BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Hypersigil Help

 
 
eeoam
10:19 / 26.01.05
I'd like to construct a hypersigil in the form of a story to make some changes to my life. Any tips on a good approach, things to bear in mind, pitfalls to avoid?
 
 
Gypsy Lantern
16:34 / 26.01.05
As a first step, I'd suggest becoming a popular sci-fi author or comic book writer with a solid fan base, then come up with an idea for a serialised story that will come out every month or so and be read by thousands of people. Ideally you should develop a concept that reflects the zeitgiest of the times and resonates with so many people to such an extent that they are inspired to create places like barbelith that are still going strong almost a decade after your hypersigil is completed.

I'd root the story in a fictional world that's not too disimilar to our own, but perhaps a more glamourised, sexier version. The kind of world that you would most like to inhabit yourself. Get the story going and get your readership excited by it. Heat things up a bit. When you think that your fictional world has started to permeate the consciousness of several thousand people on a monthly basis, start adding subtle autobiographical elements into the narrative. Put people who you know into it. Take the characters to locations that you have visited and have them do the things that you have done. Try and reflect different aspects of your own life in this fictional world.

At the same time, make a conscious decision to start acting like the characters. Go to places they might go, do the sort of things they might do, look for opportunities to get to know the types of people that they might know, maybe get the haircut that one of your characters has, or start wearing the type of clothes that they would wear. Try and get some really tangible feedback going on between this fictional world, that loads of people are engaging with every month, and your own life.

Slowly and subtley start to dissolve the boundaries between the two worlds, and start to recognise how much of your own life and the limitations and parameters that you impose on yourself are in fact just fictions themselves. Gradually replace some of these fictions with new ones out of your hypersigil, that have more or less the same level of objective validity as, say, the fiction that dictates you need to smoke 20 cigarettes a day. Keep it going. Keep building the feedback and the momentum. Be careful not to disrupt the flow of the story's narrative though. For the hypersigil to work it has to function as a consistant and engaging fictional world, you have to cultivate and nurture it so that it starts to take on a life of its own within the consciousness of your readership. You have to be careful not to push things too far too fast, or sacrifice the integrity of the narrative by being too eager to force the results you want through it. You have to be patient and let it cook in its own time.

I think it's quite essential that you have a lot of readers engaging with your story on a regular basis and developing a vested interest in the narrative and its characters. Part of the process is about creating feedback between the hypersigil narrative and your life, but I think another aspect of the process is about getting a large group of people to invest in that narrative – because it then becomes the dominant version of events.

For example, I suspect Grant Morrison's hypersigil probably had a dramatic transformative effect on his life because the King Mob "fiction suit" he was identifying with became more real to people than the alternative narrative of the Glaswegian guy who writes comics. If you write down a slightly fictionalised sexed up version of your life and place it in the public domain in such a manner that people will personally invest in it, this version of events will suddenly become more real and valid than how things may have really worked out, which exists largely in your head. Once something is written down and published it has more power than the subjective memories of half a dozen people.

The process will probably still work to some extent without a mass readership, but I doubt very much that the results will be anywhere near as potent. If we are to define a "hypersigil" (which I think is a slightly misleading term anyway...) as a method of making transformative changes to your life using the medium of fiction, then I'd suggest that the process of keeping a magical journal is a hypersigil. I'd say it functions more slowly and less dramatically than something like The Invisibles, as less people are likely to interact with it. But nonetheless, one of the things a journal does is help you to construct a magically empowering narrative out of the events of your life.

That's my spin on the concept anyway. However, you could always just write 2000 words of wish fulfilment fantasy where you're this cool kung fu sorcerer guy who fights shoggoth powered politicians and shags loads of goth birds, then put it on the internet and just call it a hypersigil. Seems to be the done thing.
 
 
Chiropteran
19:17 / 26.01.05
Even when the mass audience (read: hundreds or thousands) isn't available, a suitably personalized fiction (as described above) which is presented as real, or at least as a plausible reality, can take on some serious life of its own (taking yours right along with it) with even a relatively small amount of feedback from someone who is willing to invest your construct with as much (or even more) reality as you do.

