BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


2005: What are you currently reading?

 
  

Page: 1 ... 23456(7)89

 
 
Lysander Stark
10:09 / 06.09.05
I am reading Good Women by Jane Stevenson-- only just begun the book, but so far it seems suitably wicked and erudite, although the character narrating at the moment has too many contractions in his written language-- 'I'd've' etc. But that is small potatoes. This is a good change after the fantastic Farewell My Lovely by Chandler (Raymond, that is), which makes me never want to write again it is all so crisp and entertaining, and the early Swamp Thing tpb, 'The Curse', where John Constantine first appeared.

To the reader of Northanger Abbey, I hate to say it, but it should be the last of Austen's books to read, as she takes the mickey out of her own books, and the other novels of the day, by parodying that sort of romantic melodrama. But as long as you keep that in mind, it can be a rewarding read (but not really a patch on P & P or S & S, not that authentic Austen hit that so many seek...).
 
 
Loomis
10:40 / 06.09.05
Almost finished Cloudstreet by Tim Winton. Such a gem. Why didn't I read this years ago?
 
 
Kit-Cat Club
10:51 / 06.09.05
I wouldn't have called any of Jane Austen's novels 'romantic melodramas', Lysander... surely she is poking run at Anne Radcliffe et al rather than her own work?
 
 
nighthawk
11:46 / 06.09.05
I'm reading a lot of non-fiction at the moment so I don't have much time for novels. I started The Silent Cry by Kenzaburo Oe about a week ago but I'm only about 30 pages in. Nothing to do with the book itself, although the opening is quite odd, and it seems to be a little different in tone from the other novel I've read by him (Rise Up Oh Young Men of the New Age, or something close to that - its a line from Blake).

Before that I read Moby Dick, which I really enjoyed. It was quite unlike anything I've ever read before, and everything I'd been warned about was true (page after page of information about whaling), but I'm glad I finally got round to reading it.
 
 
Lysander Stark
12:15 / 06.09.05
A little Austen aside, following Kit-Kat Club's last, and with according apologies-- Austen's books are melodramas when viewed from our cool and distant Noughties perspective, I think. All that fuss about kissing! All that worry! But what I thought Austen did so well in Northanger is to mock both the industry that had grown up very recently, and to a great degree around her, and also to self-deprecatingly puncture her own literary balloon.

When it comes to the crunch, it is true that most of the puncturing, both in Northanger and in her other works, is of the conventions of the stories of the day, but the fact remains that Austen perpetuated them in her own right with unions such as the Bennett Darcy marriage, or the variant ending of Mansfield Park, etc etc. That is why Northanger is so intriguing-- to an extent, Austen is repenting of her own additions of fuel to the fires of young ladies' (often irrational) aspirations throughout the Kingdom and the colonies...

I am, in case it is not conveyed at all, a serious fan of her works and her writing, which drips with acidic wit as can be found, as far as I know, nowhere else.
 
 
Ariadne
12:57 / 06.09.05
I'm on a Wilkie Collins run at the moment - I read Armadale, and have just finished The Moonstone, with The Woman in White sitting waiting on my shelf. In between times, because Collins is just so darned involved, I'm skipping happily through a book called The Stornoway Way, by Kevin MacNeil. It's set on Lewis and is, so far, a look at contemporary, drunken, island life. I'm enjoying it so far.
 
 
Jack Vincennes
08:59 / 17.09.05
I'm reading Kafka's The Castle, and finding it curiously similar in tone to Flyboy's text adventure game. Enjoying it a lot, the last Kafka I read was the Metamorphosis collection of stories and I think the novels are a lot better -more time for the plot to develop (or obviously fail to).
 
 
Shrug
19:31 / 23.09.05
I think the lith has steered me in many a generous direction as regards literature but this, and it's early days yet, may be one of the best. A couple of years ago I picked up two Irish Murdoch books second-hand The Sea, The Sea and A Severed Head but for whatever reason, and oh boy do I feel foolish now, never picked them up again.
I'm solely in the first few chapters of A Severed Head and premature perhaps but there is something wonderfully sumptuous about the pros. Chapter 2 left me jubilant. I find myself unwilling to read more for fear of dissapointment.
 
 
ibis the being
16:45 / 26.09.05
I just tore through The Other End of the Leash by Patricia McConnell and The Dog Listener by Jan Fennell, two books on dog-human relationships written by animal behaviorists. They were both great though not in total agreement with each other - I think I lean toward the McConnell viewpoint.

