BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Renaissance Men (& Women)

 
 
All Acting Regiment
20:32 / 23.01.05
Is it possible to spread your artistic efforts too thin?

If an artist involves themselves in several very different projects at once, is some of the quality lost?

Or, is it better that we try out every avenue available to us rather than specialising? What's your view?
 
 
alas
01:51 / 24.01.05
Well, in general, you have to think about what your goals are--there's an old saying in some old wise culture somewhere that suggests if you want to find water, you're not going to get there by digging 100 shallow holes. You have to dig one, and go deep.

But if you want a lot of topsoil, well, then you dig differently.

I think we're largely too distracted in this culture. (Umm. . . what was I talking about?)

We are pulled in too many directions. The consumer-based nature of our culture multiplies our desires, and encourages us to believe that a quick, easy, superficial engagement with any thing or person or idea is enough--or should be. If it takes too long or is confusing, that's not our fault.

So, since that mode strikes me as dominant, I say: resist. Dig deeper. Get bored with something, even, but stay with it. (Walter Benjamin says "Boredom is the dream-bird that hatches the egg of experience. " For whatever that slightly hallucinogenic thought is worth. The point I see in it is that boredom has a kind of fecundity, possibility.)

At least carefully examine your reasons for wanting to spread out.

[Oh, here's a little bit more of that Benjamin thing--from an essay in Illuminations about the art of storytelling, but I think we should at least consider the possibility that it's relevant to any art:

"This process of assimilation, which takes place in depth, requires a state of relaxation that is becoming rarer and rarer. If sleep is the apogee of physical relaxation, boredom is the apogee of mental relaxation. Boredom is the dream bird that hatches the egg of experience. A rustling in the leaves drives him away. His nesting places - the activies that are intimately associated with boredom - are already extinct in the cities and are declining in the country as well. With this the gift for listening [i.e., I say: paying attention and internalizing something in a deep way] is lost and the comminity of listeners disappears. For storytelling is always the art of repeated stories, and this art is lost when the stories are no longer retained."
 
 
Alex's Grandma
06:55 / 24.01.05
I think it would be possible, and possibly even desirable, to have several different projects on the go at the same time if they were all coming from the same place artistically, as t'were. An example might be Nick Cave's stuff during the Eighties, where the music and writing, while on the face of it representing two separate fields of endeavour, actually seemed to feed off each other.

On the other hand, if the projects were 'very' different, I could see that causing problems. I don't see why you shouldn't be walking several different dogs at once, so to speak, but if they all start pulling in different directions, then there's a danger you'll wind up flat on your ass,* I'd suppose.



* More gnomic utterances available at the above address.
 
 
Lilly Nowhere Late
18:46 / 24.01.05
Just had to say I love that Benjamin passage. I reckon that when the mind is taxed to bits over one project, there is a freedom of flow over perhaps at least one other project. If the taxing project is quite pragmatic and not overly creative, the 2nd more creative project might benefit by the mind's lack of ability to control it and restrict/restrain itself due to pure exhaustion.

One can be honest and evaluate for oneself if one is being able to give properly in many directions. However, one is not everything...
 
  
Add Your Reply