BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Election hinkiness.

 
  

Page: (1)2

 
 
grant
20:40 / 12.10.04
Here, a friend of mine in Tallahassee just wrote this.

I'm not normally one to be overly-suspicious or even particularly paranoid, but over the weekend I received a phone call that went something like this:

CALLER: Hello, sir. We're just calling to see if
you've received your vote by mail ballot yet?


ME: No. I —


CALLER: May I just confirm your address? You live at
[my address]?


ME: Yes, I —


CALLER: Thank you, sir. We'll be sending you a new
vote by mail ballot soon. This call was made on
behalf of the Florida Democratic Party.

Here's the problem: I've never requested such a ballot. I'm a thirty-year-old man with good health and a car; I plan to drive people to the polls all day long on November 2nd, so an absentee ballot is unnecessary and unwanted. I started to get concerned when I realized that there was a possibility that, if this request was made in my name, I might not be allowed to vote on Election Day. Also, I've dealt with the Florida Democratic Party before (I'm a member in every way except that I haven't ponied up the dues yet) and know a couple of folks there who could give me any information I might need as far as this goes.

So, I call the FDP headquarters to find a contact of mine, Rick Minor, who's coordinating the Victory 2004 effort (Rick's one of the folks who helped get me into the Democratic National Convention) and try to ask him if it really was the FDP calling. Since he was in a meeting, I was passed over to a guy named Trevor (sorry, I didn't get his last name! :-) when I explained my concern. Trevor went into his office to look me up to see if there was any record of the campaign having called me with absentee concerns.

There was no record of the FDP having called me. None.

Trevor mentioned that it was a possibility that I was called by the FDP, but that they have no record. He also explained that the party has been making these calls, but the script starts out with the following line:

CALLER: Have you decided by which method you
will be voting this election?

I never got asked that question.

Trevor and I exchanged some concerns that he GOP might be responsible ("I wouldn't put it past them," says I; Trevor concurred), and then he directed me to double-check my registration status with the Supervisor of Elections office here in town. The Supervisor in Leon County is the incomparable Ion Sancho, who oversaw one of the few outright successes of the 2000 Election in the state of Florida. Since the margin of victory was so close, the state requires automatic recounts. Only two counties saw exactly zero change in the recount: Leon County was one of them (FYI, we use an optical-scan ballot).

I called the Supervisor of Elections office and spoke to a woman there (whose name I failed to get; d'oh) who listened patiently and seemed to know pretty much what aI was talking about. She told me that she herself received the same phone call six times this past weekend. When I made mention of not being sure that it really was the FDP calling, she said that quite a few people have been calling the Supervisor office all day, asking if the Supervisor's office itself was making the calls — especially since some group of folks is calling voters at home and claiming to be the Supervisor's office.

So, we've got ostensibly bogus FDP phone calls and bogus Supervisor of Elections phone calls... in Florida. The voter registration here in the state of Florida has been about 8 to 1 in favor of the Democrats — we're outdoing them big time. While I cannot prove it was the GOP, the whole thing just stinks to high heaven. The woman at the Supervisor's office said I could or should alert the media if I have any solid evidence.

I just thought I'd offer this as a warning to everyone: double-check your registration. Make sure that the organization that seems to have called you actually did. Don't let anyone steal your right to vote.

Oh, by the way: turns out my registration is solid. Even if there was a ballot requested in my name, I can still vote on Election Day, since they compare signatures.

 
 
lekvar
00:53 / 13.10.04
I've been checking, re-checking and checking my status again after the state just happened to lose my registration the past two years in a row. I found out recently that my vote in the California recall election that brought Arnold to power was cheerfully ignored. Even after checking with the county again I still haven't received my voter info.

Be paranoid.

I heard (from a friend who knows a guy who used to share a flat with...) on the radio that "petitioners" are showing up at college campuses with a petition to legalize marijuana. You must be registered to vote in order to sign the petition. Why don't we just make sure that you're registered? Sign here.

The student later finds they've been registered as Republicans.

