BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Once and Future King

 
 
reidcourchie
21:51 / 09.07.01
Continuing my current Arthurian kick.

The prophecy foetold that Arthur would rise again in the hour of Britains greatest need.

How would you interprate that? What do you think would constitute Britain's greatest need? And if we were to assume (hence posting in the magick forum) he is going to return, what form woulf that return take? Will he come prancing out of Jouyopus Guarde weilding Excalibur? Will he be reorn to some poor unsuspecting soul? Or will it be a return of some kind of Ephemeral spirit of the nation, a rise of Arthurian ideals?
 
 
Wyrd
13:06 / 10.07.01
quote:Originally posted by reidcourchie:
And if we were to assume (hence posting in the magick forum) he is going to return, what form woulf that return take? Will he come prancing out of Jouyopus Guarde weilding Excalibur? Will he be reorn to some poor unsuspecting soul? Or will it be a return of some kind of Ephemeral spirit of the nation, a rise of Arthurian ideals?


Perhaps an ex-motorbike fellah who now has his own warband? Check out this url: http://www.warband.org/
 
 
reidcourchie
13:28 / 10.07.01
I have something terrible to admit.

I know of this guy. Lives in Farnborough where I went to College and whilst I was there ran in the local elections. I'm afraid to say that I didn't vote for him.

Locally he has the reputation of being an arrogant prick. Strangely enough going into a pub in Farnborough and acting as if you where a medival king and everyone in there your serfs doth not a good impression make.

However this does illustrate a couple of things I have been thinking. If he did come back (and he is this guy) would we just palm him off as a nutter? This is what I call my 2nd coming of Jesus syndrome, they'd never listen. And if he does come back wouldn't it be more useful if he came back in a form more adaptive to actually getting things done in modern life like say a politician, phiolanthropist or celebrity?
 
 
grant
18:45 / 10.07.01
Well, Arthur's Big Accomplishment was unifying England. I guess if it started fragmenting again, you'd see a call for someone to bring the people together.

This could also be a good metaphor for a broken personality -- probably root idea of The Fisher King, that Terry Gilliam movie.
 
 
adamswish
19:44 / 10.07.01
quote:Originally posted by grant:
...

This could also be a good metaphor for a broken personality ...


not just the only thing of arthur's that was broken. Just how many hills and valleys claim to be the last resting place of his. I tell you what that was one messy death.

And when we say:
quote:
Arthur would rise again in the hour of Britains greatest need.


maybe we're talking about his spirit as the force that enables individuals to acheive their goals, rather than a physical manifestation of the ancient king. So rather than a new jesus/messiah/leader figure, arthur is in fact that inner resolve in everyone.
 
 
reidcourchie
11:07 / 12.07.01
Genrally when I ask people about this, the idea of an Arthurian spirit returning to the land as a unifying/strngthening/healing paradigm is what is mentioned. The subtext of the prophecy. However would this be an attmpt to abdicate responsiblity for our own actions, hoping for some spiritual force to reinforce a flagging natural morale? Does this make the "magickal" paradigm of the Arthurian myth any different from mainstream religion?

Strange to talk about unification as Britain is currently undergoing a spate of race riots. Unfortunatly I see them a depressingly cyclical raher than Britain's darkest hour. Anyone care to offer ideas on what would constitute the darkest hours?

In line with abdication of personal responsibilities and the idea of the return of some kind of Arthurian figure (and I don't see it nesseceraly as messianic figure as the person could be completely unaware of any connection and even if he was would probably be unwise to mention it, see the link that Wyrd posted above for reasons why) one of the biggest problms with the stories is the sheep like qualities us every day proles take on in the face of the archetypal strong leader. I was trying to work out what sort of persona 21st century Arthur would have to be and it struck me he could be someone like Subcommandante Marcos (I hope that's right) of the Zapatistas. I'd be interested to hear what people think of the comparison.

Is Arthur and his knights the British pantheon? If people are prepared to discuss this does anyone use or have any stories about the use of Arthurian archetypes in magickal workings?
 