My main experience with this sort of thing is over the internet --==and consider this my disclaimer that I know that the net-based 'fictionsuit'/'hypersigil' idea is all too often misapplied/abused/a cop-out/slightly stoopid/etc. - but it can work well in some cases==-- and more with groups than with individuals (though obviously individuals within those groups felt the effects of the changes, and often changed themselves).

One key, of course, is to not restrict the project to your computer - get out and do stuff related to the project (within practical limits - even GM didn't run around in a jumped-up gasmask shooting people [??!]). Have at least some of the adventures attributed to your character(s), embellishing the relevant details as much as you desire (motivations, compatriots, rivals, Grand Causes - make full use of your poetic/metaphorical license. It's like padding out your "astral resume," if you want to be cheesy about it).

As you (or your group) gradually work towards what it is that you want to do/become, and continue to develop your pseudofictional presence online, you may eventually start getting that feedback - maybe from cranks, maybe from kindred spirits (or, depending on what you're writing about, maybe from the Department of Homeland Security. Apply this technique with discretion). A single contact at just the right time can seriously shiver the boundaries between your "reality" and your "fiction." [Oh, and be very careful about how much identifiable "You" information you provide, if any, as well as the types of contact information you give - avoid any aliases/addresses/etc. that you have used previously which could be used to triangulate to your real name/location. You don't want people showing up at your house, proclaiming themselves to be envoys from a rival Right-Wing Vampire Militia.)

In the several instances (of varying intensity) that I have witnessed and/or experienced, I have to say that the results were not always the desired ones -- and in hindsight it was often possible to look back and see where the undesirable elements were coded into the fiction (or uncovered and reinforced in the "reality"). Again, play with discretion, and caution. Of course, that advice applies in any working where one is trying to make significant changes in oneself and one's life.

Good luck. And don't get caught.

~Lepidopteran
 
 
trouser the trouserian
20:18 / 26.01.05
You might find this article of interest:

Don Webb considers the relationship between magic & fiction
 
 
Ria
03:10 / 27.01.05
you can also do retroactive sigils. fix (a/the) past, clarify it, maybe even alter it.
 
 
Chiropteran
12:43 / 27.01.05
Ria, how would you go about doing that? And in what way would the past be "fixed?" The idea of magic working "backwards and forwards" in time (or nonlinearly) isn't a new one (and is something I think most magicians take for granted, whether they've ever thought about it that way or not), but how might this apply to hypersigils? Or are you talking about adjusting one's memory/perception of past events in such a way as to "undo" past traumas (which, IIRC, is part of what NLP is on about)?

~L
 
 
FinderWolf
15:11 / 27.01.05
Cool article you linked, trouser - thanks.

Always helpful is not listing your name directly in the story (if it's about you) and creating similar names (or names you feel evoke your essence, or the essence of whichever character you're dealing with that might be the avatar/fictionsuit/analogue to one of your friends, family members, etc.).

And of course, be careful what you write for, you just may get it.
 
 
Ria
15:47 / 27.01.05
I never sat down and said, "I will write a hypersigil". sat down, wrote an autobiographical story. because it worked artistically I wrote it in the second person ("you...") which may have assisted its effect.
 
 
Ria
15:51 / 27.01.05
Or are you talking about adjusting one's memory/perception of past events in such a way as to "undo" past traumas (which, IIRC, is part of what NLP is on about)?

I think part of the anxiety around past events revolves us not deciding how to describe it and when you write out the event you describe it in a permanent way.
 
 
Ria
15:56 / 27.01.05
you could try to do a retroactive hypersigil so that you went out Wednesday instead of staying home that night. if I did and other people could corroborate that would make some proof which in the case of magic you don't usually get.

figuring that if you already wrote in your blog that you stayed in Wednesday that would settle it. maybe if you haven't then you can change it.
 
