|
|
Gypsy Lantern: As has been pointed out at least twice in this thread already, the early 90s passing fad of "ska" in US pop culture, didn't really happen at all in the UK....Not exactly a passing fad, you see?
TunaGhost: That doesn't change the fact that, in the early nineties, in the US, pop culture-wise, it was a passing fad
So Gypsy Lantern, what's your point? Tuna Ghost is pretty explicit about the fact that it happened in the US. Your post about the history of ska in the UK is interesting (not sarcasm) but unfortunately barely relevant. Ska was mentioned by Flyboy, then TunaGhost mentioned it and asked if the ska "period" in the UK was similar to the ska "fad" in the US. You jumped all over that.
You wrote: You people sniggering at ska as if it were some flash in the pan US pop-punk craze from the 90s are fucking laughable.
But a good portion of people on this thread are "sniggering" at No Doubt.
The reason why I'm taking you to task is because one could make absolutely any claim similar to this:
If it wasn't made in Kingston in the 1960s, it wasn't ska. Just replace the city, time, and the style, and you have a weird sentence like this:
If it wasn't made in Atlanta in the early 1960s, it wasn't rhythm and blues.
To use this example quickly... if I said that Usher or R. Kelly was R&B, the speaker of the italicized sentence could say, "That's not R&B; Aretha, Sam Cooke, Otis Redding was R&B" The point is...
Toksik wrote: a lot of music evolves as it ages and spreads
It evolves, man. |
|
|