Borrowed Alias Grace by Margaret Atwood from the library, hoping for a semi-light read, and I can't even get 100 pages in. It's just not holding my attention.

I bought and started Lullaby by Chuck Palaniuk. I've never read anything of his before and thought it was high time. To my disappointment, it's not to my taste AT ALL. I'm really not into his moralizing, however "hip"-ly phrased. I'll probably push through it anyway because it's short.
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
17:03 / 26.09.05
I like Palahniuk a lot, though I can see why many others don't. Lullaby, though, I would say is by far his weakest book. (Survivor being, imho, his best).
 
 
haus of fraser
15:32 / 28.09.05
I finished Cloud Atlas last week- and i loved it- it took a little getting used to- the first couple of chapters are pretty slow and the first chapter jump leaves you wondering what's going on (i had managed to avoid spoilers thankfully)- however once I hit the third chapter i ripped through it, I don't think I had a particular favourite 'story' each one had something that kept me attached.

Definitely a page turner and a book i'd happily recommend to anyone. Its very strange when your reading one of the books of the moment- i was on the tube one day and saw 3 other people reading it in my carriage alone then got into work and two collegues are also reading it.

I bailed on starting Jonathan strange & Mr Norrell - as i decided that i should save it for my holiday in Cornwall in two weeks (I much prefer reading whole books on holiday- and this one seems like it will suit a log fire!)- as a stopgap book am now reading my 50p purchase Rat Pack Confidential which is (as you'd expect) pretty tabloid and starting to get a little dull now- so may switch to Jonathan Strange...
 
 
Our Lady Has Left the Building
17:45 / 28.09.05
Now on The Fountain at the Centre of the World by Rob Newman and am seriously considering breaking my rule about not giving up on books but reading them all the way through. It is mind-numbingly dull for the most part, introduces the characters quickly and then does nothing for ages. I also find I like the evil corporate bastards rather than the poor oppressed Mexicans, though I couldn't exactly say why.

It feels terribly over-written, as though Newman has sweated over every single word and phrase. It's a bit like Dependence Day, the only other book by Newman that I read, soon after it came out, he has a perfectly good idea for a story, then insists on dragging it out too far. (Though if you haven't read DD you must read the first chapter, a very funny David Bowie story that has nothing to do with the rest of the book).
 
 
Delicatesseract
04:38 / 01.10.05
Double Shrug, I don't know if you ever braved Miss Murdoch again, but I'm interested in hearing more about her. I hear she's a nutjob and for that reason I've had a bit of approach/avoidance with her. Fascinated, but a little nervous about diving in. So I haven't read any yet but The Severed Head looks compelling, title alone. To whom would you compare her?

As far as Palahniuk, I'm probably biased towards Choke, which was my first and fairly recent exposure. I liked that essentially you had one odd guy in a fairly unique set of predicaments that reinforced each other. I felt that Survivor poked at this idea but with less compelling result. The cult thing and the "fame arc" were sort of gimmicky and trite. I just finished Invisible Monsters which was a train wreck of a book with a get-well card inside; the fact that it wasn't a nihilist toss-off in the end was probably the bizarrest twist of all.

Currently I'm devouring Greetings From Earth by Scott Bradfield. These are short stories about people and it's hard to say much more than this. Some of the endings don't always make sense directly but nonetheless, the stories feel resolved. I like how he writes characters, and I like how he can create such dense, complete internal worlds in a short-story format. Doubleplus good and all that.
 
 
matthew.
14:20 / 01.10.05
threadrot

re: Palahniuk. Yeah, sure, his hip style is hip, but it becomes altogether annoying after six books. It's called evolution, buddy, try it! Within his style, he does the same thing over and over and over.
Example:
I say to her, I don't know.
I say to her, I could never know.
The autopsy usually starts with a Y-incision across the chest and down the stomach.
I say, I will never know.
The ribs are cracked open and the organs pulled out.
I say, How could I know?
The organs are put in jars and...

That's Chuck for ya!

Diary is easily is his worst book. At least Lullaby had an interesting premise. Diary has nothing. Chuck called it his Rosemary's Baby, which is to say, a community rallies into a conspiracy against a couple people. Yeah... it fucking sucked. I loved Survivor and Fight Club. Everything else is like a bad copy of those two.

