|
|
A very, very long time? Makes one wonder which movies you attend, or buy, or see.
(This discussion could go multiple ways, but to narrow down what I meant, I'll say that I can prefer - can - stunningly realized movies which can be vapid to some or inferior to the earlier movies by the same director; I mean, I enjoyed the heck outta the beautifully staged Panic Room even though it wasn't the wholesome package in the way that Fight Club and Se7en were; I prefer the fourth Alien movie - and here I can't get virtually anyone to agree with me - because it is visually stunning, with all the characteristic Jeunet cinematic touches and besides, trust me on this, there's not a whole lot of difference between Amelie and Alien (and A Very Long Engagement, based on the trailer) cinematically, if not for the content; The Machinist, which I just saw today, is a marriage of form and content - to deconstruct this one more, a thread devoted to it and some tremendous spoilers would be needed), Finding Nemo/Incredibles are, as I have previously stated, exquisite (and yeah, Cameron, fuck Shrek); the beyootifully fun, funky and fantastic Charlies Angels: Full Throttle; Spun, and perhaps not for the visuals but more for the untraditional methods Åkerlund goes about editing the story (and I shall proclaim that he should receive his own Directors Series entry! Smack my Bitch Up, My Favourite Game, Ray of Light are qualifiers); the underrated noir fest, the Salton Sea; and I could go on if you ask me to, TeN)
Compared to these, Eternal Sunshine is very pared down, visually. Interesting narrative structure, certainly, but nothing fancy. |
|
|