BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Out, Vile Thing!

 
 
Seth
10:17 / 11.07.01
My mind's been dwelling on this subject (exorcism) a lot recently, not least because one of my friends may have problems (and it may be down to me to deal with it, at least in part). I have limited experience and knowledge in this area, and I'm finding it hard to get a well-rounded view based on my own faith. I tend to question everything put before me – I thought I'd throw it out to you lot so we can share knowledge and experience. Remember: I recognise there are beliefs and phenomena that exist outside of my understanding of my own particular faith. I wouldn't be asking for help otherwise!

I come from a Charismatic Christian background, which has a highly developed demonic theology referring to oppression, possession, demonic principalities behind institutions, and locations, and disciplines such as intercessory prayer and spiritual mapping. It also engages belief systems from other cultures, rather than have the blinkered "nothing exists outside of the ‘Western Rational World’" attitude of other denominations. However, there is an "If in doubt, drive it out" mentality - born out of a tendency to misdiagnose via incorrect use and inexperience of the Spiritual Gifts (in this case, Discernment of Spirits and Word of Knowledge) - that can be unhelpful at best, downright dangerous at worst. As a disclaimer, I'd own up to this as a generalisation, and there seems to be a growing strain of thinking Charismatics who'd make an evaluation of the kind detailed below.

The other school of thought (which seems to be adhered to by the Anglican Church) is balanced by a more rational, diagnostic approach. Demonic activity is seen as one of a number of possible causes for possession style behaviour. Other causes could also be psychological, through repression, projection, bereavement, possession syndrome, or schizophrenia, or due to chemical imbalances and physical illnesses (ie: epilepsy being commonly misdiagnosed, even in this day and age, as demonic. One of my friends has this happen, and the results really weren't pretty). All this is great, but their analyses and conclusions are based on the kind of people who would go to an English Anglican church for help - test samples that are skewed in favour of middle class English Christians are pretty unreliable if you're dealing with someone from a completely different cultural background.

Finally, the Catholic Church seems to have a good balance between the two stances (taken on advisement - I've never read any of their books on the subject). However, Catholics always seem to have a large emphasis on their ritualistic approach that doesn't sit well with my Biblical understanding, experience and pragmatism (us Charismatics being the Chaos Mages of the Christian Church!).

Rollo Kim posted links to an article discussing whether exorcism could be harmful - read it
here if you haven't already. The article isn't exhaustive and only covers symptoms of possession that could be interpreted as natural phenomena. I've listed three diagnostic symptoms below that weren't covered fully in the article, and could be indicators that the subject is oppressed/possessed:

1 - Linguistics. It's perfectly possible for someone with multiple personalities to speak as though they were several different people/beings, even to the extent at which their voice becomes distorted and "inhuman." That's not what I mean here: I'm talking about the subject speaking fluently in languages of which they have no prior knowledge (one example: a friend related a story of praying for and acquaintance when they started moaning and answering questions in fluid German. My friend could speak German; his acquaintance could not). Yes, this can happen through other means (the Gift of Tongues manifests in this way on occasion), but I guess you'd have to judge the phenomena within its context. It's certainly proof of something beyond the range of modern psychology (at least, as far as I am aware).

2 - Clairvoyance. Again, something you'd have to judge within its context, particularly concerning the motivation of the subject in using the ability. The ability certainly exists outside the realm of demonic activity, and even outside the realm of the supernatural (many people simply have highly trained insight and judgement). However, the quality, quantity and (of course) accuracy of perception, as well as the motivation and delivery of what has been perceived, can all aid in diagnosis. As a general rule of thumb, if the subject keeps reminding you of guilty memories which you've never shared with anyone in blatant attempts to do psychological harm, you may realise there's more going on beneath the surface (especially if this correlates with other symptoms).

3 - Contortions. Spirits often manifest as snakes or scorpions (amongst other animals - these are the most documented that I know of) in physical contortions that are not possible within the normal range of movement our bodies allow. I've also heard of people twisting arm and leg positions into those detailed images of Hindu pantheons and mythology, although this could be purely psychological or an extension of an ecstatic worship experience - again, this means you'd have to judge the phenomena within its context.

I'd like to say again that this list is not exhaustive. There are many other symptoms: I just tried to detail a few that aren't readily explicable through other means. So, here are my questions/requests:

Have any of you had experiences in this area you'd like to share? How do you go about diagnosing oppression/possession? What do you do if circumstances do not allow for close examination (due to time pressures or physical threat from the subject)? Do you think a misdiagnosed exorcism is always harmful, or can it bring benefits to the subject if it is purely a placebo? Are there any "foolproof" diagnostics? Does the exorcism always work? What aids success or causes failure? Is the use of ritual helpful because the cause is psychological? Does ritual make any real difference in genuine cases of exorcism (if there is such a thing)? Are there any possession scenarios that are inexplicable by other means? Do you only exorcise those who have expressed a desire to be free of the demonic influence (and if so, what would you do in those rare cases where the subject is clearly in distress but never has a period of manifestation over the demonic presence to make their feelings known)? Do you believe a successful exorcism can be harmful if the subject isn't given a means for defense (ie; the Biblical story in which the demon is driven out but comes back later with seven mates, making the problem worse)? How do you think people get possessed? Finally, although I've labelled them as "demons" (for convenience' sake), what do you think is doing the possessing, and does any of this actually exist in an objective sense (my favourite question at the moment)?

That's my perspective (limited though it is): tell me yours!
 
 
Seth
10:19 / 11.07.01
Sorry about War and Peace...
 
 
grant
14:11 / 11.07.01
That's a fascinating post.

I'm a bit out of my depth here, but I'll offer this: I have a feeling any phenomena you experience can be interpreted however you want; a hard-nosed "realist" is gonna interpret impossible physical contortions as simply "extreme" contortions.

I'm also pretty sure ritual has an important place. Then again, I was raised Catholic.

"Misdiagnosed exorcism" could act as a placebo, but there have been a few cases of people dying or being maimed in home-done exorcisms gone wrong. Leave the knives and hot pokers out of it, is my advice.
 
 
Seth
14:25 / 11.07.01
Some exorcism rituals are just plain horrific and unnecessary IMHO. One bizarre practice I heard of was anointing all bodily orifices so that the demon could not escape (I know what you’re thinking – surely the objective was for the demon to get out! I don’t understand it either). Pokers and knives are a definite no-no in my book. This kind of thing causes/reinforces psychological harm on the subject. I’m only comfortable with any practice if it’s wholly loving, releasing and healing for the person involved.
 
 
The Return Of Rothkoid
14:25 / 11.07.01
Related links, though not much to say of my own - I thought these shone a bit of light on mental illness/posession that could be a consideration: this article tells of the increase in exorcisms in the US, while this is the story of an exorcism that went wrong. Joan Vollmer was suffereing from hypomania, and ended up dying in a Pentecostal exorcism. It's pretty sad stuff.
 
 
Lothar Tuppan
16:13 / 11.07.01
Cool thread. I've only personally been involved with one case of definite 'possession' where the person's personality is surpressed by another and a few where there were definite non-defined 'energies' influencing people. For the extreme possession since no one involved in it came from a Christian ontology no one saw it as 'demonic'. It was definitely unwanted and annoying but it wasn't always malicious and 'evil' really didn't figure in anywhere. It was an opportunistic spirit who helped foster a 'co-dependent' relationship with the person.

Essentially, the hold that the spirit had on the person was possible because the person wasn't ready to give up the 'relationship' with the spirit. To some degree, I think that if someone isn't willing to 'heal' (whatever form that healing takes) and you 'force' the issue then either more damage can be done or the problem will just return once the smoke's cleared. This could be just as true for an unhealthy psychological pattern as for 'possession'.