 
Ierne
11:47 / 12.07.01
But the Arthurian Cycle originates from Cymru (Wales), doesn't it? It's a Celtic myth filtered through medieval France.
 
 
reidcourchie
11:57 / 12.07.01
Absolutly but I was taking Wales as part of Britain and Cletic (which I am) as intrisicly British.
 
 
reidcourchie
12:04 / 12.07.01
The absolutly beautiful thunderstorm I am curentyl watching has reminded me of somthing I was going to post about the monarchy/Arthurian connection.

This has to do with the Monarch's connection to the land and is slightly of topic. The day after Diana died there storms wracked Britain, I can remember because I was trying to get home by train and ended up missing work on the Monday and having to spend an extra night with my girlfriend, nightmare ay.

Is the connection still there?
 
 
Ierne
12:14 / 12.07.01
Here's the Story I had in mind:

Culhwch & Olwen

and a bit of background on the Mabinogion

And if we were to assume he is going to return, what form would that return take?

One has to consider that today's Britain no longer consists solely of the Celts, Romans and Saxons of Arthur's Britain. There's a plethora of cultures involved in the modern Britain, many of which have little or no interest in the Arthurian myth. So it would be interesting to see how a resurrected regent would handle that.
 
 
reidcourchie
12:36 / 12.07.01
Actually that's an issue I was wondering how to ask a question about.

See Celtic Britain was more than just Roman's and Celts, it had representative from almost every culture that the Romans came into contact with, it was a very multicultural society. There is also some modes of thought that suggest that th first inhabitants of Britian weren't caucasian at all. We have long been a multi-cultural society and that for me is where the idea of some sort of unifying force appeals to me.

I'm not quite saying what I mean at the moement off too have another think.
 
 
Ierne
12:53 / 12.07.01
See Celtic Britain was more than just Romans and Celts, it had representatives from almost every culture that the Romans came into contact with, it was a very multicultural society.

TOUCHÉ!!! You got me there, you are absolutely right!
 
 
adamswish
17:52 / 12.07.01
quote:Originally posted by reidcourchie:
...would this be an attmpt to abdicate responsiblity for our own actions, hoping for some spiritual force to reinforce a flagging natural morale? Does this make the "magickal" paradigm of the Arthurian myth any different from mainstream religion?



I didn't mean to refer to arthur as an outside "spiritual force" but rather something that is inside all his descendents and modern subjects.
I guess you could sum it up as the "british stiff upper lip" if you like. The idea that no matter what is thrown at this country and its inhabitants they will riase towards it.
In terms of magick work one thought is using a meditation (or anything better suitted) to find and draw upon the "arthur inside us" (as it were) to help with personal, or non-personal, dilemas that face us (depending on how you approach your magick).

[ 12-07-2001: Message edited by: adamswish ]
 
 
Ierne
17:55 / 12.07.01
As regards to Merlin...(someone asked about him in the other thread, but I figure people will go back & forth between the two!) I think the word Merlin or Myddrin was originally a title, and only became a name with the repitition of the stories over the years & centuries. I'll have to go home and check on that though.
 
 
Cavatina
23:12 / 12.07.01
It fascinates me that, although an Arthur figure is supposed to rise again to deliver Britain in a time of trouble, the myth also seems to be constantly being regionalised in the sense of claims being made for the 'true location' of Arthur's kingdom - Wales or Glastonbury or even Scotland. Incidentally, the best and funniest appropriation of the myth I know is Queendom Come (1990) by Ellen Galford (whose novels I've enjoyed more than those of Jeannette Winterson). It's a satire on Thatcher's domineering 'reign' and is set in Scotland, beginning with an hilarious druidical meeting on Arthur's seat. Albanna, rises to reclaim and put to rights her queendom, with the help of her lesbian High Priestess Gwyhyldis.
 
 
reidcourchie
07:00 / 13.07.01
Adamwish fair point and a good suggestion. But could you see forces/entities call it what you will from Arthurian myth as an external spiritual force?