Acording to the program the DNC is doing things in much the same way.
 
 
lekvar
01:31 / 13.10.04
Here's something a little more concrete...
 
 
Tryphena Absent
12:48 / 13.10.04
Jesus, your system is so screwed up.
 
 
FinderWolf
13:01 / 13.10.04
Holy shit, that's some scary stuff...
 
 
Hattie's Kitchen
13:28 / 13.10.04
Jesus. If there was ever a case for UN observers to monitor an election, this is it.
 
 
Nobody's girl
13:40 / 13.10.04
My partner will be voting by absentee ballot in Ohio, another swing state. He recently phoned the electoral commission because he still doesn't have his ballot and was told he wasn't yet registered, despite sending his application off early September. Then I read this article on Salon about dirty tricks in Ohio.

They're getting pretty desperate aren't they?
 
 
Tezcatlipoca
13:55 / 13.10.04
Alright so it's aimed at non-US voters, but there's more on that Ohio swing-state in today's Grauniad.
 
 
FinderWolf
17:59 / 13.10.04
from Yahoo today:

---------------------------------------------------
Nevada Move to Purge Some Dem Voters Fails

1 hour, 31 minutes ago

By ADAM GOLDMAN, Associated Press Writer

LAS VEGAS - Elections officials have rebuffed an attempt by a former GOP operative to purge about 17,000 Democrats from the voter rolls in the battleground state of Nevada, where the two presidential candidates are in a dead heat.

Dan Burdish, former head of the state Republican Party, filed a challenge last week claiming the Democrats should be removed from the rolls because they were inactive voters.

But Clark County Registrar of Voters Larry Lomax rejected the move Tuesday, saying Burdish could only challenge voters in his precinct, and then only if he has personal knowledge that they are inactive.

"I don't think pulling names off a database equates to personal knowledge," Lomax said.

Under state law, voters are placed on "inactive status" if they move and don't update their addresses within 30 days of receiving notice to do so. Their registrations are then canceled if they don't vote in two consecutive federal elections.

Democrats have criticized Burdish for trying to influence the hotly contested congressional race between Republican Rep. Jon Porter (news, bio, voting record) and his Democratic challenger, former casino executive Tom Gallagher, in the 3rd District.

State Republican officials have also distanced themselves from Burdish.

But Burdish denied trying to disenfranchise people.

The Democrats are just "blowing hot air as far as I'm concerned," Burdish said. "I'm not suppressing any vote unless it's in a local district they are not allowed to vote in."

The latest poll from Oct. 5 showed Democratic Sen. John Kerry (news - web sites) with a 1 percentage point lead over President Bush (news - web sites) in Nevada. Democrat Al Gore (news - web sites) lost the state by fewer than 22,000 votes in 2000.
 
 
diz
19:42 / 13.10.04
Jesus, your system is so screwed up.

yeah, no shit. you're talking about a country where powerful elected representatives talk seriously about the possibility that 9/11 happened because God is angry at us for being excessively tolerant of Sodomites or for having wavered in our support for Israel. i'm expecting one day to find our leaders being chosen by sacrificing a goat and reading its entrails to see who God has chosen to lead us in our never-ending war with the heathens.

do you have any room over there? i might need to crash on your couch or something for a few decades or so.

Nevada Move to Purge Some Dem Voters Fails

jesus fuck. how blatant can they get?
 
 
grant
20:30 / 13.10.04
I remember getting some email about irregularities from the other side of the aisle, but I can't find much of that now.

Nader has made some complaints about Democrat dirty tricks.

