BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


What were they thinking?

 
 
Papess
19:01 / 18.05.05
I had no idea where to put this so, I thought we needed a thread for such absurdity.

Really, what was she thinking?
 
 
Aertho
19:18 / 18.05.05
Do they accept PayPal?
 
 
Alex's Grandma
19:21 / 18.05.05
Oh come now Strix, who occasionally doesn't find buying the groceries a bit of a drag ? And the pants 'could' have malfunctioned, after all.
 
 
Shrug
19:21 / 18.05.05
What? I'm wearing one now.
 
 
paranoidwriter waves hello
19:35 / 18.05.05
Reminded me of The Fermata by Nicholson Baker.

By the way, did anyone else find the following line a little disturbing?

... "so aroused by the 2½-inch vibrating bullet inside [her] that she fainted"...

Guns don't kill people,...
 
 
Whisky Priestess
20:32 / 18.05.05
But just think of the hope it will bring to underendowed men everywhere:

"If 2 1/2 inches can do that to a woman, wait till the ladeez check out my 4" whopper!!!"
 
 
fuckbaked
00:38 / 21.05.05
This is funny.

from the article: This prompted the attendance of the paramedics who "found the black leatherette panties still buzzing".

Did anyone else wonder how the paramedics knew to check inside her underwear? I mean, was there an audible buzzing noise coming from this woman, or what?
 
 
Saint Keggers
00:44 / 21.05.05
like a chainsaw!
 
 
Papess
01:15 / 21.05.05
...was there an audible buzzing noise coming from this woman, or what?

See, that is kinda my point here. There is a time and a place for this. Grocery shopping isn't one of them. I have worn a remote-controlled vibrating harness out to dinner before, and it certainly makes a significant amount of suspicious drone. However, I was with my lover and having a romantic dinner at a fairly secluded table. That makes a bit more sense to me. Or in a nightclub, perhaps.

If it really is someone's turn on to wear a vibrator to a grocery store, then they should be careful as to it's effect and strength, beforehand. I really don't think this woman even tried this out at home. I think she bought it that day, went into a public washroom and slipped it on. That is just speculation, although I think the article alludes to that.

The other point is; the instructions specifically stated: DO NOT INSERT! Which she had.

At least now I understand why it is that hairdryers have a warning on them that says: DO NOT OPERATE IN THE SHOWER!

*sigh*
 
 
fuckbaked
01:54 / 21.05.05
"The other point is; the instructions specifically stated: DO NOT INSERT! Which she had."

Actually, in the article you linked to, it doesn't say anywhere that she inserted it. Did you read another article that said that she did?
 
 
Papess
02:01 / 21.05.05
Well, it is rather sensitive, so I think it is just alluded to instead of being too graphic.

Unfortunately, she became "so aroused by the 2½-inch vibrating bullet inside that she fainted"

...

For the record, Ann Summers notes that Passion Pants are "Not for internal use". Now we know why.


It seems that these statements are suggesting she had. Otherwise, why bother mentioning the fact they are not for insertion?
 
 
fuckbaked
05:44 / 21.05.05
Unfortunately, she became "so aroused by the 2½-inch vibrating bullet inside that she fainted"

I interpreted this as meaning "inside her panties" rather than "inside her body".

why bother mentioning the fact they are not for insertion?

This is the only thing that I saw in the article that implied that she may have inserted it, but it contradicts this:

This prompted the attendance of the paramedics who "found the black leatherette panties still buzzing".

This seems to state rather clearly that the panties were vibrating. If she'd inserted it, her panties wouldn't have been buzzing.
 
 
Papess
15:16 / 21.05.05
The black leatherette panties and the vibrator are all one unit, We. I take it you have never used a pair before. When the vibrator part buzzes, so do the panties. Take a look at the picture at least, that should make it clearer to you.

You have to realise as well, they aren't Barbelith. They are not going to be very direct about sexual matters. They have phrased things in as polite a way as possible. They aren't about to say

This prompted the attendance of the paramedics who "found the the vibrator that was inserted in her vagina, still buzzing".

I think they are trying to report this story without being graphically offensive (hence, they referenced the instructions - very legit and would not likely be construed as gratuitous, simply informative - in more ways than one).

So, they are just simply hinting. We just have to take a hint to get it.
 
 
Alex's Grandma
15:23 / 21.05.05
'Nurse, the screens !'
 
 
Mistoffelees
21:32 / 21.05.05
Meow!

Lion Mutilates 42 Midgets in Cambodian Ring-Fight


An African Lion much like this is responsible for the death of 28 Cambodian Midgets
Spectators cheered as entire Cambodian Midget Fighting League squared off against African Lion

Tickets had been sold-out three weeks before the much anticipated fight, which took place in the city of Kâmpóng Chhnãng.

The fight was slated when an angry fan contested Yang Sihamoni, President of the CMFL, claiming that one lion could defeat his entire league of 42 fighters.

Sihamoni takes great pride in the league he helped create, as was conveyed in his recent advertising campaign for the CMFL that stated his midgets will "... take on anything; man, beast, or machine."

