|
|
Okay, well. How about if I write some fast impressions first & then follow up with something more thought out? As a whole, it wasn't as bad as I thought it would be. In fact I thought the story gathered storm pretty effectively from the middle to the end. Had I just picked up Part One in the store, I doubt that I'd have even bought the book & I certainly wouldn't have stayed with this stupid girl & her story for any length of time.
Between what matsya and sleaze are saying, I kept thinking that it all depends on the author's intent --i.e., what she thinks about this character, what she wants you to think about this character. This is not clear to me, and it leaned more towards that she wanted you to sympathize with Carla. It's not such a problem that Carla is a horrendous person, but it is a problem for me that Carla --as the first-person narrator-- is not clearly presented as a horrendous person.
I did think it was a good story, in the end. And I was also thinking that perhaps this story was particularly not well-served by the comic format. I really think that this would have made a really good movie --and may yet, as far as I know. If you can imagine, the camera would give you a view from the outside in --whereas the comic gives you a view from the inside out. (There would be no voiceovers in my movie version.) And actually, sometimes, you get a really weird view from the comic --e.g., here's this girl telling you her story, and here's a panel that shows her ass. What's that about?? I may be too easily distracted, but that just pulls me out of the story to think about stupid questions like If she's telling this story, who's drawing this story? Is she drawing this story? Whose gaze is this? Was she, like, thinking about her ass in this scene? If it were a first-person novel & all of a sudden you got a description of the first-person narrator from the back, it would raise these same questions. |
|
|