It's kind of the 'nature abhors a vaccum' concept. Unless a peson is going to replace the 'bad' thing with something 'good' then that space is going to be filled with whatever can find it's way in. Usually that's what is familiar (the old thing) or something that feels as safe as the old thing. If the person is 'exorcised' but isn't able or willing to address why the being was able to possess them in the first place then it's likely that the situation will just repeat itself in some way. Like the superheroes who kick the bad guy's ass but then leave the town in rubbles with the people trying to put the city back together again, 'exorcists' have to help the person put themselves back together again.

Another thing to mention is that outside of the Judeo/Christian/Islam world there is more than one type of 'possession'. A term being used currently in anthropological circles is 'embodiment' for either partial or willing possession.

When a shaman allows one of his spirit allies to work through him it is 'embodiment'. To some degree, if you felt the 'Holy Spirit' 'tell' you what to do and you found yourself doing things that you previously didn't know how to do, that would be a type of 'embodiment'. Usually embodiment doesn't involve losing 'consciousness' and the shaman (or whoever) is always in control, he is just choosing to allow the situation to happen.

Also, the possession in Dahomean/Yoruban practice can be anywhere from light embodiment to full blown 'I don't remember dancing around the fire' possession but it's voluntary and temporary with services given on both sides.

'Possession' is just a phenomena where the spirit world comes to us in a very personal way. Sometimes it's bad (when uninvited and oppressive), sometimes it's good (when everyone involved - including the spirit or god - benefits), and sometimes it's just neutral.

The 'demonic' possession you describe is definitely bad in my opinion but my only concern with a lot of Christian sects is that they say that all of it is 'bad'.

[ 11-07-2001: Message edited by: Lothar Tuppan ]
 
 
Lothar Tuppan
16:25 / 11.07.01
In regards to ritual, I think ritual definitely has a positive effect as long as it's the right ritual. Ritual, in this case, should serve two purposes: 1) to aid the 'exorcists' in successfully performing their 'magic' and; 2) to give the other 'participants' a structure and framework for what's going on. Part of the role that structure should play is in giving the 'possessed' and any supportive 'onlookers' a way to feel empowered in the situation and to have it make sense and be integrated in their lives. It should help them to 'put it all back together again' afterwards as well. Or at least start that process.

If it doesn't do those things then maybe it's not a helpful ritual.

[ 11-07-2001: Message edited by: Lothar Tuppan ]
 
 
Seth
17:18 / 11.07.01
Lothar: a very good case in support of the ritualistic approach - it’s important that everyone involved has a way of processing the experience.

I was thinking about embodiment earlier today (although I didn’t know that was what it’s called), and I thought you might mention the subject, particularly after chatting about ecstatic drumming in the Bang the Drum thread (the “being played” feeling). Regarding whether Christians throw the baby out with the bathwater... you may be right. My trust of the Holy Spirit (if embodiment is what is occurring) is bourne out of faith in a perfect God (believing what you don’t see and can’t understand) and so it’s pretty hard to rationalise. How can I say that about God? Well, He’s not let me down yet. I started interacting with God from a very early age, and He’s informed my understanding ever since. Does that limit me? A question I often ask myself. I certainly can’t change my background and experience - although if you listen to some people, they’ll say that all memory is false in an objective sense (due to its subjective bias) and I could just re-write myself into a different perspective (the problem is, I’d always know that I’d done it). What strikes me most is that it’s a pity that very few other people seem to put those same questions to themselves and their beliefs.

The reason I wouldn’t allow another entity that kind of access to me is the same as the reason I wouldn’t let anyone else take over my fiction suit for a day (even if I could stop them at any time). I guess I’m reminded of all those faery stories, where every favour comes with a price. Even outside of any spiritual dimension (well - if you listen to Stephen Knight, maybe not altogether outside) Freemasonry exhibits similar traits: access to secret power through knowledge/membership, working as favour returning favour. If I find it hard to trust human nature, I guess I’ll find it hard to trust supernature. Finally, we all know that “control” is not confined to being a blunt instrument, openly treading on the will in something as overt as possession. There are far subtler forms that are manifest in relationships, even with those you love the most. I can live with that in humans, and forgive it (as I would hope other people would forgive me when I do it, intentionally or unintentionally) - I just find it a touch harder when the other party involved has powers that I don’t fully understand.

What was the name of Nicolette’s album? “Let No One Live Rent Free In Your Head?”

Totally agree with you about the “nature abhors a vacuum” thing. I think that freeing someone to leave them to fend for themselves is utterly irresponsible and against the spirit in which the exorcism should have been performed (ie: to see them grow and develop away from slavery - an expression of love, support and solidarity). I strongly feel that people practising deliverance should work side by side with psychiatrists and counsellors.
 
 
Wyrd
11:42 / 12.07.01
Just a quick word to say that Lothar's post is really excellent and summarises many of the points I was considering.

Possession is a difficult situation because there is a quite a wide variety of ways it occurs, from beneficial to parasitical, and all the shades in between. As Lothar points out, there are big problems if the "host" does not want the entity to leave - in that case no matter what you do, even if you succeed, s/he is likely to attract in a new inhabitant anyway.
 
 
Lothar Tuppan
14:18 / 12.07.01
quote:Originally posted by expressionless:

The reason I wouldn’t allow another entity that kind of access to me is the same as the reason I wouldn’t let anyone else take over my fiction suit for a day (even if I could stop them at any time). I guess I’m reminded of all those faery stories, where every favour comes with a price. Even outside of any spiritual dimension (well - if you listen to Stephen Knight, maybe not altogether outside) Freemasonry exhibits similar traits: access to secret power through knowledge/membership, working as favour returning favour. If I find it hard to trust human nature, I guess I’ll find it hard to trust supernature. Finally, we all know that “control” is not confined to being a blunt instrument, openly treading on the will in something as overt as possession. There are far subtler forms that are manifest in relationships, even with those you love the most. I can live with that in humans, and forgive it (as I would hope other people would forgive me when I do it, intentionally or unintentionally) - I just find it a touch harder when the other party involved has powers that I don’t fully understand.

What was the name of Nicolette’s album? “Let No One Live Rent Free In Your Head?”


I can certainly understand erring on the side of caution regarding anything like this. Hell, I might invite someone over to my house but I'm not going to invite him to rummage through my underwear drawer.

That being said, I think that one of the really interesting things that is becoming apparent in this thread is how a difference in ontologies, paradigms, etc. REALLY DOES affect the way reality manifests for us and how the 'rules' that we take for granted may not be the same ones that others play by.

From a shamanic worldview, embodiment is part of the 'job description'. Shamans are meant to 'walk between the worlds' and to be the mediators between the spiritual and the physical. While a lot of the time that entails sending your 'soul' into the realm of the spirits, sometimes that means allowing the spirits to manifest here (the shaman's body becomes the default vehicle).

Because this is expected, the shamanic methodology requires the shaman to always be in control of his/her trance and it provides some safety mechanisms to deal with the dangers involved.

1) When using a drum or other percussive, that instrument is opening the door to the other world. It can also close the door when need be. When I'm drumming for my partner's sessions (usually because she needs her hands free to do some energy work) one of my jobs is to be aware of anything going 'wrong'. If she's getting stuck in a realm and can't get back or if it's getting to hairy and she needs help I need to change the beat in order to call her back. Usually a call back rhythm will have a pavlovian effect and the practitioner will 'shoot back' into their body pretty quick. If that doesn't work there are other steps. The same thing is true for embodiment. Like anything else, the more you do it the easier it becomes to both enter and exit trance states and 'embodiment' states.

