|
|
Sorry to be snide - the network and coordination is obviously well-needed, but then so are some tactics that actually work. The following exchange from the Archives of Pita's mailing list doesn't exactly fill me with hope. One guy wrote:
I'm not exactly sure what you are saying, so please feel free to correct me on this. It's seems as though you are saying that occult work is largely a waste of time, and that one should practice physical means, as that is what actually works. If I am wrong, apologies in advance. Going on that premise, I would ask, unless it causes a person to not do the physical techniques such as lobbying, protest, and the like, what can it hurt? Logic dictates that given the condition, *no change in physical involvement*, if magick does not work, nothing has been lost. If magick does work, something has been gained, provided the condition, *no change in physical involvement*, is met. It seems like an old argument to me, "Does magick work or doesn't it?" The problem with the argument is that it frequently pre-supposes the proposition that using it somehow reduces one's desire to engage in physical means. It may do that, or it may not, or any combination of the two in succession. Ultimately, until magick's functions are proven using solid physics,(as if there is any such thing), there is really no way to tell whether occult action of any type does anything. So my question is, "Why not?" |
|
|