|
|
OK... first up, I'm really not sure that describing Colin Powell as an "Uncle Tom" is particularly useful. What does that mean? That he's black? We already know that. That he's black and has somehow "sold out" by working in the Bush administration? Does that make Rumsfeld a Benedict Arnold or Condoleeza Rice a Coco Chanel? It's an unhelpful and unnecessary piece of terminology.
Moving on... I don't think it works quite in terms either of "working against" or "flexing muscles" - remember that Powell is a public servant. As Secretary of State, his job is not to frustrate the decisions of the Executive Branch. If I were him, I would suspect that I had been so marginalised that I could no longer make a meaningful contribution either to the people of the US or the conduct of the Executive Branch, and thus resign. However, there's a balnce there - we want Bush to put left-leaners in the cabinet to show his cmmitment to unity, but do we then insist when they get there that they attempt to work against the President from the inside? If so, where's the incentive?
I think Powell can reasonably demand that his role as Secretary of State be given due recognition, and by extension that Bush does not turn his back on Afghanistan, on the Middle East peace process, on the battle against AIDS - on the things the Secretary of State is meant to be appointed to deal with. If he can't get that, and I suspect that even if he gets the promise he won't get the effect, then he might be best served by resigning and _then_, as a private citizen, criticising the Bush White House, especially as his logical successor, the deputy S of S, would be likely to walk as well...
Also, Rummy may be about to go. If that happens, Powell may feel he is better placed to moderate America's foreign affairs... |
|
|