/threadrot
 
 
matthew.
14:21 / 01.10.05
Oh yeah, and currently I'm reading Red Mars by Kim Stanley Robinson for the second time. I hate the politics that bog down the second half of this book. Maybe I'll be able to read the other books in the trilogy after this for once.
 
 
MrKismet
16:19 / 03.10.05
Just bought Jonathan Carroll's Glass Soup, the sequel to White Apples, so I suppose I need to go back and re-read the first one.

Also, Neil Gaiman's Anansi Boys, his follow-up to American Gods .
 
 
ibis the being
18:36 / 03.10.05
I finished Lullaby. It did have an interesting premise, and there were things about the story that I liked... parts reminded me of Tom Robbins, other parts of Vonnegut. The writing, though, got way up my ass. I can't take seriously any writer who so earnestly references "Big Brother" - and sooo many times! Yikes!

Example: The easiest way to avoid living is to just watch. Look for the details. Report. Don't participate. Let Big Brother do the singing and dancing for you. Be a reporter. Be a good witness. A grateful member of the audience. Or his whole "these noiseoholics, these quietophobics." It's embarassing, like reading a teenager's diary.

Now I've started A Million Little Pieces by James Frey - autobiographical account of drug/alcohol addiction recovery. Cheese factor: it's the current Oprah book club pick. What can I say, it looked interesting. So far it's absolutely riveting - I tore through the first 100 pages last night when I should have been sleeping.
 
 
Mourne Kransky
18:42 / 03.10.05
Iris Murdoch was a nutjob? Take that language somewhere else, delicatesseract.

Happy to dicsuss her writing but without the gratuitously offensive terminology.
 
 
haus of fraser
11:36 / 04.10.05
As predicted upthread I gave up on my 50p Rat Pack Confidential - there's only so many times you can hear how worthy Sammy Davies Junior was- or how cool Sinatra was... pages and pages of it... horrible

The good news is that i'm now reading Jonathan Strange and Mr Norrell which is making me very very happy at the moment... I found myself looking forward to a long train ride i had to do this morning as it meant more reading time... a good sign!
 
 
Ulysses Lazarus
19:13 / 04.10.05
as i currently find myself living abroad sequestered from typical concerns i decided to take the opportunity to read the three bees in my bonnet for the last couple of years. to that end i find myself trying to conquer the following tomes:

Ulysses, Magick in Theory and Practice, the Atrocity Exhibition

I recommend House of Leaves and Stranger in a Strange Land to just about everyone who will listen.
 
 
Jack Vincennes
20:23 / 04.10.05
How's the Ulysses going? I'd read the first 150 pages about five times once I'd actually finished it, each on different concerted efforts to read something good. After the first 150, though, whilst it didn't get much easier I got into it a bit more. Still like Dubliners best, though.

I'm reading Uncle Fred In The Springtime to make up for the shockingly few Blandings stories I've read, and Porterhouse Blue, which I got on spec from the library and is, for something I got on the vague notion a friend of mine mentioned it three years ago, rather a good read.
 
 
Delicatesseract
03:56 / 05.10.05
Sorry about the nutjob thing. I should have put that in quotes because that's the term a few people have used to describe Iris Murdoch to me. I don't know one way or another and I'm the last person to be questioning someone else's sanity. Plus, in my book "nutjobs" are kinda ok.
 
 
Mistoffelees
10:07 / 05.10.05
After I finally finished Quicksilver, Mask De Vincennes told me, I should give the second part of the Baroque trilogy a try.

It´s been over a month now, and I´m finally close to page 500 (=300 more to go) of Confusion.

I find these books really hard to read. And sometimes I just don´t understand what´s happening:

Yesterday I read a part, where two guys are sitting and talking in a pub. Suddenly for no apparent reason another man bites off the ear off of a fourth man. And then a hand gets pinned to the wall by a silver dagger. Huh? Que?
 
 
jeed
10:11 / 05.10.05
Just finished Kazuo Ishiguro's 'The Unconsoled'. I'm really bad at giving up on books, so i ploughed through it. In places it was beautiful, with some incredibly poetic turns of phrase, but...gah. Zero characterisation, the timewarps, the interchangeable geography, the lack of consequence to ANY actions made me want to tear my arm off and beat myself to death with the wet end. I can deal with unusual structures and forms, but on finishing I felt like i'd been on the wrong end of a half-arsed creative writing exercise, and I want those hours of my life back. Five cocking pages describing a conversation during a two-floor journey in a lift about the wallpaper in a cafe...