And Republicans' signs are getting vandalized, which, you know, is a real miscarriage of justice. (registration required)
 
 
grant
20:34 / 13.10.04
More troubling (slightly) are reports of demonstrators "storming" Rep campaign offices, which reminds me a lot of stories from Miami during Election 2000, only the sides were reversed.
 
 
ibis the being
21:07 / 13.10.04
For those who can stomach still more anecdotes about voter fraud in swing states, here you go. It appears a man named Nathan Sproul, leader of the GOP and Christian Coalition in Arizona, has been launching fraudulent voter registration drives in the swing states. The gist of his scam is to have volunteers claiming to be "nonpartisan" go out and ask people who they're going to vote for. If they say "Bush," they're handed a registration form. If they say "Kerry," they're told "thank you" and move along.
 
 
grant
00:47 / 14.10.04
That actually doesn't sound *that* bad to me -- mostly because the Democrats are pretty soundly winning the race to register the unregistered.

What's troubling is that the Nevada form-trashing is also taking place in Oregon, it appears. And who knows where else.

Sproul is also in charge of the organization behind these.
 
 
grant
01:00 / 14.10.04
I found another bit of pro-Dem hinkiness in California (one of the blue states). Apparently, some of the names on registration forms for Democratic households are a little weird.

Among the irregularities:


Similar names registered in some households. One example listed a "Michael Vincent" and a "Vincent Michael Norte" registered less than a year apart and sharing the same birthdate and residence.


An abnormal amount of registrants sharing the same birthdate. Garcia culled a 39-page list of roughly 2,000 registered Riverside County voters who have the same birthdays according to county voting records.


Numerous variations on the spellings of names such as "Figueroa" and "Figuerda;" "Preisbach" and "Dreisbach" registered to the same address.

"Many of these irregular voter registrations involve multiple registration cards for a single individual, submitted within days of each other," Garcia wrote this week in a letter to Shelley. "Often the voter is registered to vote at his/her polling place and has also requested an absentee ballot."
 
 
alas
01:39 / 14.10.04
Florida e-voting machines testing problems. But we're not supposed to be worried... Just a computer glitch. That would be like getting worried about, oh, hanging chads . . .
 
 
FinderWolf
16:40 / 14.10.04
another angle on the same e-voting crash story, from Yahoo News:

E-Voting Machine Crash Deepens Concerns

October 14, 2004
2 hours, 21 minutes ago Top Stories - AP

By RACHEL KONRAD, AP Technology Writer

WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. - A computer crash that forced a pre-election test of electronic voting machines to be postponed was trumpeted by critics as proof of the balloting technology's unreliability.

The incident in Palm Beach County — which is infamous for its hanging and pregnant chads during the 2000 presidential election — did not directly involve the touch-screen terminals on which nearly one in three U.S. voters will cast ballots on Election Day.

But critics of the ATM-like machines said it proved how fickle any computer-based voting system can be and highlighted the need for touch-screens to produce paper records.

Tuesday's public dry run had to be postponed until Friday because a computer server that tabulates data from the touch-screen machines crashed, said county elections supervisor Theresa LePore. Such "logic and accuracy" tests are required by law.

She said she suspected Hurricane Jeanne, which struck in September, may have zapped electricity and air conditioning to the room where the server was stored, causing temperatures to soar to 90 degrees or more and possibly causing the crash. The storm wiped out power to nearly 1.3 million homes and businesses throughout Florida.

The incident raised questions in the minds of computer hardware and software engineers about the reliability of other computers on which Floridians will depend for an accurate vote count on Nov. 2 — especially touch-screen machines.

An Achilles' heel of electronic voting equipment, just like any machines whose circuits get hot with colliding electrons, is its inability to tolerate extreme conditions, many experts say.

"Heat is a very serious problem for these machines, especially in Louisiana and Florida," said Dan Spillane, former senior testing engineer of touch-screens for a small equipment manufacturer in Seattle. "Basically, these things work in the secretary of state's office. Outside of that, no one knows."

LePore, who lost a re-election bid and will be replaced as supervisor in January, said the incident did not result in deleted or altered data and she predicted a smooth election on Nov. 2.

"We can always go back if everything totally crashes and burns," she said. "We still have the info on the cartridges and the voting machines."

LePore was referring to the memory cartridges in the touch-screen machines that record the votes.

Critics of paperless voting systems used in 15 Florida counties said the incident demonstrates their pleas for a system that includes printers on every touch-screen and produces paper records of every ballot cast.

