BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Spirituality Shopper

 
 
Shiny: Well Over Thirty
04:32 / 07.06.05
Did anyone else see this? Basically the show involves an individual with no strong religious beliefs experimenting with various practices from several different religions without making an actual commitment to the philosophy behind any of the religions in an attempt to see if these techniques are in and of themselves effective in helping the practitioner in living a happy more fulfilled life. Last night Sufi whirling, Buddhist meditation, and Christian lent, and a Jewish Sabbath meal were explored, all of which seemed like they did have at least some merit as things to build into ones life regardless of ones religious beliefs. I found this show interesting mainly because it seemed to partake pretty strongly of my semi-agnostic pick and mix attitude to religion, certainly I give something up for lent every year, despite not being a Christian and experimentation with various other religious practices is one of those things that’s always on my to do list. Anyone else watch it and feel like sharing opinions?
 
 
Spaniel
05:56 / 07.06.05
Here's an opinion: it's fucking retarded.
 
 
Smoothly
09:29 / 07.06.05
I only saw about 5 minutes of this, but what puzzled me about the set-up is that it seems to have fuck all to do with spirituality. So, I might feel healthier if I stopped eating pork, more relaxed if meditated, and fitter if I did Tai Chi – but to conflate those things with being Jewish, Buddhist, whatever, is fatuous and fundamentally insulting to those religions. No?

‘I was almost a Muslim because I dig beards, but I like a drink so I’ve decided I’m Catholic…’
 
 
Gypsy Lantern
10:46 / 07.06.05
I found this show interesting mainly because it seemed to partake pretty strongly of my semi-agnostic pick and mix attitude to religion

**shudder**
 
 
Spaniel
10:49 / 07.06.05
I know...

Smooth Operator, you really don't need to explain what's bad about the show.
 
 
Scrambled Password Bogus Email
11:32 / 07.06.05
I was almost a Muslim because I dig beards...

Cracked me up.
 
 
Shiny: Well Over Thirty
16:14 / 07.06.05
Fair enough. I wouldn't argue that it was great or necessarily even good TV, but for me the flaws in the execution of the show don't put to much of a dent in my enthusiasm for the concept, the idea of exploring different spiritual paths and practices wrapped up and packaged for the masses, just something about that captures my imagination - no matter how much I may be wishing I'd never bought it up right now.
 
 
Tom Tit's Tot: A Girl!
17:56 / 07.06.05
So, I might feel healthier if I stopped eating pork, more relaxed if meditated, and fitter if I did Tai Chi – but to conflate those things with being Jewish, Buddhist, whatever, is fatuous and fundamentally insulting to those religions. No?

I suppose the question is then at what point does it stop being a lifestyle choice and start being attributed to the religion?

There are many people that practice the traditions of Judaism without any deeply-held spiritual connection to the religion, yet if you tell them they're not "properly" Jewish I'd expect rather a large amount of bile coming your way.

Which is not to say that I disagree with your point, but rather, a which point does everyone here think a behaviour becomes religious?
 
 
Foust is SO authentic
19:00 / 07.06.05
?Which is not to say that I disagree with your point, but rather, a which point does everyone here think a behaviour becomes religious?

Particular religions carry particular rationalities. Catholics take communion for particular reasons; if you are not attempting to partake in a re-enactment of the crucifixtion, then you are not taking communion - you're eating a piece of bread and drinking some wine. The most that can be said is that you are taking part in a cultural practice.
 
 
Tom Tit's Tot: A Girl!
23:29 / 07.06.05
if you are not attempting to partake in a re-enactment of the crucifixtion, then you are not taking communion - you're eating a piece of bread and drinking some wine.

Really, you're "eating a piece of bread and drinking some wine" no matter what. The bread is still bread, regardless of the metaphor you attach to it.

I think I perhaps meant to ask, who decides when that "cultural practice" becomes a religious observance? Is the dividing line between the two is as simple as belief? If someone doubts and is more agnostic than Catholic, but partakes out of fear or comfort of routine, are they Catholic, or just "cultural practitioners"?
 