2) The more you journey to the spirit worlds the more you learn the nature of the spirits on their home turf. The more familiar you become the less 'unknowns' there are.

In regards to the fear that a lot of people have regarding spirits, bear with my as I try an analogy (and this isn't directed at Expressionless. The fact that you're discussing this in this way proves that you're open minded and will to entertain 'alien' ideas. More so than some 'pagans' I know): when I was growing up in Southern California, as a middle class white boy, I was 'programmed' to fear Mexicans. A whole nation of them was just miles away (I grew up in San Diego, just north of the Mexican border) and they kept coming into our country *illegally*. The common prejudice was that at best they would accost you for money and at worst mug or kill you. Because they were 'spics', 'beaners', 'wetbacks', etc.

My parents loved Mexico and I started going there at a fairly early age and in going there I learned that they were people just like anybody else in the world. I now love most of North and Cenral American countries and wouldn't have found out how wonderful they were if I had stayed in a place of fear. Of course, you should always employ street smarts when going to any of these places.

There's currently a lot of separation betweeen the spirit and human worlds and a lot of propaganda against people having personal relationships with spirits other than in the state sanctioned way (through a priest or other official as part of a congregation).

<preachy mode>In my personal opinion, there are lots of 'God's' creatures whose spirits are neglected, abused, and 'discriminated' against because of the 'negative' view that spirits are bad (except for the Trinity or maybe Angels).</preachy mode>
 
 
Seth
20:04 / 12.07.01
I for one would never say that spirits are bad. It’s kind of like saying that physical bodies are bad. I believe we all have spirits, even if the term is only a convenient way of understanding myself as a whole (through a group of constituent parts. I appreciate the school of thought that suggests that we shouldn’t draw a line between body, soul and spirit, and I agree they’re all parts of the same thing. However, sometimes I do feel the need to talk specifically about my hand or my foot).

quote: As Lothar points out, there are big problems if the "host" does not want the entity to leave - in that case no matter what you do, even if you succeed, s/he is likely to attract in a new inhabitant anyway.

Total agreement. There’s probably no point in even trying make it leave in this case. Unless the apparent symbiosis is a means of control by the invading/invited being. Is there a spiritual version of persuading someone to dump their possessive boy/girlfriend? Could be dangerous - what if they sneak into your house and nick half your record collection?

quote: If she's getting stuck in a realm and can't get back or if it's getting to hairy and she needs help I need to change the beat in order to call her back. Usually a call back rhythm will have a pavlovian effect and the practitioner will 'shoot back' into their body pretty quick.

I was trying to think of an application for my dice drums in the Bang the Drum thread. It basically involves assigning numbers to sections of breakbeats and randomly generating the programmed rhythm sequence through throws of the dice. I’m sure you could think of an adaptation for live playing (although being truly random would be hard or impossible). I guess any structured rhythm initiates the travelling, and the introduction of the chaos element acts as the bucket of cold water. Don’t know... may be dangerous and dislocating.

Thanks for not dismissing me because of my faith, Lothar. I tend to go by the scripture, “Everything is permissible but not everything is beneficial.” It’s one thing to understand another persons beliefs - it helps to fully flesh out your own. However, it’s quite another thing to actively get involved yourself. You can probably tell that I’m a cautious person, who believes that if my faith is prescriptive on an issue then it’s for a reason. I’ve always got loads of questions, directed at myself and at God as much as at other people and their faith systems. I think that’s a good thing, and that it’s a practise worth encouraging. Here’s a question (and it could be seen to be a loaded one, although it’s not meant in that way): why is it that I only enjoy these discussions with Wyrd and Lothar in the main, when there’s loads of people who post to the Magick? Are the rest of you not interested in the subject matter? I’d love to hear from you.

Further to all this self questioning, I’m considering re-examining the Servitor topic based on recent parallels with some of my own long held beliefs. Probably a subject for another thread. Fancy joining me elsewhere?

Interesting parallel with racial prejudice. I guess to fully explore the analogy we need to discuss exactly what these spirits are and where they came from. Are there any studies on the subject? There could be loads of sources, from dislocated human spirits, angels, demons, collective projections, other "species," etc. Any ideas?
 
 
grant
14:19 / 13.07.01
Well, it didn't seem relevant to the topic at hand entirely, but I do remember reading a fun little study called "The Crisis of Possession in Haitian Voodoo."
Sort of a colonial gentleman-scholar's look at how the possessive state actually works in the Haitian syncretic religion. I think it came out in 1930-some, but it could be more recent. One of the first serious, academic looks at the possession phenomena from a psychological standpoint rather than an awe-n-terror religious one.
Lots of anecdotes about psychosomatic disease, and the opposite -- psychosomatic superpowers, sort of.
If I'm not getting terribly confused, he also drew the link directly from Haitian possessions (with drum-led rituals and chanting) to Pentecostal Christianity, which featured "gifts of the Spirit" (during services with rhythmic hymn-singing) which were somewhat similar to the feats accomplished by those ridden by the loa.

The book only came into my hands because of its sensational descriptions of possession rituals; the library for the tabloid at which I work was giving old books away.

It seemed to follow the steps of Joseph Campbell and William James, investigating how seemingly different faith-systems can lead to remarkably similar faith-based behaviors and syndromes. I like that. Wish I could remember the author's name.

I also think a lot of the fear-element in these possession states comes from a kind of clinging, rigidly-defined sense of self. Where Buddhists and Taoists meditate to shake off the ego, the voudouisants in the study (and everything else I've read backs it up) actively replace the ego with something else.

Which is kind of cool.
 
 
Lothar Tuppan
14:30 / 13.07.01
quote:Originally posted by expressionless:
I guess any structured rhythm initiates the travelling, and the introduction of the chaos element acts as the bucket of cold water. Don’t know... may be dangerous and dislocating.


For shamanic journeying it's a steady beat. Usually around 4 beats per second is pretty good. This can speed up, slow down, or change in intensity but the basic rhythm is always a steady beat. Anything too complex is 1) hard to play on a traditional shamanic drum (usually a single or double sided hoop/frame drum. Held in one hand while the other hand uses the beater) and 2) distracting to the person trying to journey.

The call backs are usually recognized and agreed upon. You hear the rhythm and your conscious and subconscious mind recognizes it for what it is and you respond accordingly. Random 'chaos' rhythms would be jarring and maybe dangerous. At the least it would be annoying

quote:Interesting parallel with racial prejudice. I guess to fully explore the analogy we need to discuss exactly what these spirits are and where they came from. Are there any studies on the subject? There could be loads of sources, from dislocated human spirits, angels, demons, collective projections, other "species," etc. Any ideas?

That's really stepping into the realm of faith, belief, and religious cosmogony here. Who knows? I don't really know where I came from (besides the birds and the bees stuff ). Where did life come from? Where did our world come from? Why is a deer what it is? Science says it has some answers, religious factions have fought over their versions of the answers. Assumptions of whether they are good, evil, chaotic, orderly, etc. all comes down to what dualistic (or not) structures are inherent to your beliefs.

People have put forth plenty of theories but in my opinion it all comes down to faith in what sounds good to you, or what you've been traditionally taught.

For me, spirits are another form of 'life'. They have consciousness and I can interact with them. Some I trust, some I'm very wary of and some I'd run the other way as fast as I can if they came anywhere near me.
 