Of course i may be missing something. Enlighten me if I am.

Now just started Haldor Laxness' 'Independent People', picked up after a trip to Iceland and so far I'm really getting into it. Very of it's country, very true, whatever that means, and some of the writing strips your skin from your bones with its clarity. How much of that's the translator though, i'm not sure.
 
 
OJ
10:35 / 05.10.05
I wish I could enlighten you jd, but The Unconsoled is the only Kazuo Ishiguro novel I never finished. Despite having been carried along by some of the meandering, dreamlike passages in When We Were Orphans I just could not get along with it.

For something completely different, can I suggest A Pale View of Hills if you haven't already read it. Brief, elliptical, haunting. I might re-read it myself.

Speaking of giving up, I think I've now officially given up on The Line of Beauty . Just into the second phase and halfway through the umpteenth interminable Tory social occasion I realised that I'd rather stab myself with a fork than go any further. I hate giving up on books but I just can't do it.

Now reading Paul Auster's Oracle Night , picked up at almost random as the third of a 3 for 2. It bodes well so far, despite the tricksy footnotes adding to the story within a story structure, it has - hoorah - narrative momentum. Also, am feeling hopeful because I finally got around to watching a videoed South Bank show about Sophie Calle*, whose work I'm currently interested in and discovered that there is a connection between the two. Connections always work well for me.

Also trying to read The Renaissance (Walter Pater), a charity shop pickup. Haven't read anything about him since University (about a decade ago) but it piqued my interest.
 
 
Jack Vincennes
11:38 / 05.10.05
Sorry you're not enjoying it so much Mistoffeles; I think part of the reason I recommended it was that I know it gets confusing and I thought it'd be worth keeping the momentum going with the Cycle. As far as I remember it does become clearer what's going on -you see a lot more of the ear-biter in The System Of The World, and whilst his role in The Confusion is rather obscure it is explained later (either in the book you're reading or the next one). Really, I'm just encouraging you to keep going with them -there's a lot of explaining done in System, so it's worth hanging in there! (Although I wouldn't blame you for not believing that line again.)
 
 
Tryphena Absent
13:31 / 05.10.05
I have finally finished Laurell K Hamilton's latest heap of dung, I think it's called Incubus Dreams and basically in summary it contains too much sex not enough violence. I read them because sometimes trash is important and if you're going to read a bad book it should be really, really bad.

Now I'm about to start The Oxford Murders because I wanted to read a crime novel and it seemed the most detective-like without being a Detective novel in Books Etc this lunchtime. I'm 99% certain it's better than Incubus Dreams.
 
 
Lysander Stark
13:49 / 05.10.05
I am reading The Idea of North by Peter Davidson, the husband of the author of Good Women which I mentioned earlier. Peter was one of my tutors at university, and one of the most fascinating and erudite people I have ever known.

His book traces ideas of North in literature, art and even just mentality and links Philip Pullman to Auden to Inuit sculpture to Norse myth to Ancient Greece etc etc etc. It is fascinating and entertaining, written in beautiful prose, making stunning leaps from subject to subject but, ehm, for my attention span there is a little too much info and it is taking me a while to read it...
 
 
Ulysses Lazarus
19:39 / 05.10.05
How's the Ulysses going? I'd read the first 150 pages about five times once I'd actually finished it

Funny... I've had basically the same experience with it minus the finishing it bit. My attention has been a bit more directed toward the Atrocity Exhibition and I suspect I ought to ignore my desire to look up every word I don't know or don't understand in context. At the same time, I enjoy seeing how Joyce will use a word like "hyperborean" and have each meaning be equally interesting / relevant.
 
 
Baz Auckland
00:03 / 06.10.05
I finished 'Everything is Illuminated' last week, and it really... sort of annoyed me. I was disappointed since I had heard such good things about it.

Now I'm up to volume 4 of 5 of Philip K Dick's Complete Short Stories. Damn, I'm enjoying these!
 
 
Mistoffelees
07:50 / 06.10.05
Now I'm up to volume 4 of 5 of Philip K Dick's Complete Short Stories. Damn, I'm enjoying these!

Yes, those are great, I´ve read them all and most of his novels!