 
Tryphena Absent
00:19 / 08.06.05
I think I perhaps meant to ask, who decides when that "cultural practice" becomes a religious observance? Is the dividing line between the two is as simple as belief?

Possibly when it becomes an act of ritual. For instance eating cholla bread normally might be eating bread, eating it on the shabbat to celebrate a day of rest is ritually significant. Whirling in a club is not religious, sufi whirling is an act that is ritualistic in nature. It's not the eating of the bread, it's the intention of that consumption, the location, the moment that is behind it. If you partake out of comfort or fear then it's not the act of a Catholic or of religious conviction and the intention isn't there, it's not a religious act, it might be ritualistic but not for the spiritual reasons that underlie the ritual as it is meant to be performed thus it's your own ritual and not that of the religion.

Judaism is rather distinct because cultural history has dictated that Jews regard themselves as a race and not simply a religion. They're still proper Jews, the pertinent question would be 'do they practice Judaism,' a significant number of people who see themselves as Jewish might answer no.
 
 
Spatula Clarke
00:22 / 08.06.05
Really, you're "eating a piece of bread and drinking some wine" no matter what. The bread is still bread, regardless of the metaphor you attach to it.

A lot of Catholics would probably disagree with you on that one. It's called transubstantiation. You might want to Google it.
 
 
Spaniel
05:53 / 08.06.05
And as far as many of them are concerned there's nothing metaphorical about it.
 
 
Scrambled Password Bogus Email
08:44 / 08.06.05
Like this really switched on hepcat
 
 
Tom Tit's Tot: A Girl!
16:00 / 08.06.05
A lot of Catholics would probably disagree with you on that one. It's called transubstantiation. You might want to Google it.

I'm perfectly aware of the belief in transubstantiation, but I think most Catholics are aware that it's a metaphorical change from bread to flesh, and that they aren't actually taking part in a cannibalistic ritual where flesh and blood are consumed. If you meet a Catholic that Literal-minded in this day and age, back away slowly... they might try to punish you for eating lobster, or wearing cotton-poly blend.

it might be ritualistic but not for the spiritual reasons that underlie the ritual as it is meant to be performed thus it's your own ritual and not that of the religion.

There are mundane, everyday "rituals" that people attach spiritual significance to. Does simply attaching this significance validate them as religious observance, or does it require something more, like the attachment to a long-standing religious tradition? I still don't understand where the line is drawn.
 
 
Spatula Clarke
17:17 / 08.06.05
Does your "it's not actually real, you know" thinking extend to the topics on discussion in Temple? It's just that, you know, I kind of expect people here to be a little more open to odd ideas.
 
 
Mourne Kransky
17:54 / 08.06.05
I did find it interesting but possibly not in the way Jonathan Creepy Edwards' narration directed. I could imagine myself doing all of those things attempted but without ever feeling any sense of the numinous or of transcendence. Maybe I'm just fucked.

Chanting the Lotus Sutra and meditating does me good but I am not and probably never could be a Buddhist, despite having been naturally gifted with the figure for it. Conclusion, regular meditation is a bloody good thing. Fortunately, Mindfulness is achievable in any number of ways. I suspect the Buddhists have still got a better route to it than the rest of us. Check out Kemal in the Big Brother thread doing his own bit of spiritual tourism, teaching Derek nya myoho renge kyo. Quicker and more entertaining than this programme was.

Going to Church on Christmas Eve to keep my mum company and belting out those old favourite hymns is good for my soul but I could not be less Christian if I had two pointy horns and a big, swishy tail. So, the woman on tv gave up using her hair straighteners. Good for her. Utterly pointless exercise. Might have seen the point is she'd stopped flushing after every toilet visit or stopped eating battery farmed meat or stopped wearing clothing that wasn't ethically sourced. Cleartly the definition of hardship that is being endured has changed since the early Christians had a bit of a giggle in a backroom in Jerusalem writing the rules for Lent.

I thought getting off on Dervish Whirling seemed perfectly straightforward. Same vibe, exactly, that I get on the stage at Duckie on the few occasions when I am there and dancing but not shitfaced. Not much explanation of Sufism and how it sits within the body of Islam, which was a shame because that would be a much more interesting tale to tell, Jonathan.