 
Seth
14:28 / 14.07.01
quote: Well, it didn't seem relevant to the topic at hand entirely, but I do remember reading a fun little study called "The Crisis of Possession in Haitian Voodoo."

If I'm not getting terribly confused, he also drew the link directly from Haitian possessions (with drum-led rituals and chanting) to Pentecostal Christianity, which featured "gifts of the Spirit" (during services with rhythmic hymn-singing) which were somewhat similar to the feats accomplished by those ridden by the loa.


Sounds fascinating. Is it still in print? Does anyone know of any other formal studies on the subject (lazy expressionless cannot be arsed to trawl through web garbage to find succulent brain fruit).

quote: Random 'chaos' rhythms would be jarring and maybe dangerous. At the least it would be annoying

You may have misunderstood me. The drums certainly have a random element in the construction of their flow, but they are made from fragments of larger rhythms rearranged. Imagine an eight bar phrase written on a stave, divide it into equal (or unequal) fragments, and play those fragments with no pre-arranged order. For a more subtle effect, the rhythm could be fairly standard, with unexpected random elements at planned or unplanned intervals. You could also use a melodic instrument to act as a grounding effect.

It’s not nearly as annoying as it sounds (depends how natural you find different styles, or what you’ve trained your ear to appreciate). There’s an entire scene built around glitches and chaotic elements in breakbeats, which has produced some of the most beautiful and moving music of the last ten years. A lot of it has definite spiritual application, but it’s totally down to the individual, as you said elsewhere.

quote: That's really stepping into the realm of faith, belief, and religious cosmogony here.

I agree. I’m just surprised that you’ve picked this moment to say that it’s a matter of faith. What have we been doing up to now?

quote: For me, spirits are another form of 'life'. They have consciousness and I can interact with them. Some I trust, some I'm very wary of and some I'd run the other way as fast as I can if they came anywhere near me.

That sounds pretty reductive. I’m not sure that all “spirits” can be termed as “alive,” to begin with. I also believe that an understanding of history - even if it’s only a personal theory read from fragments of experience or learning - is vital for comprehending our lives. The same is true of spiritual history.

I think there’s a massive variety in what people term as spirits, and each may have different origins. Some are harmless forms of place memory or place precognition, formed through trauma, routine or temporal phenomena. Others are psychic projections and so are not intelligent entities (although they may act as though they are). Some are manifestations of psychosis or mental illness. Others are creations of men. Some are dislocated human spirits, unable to leave this plane after death or unable to find their way back to their bodies. Others are sentient beings, whether utterly alien, animal, or close to human.

This topic started with my personal request for help with diagnosis in this area, without wanting to go into details of the specific case. I think an understanding of the type and origin of the “spirit” is fundamental in making diagnosis, and knowing how to deal with the situation.
 
 
Lothar Tuppan
13:30 / 16.07.01
quote:Originally posted by grant:
Well, it didn't seem relevant to the topic at hand entirely, but I do remember reading a fun little study called "The Crisis of Possession in Haitian Voodoo."


I think it's very relevant actually.

quote:I also think a lot of the fear-element in these possession states comes from a kind of clinging, rigidly-defined sense of self. Where Buddhists and Taoists meditate to shake off the ego, the voudouisants in the study (and everything else I've read backs it up) actively replace the ego with something else.

Which is kind of cool.


I think so too.
 
 
Lothar Tuppan
14:04 / 16.07.01
quote:Originally posted by expressionless:

You may have misunderstood me. The drums certainly have a random element in the construction of their flow, but they are made from fragments of larger rhythms rearranged. Imagine an eight bar phrase written on a stave, divide it into equal (or unequal) fragments, and play those fragments with no pre-arranged order. For a more subtle effect, the rhythm could be fairly standard, with unexpected random elements at planned or unplanned intervals. You could also use a melodic instrument to act as a grounding effect.


I did misunderstand. That actually sounds pretty intriguing. It would be interesting to experiment with that.

quote:
I agree. I’m just surprised that you’ve picked this moment to say that it’s a matter of faith. What have we been doing up to now?


Well there's faith and then there's faith

Up to now it seems that we've been discussing faith in our own experiences, abilities, and perceptions of those. For me my faith in those things has been based on successes verified by clients or to put in in a 'magical' context: if my thaumaturgic spells more often than not succeed in the intended goal, I will have faith that I'm doing something right and that it will have a good chance of working again in the future.

quote:
That sounds pretty reductive. I’m not sure that all “spirits” can be termed as “alive,” to begin with. I also believe that an understanding of history - even if it’s only a personal theory read from fragments of experience or learning - is vital for comprehending our lives. The same is true of spiritual history.


That's a good point. In this sense I'm using 'life' as I said above to mean: "They have consciousness and I can interact with them."

quote:I think there’s a massive variety in what people term as spirits, and each may have different origins. Some are harmless forms of place memory or place precognition, formed through trauma, routine or temporal phenomena.

Others are psychic projections and so are not intelligent entities (although they may act as though they are). Some are manifestations of psychosis or mental illness. Others are creations of men. Some are dislocated human spirits, unable to leave this plane after death or unable to find their way back to their bodies. Others are sentient beings, whether utterly alien, animal, or close to human.

This topic started with my personal request for help with diagnosis in this area, without wanting to go into details of the specific case. I think an understanding of the type and origin of the “spirit” is fundamental in making diagnosis, and knowing how to deal with the situation.


Good points. I didn't mean to delve into 'reductionism' I think I was misunderstanding your meaning of 'where they came from'. I was thinking too much of cosmic origin as opposed to individual origin. I completely agree that in order to diagnose a problem with 'spirits' harming people you need to be able to get at least some grasp on where the spirit originated from and what the spirit wants. My 'prejudice' analogy above was about this in that most Judeo/Christian denominations (as you've indicated in your posts, yours sounds a bit more 'hands on' and therefore open minded - by the way, are there any good resources regarding your type of Christianity? I don't know much about it) state that unless it's part of the trinity, or an Angel or Saint then all spirits are bad and under the domain of Satan. It's hard to impartially diagnose a situation involving a spirit if your belief structure automatically labels them as 'evil'.
 
 
grant
15:12 / 16.07.01
On The Crisis of Possession:

Mars, Louis B. The Crisis of Possession in Voodoo. 1946. Trans. Kathleen Collins. [Berkeley, Calif.]: Reed, Cannon & Jackson, 1977.

Amazon says it's out of stock, but this page has a picture of the cover, and quite a few other voodoo books.

This is a more theoretical work about implications of possession states.

And this neurophysiological essay also cites the book.
 
 
Seth
20:53 / 17.07.01
Sorry about my irregular replies - I never know when I’ll next get web access. Thanks for those amazing links, Grant: they look very interesting. I've not had a chance to read them in depth, so I'll probably print them off and digest them over the weekend.

quote: Up to now it seems that we've been discussing faith in our own experiences, abilities, and perceptions of those. For me my faith in those things has been based on successes verified by clients or to put in a 'magical' context: if my thaumaturgic spells more often than not succeed in the intended goal, I will have faith that I'm doing something right and that it will have a good chance of working again in the future.