Got to go boss is back.
 
 
Cavatina
11:22 / 13.07.01
reidcourchie, if I understand you rightly, you're not considering a magickal 'second coming' of an Arthur figure, but rather 'a rise of Arthurian ideals' or a 'spiritual force' which would somehow renew or reinvigorate the British nation.

Apart from the valour, vigour and leadership of Arthur, which elements of the myth would you consider to be most inspirational here?

If the democratic and homosocial aspects of the round table were to be prominent, then these are not uniquely 'British' - the notion of the round table was introduced to the chronicles after Monmouth by Robert Wace in Roman de Brut(1155) and further embellished by Chretien de Troyes in his long romances Li Contes del Graal(1180). Chretien's poem Perceval (1182), also introduced the thread of the quest for 'a graal' (not the christianized version of Wagner's Parsifal. The 'graal' here is a dish, not a cup, and its supernatural powers are not associated with the blood of Christ). The Grail element of the myth was further developed by Wolfram von Eschenbach and is not specifically British either.

Arguably these threads of 'the' myth are important for European as well as other English-speaking cultures. So, would you envisage a spiritual renewal beyond Britain?
 
 
reidcourchie
15:49 / 13.07.01
Originally posted by Cavatina
"reidcourchie, if I understand you rightly, you're not considering a magickal 'second coming' of an Arthur figure, but rather 'a rise of Arthurian ideals' or a 'spiritual force' which would somehow renew or reinvigorate the British nation."

This is largely a hypothetical excercise for me. I am happy to consider either and or. When I've discussed this with friends of mine who know a lot more about magick and Arthur than I do, the spirtual force is genrally the favoured one rather than a second coming. I'm enjoying speculating about what kind of person a 21st century Arthur would be but I think the spiritual force concept has a lot of positive aspects to it. I think I may have gone about this the wrong way, perhaps I should have set down an idea and just tried arguing the point, this and it's sisiter thread in the headshop may be a tad to general.

As for which aspect would I personally consider to be important? I think the round table in terms of equality (symbolic only because lets face facts the knights with few exception were largely white norman nobility by the time it gets round to the French romances) because I think inequality seriously weakens a society. I like very much the healing aspect of the grail but I'm somewhat leary of the Christian aspect of the mainstream tellings of the story (I know that the grail could just as well have been one of the seemingly hundred of magickal cauldrons that infest Celtic mythology) as an agnostic it seems to exclusive. The warrior aspects and the fighting for what you believe also appeal to me in a largely non-violent way, to me more than anything this suggests that if you want to change things it's a matter of hard work.

I wasn't trying to take these aspects of the stories as just being British merely in this thread I am concerned with Britain (it's where I live and what I know most about).

Originally posted by Cavatina
"Arguably these threads of 'the' myth are important for European as well as other English-speaking cultures. So, would you envisage a spiritual renewal beyond Britain?"

This is not really my area of expertise but too hazard a guess I would say it would be connected heavily to belief. I believe that Arthurian myth is very heavily connected with the spiritual forces connected to Britain because of the investments we've made in the myth. If other cultures have made the same investment then yes it would. In the other thread I think it was Grant who posted a number of similar myths to Arthur from different cultures, perhaps if one returned this would cause some kind of domina effect. The problem is if it did how would you go about concentrating on the positive side of the myths and avoid the negative and/or nationalistic side of the myths? This is however all wild speculation ona subject I know little about so feel free to shoot me down.
 
 
Kobol Strom
16:03 / 13.07.01
This might be nothing,but I had a dream aweek ago,I was standing on high ground near Arthur and Merlin,(who looks like this big six foot geeky guy,NOT what I expected),and it reminded me of another dream I had about 5/6 years ago,where I was in a room full of antiques,like in 'Return to Oz',and I could choose two paths in life ; the warrior path : represented by a suit of armour with a shield.The wizard path :represented by a book I think.Sorry to bore you all with this irrelevent nonsense but I was wondering if these archetypes may be related to social structures that existed then? (and now).In these dreams,the archetypes of Arthur and Merlin,seem to symbolise two sides of my psyche,one wants to run away into the hills and have adventures,and the other is this big geek who wants to hide in all the books.
 
 
reidcourchie
06:16 / 16.07.01
Could you describe this Merlin figure a bit more?
 
