BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


The Mythology of Satanism

 
 
Henningjohnathan
18:25 / 02.03.05
I'm sure there are at least a few posters who are familiar with Levay's Church of Satan (in San Francisco). I'm looking for a succint description of the mythology of that religion. What is Satan's "story"? Is it at all related to the Catholic/Christian theology and mythology? Does it have a creator god?

Thanks for any help or suggestions where to look.
 
 
LykeX
19:38 / 02.03.05
Interesting question. I've read the Satanic Bible and I seem to remember that it conveniently skips the issue of who actually created the world. It's a while ago, though, so I could be wrong.
Anyway, the impression I got is, that it deals more with the world as it is right now, than how it all began, evolved etc. which is the usual theme of mythology.
 
 
Henningjohnathan
21:49 / 02.03.05
Right. It seems like the Church has no cosmological philosophy whatsoever and is more about behavioral modification than anything else. I suppose this isn't so different from Crowley who didn't seem to adhere to any mythological premise.
 
 
Salamander
07:58 / 03.03.05
As far as I know the Church of Satan supports no creation myth, other than the one supported by science. To them, Satan is an archetype of the Rebel, and don't really believe in anything spiritual. They practice magic, yes, but LeVay convieniantly leaps over the candlestick when explaining how it works. The explanation is along the lines of, "It just does, try it".
 
 
Unconditional Love
14:10 / 03.03.05
the self help book for goths and metallers doesnt seem to have any cosmology just as others have pointed out, accept perhaps as a guide to the inner workings of a lounge lizard.
 
 
Ria
17:02 / 03.03.05
[QUOTE]I suppose this isn't so different from Crowley who didn't seem to adhere to any mythological premise.[/QUOTE]

oh yes he did. enter these in a search engine. Aeon of Horus, Nuit, Thelema. if at all possible, read AC's THE LAW IS FOR ALL, for starters.
 
 
Henningjohnathan
16:26 / 04.03.05
However, with Crowley is there a "mythology" in the sense of stories about these spiritual beings and their actions and interaction?
 
 
Salamander
16:39 / 04.03.05
yeah, its called The Book of The Law.
 
 
solomon
02:16 / 10.03.05
from the little i know of satanism, I thought the creation myth was that LaVey began the church as a tax shelter.

Seems to be more on symbolism than mythology, since they don't beleive in much other than (and pardon my bigotry, but i lived with a satanist and it was hell) worshiping your own ego, and trying to bridge the gap between low self esteem and megalomania.

The main reason why I have beef with the church of satan, having read LaVey's work, is that they seem to be just like what I dislike about Christianity, but at least stripped of the hypocrysy. that's their main advance. the Christians sin and deny it, pretending to be pious. thew satanists sin, and call it virtue when they destroy your life by indulging in their destructive desires.

But that's more about my personal beef with one jerk.

I'm sure satanism has many good points too.
 
 
Salamander
13:16 / 10.03.05
I'm sure thats just a myth, since the church o' satan openly holds the stance that all churches should be taxed, believing they wouldn't survive a year if such a thing were done.
The two Satanists I knew were pretty polite guys, you must have just been living with a dork.
 
 
Jack Denfeld
17:15 / 10.03.05
I thought I once read one of Lavey's enemies say that while they didn't publicly acknowledge any deity, that those in the inner most circle did believe in Satan, and Hell, and one reason some of them hated Lavey was because he didn't believe any of this at all.
 
 
Jack Denfeld
17:39 / 10.03.05
found this on the Church of Satan faq page

We take the name Satan in concept only. Any other connection is
thrust upon us by anxious, ignorant, and/or misinformed people. The
archetype itself, by whatever name is appropriate, is far older
than Xtianity or Judaism, and it was these religions that, in order
to gain a foothold in the world, decided to destroy and bastardize
the "pagan gods." Satan has generally been the character who has
challenged sterile thought, encouraged indulgence, rebelled against
slavery, and truly represented human nature and all that the
mundane world offers. By extension, instead of worshipping Satan,
we emulate him. The Xtian bible was probably one of the greatest
pieces of propaganda (with Mein Kampf running a close second) in
world history but, quite frankly, we think that the intelligent
members of a scientifically, philosophically, and technologically
advanced civilization should logically cease to have a need for
such outmoded parables and slave ethics. But, seeing as insecurity
never goes out of style, those in need seek their baby-sitters in
whatever avenue is acceptable; in LaVey's words, a "privileged lie."
Many Satanists also view the Xtian bible as an example of mankind's
hypocrisy, incompetence, and spinelessness. Jesus Christ is the
paradigm for these qualities, and is thus reviled by Satanists.
How can anyone with human insight and reasonable logic skills
accept the phrase "the meek shall inherit the Earth" without
laughing? History certainly doesn't support this assertion. From my
experience, many people who call themselves Xtians are so merely by
convenience and not so much by a rational decision, if rationality is
possible. It's a truly insecure philosophy that demands its tenets
to be installed in humans from early childhood, because if it was
introduced for the first time to adults, many would raise their
eyebrows in suspicion and disgust. Many Xtians I've met haven't even
read their bible (at least, not critically), but keep the book on
their coffee table to appear "righteous." And, some just skip the
sanguine parts. Many of them really seem to "get off" on their
religion; the self-righteousness feeds their impoverished egos.
 
  
Add Your Reply