It’s much easier to rely on past experience that it is on future uncertainty, although I think that true faith is believing in what we don’t know and can’t understand. However, there is a dimension to past experience whereby we have to recognise that many theories fit the facts, and that even our interpretation of our memories and study is a faith response. There is also a tendency for spiritual events to take place despite our mechanisms, not because of them. Poor methodology may work for a season, but to carry on blindly without questioning can have a damaging effect on future progress. That comment is aimed at no one more than myself. There have been many occasions where God acted in situations despite my poor understanding and flawed approach - that’s just the lovely sweet guy He is. Don’t you just hate it when your pedantic mates pick up on every little error, no matter how unimportant, even when it’s clear that your heart’s in the right place? I’m very glad He’s bigger than that. I guess, if one were to look at God in terms of an invoked entity, that’s an area in which He’d differ: He doesn’t exert control by making you fear about misperforming complicated rituals.

quote: My 'prejudice' analogy above was about this in that most Judeo/Christian denominations state that unless it's part of the trinity, or an Angel or Saint then all spirits are bad and under the domain of Satan. It's hard to impartially diagnose a situation involving a spirit if your belief structure automatically labels them as 'evil'.

I don’t think all spirits - oustide of the Godhead - and angels are “evil.” For a start, I don’t believe that humanity is diabolic (although we often do diabolical things to each other), and I reckon we’re all spiritual beings. There are facets of the human spirit that I don’t fully understand, which may account for a lot of possession phenomena. I mean more than psychoses here: for example, we’ve chatted elsewhere about Servitors and man made spirits. Are they “evil?” I would say probably not, although they may be unhelpful or have dangerous potential. However, I do believe there are spirits that I would certainly term as “evil,” that they have a destructive agenda and that they often work as a team. The nasty beasties particularly like to work through deceit, and they’re particularly good at doing it. From your posts (Lothar and Wyrd) I’ve observed that you recognise the dangers of operating within your field - I reckon a lot of the Christian feeling is based on the same recognition of the potential dangers, and an ensuing rational decision not to get involved at all. However, not all Christians have thought it through to this extent, which unfortunately means they may speak out of ignorance of the real issues. Apologies if any of us have ever spoken out of turn at you over these issues.

quote: yours sounds a bit more 'hands on' and therefore open minded - by the way, are there any good resources regarding your type of Christianity? I don't know much about it

The Bible! Seriously, though: I think a lot of the problems with Christianity developed when the faith was integrated into the Roman Empire. A lot of bad shit like hierarchical authority crept in (all the rank/title pompous religious nonsense that Jesus actively spoke out against). There are several things that characterise my faith (and that of others I’m involved with), and one of them is a desire to unlearn all the religion and get closer to the faith as determined in the New Testament. In other words, a relationship, not a system.

I guess it would be an understanding of God analogous to what I think you mean when you talk about spirit allies. My experience of God is that He always gives selflessly, He always loves, He always nurtures, and He always wants us to realise our full potential. He has no needs that we could possibly meet, and so when He asks things of us, it’s for our sake more than anything. In the Goetia topic, there was one comment that said something like, “If you wanted an accounting question answered, you’d ask the accountant and not the boss.” That’s true... but what if the boss started the company, creating and personally performing all the job roles, and delegating to others not through an inability to do all the jobs Himself but through a desire to see His staff develop? I’d probably still find it best to ask the man at the top, and He’s so good at time management that He can always offer an open door policy to his employees. I guess that’s how I’d justify my faith that He’s sufficient for any need. In other words, a pretty damn good spirit ally!

There’s a feeling in my church that Christians in a lot of places have got it badly wrong. As I’ve said above, I believe God is utterly consistent in His nature (who He is): however, He’s wildly unpredictable in what He does. The problem with a lot of Christians is that they’re wildly inconsistent in nature (arrogant, self righteous, spreading hatred and pain) while being totally predictable in the way they operate (expensive church building/social club. Joyless worship. Bigoted and reactionary). This explains a lot of the Christian responses to your spiritual expression - I’m simply not convinced they’ve even had a spiritual experience themselves in a lot of cases.

As far as actual resources for reading yourself, I’m afraid I can’t recommend many: this is because most of my beliefs were shaped through being very questioning, impartation from the community, and learning through experience. My reading has been sporadic, and most books I’ll disagree with as much as appreciate. I’m very lucky to belong to a church that embraces a vast range of experience, including NLP, Fair Trade, cultural diversity and creativity. A lot of my understanding also comes from my Dad , who’s one of the most respected prophets in the western church (that sounds soooo sad, but it’s important you know where I’m coming from. Looks at shoes, embarrassed). It’s nice to sit back, watch a Western and drink a beer one minute, then have a chat about the Biblical model for authority having parallels with Chaos Theory, Complexity Theory and organic growth. I’ve had a lot of damn good teachers. I’ll post you copies of his books, if you want: they’re kinda specialised, but you may find them interesting.
 
 
Wyrd
11:13 / 18.07.01
quote:I don’t think all spirits - oustide of the Godhead - and angels are “evil.” For a start, I don’t believe that humanity is diabolic (although we often do diabolical things to each other), and I reckon we’re all spiritual beings. There are facets of the human spirit that I don’t fully understand, which may account for a lot of possession phenomena. I mean more than psychoses here: for example, we’ve chatted elsewhere about Servitors and man made spirits. Are they “evil?” I would say probably not, although they may be unhelpful or have dangerous potential. However, I do believe there are spirits that I would certainly term as “evil,” that they have a destructive agenda and that they often work as a team. The nasty beasties particularly like to work through deceit, and they’re particularly good at doing it. From your posts (Lothar and Wyrd) I’ve observed that you recognise the dangers of operating within your field - I reckon a lot of the Christian feeling is based on the same recognition of the potential dangers, and an ensuing rational decision not to get involved at all. However, not all Christians have thought it through to this extent, which unfortunately means they may speak out of ignorance of the real issues. Apologies if any of us have ever spoken out of turn atyou over these issues.

I don't think you need to apologise for other Christians, as with any diverse religious/spiritual group, I do not judge them all based on the actions of individuals. There is a general fear/suspicion of "trafficing with spirits" among Christians, but equally, it's present in many other religious systems. As you say, there is an understanding that this is a tricky field and things can (and do) go wrong.

I suppose the difference in true shamanic work is that it is a calling/vocation, and there is no choice involved. You do the work because it's what you are, and what you do. To do otherwise runs against your nature, even when it scares the shit out of you.

As I've said before, there is such a huge diversity of spiritual entities that it would be difficult to classify them all as one thing or another. I generally take them as they come, with as few preconceptions as possible (though I'm prone to my own biases and prejudices too). I operate within quite common sensical parameters, and with a strong sense of my own personal safety.

I think humans have huge potential - beyond what they allow themselves to realise. "Every man and woman a star". They can use that potential in lots of different ways, and of course, some use it to make other people's lives difficult.

quote:In the Goetia topic, there was one comment that said something like, “If you wanted an accounting question answered, you’d ask the accountant and not the boss.” That’s true... but what if the boss started the company, creating and personally performing all the job roles, and delegating to others not through an inability to do all the jobs Himself but through a desire to see His staff develop? I’d probably still find it best to ask the man at the top, and He’s so good at time management that He can always offer an open door policy to his employees. I guess that’s how I’d justify my faith that He’s sufficient for any need. In other words, a pretty damn good spirit ally!

Sounds like a reasonable approach, and that you have a close relationship with your God. Can't see anything wrong with that. It also sounds like you work within a very open-minded Christian community, which is great!
 
 
Seth
18:37 / 23.07.01
Sorry, Wyrd: I've gone for nearly a week thinking I was the last person to post to this topic, and so I haven't replied. What a dumbass.

quote: As I've said before, there is such a huge diversity of spiritual entities that it would be difficult to classify them all as one thing or another.

OK, so we don’t want to be overly simplistic. Fine by me. However, check this out:



The spiritual kingdom probably has a variety equivalent to the animal kingdom. My dim memories of biology seem to recall an animal classification system, whereby the entire natural world could be subdivided into various Phyla. My question: is there cross cultural system for identifying spirits (one that doesn't patronise or pick any particular faith, methodology or religion)? And if such diagnostics don't exist, do you think it would be worth putting something together?