One short story was weird, though - The Pre-Persons (1973, fifth volume).

It´s about his view of abortion, taken to the extreme, mixed with his usual paranoia.

The children can be legally taken to "abortion clinics", until they´re 12 years old. That´s when they officially get "souls" and become human. And he describes how the children are afraid, and are hiding whenever they see a white truck approaching.

A very chilly story, and PKD got a lot of flak, threats and hate mail for that. I never expected him to write something like that, that was totally out of left field.
 
 
A fall of geckos
14:20 / 06.10.05
I've just finished reading a piece of 1950s science fiction - Wasp, by Eric Frank Russell.

It's a simple premise - a young man with a natural talent for disruption is sent to infiltrate a fascist society and destroy it. The example he is told to emulate is the actions of a wasp within a car, buzzing around and distracting the occupants - causing the driver to loose control and kill everyone. The hero duly disguises himself and starts a one man terror campaign, faking a political group, killing policemen and mail bombing members of the secret police. The intent being for one person to occupy a disproportionate amount of the enemy’s resources...

''Mail would be examined, and all suspicious parcels would be taken apart in a blast-proof room. There'd be a city-wide search with radiation-detectors for the component parts of a fission bomb. Civil defence would be alerted in readiness to cope with a mammoth explosion that might or might not take place. Anyone on the streets who walked with a secretive air and wore a slightly mad expression would be arrested and hauled in for questioning."

It's not a particularly well written book - it reminds me of the Stainless Steel Rat series I read in my teens only with more murders, bombings and assassinations. It's fascinating though as a piece of cold war science fiction, especially in today’s political climate.
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
14:27 / 06.10.05
Yesterday I read a part, where two guys are sitting and talking in a pub. Suddenly for no apparent reason another man bites off the ear off of a fourth man. And then a hand gets pinned to the wall by a silver dagger. Huh? Que?

The ear-biter is Charles White, a Tory who is not above using physical violence to intimidate his Whig opponents (since he is in all likelihood also a psychopath). He's not a nice man. The incident illustrates that the world of politics in London at the time, although very respectable and cultivated and civilised in many ways, was also vicious in more than a metaphorical sense.

It's also an important moment because of what it tells you about Roger Comstock aka the Marquis of Ravenscar: that not only is he now a consummate political operative, but he can back it up with a knife if he has to (he's not just a fop). He's able to deal with this kind of world, whereas Daniel Waterhouse doesn't think he is, which is partly why he buggers off to America shortly thereafter.
 
 
Mistoffelees
15:07 / 06.10.05
Aha, thanks for the explanation. That moment took me out of the narration. One moment I´m reading about 17th century politics, suddenly there´s a Hannibal Lector/US boxer incident.

I´ll buy the third book tomorrow, because I heard, people immediately want to continue reading, when the second part stops [cliffhanger ending?].
 
 
Delicatesseract
15:46 / 06.10.05
I just finished Mao II by Don Delillo. It's about a writer who leaves his well-tended seclusion to lend his voice to a hostage situation in the Middle East. It's also about the people he's involved with, including a photographer who only takes pictures of writers, his assistant, and his/his assistant's lover, who is a former and unsuccessfully deprogrammed Moonie. This is my first Delillo and he has a penchant for overly drawn out and meditative opening scenes. (This is why I never made it past the first five pages of Underworld.) That said, if you can get past it, it's a crystalline glimpse that lends context to the remainder of the book. It's just at the time it seems a little masturbatory. And he kind of is. His characterization is both engaging and off-putting; I fantasize about someone writing about me the way he writes his characters, but because the scrutiny is precise but cool, it has this kind of killing jar distancing effect. The book was written in 1991 and includes the conflicts in Beirut and the death of the Ayatollah. Even though there are still conflicts in the Middle East, his specifics date the book somewhat. The way the book seems to pertain to a very specific time in history, despite references to other period and regimes, also does a lot to distance the reader. As a result of this distance I never found myself caring about what he wanted me to care about, which was the influence of masses. Delillo's agenda and my agendas were pretty diammetric: I kept wanting to bask in his exquisite focus on individual characters, and he wanted me to get caught up in the fray of crowds, so we spent the whole book wrangling. I still don't know whether I liked that or not.

Next up: Dance Dance Dance by Haruki Murakami
 
  

Page: 1 ... 23456(7)89

 
  
Add Your Reply