BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Bodies

 
 
Ganesh
23:10 / 01.12.04
I can recall enthusing about Jed Mercurio's book of the same name when it came out, a year or two ago, but Barbe-searches have failed to yield anything on either the book or the Channel 4 series, now nearing its conclusion.

Mercurio (not his real name) is a disaffected-doctor-turned-writer: I endured my own House Officer year around the same time as his Cardiac Arrest, and I remember being excited, along with my colleagues, by how honest it seemed, bitterly black humour and all - how, next to cosily bland Casualty and histrionically poisonous ER, it was a breath of fresh air. It really felt as if he were telling it like it is.

Bodies, the book, is apparently semi-autobiographical, returning to many of the same concerns as Cardiac Arrest with less flippancy. C4's adaptation, while remaining broadly faithful to the tone of the novel, has, if anything, gone darker still. On the one hand, I appreciate anything which goes some way in countering the breast-beating medico-martyrdom of other hospital dramas; on the other, Bodies is almost too relentless in its bleakness. Nobody is motivated by altruism any more, or the urge to heal; in Bodies' NHS, doctors and nurses are routinely punished for idealism, while the cynical, corrupt and frankly dangerous thrive.

It's gripping stuff, and extremely well-acted. Patrick Baladi's incredibly convincing as incompetent-but-treacherous surgeon Roger Hurley, and Keith Allen is somehow perfect as his secretary-shagging counterpart. At least half of it's shot at night, giving a claustrophobic, sometimes Hellish feel - which is just how I remember hospital-based on-call.

Is anyone else watching this? I'd be interested to hear how it's perceived by those who don't work in the NHS...
 
 
Ganesh
00:17 / 02.12.04
Ah, found it. Here's where I previously mentioned Bodies, as a prelude to my own embittered NHS rant. Might be worth reviving that thread...
 
 
Nobody's girl
12:22 / 02.12.04
I've been enjoying this drama. It's well written and acted and the sets look a lot more like the NHS hospitals I know than any other medical drama I've seen. It is a little on the bleak side, but I wonder if they wont give us some form of a happy ending after all.

As far as being realistic, I'm not really sure. The pessimist in me thinks this is exactly the way it really is amongst the medical elite, but I accept that I will probably never know for sure. The year I worked in a clinic I saw quite a lot of the politicing between the staff, and I have to say that I found the hugely inflated egos of the consultants incredibly irritating. The politicing between nurses was also pretty horrendous but the seemed to have an unspoken rule to keep it "in the family" and cosset the consultants.

A friend of mine recently made a point about how it might be a good thing if doctors were knocked off their pedestal as mighty healers because it must be such a strain on them not to be allowed to make the occasional human mistake, like everyone does. I think Bodies is addressing that issue by making the line between incompetence and arrogance (Hurley) and genuine human error/system error (the Angela Strawberry debacle) clear. Sadly, I certainly wouldn't put it past hospital management to cover up for an incompetent doctor to keep valuable reseach money and kudos.

I really enjoyed the episode with the woman insisting on a C-section because it was fashionable and then being surprised at the subsequent infection and complications. Irate Patient- "I thought hospitals were meant to be clean!"
Bemused Polly- "Who told you that?"
 
 
_pin
14:08 / 02.12.04
Doesn't it all just seem so... inefficient? Would a hospital really gain so much money and respect from having the Mean One on board, given that he is so stunningly awful at his job? Enough to make the endless sitting in meetings being nasty to ex-patients seem worth it?

I assume the chairs aren't very comfy and the coffee is poor, if nothing else. I just can't buy that that much unnecessary self-flagelation goes on in hospital administration. Does it? Am I going to be forced to conclude that real life isn't very believable?
 
 
Ganesh
22:57 / 02.12.04
Mobody's Girl: Yes, it's all quite believable, really. O guess it's all about concentration: it seems like every sort of NHS dodginess is happening in Max Beesley's ward, to the max extent possible. My own experience suggests a lower level of NHS sleight-of-hand is pretty much everyday - and yes, one's consultant's peccadilloes are largely indulged. Which may be, acutely, a good or a bad thing - but actual quantifiable results should always be accessible.

(I'm so pished this is laughable...)
 