Woah. Flashbacks to "Toben's Spirit Guide" from Ghostbusters.

quote: I don't think you need to apologise for other Christians, as with any diverse religious/spiritual group, I do not judge them all based on the actions of individuals.

You're a wise and gracious man.

quote: I suppose the difference in true shamanic work is that it is a calling/vocation, and there is no choice involved.

I grew up with prophecy as a normal facet of my life, so I know how you feel about calling, or intended paths. Pre-destination is too strong a word. I spent a long time running away from what I knew was my life’s purpose, and wondered why I was so deeply lonely and unhappy. Like I said: dumbass.
 
 
Kobol Strom
19:59 / 23.07.01
This is just an aside,but what do you say if ,say for example, a plant spirit asks what type youare? It would be a tough one to get right with just one word, in a way that was clear for both of you to understand.Especially if they happen to be a lot bigger than you.What would you say?The kinds of experiences I've had with spirits are generally benign,but when I've asked them for something, the effects are a lot more positive.Sometimes spirits come and look at you,seemingly out of interests sake.Has anyone else been asked about their 'type'?,by a spirit,I mean.
Thanks.
 
 
Seth
10:54 / 26.07.01
I’ve not been asked my type, no. I’ve heard stories spirits addressing people with a “Who are you?” question: for the most part, it was to challenge, wrongfoot or demoralise. “Who are you to be addressing me?” That kind of thing.

It would be hard to come up with any classification that could be agreed on between human spirits and those of a different nature. But I imagine it’s definitely possible for a group of people to get together and agree a common language, at least in part. Bear in mind I’m only considering the applications of this as one tool amongst many, and not as the only way of approaching the subject. At the very least, something of this nature would be of help to those who have had supernatural encounters without any frame of reference for processing them. Let me know if there are other techniques.

In the classification of animals, you’d ask a number of questions about physical characteristics to determine type. I imagine that anyone dealing with spirits does something similar of a spiritual nature (perhaps learnt entirely through kinesthetic means, making it hard to realise that you’re practicing diagnostic technique). To give illustrations of spirit diagnostics:

Does the spirit manifest physically? Does it react to stimuli? Does it manifest to a group, or to one particular individual? Does the spirit manifest differently to different people? Does the spirit display sentience, follow routines or seem programmed? Is it friendly? Is it unconsciously dangerous or knowingly hostile? Does its manifestation fall in line with belief systems? Does its behaviour closely parallel historic events surrounding a family or location? Does it have insights into you and your life? Does it have it’s own agenda? Is it part of a group or spirits, or does it show allegiances/have allies? Is its manifestation that of a known plant or animal?

Is this making sense to anyone? Do any of you feel there’s mileage in adopting such an approach? If not, why not?

I dunno… works for Mr. Giles.
 
 
Blank Faced Avatar
13:39 / 26.07.01
The Crab suffers from the paranoia that some nasty influence could affect the mind & posess, particularly long-running nightmares about, basically, what we now know as Archons. & So am keen on cleansing & freeing from external influences. maybe I'm being a bit of a Nazi to some nice animal guide or other.
I blame Fu Manchu for this - he'd hypnotise you so powerfully that he could tell you to assasinate someone then kill yourself, and NO-ONE CAN RESIST THE WILL OF FU MANCHU! Scared the shit out of me as a kid -

"graaaargh - Get Out Of My Miiind!!!"

[ 26-07-2001: Message edited by: the Humble Crab ]
 
 
A Bigger Boat
09:03 / 27.07.01
The trouble with using animals as an analogy with catagorizing spirits is that we type animals and species through how they look, how they are built and not what they do.

To differentiate between spirits based soley on what it is they are observed to do is to assume that a certain type of spirit can only do one thing. Sounds more dangerous than beneficial. And remember, if we're specifically discussing the type of spirits that you have experience in exorcising then one thing is paramount: they lie. Any kind of ham-fisted catagorisation would probably have them clamouring to fuck with our heads; getting us to scratch our beards while we chase our own tails.

I think to try to objectify the subject and codify it - specifically when we are dealing with matters of faith & spirituality - is to ignore its very essence. As far as I'm concerned I think that we all have, inherent within ourselves, all the means we need to identify spirit threat or benevolence. It's called a soul. Don't try and describe it or compartmentalise it, just listen to it. You can be told all the lies in the world, but words and actions will not be able to affect what your own soul is telling you. Sure, you can be distracted from it, maybe even diverted, but no spirit can change it.

Just a thought.
 
 
Seth
13:44 / 27.07.01
quote: The trouble with using animals as an analogy with catagorizing spirits is that we type animals and species through how they look, how they are built and not what they do.

Yeah, it’s a flawed analogy. Try to look beyond language at the principle being discussed. I used the animal kingdom because of its awesome size and variety, and because many of the species, although categorized, have unique traits that do not fit comfortably within the phyla.

quote: To differentiate between spirits based soley on what it is they are observed to do is to assume that a certain type of spirit can only do one thing. Sounds more dangerous than beneficial.

Not at all. Correct usage of such a tool would discourage using diagnostics in isolation from other approaches. As I said, one tool used to the exclusion of others is inherently flawed: including perception based on what your soul is “telling” you. Why go into a potentially dangerous situation without an array of techniques? What happens when your trusted personal methods fail? Variety and open mindedness bring all kinds of helpful options and perspectives.

quote: And remember, if we're specifically discussing the type of spirits that you have experience in exorcising then one thing is paramount: they lie. Any kind of ham-fisted catagorisation would probably have them clamouring to fuck with our heads; getting us to scratch our beards while we chase our own tails.

We’re not just discussing those kind of spirits (we started off on that level, but the playing field of the debate soon broadened). I entirely agree that a lot of spirits are liars and manipulators. When a demon surfaces around me it’s nearly always prompted by the presence of my God, and they’re not very good at hiding themselves under those circumstances, no matter how much they lie. You’d be surprised how silly they often seem, and how quickly they’re dealt with. Real life isn’t like the Exorcist. It’s the ongoing repercussions and aftereffects in the host or location that are more difficult to deal with (but much more rewarding than the actual act of exorcism).

I never actively seek out experiences of spirits. When they turn up without prior expectation it’s nearly always because I was in the right place at the right time, and the situation was therefore within the remit of what my God had deemed safe to deal with. I agree that there’s a strong possibility that you’ll bite off more than you can chew and end up fried if you go looking (I can think of a lot of examples!). I hear those Goetia chaps love the unprepared!

(The usual disclaimer… many theories fit the facts; interpreting all current phenomena from my past experience and learning, which is what everyone does; we’re all people of faith; I question myself and my experience, wish everyone else would, blah, blah, blah – I speak solipsistic bunches of anus)

quote: I think to try to objectify the subject and codify it - specifically when we are dealing with matters of faith & spirituality - is to ignore its very essence. As far as I'm concerned I think that we all have, inherent within ourselves, all the means we need to identify spirit threat or benevolence. It's called a soul. Don't try and describe it or compartmentalise it, just listen to it. You can be told all the lies in the world, but words and actions will not be able to affect what your own soul is telling you. Sure, you can be distracted from it, maybe even diverted, but no spirit can change it.

