BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Soda brain

 
 
subcultureofone
15:03 / 27.10.04
Coke versus Pepsi: It's all in the head
The preference for Coke versus Pepsi is not only a matter for the tongue to decide, Samuel McClure and his colleagues have found. Brain scans of people tasting the soft drinks reveal that knowing which drink they're tasting affects their preference and activates memory-related brain regions that recall cultural influences. Thus, say the researchers, they have shown neurologically how a culturally based brand image influences a behavioral choice.

These choices are affected by perception, wrote the researchers, because "there are visual images and marketing messages that have insinuated themselves into the nervous systems of humans that consume the drinks."

Even though scientists have long believed that such cultural messages affect taste perception, there had been no direct neural probes to test the effect, wrote the researchers. Findings about the effects of such cultural information on the brain have important medical implications, they wrote.

"There is literally a growing crisis in obesity, type II diabetes, and all their sequelae that result directly from or are exacerbated by overconsumption of calories. It is now strongly suspected that one major culprit is sugared colas," they wrote.

Besides the health implications of studying soft drink preference, the researchers decided to use Coke and Pepsi because-- even though the two drinks are nearly identical chemically and physically--people routinely strongly favor one over the other. Thus, the two soft drinks made excellent subjects for rigorous experimental studies.

In their study, the researchers first determined the Coke versus Pepsi preference of 67 volunteer subjects, both by asking them and by subjecting them to blind taste tests. They then gave the subjects sips of one drink or the other as they scanned the subjects' brains using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). In this widely used imaging technique, harmless magnetic fields and radio signals are used to measure blood flow in regions of the brain, with such flow indicating brain activity levels. In the experiments, the sips were preceded by either "anonymous" cues of flashes of light or pictures of a Coke or Pepsi can.

The experimental design enabled the researchers to discover the specific brain regions activated when the subjects used only taste information versus when they also had brand identification. While the researchers found no influence of brand knowledge for Pepsi, they found a dramatic effect of the Coke label on behavioral preference. The brand knowledge of Coke both influenced their preference and activated brain areas including the "dorsolateral prefrontal cortex" and the hippocampus. Both of these areas are implicated in modifying behavior based on emotion and affect. In particular, wrote the researchers, their findings suggest "that the hippocampus may participate in recalling cultural information that biases preference judgments."

The researchers concluded that their findings indicate that two separate brain systems--one involving taste and one recalling cultural influence--in the prefrontal cortex interact to determine preferences.

###

Samuel M. McClure, Jian Li, Damon Tomlin, Kim S. Cypert, Latané M. Montague, and P. Read Montague: "Neural Correlates of Behavioral Preference for Culturally Familiar Drinks"

Published in Neuron, Volume 44, Number 2, October 14, 2004, pages 379–387.
 
 
astrojax69
20:25 / 01.11.04
this is an interesting experiment, and the neurological findings are rather interesting, though i have some fears about the social sciences interpretation of the data.

it may or may not be true that sugared colas are a major culprit in obesity epidemiologies, but this data doesn't support or refute that allegation in any meaningful way.

it doesn't refute the assertion, for instance, that 'marketing' as a concept (let's call it communication specifically to entice a potential consumer of the product associated with the message to become an actual consumer) is simply neurologically possible because it is coincidentally identical to the neurological correlates of mind strategies that recognise and form concepts of any sort.

it didn't state that no pepsi experience in any subject didn't light up the same brain regions - or more importantly that they wouldn't light up these same areas - if there were some subjects who take on the inculturation of pepsi in their life experiences as others take on coke? or take on drinking a style of white wine for people in one region of germany or a style of red wine for other communities in a region of italy, as a cultural 'mindset' present in these nueral correlates??

but good find - thanks for sharing it! ooh, "subcultureofone" - does this mean my reply will cause you to cease to exist?
 
  
Add Your Reply