|
|
Fuck it. Gimme some good jokes on the subject.
Mmkay?
Well, not a good joke, but a fairly well worn one, and the only one I could think of.
"No you weren't. Not being alive is not the same as being dead. Death is the loss of life, not the never-having of it.
Quite the expert, WP. I'm guessing you're a 'Glass half empty' kind of person. Tell me, is it better to have loved and lost than to have never loved at all? Or WOT?
Since 'you' have never died, and the term refers to the cessation of 'your' experiencing structure, so 'you' never will experience dying (contradiction in terms, non?), it seems a bit bold to steam in with absolutes about split-hair differences. Nor will we ever experience dying... By definition, it cannot be experienced. It is the end of that which experiences. (*Ducks*)
How do we know that we living are not the lost ones, struggling to return to the peace of non-existence, and that 'being' dead is not actually the preferable state of affairs, and this whole life business is all a bit inconvenient? Until it happens, it's a cuspy one, eh? Hard to bet on, and even harder to collect on a result one way or the other.
The experiencing structure is a rather sad little scrawny thing, useful for a purpose, but somewhat surplus to requirements otherwise. And it's only that which really fears extinction, in fact, it's so bent on immortality, it's really rather hard to get it to fuck off, even when it's clearly being a nuisance. It likes being around, it just luuurves the sound of its own voice.
Left to its own devices, the organism has no 'fear'. It's far too busy getting on with the business of living, and pumping out adrenaline to avoid being squashed, and so on. |
|
|