The approach I suggested is not perfect, and is not intended to be foolproof. It could be a way of complimenting our senses with a wider frame of reference if used in the right way. Lets not forget that (as far as I know – please tell me if I’m wrong) such a system does not yet exist, and we don’t know what it would look like. My list of diagnostics was not intended to be exhaustive, and is certainly up for debate. One of my primary purposes was to distinguish between spirit encounters and natural, psychological phenomenon (and I’ll admit it’s may not be possible even to attempt that, from some people’s definitions). I’m sure any endeavour of this magnitude is looked on as hopeless before it’s attempted

My problem with your post, 7 Magpies, is that you seem eager to denounce one system as inherently flawed and dangerous, but don’t seem equally interested in questioning your own operating methods. Your faith in yourself seems just as dangerous as the single-minded use of a categorisation system. There are plenty of very spiritually attuned people that I know who have walked into classic blunders based on their perceptions alone: and I’m one of them!

Please post back and prove that assessment wrong. I only draw those conclusions because your post seemed overbalanced in favour of one argument, in order to make a point (which was well made and timely).
 
 
A Bigger Boat
07:58 / 28.07.01
Hey, thanks for the reply. Possibly found a thread that I can't kill dead just by opening my mouth!

That last post of mine was just a quick, late night thing to get a couple of POV into the mix. I have no experience in this matter and so am the dunce of this particular class, but sometimes it's worth putting a nose or two out of joint to get people to really clarify what they are trying to say.

To clear up a little point in my messy last post, I didn't mean to imply that ours souls should act as the only guides, like some kind of geiger counter. Reading it back, the way I expressed myself sounded bloody naive. I guess what I was attempting to highlight was what I saw as an certain futility in what you hoped for, simply because the entire subject would necessarily reduce itself down to questions of belief, faith, the soul. Our language just isn't that good when it comes to matters like this. This is the only reason I chucked souls into the equation: just the most obvious thing I could think of to demonstrate our lack of understanding of ourselves as spiritual beings before trying to look outside.

Don't jump down my throat here. I know there are probably some very enlightened people who read these pages. I'm sure they are all much better equipped to understand themselves as spiritual beings than I am. I just think that the link between the physical and spiritual - the places they touch, the areas they merge and interact - is one of the most fundamental and unknowable mysteries about ourselves that has ever been. All art, IMHO, has been a questioning of this mystery in some way or another. An attempt to understand oursleves.

Shit, now I'm talking about art.

Bottom line with the soul thing: from day one the very best of what we are is spiritual. I have no doubt about that. I have certain beliefs about where that portion of ourselves comes from that are not pertinent to this discussion. I do not believe that anyone fully understands that part of themselves or the mysteries inherent within it. Why should we?
Random quote: 'What does the fish know about the water in which he swims all his life?' Mr Albert Einstein.
So if we don't fully understand ourselves - spirit/meat hybrids - we're already on the back foot when discussing (or even trying to find the words to discuss) spirits who exist in their own right.

That said...
A few of the things you guys have been discussing have been whirring around in the old noodle.

If you follow what I say above - that we are ill-equipped to fathom the spirit world without descending into non-specific, imprecise umbrella terms - we can speak from our experience. Flesh and spirit. That's our territory. This, perhaps, might be the best starting point to try and get a handle on them. When they step into our ring, so to speak.

From what you guys have been discussing, from differing stances, the most fundamental difference in your experiences seems to be the point of contact between spirit and us. More precisely, method of entrance.

Perhaps we could make an initial division between 'invited' and 'uninvited'?
This necessarily leads us back to ourselves. Do we need to make space for them? Lothar, hope you can field this one: do these shamanistic rituals necessitate a bit of furniture moving in the noggin? or is our mind a space that can be inhabited by 2 spirits (ours and theirs)?
There was also the mention, I think, of instances of human/spirit symbiosis. The mutual fulfilling of needs. Does this also hint at a lack of something, or a space within ourselves that has to be in effect before the spirit can gain entry?
Thirdly, we have the Blatty stuff. Possessions. Expressionless, if we can agree to discuss entrances as a good starting point, then perhaps you could give us your views on this third category. I don't want to churn out what I've seen in movies or read in books. That's fiction. Are the entrances made forceably? Is there a need for a 'space'or 'lacking' within us to inhabit initially. Is there, perhaps, a subconscious invitation or is it even more malicious than that?
I'm at sea here, you'll have to provide the facts. One thing that I don't want you to misunderstand: I do not mean to imply that people who experience this are culpable, or asked for it or 'lacking' themselves (see how lanuage gets us into trouble?). I certainly don't mean to imply they are weak, therefore they are preyed upon. I'm just trying to find common ground between all of the experiences previously mentioned in this thread.

After entrances, perhaps the next logical aspect to look at would be duration. The shamanistic rituals sound short-lived and infrequent. Is this the case?

With the symbiotic cases can I presume that these can go on for much longer and with greater frequency? Is it even possible for them to go undetected for quite some period of time? Again, I have no answers, only questions.

And then to the third type: expressionless, are they short or long? Frequent or not?

If you're happy to take these two possible starting points and run with them that would be cool. If I'm still behind the class and these things are taken as read then fill me in!

Parting thought: and bear in mind that I'm fully aware I'm posting in Magic with no magical knowledge whatsoever; don't let my ignorance offend.
If we want to discuss invitations and the uninvited; all intstances given so far of the 'invitation' variety have been performed by experienced people who remain in control, are aware of their actions and are practiced.

How do you practice? It's either sink or swim isn't it?

So what about ouija boards and the like? Do they muddy the systems I've tentatively built above? Invitation by the inexperienced?

Thoughts please.
 
 
A Bigger Boat
08:00 / 28.07.01
One more dumbass question, completely off subject: how do you guys take the previous post to pieces and quote it in your own so that you can address each point? Very handy, that.
 
 
Wyrd
15:30 / 28.07.01
quote:Originally posted by 7 Magpies:
One more dumbass question, completely off subject: how do you guys take the previous post to pieces and quote it in your own so that you can address each point? Very handy, that.



Choose the "reply with quotes" option.
 
 
Wyrd
15:51 / 28.07.01
Just thought I'd drop in a couple of thoughts on the classification of Spirits question.

There are a bunch of general classifications you can make, such as "Fairy", "Other-Dimension", "Human Departed Consciousness", etc., but of course there are thousands of sub-categories underneath them. I'm not terribly interested in spending my time coming up a classification system for Spirits (because, after all they are artificial classifications put together by humans for non-ordinary entities). What usually happens is that there are two main categories I'm concerned with when I meet any entity, and that is "known" and "unknown".

So, it runs something like this when I meet a new Spirit. I scan or request identification, the information that comes back is matched against my own personal encounters and previous experiences. If that is unsuccessful, then I get feedback from Allies of mine to find out if it is known to them. It could be an Ally of an Ally for example. If the entity comes back as unknown - which doesn't happen very often - then I would tend to be very cautious in my dealings with it.

Often when I go back to an Ally then I'll be told something like "oh, that's so-and-so, they're annoying little feckers, but harmless; they're probably looking for attention". You quickly get a feel for certain types - such as Fairy for example - so you know they are part of that broad group, but each lot has a different temperament and agenda. How to act towards each one varies a great deal, especially if you are on their home turf. The best two rules I abide by are: 1. Be polite and 2. Be wary. That'll get you by in most situations.

Actually, if you apply a little common sense to these encounters you'd be surprise how easily they can be managed. Common sense doesn't seem to be too common among some people though.
 
 
Wyrd
16:25 / 28.07.01
quote:Originally posted by 7 Magpies:
Perhaps we could make an initial division between 'invited' and 'uninvited'?
This necessarily leads us back to ourselves. Do we need to make space for them? Lothar, hope you can field this one: do these shamanistic rituals necessitate a bit of furniture moving in the noggin? or is our mind a space that can be inhabited by 2 spirits (ours and theirs)?


