BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Uzbekistan: terrorist uprising or popular uprising?

 
 
sleazenation
16:57 / 13.05.05
Big things are occuring in Uzbekistan at the moment... but quite what is going on is being protrayed an a variety of different ways on the BBC, CNN and Fox.

As the CIA Factbook, Uzbekistan's main concerns at the moment can be described as including terrorism by Islamic militants, economic stagnation, and the curtailment of human rights and democratization, but which is which?

Britain recently had to recall it's ambasador to Uzbekistan because of his criticism of the use of intelligence allegedly obtained under torture by the Uzbekistan Government. (The Foreign and Commonwealth Office, the UK equivilent of the State Dept. has also praised that diplomat for drawing attention to human rights abuses in the country, including the plight
of a mother of a man apparently tortured to death with boiling water in 2002.)

Amnesty international's 2003 report on Uzbekistan points out that torture was “systematic” in Uzbekistan after a visit to the country. At least five men died in custody or shortly after their release, reportedly as a result of torture. The death penalty continued to be used widely and families of death row prisoners were subjected to a form of mental cruelty. Freedom of expression continued to be stifled as newspaper editors reportedly inherited censorship functions from the press censor’s office.

However, Uzbekistan has been an important allie to the US in its war against terrorism and has granted the US permission to operate a military base within in its boarders.

I'm rambling a bit here - what I guess I'm asking is what people are heariing about Uzbekistan? What is your interpretation?
 
 
Hieronymus
17:33 / 13.05.05
It just underscores the blowhard righteousness of neo-conservatives and their bullshit pseudo-altruism, discovered in their hearts only AFTER we couldn't find WMDs. Bush's turning of a blind eye to this bulldozes any argument the theo-cons had that we invaded Iraq to bring 'liberty and democracy' to a terrorized nation. It's nothing but the same old meaningless rhetoric. The same old "he's Vlad Tepes but he's OUR Vlad Tepes, har har" defense that kept bastards like Saddam Hussein in power in the first place.

The human rights abuses there are absolutely staggering.

In addition to hundreds of reports of beatings and numerous accounts of the use of electric shock, temporary suffocation, hanging by the ankles or wrists, removal of fingernails, and punctures with sharp objects, Human Rights Watch received credible reports in 2000 that police sodomized male detainees with bottles, raped them, and beat and burned them in the groin area. Male and female detainees were regularly threatened with rape. Police made such threats in particular against female detainees in the presence of male relatives to force the men to sign self-incriminating statements. Police also regularly threatened tomurder detainees or their family members and to place minor children in orphanages. Self-incriminating testimony obtained through torture was routinely admitted by judges, who cited this as evidence, often the only evidence, to convict. Courts did not initiate investigations into allegations of mistreatment by police.

So yeah, I'd say whatever revolution Karimov gets, he pretty much deserves.
 
 
alejandrodelloco
20:02 / 13.05.05
 
  
Add Your Reply