"I don't have any confidence at all in these machines," said Susan VanHouten, a poll worker in Lake Worth, Fla., who has helped mobilize 900 monitors at polls in Palm Beach County on Nov. 2. "At this point, the only thing we can focus on is getting as many people as possible in the polls to watch for electrical problems and hardware and software problems."

According to technical standards for electronic voting systems, updated in 2002, voting machines must be able to tolerate storage temperatures ranging from minus 4 to 140 degrees Fahrenheit. They must be able to operate in "natural" conditions and temperatures ranging from 50 to 95 degrees.

Those standards aren't satisfactory to Vincent Lipsio, a firmware design engineer in Gainesville, Fla.

Lipsio, who is helping draft e-voting equipment standards for the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, said most hardware that's considered "mission critical" — including medical devices, military equipment and aviation hardware — should tolerate 180 degrees or more. He worries that the machines could fail under a variety of extremes, from heat waves to lightning storms and severe low-pressure systems.

"Conceptually, the whole electronic voting thing is now so far from what I think is acceptable that I would never vote for it, if I had the choice," Lipsio said. "These standards aren't any more mission critical than your average video game."

Lipsio said he took little comfort in knowing that the meltdown at the Palm Beach elections office happened during a trial to help spot such problems.

"What happens if there's a hurricane on election day, or terrorists knock the power out?" Lipsio said. "The reality is these machines are dependent on electricity, and unless you're going to have generators at polling places, you need a paper backup system."

Mechanical problems during California's March primary caused nearly half of all touch-screens in San Diego County to malfunction, causing hundreds of precincts to open late. Heat-related troubles have flared up in other counties.

In the July primary, numerous machines in one elementary school in Decatur, Ga., failed throughout the day, when temperatures exceeded 90 degrees, according to a report by poll monitors.

An executive at Sequoia Voting Systems, which provides Palm Beach County's touch-screens but not the county office server that crashed, called critics' fears were overblown.

"These machines have been tested to severe conditions, and we haven't seen any weather-related problems — from dry Nevada to humid Florida," spokesman Alfie Charles said.

-----------
 
 
FinderWolf
17:52 / 14.10.04
Colo. Elections Chief Says AG Lax on Fraud
Wed Oct 13,11:02 PM ET
Yahoo News

By JON SARCHE, Associated Press Writer

DENVER - After a cascade of allegations about voter fraud, the state's top election official accused Colorado's attorney general Wednesday of not doing enough to prosecute potential ballot crimes.

Secretary of State Donetta Davidson said voters and candidates need reassurance that the election can be managed effectively and that more aggressive prosecution would serve as a deterrent to fraud.

Davidson confirmed this week that 6,000 felons are registered to vote statewide, even though they are barred from voting by state law. A woman told a Denver television she had registered 25 times and signed up several friends up to 40 times to help her boyfriend, who was being paid by a community group to register new voters.

Davidson, a Republican, said her office has sent hundreds of questionable voter registration forms to Democratic Attorney General Ken Salazar since April, but only one person has been charged.

"I have been kept out of the loop, but I have been the one held responsible," she said. "We need to pull all our resources together to make sure we look into these problems."

In a statement, Salazar said investigations are under way, and condemned voter fraud and other election-law violations.

"We will find and prosecute these violations aggressively and to the fullest extent of the law," said Salazar, who is running for the Senate this year.

Salazar's chief deputy, Don Quick, said investigations are under way on about 150 questionable registration forms but that locating documents and analyzing handwriting takes time. He said Davidson will be kept informed on the progress.
 
 
grant
13:33 / 15.10.04
It's spread to South Dakota! And from there to Ohio!

Yeah, so this dude Russell had to resign from the S. Dakota "Victory for Republicans" organization because of a fraud investigation into absentee ballots.

And now, guess what? He and a few of his SD employees have new jobs leading the Bush-Cheney campaign in Ohio, according to a memo from the South Dakota state party Executive Director Jason Glodt.

