constantly will definitely make your car break down sooner, right?
And the cells in our bones are not fundamentally different from other cells in our body; they are subject to aging phenomena

...& good luck!!

thanx; i may need that
today we had 2 phonecalls from people pretending to be newsreporters, but who both hang up when we asked what newspaper.
 
 
ReformedRobotMan
09:06 / 19.07.05
this is what professor Rizzoli, from the International Osteoporosis Foundation wrote me in response to the article:

The problem is the issue of the causal relationship. There are data showing that hip fracture incience is proportional to the number of books in the public libraries in each country.
Thus a reflection of the socio-economic level and of the longevity of the population.
 
 
ReformedRobotMan
14:39 / 20.08.05
Received some encouraging comments from scientists and health professionals:

"I am not clear about your conclusions
...I like your concept of ARORC"

Lawrence G. Raisz, MD
Distinguished Professor of Medicine
US National Osteoporosis Foundation


"You have published an article which is intriguing...
Although I do not know if it is a valid correlation you observed, every challenging theory deserves to be put at test".

Dr Peter Lakatos, Hungary
European Calcified Tissue Society


"Living in the part of the world with the highest incidence of fractures, we have been puzzled of the seemingly paradoxical situation of having a very high calcium intake and the high fracture incidence.
We will discuss your hypothesis at length in our group.
It would be very exciting to be able to proceed to trials in the area"

Vinjar Fønnebø
Professor of Medicine
Norwegian Osteoporosis Foundation


"Your translated article (in Romanian) has been posted on ASPOR's site"
Dr. Andrea Gasparik Ildiko
of the Association for the Prevention of Osteoporosis in Romania (ASPOR)


"Most fascinating.
I am looking forward to hear about your mouse experiments"

Dr Uffe Ravnskov, Sweden

"Interesting paper --
the conclusions of which could have been predicted by the evolutionary template"

Dr Loren Cordain

"Thought-provoking article"
Chet Day, professional health writer

"Interesting suggestion"
Mark Abramowicz MD, Medical Letter

"Interesting article"
Brandi Redo, Physicians Commitee for Responsible Medicine

"Very interesting article
Your hypothesis makes a great deal of sense
and I will certainly abstract the article for a future issue of International Health News".

Hans Larsen, International Health News[/b]
 
  
Add Your Reply