 
Mug Chum
06:47 / 28.01.05
trouserian, THIS ARTICLE IS BLOODY BRILLIANT!!!! THANKS A BUNCH!!!!!!

By the way, does anyone know any other place where I can find semiotics/semiology related to magick????

tks.
 
 
trouser the trouserian
07:08 / 28.01.05
little bit on semiotics in this essay.
 
 
Unconditional Love
11:13 / 28.01.05
memetic magick by kirk thingy.

i havent read it but am intrigued by its application, looks like it could be good and is very much related to your ideas.
 
 
sine
19:51 / 28.01.05
Well, I can quickly give you some of my own musings and suggestions on the subject, some from theory, some from practice.

Try translating other techniques of magick into a textual form; for example, I've had good luck with a technique I first noticed in (wait for it) The Invisibles. It is also quite obvious in the much-discussed Illuminatus Trilogy.

Basically, I recognized during the final sequences of the story that everything leading to the 'merging of opposites' can be treated as a kind of extended dialectic annihilation - basically, the Neti-Neti technique. Once I reread Spare on the Neti-Neti, I saw how it easy it was to use prose to extend the dialectic past the simple proposition-negation-synthesis cycle and into broader, longer, more intricately symbolic arguments.

Mutual annihilation releases energy...whatever remains absorbs that energy. Beliefs are bound together with, obviously, Belief; therefore, free Belief is released when you collide them. The suspension of disbelief necessary to a good story is also achieved through a cluster of binding Belief, and it can, under the right circumstances, be liberated. Build up two narrative heads-of-steam, ram them together and let whatever remains harvest the excess. That's the theory anyhow. Seems to work.

Of course, using the principle of sympathy is a given; put your characters into situations that reflect the changes you want to effect. Depending on your style, this connexion may be more or less 'encoded' into the narrative.

I try to make full use of the emotional effects of writing: intense anger, real arousal, genuine wonderment, calm aesthetic appreciation, outright anxiety, overpowering curiosity, all can be evoked by prose and poetry with a little forethought. Generally, if I experience the emotion while I'm doing the writing, at least some trace will present itself to the Reader. Learn how to uncover and polish that trace and you can use text to orchestrate an emotional symphony to whatever end you may have in mind.

I always try to remember that any conclusion the Reader reaches on their own is far more powerful than any secondhand statement I lay at their feet. This is the essence of good propaganda and a valuable tool. When you can lead the Reader to a specific thought, or constellate pre-existing material in a particular way, the effect can be quite striking - in a sense, their minds and realities are intersecting at a single point with your own and each other, and energy can be reached through it.

The extended contemplation of an unresolved paradox seems to release a slow trickle of energy; if you can actually cut the Gordian Knot, or better, get the Reader to cut it, the release can be explosive. This effect is easily and pleasingly incorporated into mysteries.

If you do plan to have readers besides yourself, remember that what you write becomes what they read, and they do so without the benefit of knowing what will happen next. This enables you to treat the progression of your text as a sort of ritual labyrinth, where the pages are a series of chambers designed to have a specific cumulative effect, like a statuary gallery with an artfully arranged counterpoint of images and dialogue. But keep them walking - use every dirty, low-art, sensationalist, pop culture special effect technique you need to keep it riveting and them moving forward without ruining the suspension of disbelief.

Prose is a brilliant delivery system because the near-synesthetic properties of words allow for simulated initiations, quasi-hallucinatory rituals, and unfiltered access to the raw clay of dreams. Whenever I'm working a hypersigil, I constantly try to remember that drama is the essence of our experiences, a sort of code equation at the heart of life... we naturally resolve memory and history into mythic struggles, dramas, and storytelling is a powerful way to directly and purposefully inject material into the Subconscious.
 
 
Etruscan
19:04 / 02.05.05
I'm no magician, but to resurrect this thread: i've had some really powerful (and possibly gnostic, for what the term is worth) experiences while writing; esp writing with other people -- collaborative fiction, MUSHing, and the like. Strongly identifying with/writing as a specific character for weeks and months can lend itself to a bit of 'bleed' where the character gets confused with your own headspace... events that belong in the fictional world start to worm their way into the real, sometimes to a frightening degree.