There was little in the shabbas meal that isn't translatable to many other shared dining experiences. Those have, historically, energised our spiritual muscles across religious and tribal divides but so what? I watched the bread loaf being lovingly plaited as if surgery were being performed and wondered if eating haggis would be a comparable ritual for me. We eat special food, we wear special clothes, we recite special words, our God's gonna beat up your God, boo yah.

Will there be more episodes of this? Will she get to try tantric sex or be crushed under the wheels of the Juggernaut or will she be sacrificing babies to Marduk? I do hope so. Big Brother has been very dull so far this year and Songs of Praise has been shite since Thora Hird died.
 
 
Smoothly
18:56 / 08.06.05
I'm perfectly aware of the belief in transubstantiation, but I think most Catholics are aware that it's a metaphorical change from bread to flesh, and that they aren't actually taking part in a cannibalistic ritual where flesh and blood are consumed.

Polls suggest that most Catholics *do* believe in transubstantiation. And if I met a Catholic who didn't then I'd ask which other express doctrines of hir church ze also rejects. Presumably the infallibility of the ecumenical councils, for a start.
Which brings us back to where we started: What qualifies you to be a practicing member of a particular religion? Is mimicking the rituals sufficient? Is absolute adherence to all its doctrines necessary? I'm with Tom Tit, I dunno. And as an atheist don't really feel it's my place to say.

I fear that some of us in this thread are rather pissing on Shiney Thing's joss sticks. Since ze clearly feels that a pick 'n' mix approach to religious rituals can be spiritually fulfilling, and was enthused by this evidence presented in the programme rather than dissuaded, I'd be interested to hear hir side. Don't be discouraged, ST; tell us more.
 
 
Spatula Clarke
19:15 / 08.06.05
Xoc> It's a series, I think. There's definitely another episode next week, anyway, featuring a different woman (working single mother, iirc).
 
 
Shrug
19:27 / 08.06.05
I had a conversation with my Dad regarding transubstantiation once. It went a bit like this gist wise;
-Dad, do you believe in transubstantiation?
-Yes.
-What really?
-Yes.
-Not just metaphorically?
-No really.
-You mean you actually believe that it changes to the body of Christ?
-Yes.
It rambled on a bit like that. My sister (now a religion teacher) joined in by saying "I'd laugh if it really did change into the body of christ". Dad told her to shut up.

Now although my Dad is undeniably a bit mad he does truly believe this. My point being that in religion you can't call into question any belief because really it's not about the facts but about faith. I'm also sure that there are varying levels of belief in any religion I know that there are garden variety deists who would immediately answer Catholic (as was their upbringing) if asked without examining "why" and that there will always be people (not necessarily hardliners) who take the gospel as well gospel.
Even in primary school I was taught that transubstantiation was one of numerous theological divisions that separated the Protestant/Anglican/Catholic churches and thus was v.important.
 
 
Tom Tit's Tot: A Girl!
19:45 / 08.06.05
(Apologies to anyone terminally confused by the previous posts - they'll be gone soon. Sorry for the mistake.)

Does your "it's not actually real, you know" thinking extend to the topics on discussion in Temple?

Yeah, pretty much.

It's just that, you know, I kind of expect people here to be a little more open to odd ideas.

Actually I think you'll find that most forms of magical practice encourage a healthily sceptical attitude towards the objective reality of things experienced during magical consciousness. I'm not diametrically opposed to the idea of transubstantiation - people are welcome to believe whatever they fancy, far as I can tell - but allowing it to impact beyond a spiritual level is naive, in my estimation.

Or, to rip off Uncle Alan, if I poison a host and feed it to a believer during mass, will they be spared? Because if the bread changed into the flesh of god, the poison should not be present. I think you'd have a hard time finding a Catholic who'd willingly eat a poisoned host, faith or no, because the metaphorical truth of transubstantiation has little impact on your chances of survival after eating the aforementioned host.