 
Joetheneophyte
17:30 / 03.12.04
The series to date has been excellent in my opinion (as layperson as it comes)

SPOILERS:



I love the main character, he has an altruistic and 'decent' streak but in the first four episodes at least, his self preservation and faith in humanity has allowed him to make some poor decisions regarding how he should proceed. Even when he found the strength of character to help the victims, he still wanted to make a deal where everybody would benefit and was royally shafted as a result. Despite his clandestine affair, he at least on the surface seems to want his affair 'partner' to come clean and make a break from her husband and presumably join with him

I still believe the hero of the hour will be Keith Allen's character. I honestly think he will eventually find his balls and do the right thing. The Irish anaesthatist is fabulous, her acting is top notch and her distress over the lack of heartbeat of her unborn child was quite moving and distressing to watch.

The little remaining utopian socialist that still stirs in the recesses of my psyche did surface over this programme as it seems to at every opportunity to poo-pooh the NHS and Michael Howard couldn't do a better job of calling for privatisation than this show does week in week out.

Recently, I have broken a finger and the treatment I recieved at the A and E dept was excellent.
Admittedly, the hospital was dirty and it is no wonder that superbugs and whop knows what else are rampant but I blame this on giving cleaning contracts to the cheapest tender (that socialist in me is still active!)

Bodies is excellent and the acting is first class but I would definatly ward away any person facing an imminent operation, from watching this show. Depressing in the extreme but captivating nonetheless
 
 
haus of fraser
10:04 / 10.12.04
I watched this for the first time on Wednesday, and was fairly taken aback at the graphic detail used in the birth scenes- warts, blood, knives, vagina and all- reminded me of Saxes Birth post- Daphne giving birth in Neighbours with her knickers on this was not! I don't think I've hidden my face as much since I saw Davros for the first time on Doctor who when I was 6.

It was very well made- great to see a British drama that seems to want to compete with the likes of ER (in terms of style and tension) rather than the friendly faces of Casualty or the ex Holloaks cast of Holby City. Interestingly as Ganesh pointed out- the night thing added to the tension- something that casualty never pulled off- the fact that it was well lit (a semi film noir feel) and lots of the camera was shot handheld made it definitely unsettling and stunning to watch. The cast was brilliant- Keith Allen and Max Beesley achieved what i thought was the impossible- i didn't hate either of them!

I will be watching again although i reserve the right to cover my face and demand Mrs Copey never has children...
 
 
Peach Pie
22:41 / 23.12.04
Caught the last episode in the series, and wished I'd started watching sooner.

I thought the typecasting couldn't get more obvious than Keith Allen as smarmy consultant gynaecologist. Step forward... Patrick Baladi.
 
 
Ganesh
22:44 / 23.12.04
I thought Bodies was excellently-casted. My only real typecasting gripe was the old psychiatrist-as-catspaw-of-corrupt-regime schtick - which gets a bit wearying.
 
 
Peach Pie
00:26 / 24.12.04
sadly unable to comment knowledgeably on this fascinating interpretation.... why would a psychiatrist be a stereotypical choice for that?
 
 
Ganesh
09:31 / 24.12.04
Because the process of psychiatric diagnosis is open to abuse, particularly in more repressive regimes, as a tool for the undermining/neutralisation of political 'undesirables'. I'm assuming Bodies is drawing parallels between such regimes and machiavellian NHS management culture. Which is all well and groovy, but it's rather a well-worn trope - and one liable to grate on those of us with actual experience of occupational health clinics.

And the shrink's actual diagnosis - "depression, anxiety and paranoia" - was something of a bollocky non-diagnosis.
 
 
Peach Pie
12:48 / 24.12.04
as a tool for the undermining/neutralisation of political 'undesirables'

Seriously? That happens in real life? I'm starting to feel all wet behind the ears and parochial.
 
 
Ganesh
10:55 / 26.09.05
I don't think it happens a great deal in real life, but it's popularly perceived to happen a fair bit. More common is probably psychiatrist-as-get-out-clause or meal-ticket.

Revived this thread because I caught the first episode of the new series, and I'm loving it as much as before, even as the concentrated NHS nastiness reaches new credulity-straining heights. I'm loving the inter-consultant rivalry, with Keith Allen's unravelling Tony Whitman skilfully manipulating Baladi's well-meaning-but-crap Clinical Director character into one gory bloodbath after another. I'm wondering how, plot-wise, they're going to sustain the current situation of Beesley working his notice until a replacement can be found...
 
  
Add Your Reply