Finishing a story arc, or ending a character's life produces a lot of emotional energy. I once -- quite unexpectedly -- wept in front of my keyboard while writing the symbolic death of a character. Startled the fuck out of me, I'll tell you what, and triggered a sequence of real-world events that completely rerouted my life. When I was done (and there was no question of leaving before I was done) I stood up, walked outside, and smoked three cigarettes in a row while staring stupidly at the rooftops. Scared shitless, hands shaking, no idea what had just happened or why it was important, only that it -was- important.

Fiction is art is powerful. Even without a broad readership to follow your meme, there's an imaginative process involved that can facilitate a great deal of personal change and some bizarre synchronicities. The process strikes me as incredibly similar to that used by 'occultists'. Visualization, the 'flow' where words just slide out of your head onto paper, how mythological archetypes just seem to work their way into stories...

I ramble. Anyhoo, I'd love to see more discussion of fiction-as-magic.
 
 
FinderWolf
19:35 / 11.02.07
I was just thinking about when I've read accounts of professional writers encountering hypersigil effects even if that was not remotely their intention or when such writers don't even believe in magic(k). I read an account of one successful writer, I think it was Ray Bradbury but am not certain, who wrote a story about a guy whose building caught on fire and the same thing happened to him several months later. I've read similar accounts through the years from mainstream writers who, from my knowledge, have no spiritual/magickal aspirations or interest.

John Ostrander, writer of DC Comic's "Suicide Squad," just mentioned in an interview about the DC revival of the same book that he and his co-writer/wife, Kim Yale, would write about sending the Squad to some European country where it seems like black-ops and espionage would happen, and months later, that area would become a 'hot zone' of violence/espionage in the real world. Kim Yale joked that one time they wanted to plan a vacation in Europe and she consulted with her husband on where they were sending the comic book characters to in upcoming storylines, in order to avoid going to those places, since it seemed the stories would manifest as some violence/tension/newsworthy scary headlines in our world. John Ostrander had only this to say about this effect: "Spooky!"

Philip K. Dick also mentioned a few anecdotes about similar things happening, and I know I've read about other mainstream writers who have nothing to do with sci-fi or comics describing such hypersigilic effects. Anyone have any other examples they're heard about? (We are probably all familiar with Alan Moore's statements that years after he created John Constantine in the pages of Swamp Thing, he ran into a man who looked exactly like J.C. in a pub and the figure smiled at him and walked out. Apparently Moore encountered J.C. in real life a second time, where J.C. said "That's the secret of magic, mate - any bloke can do it" or something to that effect. Or am I confusing my stories...? I recall that after that encounter, he had J.C. say that very line in an issue of Swamp Thing.)
 
 
Quantum
08:36 / 12.02.07
Here's that panel and the story.
 
 
Mario
19:01 / 16.02.07
That particular panel is actually from a Paul Jenkins issue.
 
 
squareye
08:31 / 19.02.07
There are precedents for imaginative stories used for 'spiritual' transformations - e.g. the exercises of St. Ignatius of Loyola. Also the tantric exercises of Tibetan Buddhism.
 
 
Dutch
08:01 / 21.02.07
In reading this, I was wondering about a comment that hunter s. thompson made regarding the fictional character Raoul Duke. In some ways, the fictional character seemed to have taken over, in his words.

Can the construction of any major fictional character that the author, to some level, identifies with, become a hypersigil? Even when one has not taken into account the magical aspects of said identification?

I'm trying to formulate the right words to phrase this all, but it seems to me that the success of an alter ego, say for instance in the music industry, has the possibility to elevate itself beyond the fiction into becoming a reality overshadowing the person who created it.

Are the alter ego's of say, marshall mathers or the ICP possibly hypersigils even when not construed as such from the point of origin?
 
 
Quantum
08:52 / 22.02.07
I think you're getting fictionsuit and hypersigil mixed up there.
 
  
Add Your Reply