However I've seen some weird things in my life, which could be considered "miraculous" to some, but I just avoid placing any "belief" in those occurrences.

I fear that some of us in this thread are rather pissing on Shiney Thing's joss sticks. Since ze clearly feels that a pick 'n' mix approach to religious rituals can be spiritually fulfilling, and was enthused by this evidence presented in the programme rather than dissuaded, I'd be interested to hear hir side. Don't be discouraged, ST; tell us more.

Hear, hear!
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
19:48 / 08.06.05
Well, transubstantiation is a mystery. The whole thing is that it doesn't make sense to the uninitiated...
 
 
Tryphena Absent
20:17 / 08.06.05
I believe in transubstantiation and I'm not Catholic.

There are mundane, everyday "rituals" that people attach spiritual significance to. Does simply attaching this significance validate them as religious observance

Yes.

To be honest I don't get why you're posting on a spirituality programme when you're so disinclined towards belief... I'd suggest you start a thread discussing faith in Temple so we can really bite into the cookie.
 
 
Shiny: Well Over Thirty
20:17 / 08.06.05
Well contrary to the impression I may perhaps have given my starting point for contemplation of these spiritual/religious practices is a respect for the religions involved and for many of the practitioners of these religions, particularly those who seem to be following a path of spiritual development rather than simply carrying out worshipful rituals by rote, as the teachers in the show sort of seemed to be doing, although we were not shown enough of them to really make much of a judgement on that point. I believe that these paths are ultimately valid for those that follow them and at times I’ve certainly considered just to picking one and going along with it. But that simply is not me, it’s entirely likely this some monstrous arrogance on my part but I don’t think I could ever fully embrace a system which I didn’t entirely agree with, nor do I necessarily think I should, I tend to think that if one accepts the existence of the spirit or soul at all then each soul is unique – and so for me it seems logical to assume that simply because Christianity or Islam is the correct path for many souls it does not follow that they are necessarily the correct path for mine.

All that being the case however I still wish to follow a spiritual path, albeit one I discover for myself, not one which has been laid out for me. This leads me to consideration of the spiritual techniques of various religions. Simply because I’m not prepared to buy into the whole philosophy of a religion it does not mean I necessarily reject the tools and techniques developed by these religions – I’m very interested in experimenting with anything I can see could have some benefit for me either spiritually or psychologically, after all I’m not going to know whether they are of any use to me unless I try them out although I haven’t done as much of this as I’d like. As to any claim of ownership over said techniques by the religions involved, and the argument that to go raiding these religions for their spiritual practices is disrespectful, in defence of doing so I would say that the teachers in the show didn’t seem to have a problem with it and somewhat more combatively I’d also say that if these techniques are any good, if they can benefit more people they should be available to more people – whether the religion they originate from approves or not.

As to Joss Stick Pissing – piss metaphorical urine on my metaphorical joss sticks any time. Just don’t come round my house and piss real urine on my actual joss sticks and we’re fine, alright?
 
 
All Acting Regiment
09:19 / 09.06.05
This show dissapointed me. I thought that maybe they'd be giving Relgious people a chance to try Atheism as well.

Which, when you think about, ooh, I don't know, brothers beating their sisters for being lesbians or dressing the wrong way, strikes me as perhaps a better strategy for solving certain problems than showing how Sufi whirling can help your stress problems, especcially when that practice was clearly designed to be a bit more important than a western "lifestyle choice".
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
09:47 / 09.06.05
But the scent of piss is very relaxing...

Or, to rip off Uncle Alan, if I poison a host and feed it to a believer during mass, will they be spared? Because if the bread changed into the flesh of god, the poison should not be present.

Bread's low church.

I think the danger here is that you are taking your position on Catholicism from a comic book. The mystery of transubstantiation is this: when taken as part of a ritual, the wafer and wine become the flesh and blood of Christ. However, this does not mean that the wafer becomes a sliver of flesh or the wine 25ccs of human blood. The wafer and wine retain the accidents of wafer and wine - flavour, texture, atomic mass - while also being the body and blood of Christ. "Adulterated with poison" is actually neither an essential quality nor an accident - if a glass of wine with poison in became human blood, it woudl presumably be human blood with poison in instead, because the poison would not transubstantiate. However, if we assume that the poison was somehow integral to the wafer, it would no doubt retain the accident that made it poisonous.