This campaign is believed to be what sparked the undisclosed fan to challenge the entire league to fight a lion; a challenge that Sihamoni readily accepted.

An African Lion (Panthera Leo) was shipped to centrally located Kâmpóng Chhnãng especially for the event, which took place last Saturday, April 30, 2005 in the city’s coliseum.

The Cambodian Government allowed the fight to take place, under the condition that they receive a 50% commission on each ticket sold, and that no cameras would be allowed in the arena.

The fight was called in only 12 minutes, after which 28 fighters were declared dead, while the other 14 suffered severe injuries including broken bones and lost limbs, rendering them unable to fight back.

Sihamoni was quoted before the fight stating that he felt since his fighters out-numbered the lion 42 to 1, that they “… could out-wit and out-muscle [it].”

Unfortunately, he was wrong.
 
 
Papess
21:42 / 21.05.05
Oh my.
 
 
fuckbaked
06:58 / 22.05.05
Strix said:"The black leatherette panties and the vibrator are all one unit, We. I take it you have never used a pair before."

Yeah, I haven't.

"When the vibrator part buzzes, so do the panties. Take a look at the picture at least, that should make it clearer to you."



Actually, the picture isn't very clear to me. I see underwear, and a little purple thing next to them. Is the purple thing the vibrator? Why do the panties themselves buzz if the vibrator's inside the wearer's body? How is the vibrator connected to the panties?

"why bother mentioning the fact they are not for insertion?"

Again, this is the only clue that I see that she might have inserted it. But, actually, notice that in the article in the Register it says, "According to UK tabloid the Sun...". So, the Register got the story from the Sun. But the sun doesn't mention anything about the vibrator not being for internal use in their story here.
 
 
Papess
18:29 / 22.05.05
But as she pushed her trolley she got so aroused by the 2½-inch vibrating bullet inside that she fainted. ~The Sun

Is that not hint enough for you? Would you like a diagram or pictorial, We? How graphic should they be to help you understand what happened? Should they explain whether or not it was inserted past the labia minor or major? Maybe whether or not it was touching her G-spot, or pressed against her perineum? It is not Penthouse Forum, for keerist's sake.
 
 
subcultureofone
19:50 / 22.05.05
from the description, it sounds like this woman had a vasovagal reaction. if she had been sitting rather than standing and walking around, it might not have happened. the vagus nerve can be stimulated during various gyn procedures such as colposcopy, endometrial biopsy, IUD insertion, abortion, etc. some women will even ‘vagal’ during routine pelvic exams because they are more sensitive to this type of stimulation. i’ve seen vagal responses in all of these situations. it’s certainly possible for the vibrator described to cause this, but it would need to be located inside the vagina of the woman for this to happen. it's not really a matter of her being 'so aroused' except in the clinical sense of overstimulation of the vagus nerve. but i'm sure the idea that she fainted from _sexual_ arousal sells more papers.

more info:
Vasovagal reaction: A reflex of the involuntary nervous system that causes the heart to slow down (bradycardia) and that, at the same time, affects the nerves to the blood vessels in the legs permitting those vessels to dilate (widen). As a result the heart puts out less blood, the blood pressure drops, and what blood is circulating tends to go into the legs rather than to the head. The brain is deprived of oxygen and the fainting episode occurs. The vasovagal reaction is also called a vasovagal attack. The resultant fainting is synonymous with situational syncope, vasovagal syncope, vasodepressor syncope, and Gower syndrome which is named for Sir William Richard Gower (1845-1915), a famous English neurologist.

The situations that trigger this reaction are diverse and include having blood drawn, straining while urinating or defecating or coughing. The reaction also can be due to the emotional stress of fear or pain.

In these situations, people often become pale and feel nauseated, sweaty, and weak just before they lose consciousness.
 
 
fuckbaked
19:56 / 22.05.05
As I said before, I think that they meant "inside her panties" rather than "inside her vagina". Finding out that you read the sentance differently made me realize that it's ambiguous. Can't you see how the writer of that sentance could have intended it to mean "inside her panties"?

I realize that if the vibrator were inside her vagina, the newspapers might not tell us this at all, and definitely wouldn't give explicit detail. I just don't think that one ambiguous sentance is evidence that it was definitely inside her vagina.

I might be misinterpreting that sentance, but I'm not convinced. I'm hoping that other people who're reading this thread will give their opinion on whether or not the article implied that the vibrator was inside the woman's vagina.
 
 
Papess
19:05 / 24.05.05
This is frighteningly stupid. I realize we all want a light sabre, but really guys...what was the purpose of the petrol?
 
 
Papess
19:14 / 24.05.05
Subcultureofone, that is very interesting, btw. Like you said though, I am sure it is more of a selling point if considered to be just sexual arousal.

Still ridiculous, though.
 
 
Saint Keggers
19:16 / 24.05.05
When you dont have The Force, you go with the next best thing. In their case it would have been intelligence but I guess it got vetoed.
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
20:09 / 24.05.05
Indeed. Really fucking stupid that is. Yes.
 
  
Add Your Reply