I'll step in here since Lothar is on vacation and will not be back for another 5 weeks or so.

I presume by invited and uninvited you are only looking at the area of possession? Because, obviously, our world is full of various entities that co-exist with us, and it's not about inviting some of them in as they're already here.

If you mean in cases of possession, yes (note: in my experience only) it's possible for a shamanic worker to have an entity work through him/her without giving over complete control. It's quite possible for more than one spirit to work through a person, and the consciousness of the person still to be around and capable of interacting, or stepping in if needed. You're talking about an area where there are no limitations - unless you perceive there are limitations.


quote:There was also the mention, I think, of instances of human/spirit symbiosis. The mutual fulfilling of needs. Does this also hint at a lack of something, or a space within ourselves that has to be in effect before the spirit can gain entry?

There is usually some sort of negotiation before such a symbiosis takes effect (if it's a true symbiosis and not of the parasitical variety). The entity will have to show a worthy reason for entrance, and the person will have to agree to its occupation. In those situations, the person must agree to the entity taking up residence.


quote:Thirdly, we have the Blatty stuff. Possessions. Expressionless, if we can agree to discuss entrances as a good starting point, then perhaps you could give us your views on this third category. I don't want to churn out what I've seen in movies or read in books. That's fiction. Are the entrances made forceably? Is there a need for a 'space'or 'lacking' within us to inhabit initially. Is there, perhaps, a subconscious invitation or is it even more malicious than that?

If a person is operating healthily, then it is *extremely* difficult for an entity to forcibly gain entrance to an unwilling host. Everyone has innate defences to prevent this kind of thing.

Possessions can occur if a person is spiritually unwell - this can come from a variety of causes, two examples (from many) could be: a person suffering from emotional abuse, or a spiritual attack by another person. What that means is that there is a weakness that can be exploited. Often, parasitical/possessing entities bring a perceived "power" to the host, but normally at a cost to the host. Many people who have such entities want to keep them, and as we said before, it's a waste of your time trying to extract them if the person will just attract in a new entity. The person's underlying problem has to be discovered and then dealt with, before you can proceed to kick out the invading entity.

quote:If we want to discuss invitations and the uninvited; all intstances given so far of the 'invitation' variety have been performed by experienced people who remain in control, are aware of their actions and are practiced.

How do you practice? It's either sink or swim isn't it?


This kind of thing, joint-possession, or full-blown possession are not experiences to be taken lightly. They can be quite startling, especially the first time it occurs, and it requires a great deal of trust on your part, so that means you have to be comfortable of the system within which you are practising.

Full-blown possession usually means you retain no memory of what occurred, as your consciousness has been temporarily displaced. That occurs in the likes of Vodou, etc. Usually, if you participate in such rituals you are aware of what happens, and why, and in fact it is considered an honour. Plus, the Loa don't abuse their "horses".

quote:So what about ouija boards and the like? Do they muddy the systems I've tentatively built above? Invitation by the inexperienced?

Using a Ouija board you are reaching out and asking whatever is around to talk to you. Unless you were already very vulnerable, that should not end up in possession.

Ouija boards do work, and usually give people a bit of a scare, especially if one of the people using it has any little bit of talent for mediumship, etc.
 
 
Mordant Carnival
23:21 / 28.07.01
oh, yah... ouija. (I-tiddly-I-ty, dah-DAH!)

No, me be serious for once. I've long been interested in ouija becase it is so purely an artificial, non-traditional working, yet has such a huge mythology/psychopathology around it. In theory, it sould merely be a conduit for the user's own subconcious mind...

*thinks about last statement, blanches, hides under bed whimpering.*

Hey, did you know that it is STILL illegal to sell an ouija board in the UK? Really true.
 
 
Seth
17:58 / 29.07.01
quote: I guess what I was attempting to highlight was what I saw as an certain futility in what you hoped for, simply because the entire subject would necessarily reduce itself down to questions of belief, faith, the soul. Our language just isn't that good when it comes to matters like this.

It’s may not be so hard to overcome language barriers. Remember, language is our tool and we can expand/develop/anally rape it as much as we choose. There’s no reason why we couldn’t come up with new terminology to express some of the inherent paradoxes in the field (listing these terms in some sort of glossary). There are also techniques of using language that are helpful (axis thought, quantum uncertainty theory, etc). There are some languages that can describe incredible complex issues with a single word.

quote: There are a bunch of general classifications you can make, such as "Fairy", "Other-Dimension", "Human Departed Consciousness", etc., but of course there are thousands of sub-categories underneath them. I'm not terribly interested in spending my time coming up a classification system for Spirits (because, after all they are artificial classifications put together by humans for non-ordinary entities). What usually happens is that there are two main categories I'm concerned with when I meet any entity, and that is "known" and "unknown".

Classification doesn’t have to be artificial. It can be fluid, evolving and organic. I’m not suggesting something that’s exhaustively descriptive down to every Cthulu or Yogshoggoth. The categories could be quite broad - there’s no point in being unnecessarily complex.

Perhaps you’re not interested because you don’t personally feel the need to use such a system, because of your extensive experience in the field. That’s fair enough, but some people have spiritual experiences and don’t have any means to process what they’ve seen. It may help a lot of people to have knowledge shared outside the field.

quote: Thirdly, we have the Blatty stuff. Possessions. expressionless, if we can agree to discuss entrances as a good starting point, then perhaps you could give us your views on this third category.

Well... there’s several ways a beastie can set up shop.

To start off, the terms “invited” and “uninvited” need to have a “both” and “neither” category. Wyrd’s done his usual excellent examination of “neither” (people who are abused/disturbed/traumatised). Demonic activity often manifests as an extreme overemphasis on a particular emotional state (hate, lust, anger, fear, etc). If mentally ill people are expressing these emotions it can be a moth/flame scenario.

The “both” category could include situations like hereditary oppression/possession. In this case, it’s likely that the latest generation may not choose to partake in family tradition (whether knowing or unknowing). My Dad related one particular story about ancestral worship in Singapore (I think that was the place). He was asked to pray for a twelve year old girl who had been baptised in the spirit of her grandmother (who was a witch, by all accounts). As he prayed, the girl physically transformed into a wizened old crone, before the spiritual ties were broken (like a cinematic “morphing” effect. The transformation was allegedly witness by a good many people). This girl was frightened and confused by what was happening to her - there had been an invitation, but not consent from the subject.

There’s another example he relayed to me, of a meeting in which there was a strong presence from the military (also in Singapore, I think). The service had hit a brick wall, spiritually - a lot of resistance. Dad sensed it was due to the military connection and called everyone who had ever been involved to the front of the hall (they numbered several hundred). When he began to pray, a lion spirit began to manifest in all present. He later discovered that there is a ritual of initiation into the army in which all applicants are anointed under the spirit of the lion. Again, the ties were cut for all present, and the feeling of resistance disappeared.

So... I guess it’s possible to extend an invite on someone’s behalf. It could be done without their knowledge, before they’re capable of making a choice themselves, in some legalistic small print, through the family line or when becoming a part of a large cult/sect/organisation.

As far as duration goes, possession/oppression could re-manifest as continually unless it’s dealt with. There are cases where the spirit becomes dormant, making it seem as though the problem has been resolved by itself. There are all sorts of cases, from people who are in a constant possessed state, to people who live under oppression and control but have never been literally “possessed.”

More on this when I'm less tired...
 
  
Add Your Reply