Of course, this would not come up, because trying to poison somebody with a wafer would mean that you were not performing mass, but rather trying to poison somebody in the guise of Mass. Since transubstantiation is a ritual mystery, that means it would not occur.
 
 
Spaniel
10:44 / 09.06.05
Exactly how would a person of faith try out Atheism?
 
 
All Acting Regiment
10:47 / 09.06.05
A person could try living outside the confines of their strict religious background. That's what I meant, to clarify.

Although of course not many would want to, you're right in suggesting it wouldn't be easy.
 
 
Tom Tit's Tot: A Girl!
18:58 / 09.06.05
The mystery of transubstantiation is this: when taken as part of a ritual, the wafer and wine become the flesh and blood of Christ. However, this does not mean that the wafer becomes a sliver of flesh or the wine 25ccs of human blood. The wafer and wine retain the accidents of wafer and wine - flavour, texture, atomic mass - while also being the body and blood of Christ.

Okay, so they don't change in any observable way, but they're spiritually the body and blood of Christ?

"Adulterated with poison" is actually neither an essential quality nor an accident - if a glass of wine with poison in became human blood, it would presumably be human blood with poison in instead, because the poison would not transubstantiate.

Of course, this would not come up, because trying to poison somebody with a wafer would mean that you were not performing mass, but rather trying to poison somebody in the guise of Mass. Since transubstantiation is a ritual mystery, that means it would not occur.

I brought up poison originally because it harkened to something that someone I once knew said. He was a "Catholic Enthusiast" I suppose, though not a Catholic himself, and he claimed that if the wafers and wine for mass were consecrated, and before mass an individual confessed to a priest that the host had been poisoned, that the priest still was required to use the consecrated hosts and wine in the ritual. Bollocks, really, but it stuck in my head. Using a comic was a poor example, admittedly.

The aforementioned person learned magic from a group that frankly was filled to the brim with arseholes, he would only refer to his belief as "The Craft" (although this was before the film of the same name) and in later years of our acquaintance he started bragging that he had begun posing as a priest at various local churches and performing mass, claiming that the articles he used were now no longer considered consecrated. I informed him that he was a dick, and stopped talking to him. Later found out from a mutual acquaintance that he had actually been performing mass at these churches. I bet Middle America is chock-full of kids like that.

Sorry, that was off-topic. It seemed relevant at the time.

To be honest I don't get why you're posting on a spirituality programme when you're so disinclined towards belief...

The assumption here being that because I don't believe in an established religious framework means I'm not spiritual. Huh.

I'd suggest you start a thread discussing faith in Temple so we can really bite into the cookie.

The Temple gives me dysentery.
 
 
Spatula Clarke
19:03 / 09.06.05
Okay, so they don't change in any observable way, but they're spiritually the body and blood of Christ?

Kind of, although using the word 'spiritually' still makes it sound as though they're not actually those things. I often think that 'belief' isn't a very useful word in these sort of discussions. Wish somebody could come up with something better.

See this pencil? It's not really a pencil. It may look and feel like a pencil, and it may function as a pencil, but it's actually an orange. It's an orange not just because I say it's an orange, nor because I believe it's an orange, but because I know it's an orange. I'm still going to scribble notes with it, but it's an orange.

That said, it's also a pencil in that it retains the qualities of a pencil. But it's primarily an orange. Just an orange that can be used as a pencil.

Actually, forget all that. Check the bottom of this page and the beginning of the next one - I knew that this had been covered on C+F a few times. That's by far and away the most useful of the threads on the subject, though - the others were all turned into battlegrounds by the board's now-retired troll.
 
 
HCE
22:45 / 10.06.05
To be honest I don't get why you're posting on a spirituality programme when you're so disinclined towards belief...

Possibly this person is posting on this subject because it is of interest?
 
  
Add Your Reply