BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


The Ministry of Defence in the Control Room

 
 
unheimlich manoeuvre
23:15 / 28.03.05
counterpunch March 14, 2005
The Ministry of Defence in the Control Room
Did the BBC Broadcast Fake News Reports?

By DAVID MILLER

A Spinwatch investigation has revealed that journalists working for the Services Sound and Vision Corporation (SSVC) have been commissioned to provide news reports to the BBC. The BBC has been using these reports as if they were genuine news. In fact, the SSVC is entirely funded by the Ministry of Defence as a propaganda operation, which according to its own website makes a 'considerable contribution' to the 'morale' of the armed forces.

In the US, Washington has been rocked by the scandal of fake journalists. The Bush administration has been paying actors to produce news, paying journalists to write propaganda, and paying Republican party members to pose as journalists. In the UK this has been reported with our customary shake of the head at the bizarre nature of US politics and media. Implicitly we are relieved that, however bad things are here, at least we are not as bad as they are.

But Spinwatch can reveal that we have our very own fake journalists operating in the UK. The government pays for their wages and they provide news as if they were normal journalists rather than paid propagandists. Normally they work in a little known outfit with the acronym BFBS, which stands for British Forces Broadcasting Service. BFBS exists to 'entertain and inform' British armed forces around the world and is entirely funded by the British Ministry of Defence. BFBS is run by the SSVC. But on this occasion no mention of Ministry of defence funding was made. She was introduced simply as a reporter 'from the British Forces Broadcasting Service' who 'has been embedded with the Scots Guards'. As one wag inside the BBC puts it, this suggests a process of 'double embedding', first working for the MoD and second embedding with a regiment.


...

I read this on another board. Amazing, obviously I wasn't enough.
What do you think?
 
 
Illihit
23:43 / 28.03.05
Rather disgusting, and a bit - I hate to use the tired term - fascist. There are other ways to improve morale - porn, comedy, great food.

Although this seems to be a few small events with an irregular occurrence, if there was an eventual takeover, it'd be hard to be able to trust very many news services. People would start having to experience things for themselves to believe them (if they were aware of the situation).

And surely the bad news about certain situations outweighs the good news? So why is this needed? False hope? Is the false hope provided better than no hope at all?
 
 
Nobody's girl
08:57 / 29.03.05
Hmm. It wouldn't surprise me. During the initial phase of the invasion in Iraq I remember being disappointed with the Beeb's news coverage because of its clear government bias. That's why I prefer good ol' Channel 4 News.
 
 
Tryphena Absent
10:31 / 29.03.05
I started watching Channel 4 news for the same reason but to be honest I don't think the BBC needs military help to be rubbish. The only concern I'd have in relation to this is coverage on the World Service.
 
 
unheimlich manoeuvre
10:28 / 02.04.05
As the BBC World Service is paid for by the Foreign Office I'm sure we can really upon its impartiality.
 
  
Add Your Reply