The state Republican Party accepted the resignations of Russell, another GOP staffer and four contract workers after the questions were raised about absentee-ballot applications. Those who resigned were involved in Republican Victory campaign, a get-out-the-vote effort.

Glodt confirmed Thursday that the memo is authentic, but he said he'd prefer not to comment on an internal communication.

In the memo, Glodt praises Russell's work in South Dakota.

"Larry has done an excellent job building our organization in South Dakota and he is confident we can get the job done in the next 23 days," he wrote.


From here, the whole thing looks like sloppiness (the main problem is that some woman notarized the absentee forms, but only men were getting signatures. The weird thing: the forms supposedly don't have to be notarized at all, according to Glodt.) But still, hinky.
 
 
subcultureofone
14:57 / 15.10.04
the gainesville sun had an article yesterday about absentee ballot phone calls in this area, too. another problem is the location of the early voting and extended hours voting site. there is only one and it is located as far away from the 'lower income' areas as possible. i've heard this is a problem in other counties [volusia?] as well, and the naacp sued for other sites.
 
 
ibis the being
20:01 / 15.10.04
Yahoo news asks, Have Scary Election Scenarios increased?

[...] Michael White, the federal official responsible for coordinating certain aspects of the Electoral College, says he'll be keeping an especially close eye on Colorado, where voters are considering a referendum to divide the state's electoral votes proportionally among the candidates rather than using the existing winner-takes-all formula. A lawsuit is virtually guaranteed if the referendum is approved, meaning the state's nine electoral votes could be a lingering question long after Election Day.

"That's kind of the nightmare scenario, having the whole thing up in the air on election night," White said.

Another quirk involves "faithless electors," who refuse to cast their electoral votes for the person chosen by their state's voters. This rarely happens — only 10 times in history — but even one this year could be critical. And one of the five Republican electors from West Virginia is holding out the possibility of withholding his vote for Bush if the president carries the state.

The notion of a split decision between the popular vote and the Electoral College tally, which seemed rather unlikely before 2000, now is almost old hat. Mann, for his part, hopes that if this election splits the opposite way from 2000 — with Bush winning the popular vote and Kerry the electoral count — it might ignite a movement to junk the Electoral College altogether. [...]
 
 
Baz Auckland
20:53 / 15.10.04
I love that in the event of a tie, it would be up "to the House to pick the next president and the Senate to pick the new vice president come January.

That would leave open the jarring possibility of a Bush-Edwards or Kerry-Cheney pairing, depending on the political leanings of the new House and Senate.


...can we all agree that a Kerry/Cheney administration would be really, really funny?
 
 
FinderWolf
20:56 / 15.10.04
Faithless electors...augh.

Kerry/Cheney admin. --- yes, that would be very funny. (And I don't mean that in a sarcastic way, although it would be scary if I think about it for more than a few seconds as a joke)
 
 
grant
03:28 / 16.10.04
A Bush-Edwards ticket would *rock*.

I think I know what I'm gonna aim for on the astral plane.
 
 
Brigade du jour
10:01 / 16.10.04
Fear not, Hattie (well, fear slightly less ...), the OSCE is on the case!
 
 
sleazenation
21:24 / 17.10.04
The closeness of this election would be exciting if not for its global importance.
 
 
FinderWolf
13:26 / 18.10.04
Early voting in Florida and several other states:

Yahoo News

All Eyes on Florida as Early Voting Set to Begin

Sun Oct 17, 6:06 PM ET Politics - Reuters
By Frances Kerry and Mark Egan

MIAMI (Reuters) - Democrat John Kerry sounded a warning to Americans on Social Security as he headed to Florida on Sunday, a critical battleground state where early voting was set to begin under heavy scrutiny because of the recount controversy four years ago.

The Massachusetts senator began the day in a black church in Columbus, Ohio, while his running mate, North Carolina Sen. John Edwards (news - web sites) scheduled a second full day of campaigning in Florida, where early balloting begins on Monday.