 
Kobol Strom
14:51 / 16.07.01
Sure,he was about 6 foot 4,and thin.He had a gaunt face,but big eyes.Human.He was taller than me,and taller than King Arthur.He had dark straggly long hair and moved his arms about when he talked,but not too much.He wore a black monk oufit tied round the waist with a belt,his robe had a hood,he had a small rough pointy beard (I know,I know).He was English.Sorry its so vague but it was about a week or so ago.Could I have stumbled on to an 'Arthurian Plane'?Just a thought.

[ 16-07-2001: Message edited by: kobol strom ]
 
 
adamswish
19:19 / 16.07.01
quote:Originally posted by reidcourchie:
Adamwish fair point and a good suggestion. But could you see forces/entities call it what you will from Arthurian myth as an external spiritual force?


To be honest reidcourchie, no I can't see that.
The myths of Arthur are tied into the land (just spent the weekend in Cornwall so know all about this) and the people. Arthur as an external spiritual force limits his availability to the people who have the knowledge of how to, or where to (remebering how many places claim a link to Arthur et al) draw this power into them.
The spirit of Arthur, to my mind, is a part of us, waitting for us to learn how to tap it.
But thinking about it, if we're bringing in the surrounding myths of camelot and merlin etc, rather than just focus on the king then maybe these "myths" could be seen as an external spiritual force. The factor (or key) that triggers the accessing of the arthur inside us.
After all this is what happened in the "myths" so why not extend it out to todays dilemma
 
 
Frances Farmer
19:25 / 16.07.01
..Archtype deflates, reinflates, deflates..

Different faces and names, same quiddity.

Mists of Avalon offers a fascinating alternate perspective on the forces behind the figureheads.
 
 
reidcourchie
18:49 / 17.07.01
Frances! Frances! Your post here, I've found it.

What's the Mist of Avalon? Is that the book written froma female perspective about the myths? Can't remember the author, any good?

Posted by adamwish
"The myths of Arthur are tied into the land (just spent the weekend in Cornwall so know all about this) and the people. Arthur as an external spiritual force limits his availability to the people who have the knowledge of how to, or where to (remebering how many places claim a link to Arthur et al) draw this power into them."

Forgive my ignorance on this but a). Isn't magick to a certain extent about learning to work with such forces both external and internal and b). Would it require a geographical location, I have spoken to a friend of mine about some kind of Arthurian Ritual, wouldn't it be a case of drawing the power to you?

posted by adamwish
"But thinking about it, if we're bringing in the surrounding myths of camelot and merlin etc, rather than just focus on the king then maybe these "myths" could be seen as an external spiritual force. The factor (or key) that triggers the accessing of the arthur inside us."

Using the myths as a catalyst to awaken the Arthur inside us all. Is this magick or just inspiration? Not that it matters. Again in my ignorance (and from discussions with friends who have more knowledge than I about such things) my current belief is that there is an external mystical/spiritual energy to our own that is shaped by our beliefs, we create our own gods and devils. From this I believe if you wanted to contact some kind of Arthurian entity it would be amtter of belief and visualisation. Am I completely wrong? Or is this a valid view of magick?

Right excuse the total lack of morality of this next question and I should point out that this is a completely hypothetical question and I would never dream of doing such a thing even if I had a smidgeon of the knowledge which would be required. Would it be possibly to magickally guide a child so he became an Arthurian figure?
 
 
Ierne
19:01 / 17.07.01
Mists of Avalon was written by Marion Zimmer Bradley, if I'm not mistaken. A kickass book, I would reccommend it.
 
  
Add Your Reply