With just over two weeks to go until Election Day, President Bush (news - web sites) had the day off in Washington. Bush was in Florida on Saturday. The state's 27 electoral votes likely will be key to who wins the Nov. 2 election.

New polls over the weekend showed the race between Kerry and Bush to be very close, though Bush appeared to have a slight edge among likely voters. In key battleground states, however, the surveys suggested Kerry had a significant lead. A new Washington Post poll found Kerry held a 53 percent to 43 percent advantage among likely voters in 13 such states.

"I think those have been breaking for us over the last few weeks since the start of the first debate. So we feel good where we are," Kerry campaign adviser Joe Lockhart said on "Fox News Sunday."

But in Florida, the state won by Bush by 537 votes in 2000 after a bitter ballot recount dispute, the Post poll released on Saturday showed Kerry and Bush tied among likely voters, with 48 percent each and independent Ralph Nader (news - web sites) at 1 percent. Nader's statewide percentage was slightly less than what he received four years ago, probably costing Democrat Al Gore (news - web sites) the state.

Though Gore won the popular vote in the country, a 36-day recount effort in Florida was halted by the U.S. Supreme Court (news - web sites), awarding the electoral college votes and the election to Bush.

This year, Florida already has had legal skirmishes, with challenges lodged about the purging of a high percentage of black felons from voter lists, requests for a paper confirmation of touch-screen voting, and whether voters who show up at the wrong polling place will receive a ballot.

Bush's brother, Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, said the state had made changes.

"We have done everything we can to make sure that people have access to register to vote and that we've made it easy for people to vote. Starting Monday, people will have the chance to vote early," Jeb Bush said on ABC's "This Week."

Addressing a rally in Pembroke Pines, Florida, Kerry referred to the recount fiasco four years ago. "You go vote," he said. "We're going to make sure your vote is counted."

He pledged, "I will never privatize Social Security, I will never cut benefits, and I will never raise the retirement age." Florida is home to a large community of retirees who rely heavily on Social Security.

Speaking earlier in Columbus, Ohio, Kerry said Bush had a "big January surprise" for the government retirement plan, one that could reduce benefits by $500 a month for many Americans.

"We just learned yesterday that the president told his biggest and wealthiest donors about his big 'January surprise,"' Kerry told a black congregation, seizing on remarks by Bush reported in The New York Times Magazine that if re-elected, he would "come out strong after my swearing in with fundamental tax reform, tort reform, privatizing of Social Security."

A new Kerry campaign ad claimed it would cost $2 trillion and mean a 45 percent cut in benefits.

Bush campaign chairman Marc Racicot said, "That's absolutely preposterous. What the president is talking about and has talked about from the moment he ran in 2000 is allowing younger people, younger workers to own a portion of their Social Security and invest it and make decisions."

A spate of newspapers announced endorsements on Sunday, with The New York Times supporting Kerry, citing his wide knowledge and clear thinking. The Chicago Tribune backed Bush, noting what it called his resoluteness in fighting the war on terror.

Nader told CNN's "Late Edition" he had no plans to withdraw from the race.

"Of course not. No, less chance than John Kerry or George W. Bush dropping out," Nader said.

---

oh, and FUCK RALPH NADER!!!!
 
 
subcultureofone
17:35 / 18.10.04
from today's AP wire:

"Some groups urged Florida voters to ask for paper absentee ballots
because of concerns over the state's new touch-screen voting
machines and any potential recounts. Voters Monday morning could
choose either method.

State Rep. Shelley Vana said the paper absentee ballot she was given
at a Palm Beach County site was missing one of its two pages,
including the proposed amendments to the state constitution. She
said election workers were indifferent when she pointed out the
oversight.


"There was absolutely no concern on the part of the folks at the
Supervisor of Elections Office that this page was missing. This is not
a good start. If there are incomplete ballots out there, I can't imagine
I would be the only one getting it," she said. "
 
 
grant
21:00 / 19.10.04
Salon has a feature story on Florida's hinkiness.

Headline: Oh, please, not again.

There are automated phone callers now that tell people you can vote absentee just by punching numbers on the touchtone phone. And in my home county, abstentee ballot forms are being mailed out with parts missing -- the example they found had the last two pages, with votes on state constitutional amendments, just not there.
 
 
betty woo
20:38 / 21.10.04
This site looks to be an interesting clearing house for election weirdness on both sides of the partisan divide:

http://vote2004.eriposte.com/
 
 
+#'s, - names
00:04 / 22.10.04
From the wonderful Fark.com
Guy knocks himself out stealing political sign.

Probably the most disturbing thing to me in this election year is how obsessed people have become to the point of stealing the other sides signs. It's just really petty, and completelly pointless. This guy is a republican, but the democrats are doing it also. Would a "swing voter" be swayed by the amount of signs he sees on his way to the polls? I saw 15 Bush/Cheney signs and and 12 Kerry/Edwards signs... looks like Bush is getting my vote! (all I see are Skull/Bones signs anyways)
 
 
subcultureofone
10:12 / 22.10.04
Alachua County's election supervisor turned over 500-plus voter registration forms to the State Attorney's Office because many of those voters discovered their party affiliation had been changed to Republican by the GOP-funded group collecting the registrations; the group calls itself “Young Political Majors”.

Even a Republican student complained:

Matt Carrillo, a political science sophomore and registered Republican, said he registered to vote with the group outside of the Reitz Union.

“I filled the form out and left the party affiliation blank, then [the YPM employee] asked me to initial next to my party affiliation,” Carrillo said.

Carrillo said he didn’t understand why his initials were needed next to his party affiliation, especially since he left it blank, which made him wonder if YPM officials later planned to fill in a party affiliation for him. After Mark Jacoby, the GOP student in charge of the scam, turned in the forms last week, Supervisor of Elections Beverly Hill office began reviewing them in earnest, knowing full well of the problems ID'd in September.

"I decided it was fraud," Hill said Tuesday, a day after she gave the forms to the State Attorney's Office in Gainesville. She said her staff checked 30 of them, "And they were across the board (saying), 'No, I never intended to do that.'"

Jacoby turned in 1,218 forms, and 510 of those were for people already registered. Hill turned those over to the State Attorney’s Office and completed the registration process for the rest so they could vote on Nov. 2.
Jacoby said Tuesday he asked every person to initial a box on the form to indicate they wanted to change party affiliation.

Mindy Tucker Fletcher, a state Republican adviser, confirmed that Jacoby worked for Arno Political Consultants, a firm subcontracted to register voters at central Florida college campuses. Fletcher said she was assured that all registration workers disclosed their attempts to obtain Republican party affiliations.

Fletcher said she could not explain why the 30 people contacted by Hill's office said they did not want to register as Republicans.

"I can't guarantee you that's what those people were thinking when they signed that form that day," Fletcher said. "People really may not want to own up to that now."
 
 
grant
17:46 / 22.10.04
I wonder what the point to that is. I mean, anybody can vote for anybody in the general election, the primaries are long over and in Florida, they're so late in the season they hardly matter anyway.

I guess it's just a way of swelling the ranks in the statistics war, but I'm not sure that an imaginary army really helps things.
 
 
lekvar
22:11 / 22.10.04
I can't tell you the number of people I've spoken to who have stated that they vote for whoever they perceive as being the candidate most likely to win an election. There's a need in some people to vote for "the winning side"- this attitude was especially evident in the 2002 California Gubernatorial ( I love that word!) impeachment/election. I would be shocked if the two parties failed to recognize this. I would hazard a guess that all of this pre-election statisic-manipulation is an effort to convince this group of voters to vote in their favor.
 
 
LykeX
00:37 / 23.10.04
Also, if the ballot counters can't figure out who voted for who, like last time, having the pre-election polls on your side makes it easier for you to steal the election. It's less likely that people will object since the polls showed that you were the favorite.
 
  

Page: (1)2

 
  
Add Your Reply